Integrated Nutrient Management in Rice -Pea Cropping System for Sustainable Productivity

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV3IS041276

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Integrated Nutrient Management in Rice -Pea Cropping System for Sustainable Productivity

Pramod Kumar¹, Fateh Singp, Ajay Pratap Singpand Monika Singh4 Asst . Prof 1, Retd.Prof 2, Ph.D Scholar3, Asst.Prof 4

1,2 Regional Agriculture Research Station, Kalai, Aligarh, C.S Azad University of agriculture & Technology, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.

3, 4 Department of Applied Science, Mangalayatan university Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Abstract – Integrated nutrient management module for rice-pea cropping system was developed through field experimentation for twelve consecutive crop seasons (2006-2012). The treatments consisted of farm yard manure (FYM), vermi-compost (VC), green manure (GM), Azospirillum , blue green algae (BGA), rhizobium , phosphorus solublizing bacteria (PSB), and NPK fertilizers. Highest yield of rice (4494 kgha-1) was obtained with the application of recommended dose of NPK (120,26.4,49.8 kgha-1) , which was at par with the rice grown after green manuring with fifty per cent of NPK (60,13.2,24.9 kgha-1) accompanied by microbial cultures (Azospirillum, BGA and PSB). Reduction to the tune of seventy five per cent in recommended dose of N P fertilizers (22.5, 19.8 kgha-1) could be made with the application of FYM or vermi-compost in kharif alongwith rhizobium and PSB without decrease in the yield of pea. Cultivation of rice and pea on recommended dose of fertilizers alone reduced organic carbon, available phosphorus and potassium content of the soil. Application of FYM, VC, and green manure alone or in combination with bio-fertilizers supplemented by chemical fertilizers improved the soil fertility.

Keywords Integrated nutrient management, FYM, vermi-compost, green manure, bio-fertilizers, and cropping system

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Use of imbalanced and inadequate fertilizers has made the soil not only deficient in nutrients but also deteriorated soil health resulting in decline crop response to recommended dose of N- fertilizers. In addition the chemical fertilizers becoming expensive over the years. Therefore, the importance of organic manures and bio-fertilizers is gaining prominence. Under such a situation, integrated plant nutrient system (IPNS) has vital significance for maintenance of soil productivity. Therefore, suitable combination of chemical fertilizers, organic manures and microbial cultures need to be developed for particular cropping system and soil. Present investigation was under taken to develop integrated nutrient module for rice-pea cropping system for sustainable production.

  2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

    A field experiment was conducted at Kalai (Aligarh), Research station of C.S. Azad university of Agriculture and

    Technology, Kanpur for Twelve crop seasons beginning with rice (kharif-2006). The experimental soil was sandy loam in texture, having pH (1:2.5)7.5, Ec (1:2.5) 0.48 dSm-1, organic carbon 0.36% and available P and K contents 7.75 and 114.71 kg ha ¹ respectively. Crops grown were rice (Pant-12)and pea (KPMR-400). Details of nine treatments comprising FYM (0.65%N, 0.2% P and 0.42% K), VC (1.5% N, 0.5% P and

    0.9% K), green manure, Azospirillum, BGA, Rhizobium and NPK fertilizers are given in table -1.Manurial treatments were repeated each year during kharif season. In rice half dose of N, full dose of phosphate (DAP) and potassium (MOP) were applied as basal and rest half was top dressed.In pea full dose of N, P was applied as basal. The experiment was laid out in completely randomized block design with four replications. The statistical analyses were carried out following standard method. Soil samples collected at the harvest of pea crop after second, fourth and sixth year were air dried, ground, passed through a 2 mm sieve and analyzed for organic carbon, available P and K using standard procedures.

  3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    Grain Yield

    The highest grain yield (4474 kg ha¹) of rice was obtained with the application of recommended dose of NPK fertilizers (120, 26.4 and 49.8 kg ha¹). Rice grown after green manuring of sesbania in- situ along with half quantity of recommended dose of NPK fertilizers (60,13.2 and 24.9 kg ha¹) accompanied by microbial cultures (Azospirillum, PSB and BGA) yielded 4453 kg ha¹(Table-2).The results indicated that fifty percent of recommended dose of NPK fertilizers can be substituted with the use of green manuring along with bio- fertilizers. The grain yield 1365 kg ha¹ was lowest under the treatment where no manure,or fertilizer was applied. Application of FYM or vermi-compost along with green manuring and bio-fertilizers (Azospirillum, PSB, BGA) supplemented by one-fourth quantity of NPK (T5, T6) recorded significantly higher yield in comparison to application of

    TABLE-1 DETAIL OF TREATMENTS DURING KHARIF AND RABI EACH YEAR

    Treatments

    Kharif

    Rabi

    T1

    100% RDF NPK (120,26.4,49.8 kg ha-1)

    100% RDF NP (30,26.4 kg ha-1)

    T2

    50% RDF NPK+GM+Azos+PSB+BGA

    50% RDF NP+Rhizo +PSB

    T3

    25% RDF NPK+FYM@20t

    ha-1+Azos+PSB+BGA

    25% RDF NP+Rhizo +PSB

    T4

    25% RDF NPK+VC@10t ha ¹+Azos+PSB+BGA

    25% RDF NP+Rhizo +PSB

    T5

    25% RDF NPK+GM+FYM@10t ha-1

    +Azos+PSB+BGA

    25% RDF NP+Rhizo +PSB

    T6

    25% RDF NPK+GM+VC@5t

    ha-1+Azos+PSB+BGA

    25% RDF NP+Rhizo +PSB

    T7

    Zero RDF+GM+FYM@20t ha-1

    +Azos+PSB+BGA

    Zero RDF+Rhizo +PSB

    T8

    Zero RDF+GM+VC@10t

    ha-1+Azos+PSB+BGA

    Zero RDF+Rhizo +PSB

    T9

    Absolute control

    Absolute control

    RDF=Recommended dose of fertilizer,GM=Green manuring(15t ha-1 freshweight),Azos=Azospirillum, PSB=Phosphate solubilizing bacteria , BGA=Blue green algae (Applied in rice field 7 DAT), Rhizo=Rhizobium

    Table-2 Effect of Treatments on Grain Yield of Rice (Kg ha-¹)

    Treatments

    2006

    2007

    2008

    2009

    2010

    2011

    Average

    T1

    4689

    4665

    4585

    4235

    4305

    4363

    4474

    T2

    4481

    4555

    4600

    4350

    4260

    4475

    4453

    T3

    3223

    3315

    3605

    3700

    3380

    4250

    3579

    T4

    3338

    3450

    3575

    3645

    3395

    4275

    3613

    T5

    3812

    3905

    4105

    3885

    3675

    4363

    3958

    T6

    3915

    4028

    4210

    3950

    3715

    4481

    4050

    T7

    3526

    3633

    3870

    3650

    3600

    3569

    36.41

    T8

    3629

    740

    3800

    3688

    3630

    3794

    3714

    T9

    1495

    1505

    1405

    1275

    1235

    1275

    1365

    CD(P=0.05)

    130

    42

    64

    86

    80

    170

    Table-3 Effect of Treatments on Grain Yield of Pea (Kg ha¹)

    Treatments

    2006-07

    2007-08

    2008-09

    2009-10

    2010-11

    2011-12

    Average

    T1

    3289

    3045

    3035

    2564

    3153

    2473

    2927

    T2

    2486

    2305

    2709

    2333

    2810

    2238

    2480

    T3

    3266

    3015

    3028

    2615

    3320

    2482

    2954

    T4

    3255

    2920

    3005

    2550

    3170

    2402

    2884

    T5

    3022

    2980

    2982

    2407

    3040

    2377

    2801

    T6

    2993

    2825

    2866

    2335

    3055

    2375

    2742

    T7

    3082

    2695

    2884

    2160

    2935

    2082

    2640

    T8

    3058

    2700

    2833

    2158

    2925

    2047

    2620

    T9

    1011

    800

    780

    706

    851

    880

    838

    CD(P=0.05)

    55

    146

    128

    79

    71

    101

    Table-4 Effect of Treatments on Fertility Status of Soil

    Treatments

    After second year

    After fourth year

    After sixth year

    Organic C (%)

    Available P

    (kgha ¹)

    Available K (kgha ¹)

    Organic C (%)

    Available P

    (kgha ¹)

    Available

    K (kg ha ¹)

    Organic C (%)

    Available P (kg

    ha ¹)

    Available

    K (kg ha ¹)

    T1

    0.35

    7.70

    113.00

    0.34

    7.39

    112.05

    0.33

    6.82

    107.90

    T2

    0.46

    7.94

    114.13

    0.48

    7.99

    115.20

    0.50

    8.03

    116.70

    T3

    0.56

    9.28

    130.31

    0.58

    10.52

    134.46

    0.61

    10.91

    146.50

    T4

    0.53

    9.15

    126.99

    0.57

    9.68

    133.34

    0.58

    10.38

    142.10

    T5

    0.49

    8.43

    124.96

    0.51

    9.33

    129.07

    0.53

    9.81

    139.77

    T6

    0.43

    8.36

    122.12

    0.48

    8.67

    127.57

    0.51

    9.55

    134.71

    T7

    0.55

    9.11

    129.36

    0.59

    10.65

    137.20

    0.60

    10.78

    146.91

    T8

    0.54

    8.91

    128.03

    0.57

    10.25

    133.38

    0.59

    10.55

    144.70

    T9

    0.32

    6.68

    108.07

    0.29

    6.60

    102.13

    0.27

    6.21

    99.60

    FYM or vermi-compost and bio-fertilizers along with similar quantity of NPK(T3, T4) . Early decomposition of succulent legume such as sesbaia might have caused early release and availability of plant nutrients and these in turn might have resulted higher yield of rice. Application of one-fourth quantity of NPK dose of fertilizers along with manures and bio-fertilizers improved the yield in comparison to application of manures and bio-fertilizers alone. Beneficial effects of integrated use of manures and biofertilizers along with chemical fertilizers were also reported by Singh et.al.[1].

    The different treatments influenced the grain yield of pea (Table-3). Among three organic manures applied during kharif (once a year), FYM (20t ha-1) along with one-fourth quantity of NPK in conjunction with bio-fertilizers recorded highest grain yield of pea (2954 kg ha-1) followed by application of recommended dose of NP fertilizers (30, 26.4 kg ha-1) which was at par with the vermi-compost (10t ha-1) when supplemented with one-fourth quantity of recommended dose of N, P along with bio-fertilizers (T4). The residual effect of organic manures was found to be in the order FYM>VC>GM. Application of rhizobium and PSB supplemented by one-forth quantity of NP fertilizers along with manurial treatments in kharif recorded higher grain yield of pea as compared to green manuring( residual effect) and half dose of N P along with rhizo+PSB (T2 ) and proved better than application of FYM (20t ha-1) or vermi-compost (10t ha-1) combined with biofertilizers (Rhizobium + PSB) in rabi without NP fertilizers (T7, T8).

    The present experimental results suggests that reduction in half quantity of recommended dose of NPK fertilizers (60,

    13.2 and 24.9) could be made with the application of green manuring along with bio-fertilizers (Azospirillum, PSB and BGA) without any decrease in the yield of rice, whereas in pea three-fourth quantity may be saved with the application of FYM (20t ha-1 ) or vermi-compost (10t ha-1) along with bio- fertilizers (rhizobium and PSB).

    Organic Carbon

    Organic carbon content of the surface soil (Table-4) increased with the application of manures along with fertilizers. Application of NPK fertilizers and absolute control showed negative impact and reduced organic carbon content by 0.03% and 0.08% respectively in six years. Highest organic content was observed with the application of FYM followed by vermi- compost and green manuring. The increase in organic carbon content in manurial treatment combinations is attributed to direct incorporation of organic matter in the soil. The subsequent decomposition of these materials might have resulted in enhanced organic carbon content of the soil. The increase in organic carbon status occurred on combined use of organic manure and fertilizers, and enhanced further by the application of bio-fertilizers. Basker[2]; Singh and Pathak[3];Tolanur and Badanur[4]; Singh, et al.[1].

    Available Phosphorous

    Available phosphorus content of the surface soil (Table-4) increased appreciably with the application of manures along with fertilizers as compared to sole applicatin of NPK fertilizers, which registered a negative impact. Highest available phosphorus was observed with the application of FYM followed by vermi-compost and green manuring. The increased available P content of soil might be due to release of CO2and organic acids during decomposition, which helps in solubility of the native soil P and in turn enhanced the availability of P. Addition of organic manures like FYM, vermi-compost and green manure with inorganic fertilizers had the beneficial effect in increasing the phosphate availability. Application of PSB also contributed towards phosphate nutrition of both rice and pea as is evident from the results. Increase in available phosphorus with the application of PSB was also reported by Singh et.al.[5].

    Available Potassium

    Available potassium content of surface soil increased considerably due to combined application of manures, bio- fertilizers and inorganic fertilizers as compared to the sole application of inorganic fertilizers. The beneficial effect of FYM, vermin-compost, green manuring and bio-fertilizers on available potassium may be ascribed to the reduction of K- fixation, solublization and release of K due to interaction of organic matter with clay, besides direct potassium addition to potassium pool of soil.

  4. CONCLUSION

    Green manuring in-situ alongwith bio-fertilizers(Azospirillum, PSB, and BGA) were equivalent to 60 kg N,13.2 kg P and

    24.9 kg K fertilizers ha-1 year-1 for rice cultivativation.Integrated use of bio-fertilizers like rhizobium and PSB combined with residual effect of organic manures reduced NP fertilizers requirement for pea by seventy five per cent.

  5. REFERENCES

[1].Singh F, Kumar R and pal S. Integrated nutrient management in Rice- wheat cropping system for sustainable productivity. Journal of the Indian society of soil science Vol 56, pp. 205-208, 2008.

[2].Basker,K.Effect of integrated use of inorganic fertilizers and FYM or green leaf manure on uptake and nutrient use efficiency of rice-rice system on an inceptisol. Journal of the Indian society of soil science Vol 51, pp. 47-51, 2003.

[3]. Singh,R.N. and Pathak R.K. Response of wheat (Tritium aestivum) to integrated nutrition of K, Mg, Zn,S and biofertilizers. Journal of the Indian society of soil science Vol 51, pp. 56-60, 2003.

[4]. Tolanur S.I.and Badanur V.P. Changes in organic carbon available N P and K under integrated use of organic manure, green manure and fertilizer on sustaining productivity of pearl millet-pigeon pea system and fertility of an inceptisol. Journal of the Indian society of soil science Vol 51, pp. 37-41, 2003.

[5]. Singh F, Kumar R, Pal S, Husain MF, Kumar P and Katiyar RP. Biofertilizers as an efficient component for sustainable productivity and improving soil health under Paddy cropping system. Progressive Agriculture Vol 6, pp. 83-84, 2006.

Leave a Reply