Experimental Investigation on Ternary Blended Concrete Containing Silica Fume and Phosphogypsum

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV5IS090186

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Experimental Investigation on Ternary Blended Concrete Containing Silica Fume and Phosphogypsum

Bismi M Buhari

Department of Civil Engineering

Ilahia College of Engineering and technology, Muvattupuzha, India

Remya Raju

Department of Civil Engineering

Ilahia College of Engineering and technology Muvattupuzha,India

AbstractPhosphogypsum is the second largest waste material produced in the World. It contained small quantities of silica, fluorine and phosphate as impurities. These impair the strength development of calcined products. Because of the reason phosphogypsum can be effectively used in cement replacement. 10% Silica fume and 5-15% of phopshogypsum by weight of cement are used for this investigation

Keywords Calcined products; Phosphogypsum; Silica fume; Ternary blended concrete.

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Ordinary concrete has a single cementitious material i.e. cement. Binary blend of concrete includes cement as the binding material and a pozzolanic material being added. Ternary blended concrete marks the inclusion of two different pozzolanic materials to the concrete with cement acting as the primary binding material. Fly ash from coal fired power plants and metakaolin are both important in modern concrete technology. Enlarging the scope of material science to Supplementary Cementious Materials (SCM) viz., fly ash, slag, silica fume, rice husk ash and Metakaolin in the use of concrete, this led to the concept of blended cements and blended concretes. In India, about 6 million tons of waste gypsum such as phosphogypsum, flourogypsum etc., are being generated annually. Phosphogypsum is a by-product in the wet process for manufacture of phosphoric acid (ammonium phosphate fertilizer) by the action of sulphuric acid on the rock phosphate. Current worldwide production of phosphoric acid yields over 100 million tons of phosphogypsum per year. While most of the rest of the world looked at phosphogypsum as a valuable raw material and developed process to utilize it in chemical manufacture and building products.

  2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Materials used are cement, fine aggregate, coarse aggregate, silica fume and phosphor gypsum. All materials are tested as per standard procedures to assess their engineering properties and the results were compared with those in relevant IS codes. Cement used in this investigation is the Ordinary portland cement of 53 grade manufactured by Dalmia with specific gravity 3.125. Table 1 shows the properties of cement. The fine aggregate used was M sand with Fineness modulus 3.714 and fineness modulus of coarse aggregate is

    3.871.Table 2 and Table 3 shows the properties of fine aggregate and coarse aggregate respectively. For this study silica fume is collected from Bison shelter system, Edaplly, Kochi. It is having specific gravity of 2.73. Phopspho gypsum is an industrial waste having very fine characteristics. It is collected from FACT, Ambalamedu, Kochi . Specific gravity of phopspho gypsum is obtained as 2.31. Super plasticizer used to improve workability is Master Glenium SKY 8233 (Formerly Glenium B233). The mix design is done as per IS 10262-2009.Fig.1 and Fig.2 shows the sample of silica fume and phosphogypsyum used in the study. Table 4 shows the design mix proportion Table 5 shows the quantity of materials used and Table 6 shows the percentage replacement.

    Table 1: Properties of Cement

    Fineness

    5%

    Consistency

    35%

    Initial setting time

    240 minutes

    Specific gravity

    3.125

    Table 2: Properties of Fine aggregate

    Specific gravity

    2.69

    Bulk density

    1.2256

    Percentage voids

    54.53%

    Water absorption

    1.5%

    Fineness modulus

    3.714

    Table 3: Properties of Coarse aggregate

    Specific gravity

    2.67

    Bulk density

    1.324

    Percentage voids

    50.412%

    Water absorption

    0.8%

    Fineness modulus

    3.871

    Fig.1.Silica Fume

    Fig.2.Phosphogypsum

    Table 4: Design Mix Proportion of M30 Mix

    Grade of Concrete

    Mix Proportion

    Cement

    Fine Aggregate

    Coarse Aggregate

    Water- Cement Ratio

    M30

    1

    2.426

    3.154

    0.45

    Table 5:Quantity of Materials Used in Kg/m3

    Mix

    Cement Kg/m³

    Silica Fume Kg/m³

    Phosphogypsum Kg/m³

    M30

    350.22

    0

    0

    PG0

    315.00

    30.58

    0

    PG5

    297.50

    30.58

    13.11

    PG7.5

    288.75

    30.58

    19.66

    PG10

    280.00

    30.58

    26.21

    PG12.5

    271.25

    30.58

    32.76

    PG15

    262.50

    30.58

    39.31

    Table 6: Mix Designation with Varying Percentage of Phosphogypsum (PG)

    Mix Designation

    %of Cement

    % of Cement Replaced with Silica Fume

    % of Cement Replaced with PG

    M30

    100

    0

    0

    PG0

    90

    10

    0

    PG5

    85

    10

    5

    PG7.5

    82.5

    10

    7.5

    PG10

    80

    10

    10

    PG12.5

    77.5

    10

    12.5

    PG15

    75

    10

    15

  3. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST

    Testing of hardened concrete is important for controlling the quality of concrete. The main purpose of testing hardened concrete is to conform that the concrete has developed required strength. The compressive strength is one

    of the most important properties of hardened concrete and in general it is the characteristic value for classification of concrete in various codes. Compression test of cubes is the most common test conducted on hardened concrete because it is an easy test to perform and most of the desirable properties of concrete are comparatively related to its compressive strength. The compression test was carried out on cubical specimen of size 150mm×150mm×150mm in a compression testing machine of capacity 2000 kN, at a loading rate of 14N/mm2per minute as per IS 516:1959 specification. The test was done on all the eight mixes for determining the 3rd day, 7th day and 28th day compressive strength. Fig.3 shows compression test on cube.

    Fig.3. Compressive strength testing machine

  4. TEST RESULTS

    Hardened tests for concrete are conducted on control mix as well as on concrete containing 10% of silica fume and varying percentage of phosphogypsum. Hardened properties of OPC, PG0, PG5, PG7.5, PG10, PG12.5 and PG15 mixes

    were studied. Silica fume and phosphogypsum used in appropriate amount modifies certain properties of fresh and hardened concrete.

    A. Hardened properties of concrete

    Hardened properties of concrete made with different percentage of phosphogypsum and 10% silica fume is evaluated by doing compressive strength test. Compressive strength values of M30.PG0, PG5, PG7.5, PG10, PG12.5, PG15 are plotted in Fig.4 to Fig 10. Table 4 shows the different values.

    Table 7: Different Values of Strength

    Mix Designation

    Compressive Strength(N/Mm2)

    3 Day

    7 Day

    28 Day

    M30

    21.05

    27.40

    40.90

    PG0

    21.80

    28.30

    41.10

    PG5

    22.00

    29.00

    42.05

    PG7.5

    18.10

    29.25

    43.40

    PG10

    16.20

    29.95

    44.10

    PG12.5

    15.45

    28.25

    41.20

    PG15

    13.70

    26.55

    39.85

    60

    40

    20

    0

    3 day 7 day 28 day

    Age, days

    PG12.5

    M30

    60

    40

    20

    0

    3 day 7 day 28 day

    Age, days

    PG12.5

    M30

    60

    40

    20

    60

    40

    20

    0

    0

    3 day 7 day 28 day

    Age, day

    3 day 7 day 28 day

    Age, day

    60

    40

    20

    60

    40

    20

    compressive

    strength(N/mm2

    )

    compressive

    strength(N/mm2

    )

    compressive

    strength (N/mm2)

    compressive

    strength (N/mm2)

    compressive

    strength(N/mm2

    )

    compressive

    strength(N/mm2

    )

    Fig.4.Compressive Strength Values of M30

    PG0

    M30

    0

    PG0

    M30

    0

    3 day 7 day 28 day

    Age, day

    3 day 7 day 28 day

    Age, day

    60

    40

    20

    60

    40

    20

    compressive

    strength(N/m

    compressive

    strength(N/m

    Fig.5.Compressive Strength Values of PG0

    PG5

    M30

    0

    PG5

    M30

    0

    3 day A 7 day y 28 day

    3 day A 7 day y 28 day

    ge, da

    ge, da

    60

    40

    20

    0

    60

    40

    20

    0

    PG7.5

    PG7.5

    compressive

    strength(N/m

    m2)

    compressive

    strength(N/m

    m2)

    Fig.6.Compressive Strength Values of PG5

    M30

    3 day

    M30

    3 day

    Ag7ed, adyay

    Ag7ed, adyay

    28 day

    28 day

    60

    40

    20

    0

    60

    40

    20

    0

    PG10

    PG10

    compressive

    strength(N/mm

    2)

    compressive

    strength(N/mm

    2)

    Fig.7.Compressive Strength Values of PG7.5

    M30

    3 day

    M30

    3 day

    7 day

    Age, day

    7 day

    Age, day

    28 day

    28 day

    Fig.8.Compressive Strength Values of PG10

    Fig.9.Compressive Strength Values of PG12.5

    PG15

    M30

    3 day 7 day 28 day

    PG15

    M30

    3 day 7 day 28 day

    60

    40

    20

    0

    60

    40

    20

    0

    Age, day

    Age, day

    compressive

    strength(N/m

    m2)

    compressive

    strength(N/m

    m2)

    Fig.10.Compressive Strength Values of PG15

    2

    2

    compressive strength(N/mm )

    compressive strength(N/mm )

    Fig.11 shows the variation of compressive strength with age for different type of mixes. 3 day and 7 day compressive strength graph shows a decreasing pattern. But 28 day strength goes on increasing with respect to increasing phosphogypsum percentage. This indicate that phosphor gypsum contribute to the later age strength development.

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    3 day

    7 day

    28 day

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    3 day

    7 day

    28 day

    Mix Designation

    Mix Designation

  5. CONCLUSIONS

  • The results indicate that use of raw PG is suitable for concreting work. Because of its fine gradation, phosphogypsum provides additional workability, compactability and surface finishability of the mix.

  • The incorporation of phopshogypsum in concrete decreases the strength of concrete as the increase in replacement level of phosphogypsum greater than 10% along with 10% silica fume.

  • Optimum strength is obtained at 10% replacement of cement with phosphogypsum.

  • Total 20% of cement cane be replaced effectively by using silica fume and phosphogypsum.

  • 10% silica fume replacement also give strength greater than control mix. Addition to this 5% phosphogypsum along with 10% silica fume gave higher strength than 10% silica fume alone.

  • Ternary blended concrete help in development of later age strength of PG7.5, PG10 etc.

  • The replacement of cement results in reduction of density of concrete. This is due to the fact that the specific gravity of phosphogypsum and silica fume is much lower than that of cement.

REFERENCES

  1. S. Dhinakaran and R. Mercy Shanthi,Experimental Investigation on Concrete with Phosphogypsum ,International Journal on Emerging Researches in Engineering Science and Technology Volume 2 issue 3 March 2015 ISSN 2393 9184.

  2. Suchita R Saikhede, S. R. Satone, Department of Civil Engineering, RTMN University, Nagpur, INDIA, An Experimental Investigation of Partial Replacement of Cement by Various Percentage of Phosphogypsum And Flyash In Cement Concrete, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications Vol. 4, Issue 7(

    Version 4), July 2014, pp.37-40

  3. Khalid Mohammed Breesem and Faris Gorashi, Behavior of Self- Compacting Concrete Using Different Sludge and Waste Materials A General Overview , International Journal of Chemical, Environmental & Biological Sciences (IJCEBS) Volume 2, Issue 3 (2014) ISSN 2320 4087 (Online).

  4. Dr. Vaishali. G. Ghorpade and Dr. Sudarsana Rao, H , Deriving Mix Proportions For Different Grades Of Phosphogypsum Based Self Compacting Concrete International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 3, Issue 3, May-Jun 2013, pp.467-473 .

  5. Dinesh W Gawatre ,Advantages of Waste-Phosphogypsum in Concrete,IJSR – International Journal of Scientific Researchvolume : 2

    ,Issue : 2 , Feb 2013,Issn No 2277 8179.

  6. Mahesh A. Bagade and S. R. Satone ,An experimental investigation of partial replacement of cement by various percentage of Phosphogypsum in cement concrete, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622, www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.785-787.

  7. T. Siva Sankar Reddy and D. Rupesh Kumar, A Study on Strength Characteristics of Phosphogypsum Concrete, Asian Journal ff Civil Engineering (Building And Housing) Vol. 11, No. 4 (2010) Pages 411- 420.

  8. S. S. Bhadauria, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalya, Bhopal (M. P.), India Rajesh B. Thakare, JSPMs B. N. College of Engineering, Pusad (M. S.), Utilisaion of Phosphogypsum In Cement Mortar And Concrete, 31st Conference on Our World In Concrete & Structures: 16 – 17 August 2006, Singapore .

  9. R B Thakare, B N College of Engineering, India, K G Hiraskar, KIT's College of Engineering, India, O P Bhatia, Shri G S Institute of Technology and Science, Utilisation of phosphogypsum in cement concrete for strength and economy 26th Conference on Our World in Concrete & Structures: 27 – 28 August 2001, Singapore.

Leave a Reply