Geo-Polymer Concrete using Metakaolin , Fly-Ash and their Comparision

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV3IS080760

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Geo-Polymer Concrete using Metakaolin , Fly-Ash and their Comparision

Mr. G. Hemanaag Department of CIVIL Engineering V R Siddhartha Engineering College

Vijayawada,India

Mr. B. S. R. K. Prasad Ph.d Professor,Department of Civil Engineering V R Siddhartha Engineering College

Vijayawada,India

Abstract Portland cement is under critical review due to high amount of carbon dioxide(co2) released into atmosphere.However it is necessary to search for alternative low emission binding agent for concrete to reduce the environmental impact caused by manufacturing of cement.Geo-polymer is also known as inorganic polymer is one such material that uses the by-product materials such as metakaolin,flyash etc., instead of cement and these are activated by alkaline liquids such as sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide to prodece the binder.This project covers the material,the mixture proportion,the manufacturing process and properties etc.Compressive strength for various molarities were determined .Also suggestions for further exploration were given.

Keywords Geopolymer concrete,metakaolin,flyash,sodium hydroxide,sodium silicate.

  1. INTRODUCTION

    The use of alkali materials and aluminosilicates to form a concrete is broadly refered to as Geo-polymer technology and is coined by French researcher Davidovits in 1978.Geo- polymers were first trailed in some concrete applications by Glikhovsky and Co-workers in the soviet union post worldwar-2.In gro-polymers,the polumerisation process involves a chemical reaction under highly aalkaline conditions on Al-Si minerals yielding polymeric Si-o-Al-o bonds as proposed by Davidovits.The chemical composition of geopolymer is similar to Zeolite,but shows an amorphus microstructure.The structural model of geo-polymer material is under investigation.Hence the exact mechanism by which geopolymer setting and hardning occues is not yet clear.

    Metakaolin is one of the by-product used in the geo- polymer concrete.Metakaolin compraises of 55.556% of sio2, 1.612% Tio2, 44.788% Al2O3, 0.485% Fe2O3, 0.004% MnO,

    0.125% MgO, 0.054% CaO, 0.204% Na2O, 0.155% K2O

    ,0.062% P2O5.

    Fly ash is one of the residues generated in the combustion of coal. Fly ash is generally captured from the chimneys of power generation facilities.Low calcium Flyash has been sucessfully used to manufacture geopolymer concrete.This is easily available in the market or in the thermal power plants.In flyash the silicon and Aliminium oxides constitute of about 80% by mass with Si-o-Al ratio of about 2.The Iron oxides usually ranges from 10% – 20% by

    mass.The calcium oxide content was less than 5% by mass.Flyash also consists of magnesium and toxic heavy metals like lead, arsenic, cobalt, and copper.

    The alkaline liquids such as sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate were generally used as binders.sodium silicate solution is sticky in nature and this helps to bind the mixture.Sodium hydroxide solution is prepared by disolving the hydroxide flakes in distilled water.

  2. EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME

    1. Preperation of Alkaline Solution

      The alkaline solutions used are Sodium hydroxide(NaoH) and sodium silicate.Sodium silicate solution is directly available in the market.Sodium hydroxide flakes are available and to make hydroxide solution first the beakers are to be cleaned and the the flakes are to be weighed according to the required molarities.Now for obtaining 2M( 2 molarity) solution first sodium hydroxide flakes of 80 gm are taken in a beaker and and then distilled water is added slowly for dissolving the flakes.And then 1 liter solution is prepared.While flakes are dissolved heat is evolved.In the same way solution is prepared for 4M,6M and 8M respectively.

      Molarity=moles of solute/litre of solution. 2M=2 molarity

      =2 x molecular weight

      =2 x40

      =80 gm of flakes to be dissolved in 1 lit of distilled water.

      Required Molarity

      Weight in grams of sodium

      Hydroxide Flakes

      2M

      80

      4M

      160

      6M

      240

      8M

      320

    2. Mix design

      Fly-ash based concrete

      The mix design in the case of geopolymer concrete is based on conventional concrete with some modifications.In case of normal concrete for the required strength material properties can be found using code.But in case of geopolymer concrete

      there is no mis design procedure and by means of trail and error method optimized mixes is being prepared.several trail mixes are prepared with fly ash based on the mix given by B.V.Rangan.

      Assume the density of geopolymer concrete =2500 kg/m3 Assume the volume of combined aggregate occupied =65% of mass of concrete=65 x 2500 =1625 kg/m3

      Mass of Coarse aggregate + Fine aggregate = 1625 kg/m3 Coarse aggregate =65 % of 1625 = 1056.25 kg/m3

      Fine aggregate =35 % of 1625 =568.75 kg/m3

      Mass of Alkaline liquids and flyash =2500 1625 =875 kg/m3

      Assume mass of flyash =28% of 2500 = 700 kg/m3 Alkaline liquid / flyash = 175/700 = 0.25

      The ratio of sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide solution by mass =1.5

      Mass of sodium hydroxide solution = 65 kg/m3 Mass of sodium silicate solution =110 kg/m3

      Mass of super plasticizer = 0.7% of flyash = 0.7 x 700=5 kg/m3

      Fly Ash (kg/m

      3)

      Fine Aggrega te (kg/m3)

      Coarse Aggregate (kg/m3)

      Sodium Silicate solution (kg/m3)

      Sodium Hydroxi de Solution (kg/m3)

      Super- Plastic izer (kg/m3

      )

      20mm

      12mm

      700

      600

      325

      700

      110

      65(2M)

      5

      700

      600

      325

      700

      110

      65(4M)

      5

      700

      600

      325

      700

      110

      65(6M)

      5

      700

      600

      325

      700

      110

      65(8M)

      5

      Metakaolin based concrete

      The mix proportion followed as in case of flyash based concrete is exactly followed here also i.e, mix proportion is same as flyash based concrete.

      Fly Ash (kg/m

      3)

      Fine Aggrega te (kg/m3)

      Coarse Aggregate (kg/m3)

      Sodium Silicate solution (kg/m3)

      Sodium Hydroxi de Solution (kg/m3)

      Super- Plastic izer (kg/m3

      )

      20mm

      12mm

      700

      600

      325

      700

      110

      65(2M)

      5

      700

      600

      325

      700

      110

      65(4M)

      5

      700

      600

      325

      700

      110

      65(6M)

      5

      700

      600

      325

      700

      110

      65(8M)

      5

    3. Casting Procedure

      Generally the fne aggregate,coarse aggregate and fly ash are weighed to the required quantities and then they are mixed ni dry condition foe 2-3 minuites and then the alkaline solutions prepared(combination of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate) are to be taken to required quantity in addition to the superplasticizer and this solution is added to the dry mix.This mixing is done for 5-7 minuites in the mixer for proper bonding of all the materials.After the mixing is done the mix is filled in the cube moulds of size 100mm x 100mm x 100mm in 3 layers with equal compacting an the these cubes

      are kept on a vibrating table so that no voids are formed.This is the process for both Flyash based concrete and also Metakaolin based concrete for different molarities.

    4. Curing Procedure

    The casted cubes are kept in oven for 12 hours at 600 temperature and then the moulds are removed and the cubes are cured at the room temperature by free air for 3 days,7 days and 28 days and then they are tested.

  3. RESULTS

    The following are the test results of both fly ash based concrete and metakaolin based concrete.

    1. Based on Metakaolin

      2Molarity

      Weight

      Strength

      3days

      7days

      28days

      2.43

      300

      310

      300

      2.48

      310

      310

      320

      2.52

      310

      315

      320

      Average

      306.66

      311.66

      313.66

      4Molarity

      Weight

      Strength

      3days

      7days

      28days

      2.49

      400

      410

      415

      2.52

      410

      420

      410

      2.55

      410

      400

      410

      Average

      406.66

      410

      411.66

      6Molarity

      Weight

      Strength

      3days

      7days

      28days

      2.56

      500

      520

      530

      2.58

      510

      510

      515

      2.57

      530

      530

      525

      Average

      513.33

      520

      523.33

      8Molarity

      Weight

      Strength

      3days

      7days

      28days

      2.58

      560

      565

      570

      2.49

      555

      550

      560

      2.52

      560

      570

      570

      Average

      558.33

      561.66

      566.66

    2. Based on Fly-Ash

    2 Molarity

    Weight

    Strength

    3days

    7days

    28days

    2.36

    220

    225

    240

    2.39

    215

    225

    225

    2.35

    220

    230

    230

    Average

    218.33

    226.66

    231.66

    4 Molarity

    Weight

    Strength

    3days

    7days

    28days

    2.42

    300

    315

    315

    2.45

    310

    310

    320

    2.39

    300

    315

    310

    Average

    303.33

    313.33

    315

    6 Molarity

    Weight

    Strength

    3days

    7days

    28days

    2.52

    450

    460

    470

    2.46

    445

    450

    450

    2.48

    460

    455

    465

    Average

    451.66

    455

    461.66

    8Molarity

    Weight

    Strength

    3days

    7days

    28days

    2.56

    520

    500

    520

    2.53

    510

    520

    510

    2.49

    500

    515

    530

    Average

    510

    511.66

    520

  4. COMPARISION

  5. CONCLUSION:

    From the observations it is clear that when the molarity increased, the compressive strength is increasing.Compared to flyash based concrete the compressive strengts of metakaolin based concrete are high,but the cost of metakaolin based concrete is more.Further exploration can be done by using other by-products.

  6. REFERENCES

  1. Davidovits J (1994) High-alkali cements for 21st century concretes. Concrete technology past, present and future. ACI Special Publication, SP 144. Farmington Hills, Michigan, pp 383398

  2. Rangan BV (2006) Studies on low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Indian Concr Inst J OctoberDecember:917

  3. Performance Evaluation and Microstructure Characterization of Metakaolin-Based Geo-polymer Containing Oil Palm Ash by Abideng Hawa, Danupon Tonnayopas, andWoraphot Prachasaree, Hindawi Publishing Corporation The Scientific World Journal, Volume 2013

  4. Geopolymer concrete for ambient curing condition , P. Nath, Department of Civil Engineering, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia , P. K. Sarker

  5. Geopolymer Binders: A Need for Future Concrete Construction, K. Srinivasan and A. Sivakumar, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, ISRN Polymer Science, Volume 2013.

Leave a Reply