- Open Access
- Total Downloads : 835
- Authors : Shabana Thabassum
- Paper ID : IJERTV2IS100825
- Volume & Issue : Volume 02, Issue 10 (October 2013)
- Published (First Online): 22-10-2013
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Impact of State-wise Vehicle Contribution on Traffic Growth Rates for National Highways
Shabana Thabassum
Associate Professor, St. Martins Engineering College, Hyderabad, A. P, India
ABSTRACT
Road transport is the dominant mode of transport in India, because of advantages like flexibility, door-to-door service and easy accessibility to rural habitations[1]. In order to provide a better level of service to the long distance traveling vehicular traffic along the National Highways and to augment their capacity, it is required to forecast the traffic in long term duration during the time horizon of the study[2]. The stretch under consideration is National Highway No.2 from Km. 398.240 to Km. 521.120, located in the States of Jharkhand and West Bengal of Indian peninsula and the length is 122.880 Km. These states registered vehicles constitute majority of the vehicles plying on the stretch followed by Bihar, Rajasthan, Haryana and Nagaland registered vehicles. To establish the future traffic growth rates, the traffic growth rates of these states must be taken into consideration. The approaches explored for this study are past trends in traffic growth of the states and their growth in socio economic parameters for Transport demand elasticity approach i.e., econometric model.
-
Introduction
Road transport in India is accounting for 70% of freight movement and 85% of passenger traffic. The NH network constitutes about 2% of the countrys road network, but carries about 40% of the total traffic. Over the last decade, the numbers of LMVs and heavy vehicles have increased at about 9% and 7.6%, respectively[3]. The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) is contemplating to enhance the traffic capacity and safety for efficient transportation of goods as well as passenger traffic on the heavily trafficked National Highway sections. The stretch under consideration is NH-2 from Km. 398.240 (Barwa adda) to Km. 521.120 (Panagarh), located in the States of Jharkhand and West Bengal. The present condition of the stretch is
4 lane divided carriageway with paved shoulders and of flexible pavement type. The length of the project corridor is about 122.880 Km. Generally the freight movement on any National highway comprises of different state vehicles. Jharkhand and West Bengal state registered commercial vehicles constitute majority of the vehicles plying on the stretch followed by Bihar, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana and Nagaland registered vehicles. The traffic growth rates along the stretch have to be calculated considering the growth of socio economic parameters of all these states by considering major growth centers and trend growth of registered vehicles. Traffic growth rates are calculated in different methods like trend analysis and econometric method and the suitable values are adopted for capacity,
level of service and financial viability of the proposed investment The index map of the project stretch is shown in Figure 1.
Figure – 1: Index map of project stretch
-
Corridor Importance
National Highway No. 2 or NH-2, commonly referred as DelhiKolkata Road, is a busy National Highway in India that runs through the states of Delhi, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, and West Bengal. It constitutes a major portion of the historical Grand Trunk Road along with NH-
Figure 2: Traffic survey locations
The Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) along the stretch is obtained by multiplying the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) with the seasonal correction factor of 1.03 for petrol vehicles and 1.05 for diesel vehicles. The seasonal variation of traffic along the corridor is given in Figure 3. The AADT of vehicles at the three locations is presented in Table 1.
Petrol sales variation @ Km. 490.000
Correction factor for average
Correction factor for average
1.2
1.1
1
0.9
0.8
March
March
April
April
June
June
August
August
0.7
2009-10 2008-09 2010-11 2011-12
2009-10 2008-09 2010-11 2011-12
December
December
January
January
February
February
May
May
July
July
September
September
October
October
November
November
91 and NH-1 in India. The road is the part of
December
December
January
January
National Highway network of India, and it is officially listed as running over 1,465 Km from Delhi to Kolkata. This national highway has given a new life to public transport in Northern India.
Correction factor for average
Correction factor for average
1.3
1.1
0.9
February
February
May
May
July
July
October
October
November
November
0.7
Diesel sales variation @ Km. 490.000
March
March
April
April
June
June
August
August
September
September
2009-10 2008-09 2010-11 2011-12
-
Traffic Volume
An accurate estimate of the traffic that is likely to use the Project road is very important as it forms the basic input in planning, design, operation and financing. A thorough knowledge of the travel characteristics of the traffic likely to use the Project road as well as other major roads in the influence area of the study corridor is essential for future traffic estimation[4]. To understand the state-wise vehicle composition along the project stretch and to find out the modal split, detailed traffic volume count surveys and Origin-Destination surveys are carried out along the project stretch at strategic points as shown in Figure
2 and the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is calculated for the horizon year.
Figure – 3:Traffic seasonal variation Table – 1: Annual Average Daily Traffic
Vehicle Type
Km. 435.500
Km. 454.800
Km. 507.500
Passenger Vehicles
7257
8063
9994
2 Axle
985
1923
3930
3 Axle
3208
3005
4835
M Axle
1392
1945
2512
HEM
130
25
26
LCV/LGV
159
573
1618
Mini LCV
374
558
1894
Tractor and Tractor with trailer
72
51
90
Non Motorized Vehicles
571
425
1959
Govt. Exempted Vehicles
35
91
157
Total Vehicles
27027
32355
54690
The AADT modal split is given in Figure – 4. It is observed that, more than 55% of the vehicles along the stretch are long distance traveling commercial vehicles.
Figure – 4: Model split
The peak hour volume is taken as the highest hourly volume based on actual traffic counts. The peak hour factor of 6.30% indicates the fairly uniform distribution of the traffic volume during the day.
-
State wise Contribution
The results obtained from the Number plate survey were used to identify the project influence area. The ratio of the total traffic originated/destined to a particular zone to the total traffic gives the influence factor for that particular zone. Mode wise comparative study of the influence factors indicated that the States of Jharkhand and West Bengal, where the project stretch lies are the major influence regions with an influence factor of about 30% for all modes. The state of Bihar which is very close to the project stretch, is found to have influence of about 12%, as shown in Table 3. Most of the passenger vehicles belongs to Jharkhand state, where as commercial vehicles belongs to Jharkhand and West Bengal, as well as Haryana, Bihar, Rajasthan, Nagaland and Uttar Pradesh. These factors have all been accounted in the derivation of traffic growth rates.
Table – 3: Statewise contribution
Name of the State
Car
Mini Bus
Bus
LCV
2
Axle
3
Axle
M
Axle
Mini LCV
Jharkhand
36%
18%
32%
26%
19%
22%
19%
28%
West Bengal
53%
55%
62%
56%
55%
47%
37%
60%
Haryana
3%
0%
0%
5%
6%
10%
10%
3%
Uttar Pradesh
2%
0%
2%
1%
7%
7%
10%
3%
Bihar
4%
7%
4%
5%
6%
4%
5%
4%
Nagaland
2%
20%
0%
4%
4%
7%
14%
1%
Rajasthan
1%
0%
0%
3%
4%
3%
6%
2%
-
Traffic Forecast
li>
Origin-Destination and Number Plate Survey
The origin and destination of trips on the existing road is required to estimate the information regarding travel characteristics of different users on the project road. The O-D data is also essential for identifying the major influence zones along the road, as traffic growth of the project road is directly dependent upon the growth in economic activity of the influencing area and the road network. The data collected from the O-D survey is analysed to assess the project influencing zones for different categories of goods vehicles. Kolkata and Durgapur in the state of West Bengal, Dhanbad and Ranchi in the state of Jharkhand, Punjab, UP and Bihar are the major influencing zones in terms of trip generation and attraction. The location and percentage attraction by vehicle type is given in Table 2.
Table 2: Zone of influence
Vehicle type |
Zone of Influence |
% Attraction |
LCV |
Kolkata |
25% |
Durgapur |
18% |
|
2 Axle |
Kolkata |
25% |
Bihar, UP & Punjab |
15% |
|
Durgapur |
13% |
|
Asansol, Ranchi |
8% |
|
3 Axle |
Kolkata |
29% |
Durgapur |
12% |
|
Bihar, UP & Punjab |
12% |
|
M Axle |
Kolkata |
35% |
Bihar, UP & Punjab |
14% |
To arrive at the contribution of different state vehicles in traffic growth rate calculations, registered number of all vehicles is noted including the state and district name. The traffic on project corridor has been classified as passenger and goods transport vehicles. Goods traffic includes Light commercial vehicle (LCV and Mini LCV), 2, 3 and M axle vehicles.
The accuracy of measuring traffic growth is linked to the ability of highway planners to adequately monitor the patterns and trends of highway usage by various types of vehicles. This task is directly related to the selection of data collection sites, the reliability of data collection equipment and the ability to project
the growth rates[5].
The most important parameter, on which the future forecast of traffic depends, is the Growth rate. However, for a small stretch where most of the traffic neither originates nor ends within the stretch, growth potential of the origin and destination (Zone of Influence) need to be assessed to arrive at the growth potential of the stretch. It is ideal to identify future growth potential of each zone for goods and passenger movements and for each category of vehicles separately. The past motor vehicle registration data at the state level provides a valuable indication regarding the trends in the traffic growth and presents a dependable tool for estimating future growth rates in different categories of vehicles.
A more rational method will be to establish a relationship between the socio-economic variables such as Population, Net State Domestic Product (NSDP) and Per-Capita Income (PCI) on the one hand and the past registration data of different categories of vehicles on the other to determine the elasticity of transport demand with respect to different categories of vehicles. According to IRC: 108 – 1996, an econometric model could be derived in the form
Log e P = A0 + A1 Log e (E.I) Where:
P = number of vehicles of any particular category;
E.I = Economic Indicator such as NSDP, Per- capita income or population;
A0 = Constant;
A1 = Regression coefficient (Elasticity value). Based on future economic growth prospects in terms of income growth, Per-capita growth and population growth, the future traffic growth rate by vehicle type are estimated by suitably adjusting the elasticity values.
-
Secondary Data Collection
The analyzed traffic data from the primary surveys and processed data from secondary sources pertaining to the stretch together provide basic input for design, future projection of traffic. As it is observed from the number plate data, Jharkhand and West Bengal state registered vehicles constitute majority of the vehicles followed by Bihar, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana and Nagaland registered vehicles, following secondary information like statistical data, economic indicators and vehicle registration data (past traffic data) of these states have been collected as shown in Tables 4 to 10.
Table 4: Vehicle registration & Economic indicators of Jharkhand[6,7]
S. No
Year
Vehi
cular Regis
tration Data
Economic I
ndicators
Cars/Jeeps
Trucks
2
Wheelers
Buses
GSDP (Rs
in Crs)
PCI (Rs)
Pop(in 00's)
NSDP (Rs
in Crs)
1
2004-05
128959
65662
1049303
9878
59758
18510
286640
53056
2
2005-06
144462
68915
1164854
10238
57848
17406
291160
50678
3
2006-07
161941
73990
1302967
10792
59226
17427
295670
51527
4
2007-08
179322
79678
1428934
11270
71377
20996
300080
63005
5
2008-09
200258
86170
1570575
11699
70129
19867
304380
60472
6
2009-10
226475
93387
1738566
12256
73618
20646
308651
63724
7
2010-11
261161
99712
1947572
12847
78045
21734
312934
68013
Average Yearly Growth Rate %
12.49
7.22
10.86
4.48
4.82
3.07
1.47
4.59
Table 5: Vehicle registration & Economic indicators of West Bengal[6,8]
S. No
1
Year
2004-05
Vehicular
Registrati
on Data
Ec
onomic
Indicators
Cars/ Jeeps
Trucks
2 W
Buses
3 W
GSDP (Rs
in Crs)
PCI (Rs)
Pop(in 000's)
NSDP (Rs
in Crs)
528101
223826
1687045
33613
56038
208656
22649
83902
190029
2
2005-06
556230
235269
1833820
43599
40315
221789
23808
84843
201994
3
2006-07
602420
256072
2081355
44599
42195
239077
25400
85767
217849
4
2007-08
668365
289641
2391001
48715
44050
257632
27094
86661
234798
5
2008-09
708364
309756
2591429
50838
49391
270248
27914
87505
244262
6
2009-10
765678
336443
2912348
54535
60859
296843
30372
88335
268292
7
2010-11
840653
368169
3330511
56970
72081
317786
32228
89158
287337
Average Yearly Growth Rate %
8.07
8.68
12.03
9.55
5.8
7.27
6.07
1.02
7.15
Table 6: Vehicle registration & Economic indicators of Bihar[6,9]
S. No
Year
Veh
icular Reg
istration
Data
E
conomic
Indicator
s
Cars/ Jeeps
Trucks
2 W
Buses
GSDP
(Rs in Crs)
PCI (Rs)
Pop(in 00's)
NSDP
(Rs in Crs)
1
2004-05
111376
49437
903261
16158
77781
7914
88662
70167
2
2005-06
118759
50016
964594
16271
78494
7813
90162
70447
3
2006-07
130598
52005
1077579
17192
92427
9150
91631
83846
4
2007-08
143050
54414
1197875
18533
99492
9685
93068
90133
5
2008-09
159347
58012
1364757
19654
113994
10994
94474
103867
6
2009-10
184163
66485
1606613
21209
125875
12012
95849
115131
7
2010-11
212723
73472
1899017
22703
144472
13632
97189
132488
Average Yearly Growth Rate %
11.43
6.92
13.25
5.86
11.01
9.66
1.54
11.35
Table 7: Vehicle registration & Economic indicators of Rajasthan[6,10]
S. No
Year
Vehicular
Registrati
on Data
Economic
Indicato
rs
Cars/ Jeeps
Trucks
2 W
Buses
3 W
GSDP
(Rs in Crs)
PCI (Rs)
Pop(in 000's)
NSDP (Rs
in Crs)
1
2004-05
371681
191207
3016763
58092
61128
127746
18565
60670
112636
2
2005-06
417701
206382
3393916
60979
67779
136285
19445
61818
120202
3
2006-07
467675
225020
3833746
63320
75826
152189
21342
62951
134350
4
2007-08
524723
242283
4261695
65605
82588
160016
21922
64077
140471
5
2008-09
585161
252428
4715835
69298
89325
23356
65200
152284
6
2009-10
659616
270886
5230454
73257
95932
184189
24166
66310
160248
7
2010-11
748295
295756
5859719
77980
102967
204398
26436
67402
178184
Average Yearly Growth Rate %
12.37
7.55
11.07
5.03
9.09
8.18
6.35
1.77
7.98
S. No
Year
Vehi
cular Regi
stration D
ata
Economic I
ndicators
Cars/ Jeeps
Trucks
2 W
Buses
GSDP
(Rs in Crs)
PCI (Rs)
Pop(in 000's)
NSDP
(Rs in Crs)
1
2004-05
606045
101355
5652044
24081
–
12950
178409
231029
2
2005-06
728576
106760
6083655
25549
–
13445
181875
244514
3
2006-07
751920
107559
7138789
25134
–
14241
185322
263935
4
2007-08
825191
115552
7737237
25339
–
14875
188804
280851
5
2008-09
910718
122520
8521198
27931
–
15715
192375
302192
6
2009-10
1032379
137436
9493677
28124
–
16374
195844
320675
7
2010-11
1161335
150670
10563850
31922
–
17349
199348
345848
Average Yearly Growth Rate %
11.56
6.89
11.03
4.95
–
5.00
1.87
6.96
S. No
Year
Vehi
cular Regi
stration D
ata
Economic I
ndicators
Cars/ Jeeps
Trucks
2 W
Buses
GSDP
(Rs in Crs)
PCI (Rs)
Pop(in 000's)
NSDP
(Rs in Crs)
1
2004-05
606045
101355
5652044
24081
–
12950
178409
231029
2
2005-06
728576
106760
6083655
25549
–
13445
181875
244514
3
2006-07
751920
107559
7138789
25134
–
14241
185322
263935
4
2007-08
825191
115552
7737237
25339
–
14875
188804
280851
5
2008-09
910718
122520
8521198
27931
–
15715
192375
302192
6
2009-10
1032379
137436
9493677
28124
–
16374
195844
320675
7
2010-11
1161335
150670
10563850
31922
–
17349
199348
345848
Average Yearly Growth Rate %
11.56
6.89
11.03
4.95
–
5.00
1.87
6.96
Table 8: Vehicle registration & Economic indicators of Uttar Pradesh[6,11]
S. No
Year
Vehicular
Registrati
on Data
Economic In
dicators
Cars/ Jeeps
Trucks
2 W
Buses
3 W
GSDP (Rs
in Crs)
PCI (Rs)
Pop(in 000's)
NSDP (Rs
in Crs)
1
2004-05
402585
128715
1729236
11297
43239
95795
37972
22707
86222
2
2005-06
469109
134714
1881174
19986
45858
104610
40628
23140
94013
3
2006-07
551020
154013
2172669
22101
52620
116349
44425
23569
104705
4
2007-08
650265
167983
2463672
26906
63914
126192
47054
23997
112917
5
2008-09
730544
175091
2768197
29516
73134
136540
49806
24425
121650
6
2009-10
836293
189021
2975418
33520
83745
151563
54884
24849
136382
7
2010-11
968980
203421
3370426
35646
94770
166095
59221
25270
149651
Average Yearly Growth Rate %
15.78
7.98
11.80
23.14
14.06
9.61
8.19
1.80
9.64
S. No
Year
Vehicular
Registrati
on Data
Economic In
dicators
Cars/ Jeeps
Trucks
2 W
Buses
3 W
GSDP (Rs
in Crs)
PCI (Rs)
Pop(in 000's)
NSDP (Rs
in Crs)
1
2004-05
402585
128715
1729236
11297
43239
95795
37972
22707
86222
2
2005-06
469109
134714
1881174
19986
45858
104610
40628
23140
94013
3
2006-07
551020
154013
2172669
22101
52620
116349
44425
23569
104705
4
2007-08
650265
167983
2463672
26906
63914
126192
47054
23997
112917
5
2008-09
730544
175091
2768197
29516
73134
136540
49806
24425
121650
6
2009-10
836293
189021
2975418
33520
83745
151563
54884
24849
136382
7
2010-11
968980
203421
3370426
35646
94770
166095
59221
25270
149651
Average Yearly Growth Rate %
15.78
7.98
11.80
23.14
14.06
9.61
8.19
1.80
9.64
Table 9: Vehicle registration & Economic indicators of Haryana[6,12]
Table 10: Vehicle registration & Economic indicators of Nagaland[6,13]
S. No
Year
Vehicular
Registrati
on Data
Economic In
dicators
Cars/
Jeeps
Trucks
2 W
Buses
3 W
GSDP (Rs
in Crs)
PCI (Rs)
Pop(in
000's)
NSDP (Rs
in Crs)
1
2004-05
56865
44002
39989
3863
9100
5839
30441
1781
5421
2
2005-06
59994
47089
42851
4060
9548
6436
33072
1810
5986
3
2006-07
63946
51466
45961
4262
10408
6938
35074
1840
6454
4
2007-08
67562
55974
48976
4422
12939
7445
37317
1870
6978
5
2008-09
70760
60684
52119
4694
13143
7917
39041
1901
7422
6
2009-10
73872
65729
55208
5041
13403
8262
40057
1932
7739
7
2010-11
76562
77968
61085
5573
14284
8591
40957
1963
8040
Average Yearly Growth Rate %
5.09
10.07
7.33
6.32
8.06
6.67
5.09
1.64
6.81
-
Estimation of Growth Rates
To arrive at a realistic and rational assessment of growth factor, efforts have been made to collect various secondary data and statistical information. The growth factors derived from past traffic data on the stretch supplemented by registration trend and the statistical parameters would have been the ideal method. However, due to irregular, erratic and insufficient past traffic data available, the derivation of elasticity and growth factors was based on registration data of vehicles and the economic parameters. The growth trend has been derived for the following categories of vehicles:
Pv = Passenger Vehicles (Car, jeep and Van etc.)
T = Trucks (Mini LCV, LCV, 2 Axle, 3 Axle and M Axle)
B = Bus, Mini Bus
The following steps have been adopted to derive the elasticity and growth factors:
-
Growth rate of registered vehicles in zone of influence is found out.
-
Growth rates of NSDP/GSDP, Per Capita Income (PCI) and population (P) are obtained.
-
For passenger vehicles and buses, number of registered vehicles has been regressed with population data of the state.
-
For trucks, number of registered trucks has been regressed with NSDP of the state.
-
Mean value of average growth rate of
registered vehicles and the growth rate obtained by regression analysis for all categories have been found out for trucks.
-
For passenger vehicles and buses, the mean growth rate of registered vehicular growth rate and that from regression analysis have been adopted.
The elasticity analysis and the econometric models for different types of vehicles for different states are presented in Table 11 and Table – 12.
Table – 11: Elasticity analysis
Mode |
Economic Indicator |
Jharkhand |
West Bengal |
Bihar |
Rajasthan |
Uttar Pradesh |
Haryana |
Nagaland |
|||||||
E Value |
R2 |
E Value |
R2 |
EValue |
R2 |
E Value |
R2 |
E Value |
R2 |
E Value |
R2 |
E Value |
R2 |
||
Cars/ Jeep |
PCI |
2.23 |
0.65 |
1.33 |
0.99 |
1.11 |
0.98 |
2.28 |
0.96 |
2.06 |
0.97 |
2.20 |
0.96 |
0.99 |
0.98 |
Truck |
NSDP |
1.20 |
0.81 |
1.24 |
0.99 |
0.60 |
0.93 |
0.94 |
0.99 |
0.97 |
0.94 |
0.85 |
0.98 |
1.33 |
0.92 |
2W |
PCI |
1.96 |
0.65 |
1.94 |
0.99 |
1.29 |
0.98 |
2.15 |
0.96 |
2.15 |
0.99 |
1.72 |
0.97 |
1.31 |
0.94 |
Bus |
Pop |
3.00 |
0.99 |
7.70 |
0.90 |
3.91 |
0.96 |
2.72 |
0.98 |
2.20 |
0.83 |
9.62 |
0.88 |
3.58 |
0.97 |
Table – 12: Econometric models
State |
Vehicle type |
Econometric model |
Jharkhand |
Car / Jeep (Pv) |
Ln Pv = 2.14 Ln PCI 9.02 |
Bus (B) |
Ln B = 3.00 Ln P 28.54 |
|
2 Wheelers (Tw) |
Ln Tw = 1.85 Ln PCI 4.04 |
|
Trucks (T) |
Ln T = 1.2 Ln NSDP 1.87 |
|
West Bengal |
Car / Jeep (Pv) |
Ln Pv = 1.33 Ln PCI 0.21 |
Bus (B) |
Ln B = 7.7 Ln P 76.75 |
|
2 Wheelers (Tw) |
Ln Tw = 1.94 Ln PCI 5.08 |
|
3 Wheelers (3w) |
Ln 3w = 5.87 Ln P 55.89 |
|
Trucks (T) |
Ln T = 1.24 Ln NSDP 2.82 |
|
Bihar |
Car / Jeep (Pv) |
Ln Pv = 1.67 + 1.11 Ln PCI |
Bus (B) |
Ln B = 3.91 Ln P 34.9 |
|
2 Wheelers (Tw) |
Ln Tw = 2.19 + 1.29 Ln PCI |
|
Trucks (T) |
Ln T = 4.05 + 0.6 Ln NSDP |
|
Rajasthan |
Car / Jeep (Pv) |
Ln Pv = 2.28 Ln PCI 9.53 |
Bus (B) |
Ln B = 2.72 Ln P 19.03 |
|
2 Wheelers (Tw) |
Ln Tw = 2.15 Ln PCI 6.18 |
|
3 Wheelers (3w) |
Ln 3w = 4.94 Ln P 43.38 |
|
Trucks (T) |
Ln T = 1.2 + 0.94 Ln NSDP |
|
Uttar Pradesh |
Car / Jeep (Pv) |
Ln Pv = 2.06 Ln PCI 6.17 |
Bus (B) |
Ln B = 2.2 Ln P 16.5 |
|
2 Wheelers (Tw) |
Ln Tw = 2.15 Ln PCI 4.78 |
|
Trucks (T) |
Ln T = 0.97 Ln NSDP 0.42 |
|
Haryana |
Car / Jeep (Pv) |
Ln Pv = 2.2 Ln PCI 10.21 |
Bus (B) |
Ln B = 9.62 Ln P 86.90 |
|
2 Wheelers (Tw) |
Ln Tw = 1.72 Ln PCI 3.69 |
|
3 Wheelers (3w) |
Ln 3w = 7.78 Ln P 67.45 |
|
Trucks (T) |
Ln T = 2.06 + 0.85 Ln NSDP |
|
Nagaland |
Car / Jeep (Pv) |
Ln Pv = 0.66 + 0.99 Ln PCI |
Bus (B) |
Ln B = 3.58 Ln P 18.52 |
|
2 Wheelers (Tw) |
Ln Tw = 1.31 Ln PCI 2.97 |
|
3 Wheelers (3w) |
Ln 3w = 4.97 Ln P 28.11 |
|
Trucks (T) |
Ln T = 1.33 Ln NSDP – 0.8 |
The final % contribution of different vehicles from different states for this stretch under consideration have been derived from the number plate analysis and local area transport network justification are given in Table 13.
Table 13: % Vehicle contribution
State |
2W |
3W |
Car |
Bus |
2 Axle |
3 Axle |
M Axle |
LCV |
Mini LCV |
Jharkhand |
80% |
80% |
36% |
32% |
19% |
22% |
19% |
26% |
28% |
Haryana |
3% |
0% |
6% |
10% |
10% |
5% |
3% |
||
Bihar |
4% |
4% |
6% |
4% |
5% |
5% |
4% |
||
West Bengal |
20% |
20% |
53% |
62% |
55% |
47% |
37% |
56% |
60% |
Uttar Pradesh |
2% |
2% |
7% |
7% |
10% |
1% |
3% |
||
Rajasthan |
1% |
0% |
4% |
3% |
6% |
3% |
2% |
||
Nagaland |
2% |
0% |
4% |
7% |
14% |
4% |
1% |
The weighted average of traffic growth rates for different category of vehicles from % vehicle contribution and econometric models for financial analysis and pavement design are presented in Table 14.
Table 14: Projected growth rates for different category of vehicles
Year from |
Year to |
2W |
3W |
Car / Jeep |
Bus |
Trucks |
|||
2 Axle |
3 Axle |
M Axle |
LCV and Mini LCV |
||||||
2013 |
2014 |
8.8 |
4.4 |
9.1 |
7.5 |
6.3 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.3 |
2014 |
2015 |
8.8 |
4.4 |
9.1 |
7.5 |
6.3 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.3 |
2015 |
2016 |
8.8 |
4.4 |
9.1 |
7.5 |
6.3 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.3 |
2016 |
2017 |
7.8 |
3.4 |
8.1 |
6.5 |
5.3 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.3 |
2017 |
2018 |
7.8 |
3.4 |
8.1 |
6.5 |
5.3 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.3 |
2018 |
2019 |
7.8 |
3.4 |
8.1 |
6.5 |
5.3 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.3 |
2019 |
2020 |
7.8 |
3.4 |
8.1 |
6.5 |
5.3 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.3 |
2020 |
2021 |
7.8 |
3.4 |
8.1 |
6.5 |
5.3 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.3 |
2021 |
2022 |
6.8 |
2.4 |
7.1 |
5.5 |
4.3 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
6.3 |
2022 |
2023 |
6.8 |
2.4 |
7.1 |
5.5 |
4.3 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
6.3 |
2023 |
2024 |
6.8 |
2.4 |
7.1 |
5.5 |
4.3 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
6.3 |
2024 |
2025 |
6.8 |
2.4 |
7.1 |
5.5 |
4.3 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
6.3 |
2025 |
2026 |
6.8 |
2.4 |
7.1 |
5.5 |
4.3 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
6.3 |
2026 |
2027 |
5.8 |
2.2 |
6.1 |
4.5 |
3.3 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
5.3 |
2027 |
2028 |
5.8 |
2.2 |
6.1 |
4.5 |
3.3 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
5.3 |
2028 |
2029 |
5.8 |
2.2 |
6.1 |
4.5 |
3.3 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
5.3 |
2029 |
2030 |
5.8 |
2.2 |
6.1 |
4.5 |
3.3 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
5.3 |
2030 |
2031 |
5.8 |
2.2 |
6.1 |
4.5 |
3.3 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
5.3 |
2031 |
2032 |
4.8 |
2 |
5.1 |
3.9 |
2.6 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
2032 |
2033 |
4.8 |
2 |
5.1 |
3.9 |
2.6 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
2033 |
2034 |
4.8 |
2 |
5.1 |
3.9 |
2.6 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
2034 |
2035 |
4.8 |
2 |
5.1 |
3.9 |
2.6 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
2035 |
2036 |
4.8 |
2 |
5.1 |
3.9 |
2.6 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
2036 |
2037 |
4.8 |
2 |
5.1 |
3.9 |
2.6 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
2037 |
2038 |
4.8 |
2 |
5.1 |
3.9 |
2.6 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
2038 |
2039 |
4.8 |
2 |
5.1 |
3.9 |
2.6 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
2039 |
2040 |
4.8 |
2 |
5.1 |
3.9 |
2.6 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
2040 |
2041 |
4.8 |
2 |
5.1 |
3.9 |
2.6 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
2041 |
2042 |
4.8 |
2 |
5.1 |
3.9 |
2.6 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
2042 |
2043 |
4.8 |
2 |
5.1 |
3.9 |
2.6 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
2043 |
2044 |
4.8 |
2 |
5.1 |
3.9 |
2.6 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
This kind of approach for calculating traffic growth rates for any particular road stretch will provide the realistic information about the vehicular traffic which is going to use the facility after improvement, financial benefits to the concessionaire and economic benefits to the society.
References
-
L.R. Kadiyali and T.V. Shashikala (2009) Road transport demand forecast for 2000 AD revisited and demand forecast for 2021, Journal of the Indian Roads Congress.
-
Chapter 8 Summary of the Traffic Studies and Forecasts on the Project Highway Undertaken by the Consultant, DPR for 4/6-laning of Gonde Vadape Section of NH-3, Volume IV.
-
Final Project report Consultancy Services for Formulation of Master Plan for Indian National Expressway Network, CRAPHTS CONSULTANTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, Faridabad.
-
Traffic report Pre tender services for 6 Laning of Barwa adda-Panagarh Section of NH-2 in the States of Jharkhand and West Bengal, Aarvee Associate Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad.
-
Monica L. Barrett, R. Clark Graves, David L. Allen and Jerry G. Pigman (2001), Analysis of Traffic Growth rates, Research report, Kentucky Transportation center.
-
Transport year book 2011, Ministry of Road transport and Highways (MoRT&H).
-
www.jharkhand.nic.in
-
www.westbengal.gov.in
-
www.gov.bih.nic.in
-
www.rajasthan.gov.in
-
www.upgov.nic.in
-
www.haryana.gov.in
-
www.nagaland.nic.in