- Open Access
- Total Downloads : 22
- Authors : Manju Hooda, Sonam Jhakar, Sitender Chhillar
- Paper ID : IJERTCONV3IS10053
- Volume & Issue : NCETEMS – 2015 (Volume 3 – Issue 10)
- Published (First Online): 24-04-2018
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Investigation on Properties of Concrete by Replacing of Fine Aggregate with Bottom Fly Ash
Manju Hooda1, Sonam Jhakar2, Sitender Chhillar3
1,2,3Department of Civil Engineering, Ganga Institute of Technology and Management,
Kablana, Jhajjar, Haryana, India
Abstract- This paper presents the results of an experimental investigation carried out to evaluate the mechanical properties of concrete mixtures in which fine aggregate (sand) was partially replaced with bottom fly ash. Concrete- a material synonymous with strength and longevity has emerged as the dominant construction material for the infrastructure needs for the Twenty first century. In order to make use of coal ash popular in masonry mortar and structural concrete, research is going on worldwide. In India, research is also going on to utilize huge stocks coal ash in the different zones of the country. The prime objective of the study was to evaluate the structural properties and potential of concrete containing bottom ash vis-Ã -vis that of concrete containing no bottom ash of corresponding mix proportions and strength. The cubes were tested for the compressive strength and beams specimens were tested for flexural strength. Splitting tensile strength tests were conducted on cylinder specimens. The total numbers of 60 cubes, 40 beams specimens and 40 numbers of cylinders were tested for compressive strength, flexural strength and splitting tensile strength respectively at different ages to study the following aspect. The effect on unit weight of concrete after incorporating varying proportions of bottom ash. The effect of bottom ash on workability (C.F) of fresh concrete. The effect on compressive, flexural and splitting tensile strength using bottom ash in varying percentages as a partial replacement of fine aggregates.
-
INTRODUCTION
A. GENERAL
Concrete is a material synonymous with strength and longevity has emerged as the dominant construction material for the infrastructure needs for the twenty first century. In addition to being durable, concrete is easily prepared and fabricated from readily available constituents and is therefore widely used in all types of structural systems. The challenge for the civil engineering community in the near future will be to realize projects in harmony with the concept of sustainable development and this involves the use of high performance materials and products manufactured at reasonable cost with the lowest possible environmental impact.
-
GENERATION OF FLY ASH AND BOTTOM
ASH
Fly ash is a finely divided residue resulting from the combustion of pulverized coal in boilers. It is transported from the boilers by flue gases and collected by means of electric precipitators and mechanical collectors. It is a pozzolanic material and consists of small spheres of glassy
surface of complex chemical composition together with small quantities of quartz, mullica, haematite, magnetite and unburnt carbon. It is finer than Portland cement and varies in color from light grey to dark, depending on carbon content. The greater the carbon content darker is the colour.
A. Disposal of Coal Ash
All this coal ash ejected out of the thermal power stations has to be disposed off to an open area available near the plant. In the wet disposal, which is at present being followed by most of the Thermal Power Stations, both the fly ash and bottom ash are grounded, mixed with water and are pumped into artificial lagoon or dumping yard. This is known as lagoon ash. Sometimes, coal ash mixed with water is conveyed to ponds or to nearby water courses. Disposal of coal ash in such a way no longer remains the answer. Such a huge collection of coal ash tomorrow will be more complex than the ones at present.
-
STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF
CONCRETE
It is the most important property of hardened concrete, which represents the ability of concrete to resist forces, in other words, strength of concrete is its resistance to rupture. It is important than other properties of concrete (secondary properties) e.g. durability, density, permeability, dimensional stability, appearance, behaviour of concrete under stresses and creep of concrete etc. Strength or some measure of it, is relatively easy to evaluate, as it is roughly indicative of the quality of concrete in other directions- strength increases, density, permeability, durability etc. generally improves. The present study compression, flexural strength and splitting tensile strength are considered for investigation. splitting .
-
Compressive Strength
It is the strength of concrete against crushing due to the direct compressive load. It is considered as most important property and often taken as the index of overall quality of concrete. Concrete has high compressive stress and it is normally required to resist compressive stresses. Compressive strength at 28 days after casting is taken as the criteria for specifying the quality of concrete. IS: 456- 2000 stipulates the gain of strength beyond 28 days.
-
Tensile Strength
Concrete as we know is relatively strong in compression and weak in tension. In reinforced concrete members, little dependence is placed on the tensile strength of concrete since steel reinforcing bars are provide to resist all tensile forces.
-
-
NEED FOR THE PRESENT STUDY
The continuous reduction of natural resources and the environmental hazards posed by the disposal of coal ash has reached an alarming proportion. The use of coal ash in normal strength concrete is a new dimension in concrete mix design and if applied on large scale would revolutionize the construction industry, by economizing the construction cost and decreasing the ash content.
-
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
-
To design the reference concrete mix of grade M25 using OPC 43 grade cement.
-
To investigate the effect of replacing fine aggregate with bottom ash in varying percentages (20-50%) on compressive strength, flexural tensile strength and splitting tensile strength at the moist curing of 7,28, 56 and 90 days.
-
To investigate the effect of bottom ash on workability of freshly mixed concrete.
-
To investigate the effect the effect the bottom ash on unit weight of concrete.
-
-
EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
A. GENERAL
The prime objective of the study was to evaluate the structural properties and potential of concrete containing bottom ash vis-Ã -vis that of concrete containing no bottom ash of corresponding mix proportions and strength.
TABLE III SPECIFICATIONS OF SUPERPLASTICIZER
Basis
Aqueous solution of modified polycarboxylate
Appearance
Brown liquid
Density
Approx. 1.10
Ph
Approx. 5.0
X 150mm cubes, flexural strength tests was carried on 100mm X 100mm X 500mm prisms and split tensile strength test was carried out on 150mm X 300 mm cylinders.
-
MATERIAL TESTING
The following materials were used in the experimental work.
-
Cement
-
Fine aggregates
-
Coarse aggregates
-
Bottom ash
-
Super plastisizer
-
Cement
In the present investigation ordinary Portland cement 43 grade with brand name Jaypee Cement conforming to IS:8112-1989 was used. The cement was tested in accordance with the test methods specified in IS:4031- 1988 and results obtained.
TABLE I
Specific gravity 2.65
The sand used conforms to zone III. Sieve analysis for the sand was performed and result were obtained.
-
Coarse Aggregates
TABLE II
Since it is an established fact that hydration of pozzolanic material is a delayed process compared to hydration of plain cement concrete, the main emphasis was to compare the relative structural properties of two types of the concrete at later ages. Moreover bottom ash used in this study was obtained from Tau Devi Lal Thermal Power Plant, Panipat.
To investigate the strength considerations the following tests were conducted:
-
Compressive strength test
-
Flexural strength test
-
Split tensile strength test
Along with this test for workability was also conducted. The compression test was carried out on 150mm X 150mm
Maximum size of aggregates
20mm
Specific Gravity
2.6
Fineness modulus
6.9
Bottom Ash
Specific Gravity
1.68
-
-
Water
Portable water available in the laboratory extracted from the ground was used for casting and curing.
-
Super Plasticizer
Super plastisizer of the make SIKA VISCOCRETE-10 (H1) was used for the concrete.
-
-
CONCRETE MIX DESIGN
In the present investigation the existing method as per IS: 10262 (1982)8 has been used for selecting the referenced mix (M25), however new information given in IS:456
(2000) have been incorporated. In order to get the final mix proportions for the reference mix design three trails had been prepared earlier and tested at 7 days and 28 days.
-
CASTING OF SPECIMENS
The moulds were filled in three equal layers of concrete. Bottom layer was compacted with a 16mm dia. temping rod with bullet nose to provide a proper formation of corners and base. Then second and third layers were placed and temped. After this the moulds were placed on the table vibrator for the compaction. Proper compaction is attained when the slurry of cement appears on the surface. The vibrator was stopped and some amount of concrete was poured to fill it. The mould was again vibrated and top surface was finished with a trowel. Casting for specimens was done for each test of plain cement concrete and bottom ash concrete. The specimens were kept in a clean water tank just after removal from the mould and kept continuously moist till the time of testing.
-
PROPERTIES OF CONCRETE TO BE TESTED
-
Properties Of Fresh Concrete
-
Properties Of Hardend Concrete
-
Properties of Fresh Concrete
The divers requirements mixibility, stability, transportability,
placability, modility, compactability and finishability of fresh concrete collectively refer to as workability.
-
Measurement Of Workability:A number of different tests are available for the measuring the workability of fresh concrete, but none of them is wholly satisfactory. Each test measures only particular aspect of it.
The different tests used for measuring workability are:
-
The slump test
-
The compaction factor test
-
The Vee Bee consistency test
-
The flow
-
-
-
Properties Of Hardend Concrete
-
Compressive Strength Test: Compressive strength tests were carried on 150mm*150mm*150mmm cubes with compression testing machine of 1000KN capacity. The compressive strength was found after 7, 28, 56 and 90 days in order to compare the strength of different concrete mixes.
-
Flexural Strength Test:Although the concrete is not normally designed to resist tension, the knowledge of tensile strength is of value in estimating the load under which crack will develop.. In the present study, the flexural test was conducted on 100mm*100mm*500mm specimens under two point loading pattern. The supports
were placed at 400mm apart and loading was placed at 133mm apart.
-
Splitting Tensile Strength: Part from flexural test, the other method used to determine the tensile strength of concrete is splitting tensile strength test. In this test, in general a compressive force is applied to a concrete specimen in such a way that the specimen fails due to tensile stresses induced in the specimen.The splitting tensile strength was found at 7, 28, 56, and 90 days after casting of specimens.
-
-
-
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
-
GENERAL
The results of the tests conducted on plain and bottom ash concrete. The cubes were tested for the compressive strength and beams specimens were tested for flexural strength. Splitting tensile strength tests were conducted on cylinder specimens. The total numbers of 60 cubes, 40 beams specimens and 40 numbers of cylinders were tested for compressive strength, flexural strength and splitting tensile strength respectively at different ages to study the following aspects:
-
The effect on unit weight of concrete after incorporating varying proportions of bottom ash.
-
The effect of bottom ash on workability (C.F) of fresh concrete.
-
The effect on compressive, flexural and splitting tensile strength using bottom ash in varying percentages as a partial replacement of fine aggregates.
-
REFERENCES
-
T. U. Ganiron Jr, Scrap Waste Tire as an Additive in Asphalt Pavement for Road Construction,
-
International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences, vol. 1, no. 2, (2012), pp. 31-37.
-
2.T. U. Ganiron Jr, Concrete Debris a Fine Aggregate for Architectural Finishing Mortar, Architectural
-
4.T. U. Ganiron Jr, Effects of Rice Hush as Substitute for Fine Aggregate in Concrete Mixture, International
-
Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, vol. 58, (2013).
-
5.T. U. Ganiron Jr, Technical Specification of Concrete Hollow Blocks with Coconut Shells and Fiber as
-
Aggregate, Proceedings of the 1st International Concrete Sustainability, (2013) May 27, Tokyo, Japan.
-
6.H. Vogg and L. Stieglitz, Thermal behavior of PCDD/PCDF in Fly Ash from Municipal Incinerators,
-
7.Akthem A.Av-Manaseeer, Moir D.Hang and Karum W.Nasser Compressive strength of concrete containing fly ash, Brine and Admixture ACI Material J. March-April 1988, pp 109-116.
-
8.Chai Jaturapitakkul & Raungrut Cheerarot Development of Bottom Ash as pozzolainic material J. of materials in Civil
Engineering Jan-Feb 2003, pp48-53.
-
9.Gambhir M.L. Concrete Technology, Publisher Tata McGraw Hill.
-
10.IS:383-1970. Specifications for Coarse and Fine Aggregates from Natural sources for Concrete Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
-
11.IS:516-1959. Indian Standard Code of Practice Methods of Test for Strength of Concrete Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
-
12.IS:1199-1959. Indian Standard Methods of Sampling and analysis of Concrete, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
-
13.IS:8112-1989. Specifications for 43 Grade Portland Cement, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
-
14.IS:10262-1982. Recommended guidelines for Concrete Mix Design Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
-
15.J.Pera, L.Coutaxz, J.Ambroise, M Chababbet Use of incinerator Bottom Ash in concrete Cement and Concrete Research vlume 27, 1997, pp 1-5.
Author Profile: Manju Hooda,B.Tech., M. Tech. Scholar in Civil Engineering (Structural Design) from Ganga Institute of Technology and Management, Kablana, Jhajjar, Haryana (India) affiliated to Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana (India).