Experimental Studies on a Vapour Compression Refrigeration System using Hydrocarbon Mixtures and R-12 Refrigerant

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV3IS050581

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Experimental Studies on a Vapour Compression Refrigeration System using Hydrocarbon Mixtures and R-12 Refrigerant

Dr. S. Periyasamy

Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering

Government College of Technology Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

M. Saravanan

PG Student

ME Thermal Engineering Government College of Technology Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract this work aims for development of one of the eco-friendly vapour compression refrigeration system. The present vapour compression refrigeration system uses R-134a refrigerant, which has many adverse effects, which is minimized by use of other alternative refrigerant. This work consists of using eco-friendly hydrocarbon gas mixture as refrigerant, which does not deplete ozone layer and it can be used in the commonly used system without any significant change in the system. In this analysis, the performance of vapour compression refrigeration system is assessed experimentally with two different refrigerants. Various parameters are measured, like compressor discharge temperature and pressure. The results obtained are compared and the optimum performance in terms of higher refrigeration effect, better heat transfer rate and COP are studied.

Keywords: Vapour Compression Refrigeration system, R-12, Hydrocarbon refrigerants, Coefficient of Performance.

I. INTRODUCTION

In nature, heat transfer occurs from the region of higher temperature to lower temperature without requiring any external devices. The reverse process cannot occur by itself. The transfer of heat from lower temperature to higher temperature requires special devices called refrigerators. Refrigerator works under the principle of reversed Carnot cycle. Many types of refrigerants are available for getting refrigerant effect. It is very much important to use a suitable refrigerant, which gives the maximum cooling effect by consuming minimum power. In present situation, most of the vapour compression refrigeration system is equipped with R-134a due to its thermodynamic properties.

    1. Need for alternative

      Chlorofluorocarbon and hydro chlorofluorocarbon refrigerants fulfilled all the primary requirements and heralded an unprecedented revolution in the refrigeration and air-conditioning industry. Today, the litany of the

      requirements imposed on an ideal refrigerant has increased. The additional primary requirements now include zero ozone depletion potential and low global warming potential. The continuous depletion of the ozone layer, which shields the earths surface from the biologically damaging

      ultraviolet sunlight called UV-B radiation has resulted in a series of international treaties demanding a gradual phase out of CFC and HCFC refrigerants.

      The CFCs have been phased out in developed countries since 1996 and 2010 in developing countries. Initial alternative to CFCs included some hydro- chlorofluorocarbons, but they will also be phased out internationally by year 2020 and 2030 in developed and developing nations, respectively. Since 2010 to onwards be the fourth generation is being focusing on refrigerants that do not contribute to global warming, ozone layer depletion, efficient, non-flammable and non-toxic with good stability.

    2. Alternatives

      In CFCs and HCFCs present the chlorine content which contribute to the depletion of ozone layer. But the alternative refrigerant of CFCs and HCFCs is Hydrocarbon HCs (R-290, R-600a) as there are no content of chlorine. R-

      12 is the leading replacement for domestic refrigerators. Although the ODP of R-12 is one, the GWP is relatively high which is shown in the table 1.1

      Table 1.1 Refrigerant Information

      Refriger ant

      Saturate d Vapour Pressure [kPa]

      Molar Mass

      -1

      [g mol ]

      Molar Vapour Specific Heat

      -1 -1

      [J mol K ]

      Safety Design ation

      GWP [100

      years horizon

      ]

      ODP

      R-600a

      199.5

      58.122

      97.79

      A3

      20

      0

      R-134a

      374.6

      102.03

      94.93

      A1

      1320

      0.9

      R-290

      584.4

      44.096

      81.88

      A3

      20

      0

      R-12

      640

      120.91

      66.63

      A1

      10600

      1

      R-410A

      995.0

      72.585

      87.27

      A1

      2000

      1

      R-32

      1011.5

      52.024

      69.16

      A2

      543

      1

    3. Hydrocarbon mixture

      Hydrocarbon is an organic compound consisting entirely hydrogen and carbon. The majority of hydrocarbons found on earth naturally occurred in crude oil. Hydrocarbon mixture is an azeotropic mixture of propane (R-290) & isobutene (R-600a). It has property very similar to R-12 & R-134a which is commonly used refrigerant now a day. This blend of hydrocarbons is used in most of the Ac of European cars. It contains 60% propane, +40%isobutane. Moreover it has zero ozone depletion potential and a negligible global warming potential. Although the ODP of HC mixture is Zero, the GWP is relatively very low which is shown in the table 1.2. I have done an experimental investigation with hydrocarbon refrigerant mixture composed of R-290 and R-600a in the ratio of 60%+40% by weight as an alternative to R-12 in a Vapour compression refrigeration system.

      Table 1.2 Properties of HC mixtures with R-12 and R-134a

      PROPERTI ES

      Chemica l type

      Normal

      Boiling Point

      Latent Heat

      ODP

      GWP

      HYDROCAR BON

      MIXTURE

      HC

      -31°C

      367

      kJ/kg

      0

      3

      R-12

      CFC

      -30°C

      145

      0.9

      10600

      R-134a

      HFC

      -26°C

      189

      0

      1600

  1. METHODOLOGY

In this work the experimental work was carried out on vapour compression refrigeration system. The specification of the vapour compression refrigeration system describe in section 2.1. The refrigerant hydrocarbon mixture was used in work, the various parameters like COP, refrigeration effect, compressor work etc. There is no significant change in this system for R-12 system. We used the HCs refrigerant state constraints to specify R-12 system components are evaporator, condenser, and compressor.

    1. Specification of vapour compression refrigeration system

      Capacity 1.5 Ton

      Compressor Type Rotary

      Refrigerant R-12 [Freon]

      Charged mass 450g

    2. Experimental setup

      The evaporator and condenser are fabricated as shell and tube type adiabatic (insulated shell) heat exchangers. Compressor used is Sri Ram Model no is JB232 at the range of 5.1 A, 240 V Rotary type. Hand operated valves are provided before and the capillary tube to facilitate easy replacement. The pressure and temperature readings of refrigerant were taken at four strategic ponts 1, 2, 3 & 4 as indicated in figure 2.1 of the actual experimental set up. All of these pressure gauges were fitted on a wooden panel to ensure that the gauges do not vibrate during testing. The temperature at various points is measured with help of the thermometer and also measured the pressures.

      First we have used the hydrocarbon mixture refrigerant and experiment was conducted conventionally by taking all of data manually. The all four points of thermometer were inserting in plugs and these plugs were connected to the refrigerant flow tubes. Four pressure gauges were used and were respectively installed before and after each main component.

      Figure 2.1 Line diagram of Experimental setup

    3. Experimental procedure

  1. Before starting the experiment, the preliminary actions like any leakages in supply line, pressure drop is to be checked.

  2. To ensure the effective performance of the system, any vacuum created inside the pipe line was sucked out by using vacuum pump.

  3. Initially refrigerant was loaded into compressor suction line and allowed to settle it down for twenty minutes.

  4. The corresponding experimental parameters like temperature, pressure and energy consumption was observed for every twenty minutes time interval.

During the experimental condition, the various parameter observed are pressure (P1,P2,P3,P4) and temperature (T1,T2,T3,T4). The energy consumed by compressor for different time intervals was measured form the energy meter.

Time [Min]

Temperature [°C]

Pressure (Kg/cm2]

Table: 4.3 Performance comparisons

T1

T2

T3

T4

P1

P2

P3

P4

HC

Mixtures

20

3

68

39

-15

0.7

10

10.3

0.5

40

2

76

38

-14

0.7

10.1

10.6

0.6

60

3

79

38

-14

0.8

10.4

10.8

0.6

R-12

Refrigerants

20

26

48

30

7

0.1

7.4

7.8

0.1

40

26

52

30

8

0.1

7.4

7.8

0.1

60

27

53

30

8

0.2

7.6

8

0.1

Table 3.2 Experimental Readings

4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

R-12 and mixture of two hydrocarbons were used in the experiments. Discussion of the results will be given as turn follows.

Figure 4.1 Time Vs COP

RESULTS

HC MIXTURES

R-12

Discussion

COP

2

1.3

More than 30%

Increased

COMPRESSOR WORK(kW)

0.511

0.4324

15%

Increased

THEROTICAL HORSE POWER

(hp)

0.66

1.07

38%

Decreased

COMPRESSOR TEMPERATURE (°C)

79

54

31%

Increased

HEAT REJECTION

RATE (kJ/Min)

446

260

50%

Increased

Figure 4.2 Time Vs condenser Heat rejection rate

Figure 4.3 Time Vs Therotical Horse Power

Figure 4.4 Time Vs Compressor work

600a can be used as alternate refrigerant instead of R-12 and R-134a.

Figure 4.1 represents comparison of COP with time for HC Mixtures and R-12 refrigerant. The COP is high compare the R-12 Refrigerant . The HC mixture higher performance can be obtained.

Figure 4.2 represents comparison of Heat Rejected to the condenser with time for HC Mixtures and R-12 refrigerant. The rate is high compare the R-12 refrigerant .

Figure 4.3 represents comparison of therotical horse power with time for HC Mixtures and R-12 refrigerant. The horse power is low compare the R-12 refrigerant.

Figure 4.4 represents comparison of Compressor with time for HC Mixtures and R-12 refrigerant. The compressor consumed power is slightly high compare the R-12 refrigerant . All the Performances are compared in table 4.3

CONCLUSION

The refrigeration analysis was performed experimentally for different refrigerant mixtures for vapour compression refrigeration system and from the analysis it is concluded that,

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

[6]

REFERENCES

Mohanraj.M, Jayaraj.S, Muraleedharan.C and Chandrasekar.P (2009) Experimental investigation of R290/R600a mixture as an alternative to R134a in a domestic refrigerator, International Journal of Thermal Sciences Vol.48, pp.10361042.

Somachi wongwises, Nares chimres (2004) Experimental study of hydrocarbon mixtures to replace HFC-134a in a domestic refrigerator, Energy conversion & Management 46(2005)85-100.

Fatouh.M and El Kafafy.M (2006), Assessment of propane/commercial isobutene mixtures as possible alternatives to R134a in domestic refrigerators, Energy conversion and management, Vol.47, pp.2644-2658.

Baskaran.A and Koshy Mathews.P (2012) A Performance comparison of vapour compression refrigeration system using various alternative refrigerants, International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, Vol.3 No10,pp.1-7.

Dongsoo Jung, Chong-Bo Kim, Kilhong Song, Byoungjin Park (2000) Testing of propane/isobutene mixture in domestic Refrigerators, International Journal of Refrigeration Vol.23 pp.517-527.

Ratnesh sahu, December-2011 "Comparative analysis of mint gas with R-12 and R-134 refrigerants", International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 2, Issue 12.

      1. olaji, M.A. Akintunde, T.O. Falade, (2011)Comparative analysis of performance of three ozone-friends HFC refrigerants in a vapour compression refrigerator, Journal of Sustainable Energy and Environment 2 , 61-64.

        Ratneshu Shau (Dec @011) Comparative analysis of mint gas with R-12 and R-134a International Journal of scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 2, Issue 12.

        • This mixture provides better performance in terms of Heat rejection rate and COP. The heat rejection rate is increased 50% and COP is increased 30% for the vapour compression refrigeration system with hydrocarbon mixture

        • Hydrocarbon refrigerant are having less impact on the environment in terms of global warming based on the heat rejection rate.

        • Hydrocarbon mixture shows favorable results on theoretical horse power required to drive the compressor. The power required for hydrocarbon mixtures was 38% less than the R-12 refrigerant for same experimental condition.

        • In domestic refrigerators and industrial refrigeration systems, the mixture of R-290 & R-

Leave a Reply