Morphological Modifications of the Gamma Induced Polymer

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS121180

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Morphological Modifications of the Gamma Induced Polymer

Meenakshi Choudhary1*, Sangeeta Prasher2, Mukesh kumar3

  1. Singhania University, Rajasthan, India-333515

  2. Department of Physics, Kanya Maha Vidyalaya, Vidyalaya Marg, Jalandhar, India-144004

  3. Department of Physics, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, India-144004

ABSTRACT

Soon after the discovery of polymeric materials it became evident that they were quite sensitive to radiation of all kinds. In the present studies CR-39 polycarbonate was irradiated with gamma radiation at different doses from 1KGy to 125KGy. The morphological changes were studied by XRD technique. The structural parameters such as degree of crystallinity and crystallite size were found to increase with gamma irradiation in case of CR-39 which may be perhaps due to the increase in the Vanderwal bonding of more polymeric species in the crystallite. Microstrain had also been calculated which shows that the polymer has compressive strength. Interplanar and interchain distances are marginally changed in the sample.

Keywords: CR-39, Gamma radiation, XRD.

INTRODUCTION

The irradiation of polymeric materials with ionizing radiations [1, 2], (gamma rays, X rays, accelerated electrons, ion beams) leads to the formation of very reactive intermediates. These intermediates can follow several reaction paths, which result in rearrangements and/or formation of new bonds and leads to significant changes in structural [3-7] and thermal [8] properties. The ultimate effects of these reactions can be the formation of oxidized products, grafts, scission of main chains (degradation) or cross-linking. The degree of these transformations depends on the structure of the polymer and the conditions

of treatment before, during and after irradiation. XRD technique has been utilized to detect changes in crystalline and amorphous regions along with the degree of crystallinity and micro strain of materials through interaction of X-ray beams with samples.

EXPERIMENTAL

For the present work, the sample CR-39 (procured from Pershore Mouldings Ltd. has been cut from a sheet of average thickness of 230 µm. The samples were washed in NaOH and then with running tap water to remove the dust impurities of the polymer.

For gamma irradiation the samples, of size 2 cm2 each, were irradiated at IUAC, New Delhi by using gamma radiation source of 60Co in the high vacuum radiation chamber (106 mm dia x 140 mm ht in the form of cylindrical chamber with dose rate 9 kGy/hr or 160 Gy/min) and source strength 185 TBq 5000 Ci) One sample was kept as virgin for reference and the other samples were exposed so as to achieve the doses of 1, 5, 25 and 125 kGy respectively

For XRD Panalytical's X'Pert Pro has been used at SAIF Chandigarh working at 40 KV and 25mA. The instrument consists of vertical theta- theta goniometer having range of 0°-160° 2 theta. The radiation used has been Cu K-alpha-1 where as nickel metal is used as beta filter.

COLOR CHANGES

Colour is also an issue for many materials. Colour transformations are common in irradiation processes of polymers [9, 10]. Most polymers turn yellow or brown upon exposure to relatively low radiation doses, due partly to inherent colour centre formation of macromolecular material arising from a combination of trapped radicals and permanent structural changes in the macromolecules which include conjugated chromospheres [11, 12].

The colour transformations have also been observed in CR-39 (fig.1) with the exposure to gamma radiations. The samples which had been originally colourless got yellowish tinge on exposure with IR radiation and thereafter become brown. This may be due to the dissolution of atmospheric oxygen to the polymeric conformation during the exposure which enhances the colour centres in the sample. It may also be attributed to the trapped free radicals or charge species in the polymer.

CP C125

Fig. 1 Color Changes in pristine and irradiated CR-39

STRUCTURAL CHANGES (XRD ANALYSIS)

The XRD spectra of pristine and gamma irradiated CR-39 polymer is as shown in fig.2. The crystallinity peak of CR-39 has been observed at 2 = 20.27° corresponding to d spacing 4.40Å indicating the crystals beneath the top layer of the polymer and polymer is amorphous in nature.

The intensity variations are vibratory in case of CR-39 through an overall leaning inclination towards higher gamma irradiation. The overall decrease in intensity of peak shows the increase in amorphicity of the samples due to gamma irradiation, indicating that the structural conformation of the polymer has been

modified due to irradiation at higher doses.

However, no shift in peak position

has been noticed. This implies that lattice parameter does not change during irradiation of CR-39 films under the studied conditions. Similar observations have been reported [13] in case of 35

MeV/u Ar+ irradiated PET.

The full-width at half-maximum height (FWHM) of the diffraction peaks were calculated by fitting the X-ray diffraction data with a Gaussian Lorentzian function and the average crystallite size commonly known as grain size L for pristine and irradiated samples was estimated by calculating the broadening of the diffraction peaks

according to the Scherrer equation [14], as given below

L = K / Cos

where K is the Scherrer constant, which depends upon lattice direction and crystallite morphology (0.9 is used in this study), and = 1.54 Ã… is the wavelength of the Cu- K x-ray radiation used, is the FWHM of the diffraction peak and is the Bragg angle (radian). The change in the crystallinity of both of the polymers was calculated using the following formula: [15].

The results obtained for grain size and percentage crystallinity of CR-39 has been summarized in table 1. The crystalline size has been found to increase with gamma irradiation in case of CR-39. The increase in the crystalline size when irradiated with gamma rays may be perhaps due to the increase in the Vanderwal bonding of more polymeric species in the crystallite. The result has been found to match with the

study of Singh [16], carried out with Carbon ion beam irradiated PET at Dose 1011 ions/cm2 and Narwal et al. [17] carried out with IR irradiated CR-39 polymer. However the crystallite size decrease at dose 25KGy, which indicates the weaking of vanderwal forces at this dose and detachment of polymeric units

from the crystallite.

The interplanar spacing (d) of a set of planes in a crystal is related to the Bragg angle and the wavelength () by the expression.

d = /2sin (1)

If du indicates the unirradiated spacing and di the spacing in the irradiated polymer, the variation in microstrain [18]

d/d to be calculated in the particles in the direction normal to the diffracting plane is

= d/d = (di du) /du

The microstrain of the sample due to irradiation was calculated using the Eq.

(1) and is given in table 1. Since di<du, then d/d is negative indicating generation of residual compressive stress in the surface [19]. The compressive strength of a material is the compressive force per unit area that it can withstand. The graph betweend and d for CR-39 is shown in fig.3. The interchain distance (r), and distortion parameters (lattice strain) (g) have been calculated using the following relations [20].

Interplanar and interchain distances were marginally changed in the sample because the angle of the peak () did not vary significantl. The lattice strain decrease with dose in case of CR-39.

700

600

CRP CR1 CR5 CR25 CR125

500

Intensity

Intensity

400

300

200

100

0

0 10 20 30 40 50

2(Degree)

Fig.2 Intensity versus 2 (degree) for pristine and IR irradiated CR-39

CR39

CR39

0.02

0.00

-0.02

d

d

-0.04

-0.06

-0.08

-0.10

4.30 4.32 4.34 4.36 4.38 4.40 4.42

d(Ã…)

Fig. 3 The d versus d of gamma irradiated CR-39 polymer

Table 1 XRD data for CR-39

Dose (KGy)

Peak angle (),degree

FWHM

()

K (%)

L (Ã…)

r (Ã…)

g (%)

d (Ã…)

d

0

0.176

0.149

46

9.79

5.48

0.83

4.40

0

0

1

0.178

0.143

56

10.21

5.42

0.79

4.35

-0.05

-0.011

5

0.179

0.136

57

10.75

5.39

0.75

4.32

-0.08

-0.018

25

0.175

0.155

53

9.40

5.51

0.87

4.42

0.02

0.004

125

0.180

0.143

53

10.14

5.36

0.79

4.30

-0.10

-0.023

REFERENCES

  1. Sangappa, T. Demappa, Mahadevaiah, S. Ganesha, S. Divakara, M. Pattabi and R. Somashekar (2008), Physical and Thermal Properties of 8 MeV Electron Beam Irradiated HPMC Polymer Films, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 266, 3975-3980.

  2. A. Harisha, V. Ravindrachary, R.F. Bhajantri, Ismayil, G. Sanjeev, B. Poojary, D. Dutta and P. K. Pujari (2008), Electron Irradiation Induced Microstructural Modifications in BaCl2 Doped PVA: A Positron Annihilation Study, Polymer Degradation and Stability, 93, 1554-1563.

  3. A. Rivaton, J. Arnold (2008), Structural Modifications of Polymers under the Impact of Fast Neutrons, Polymer Degradation and Stability, 93, 1864-1868.

  4. S. Shah, A. Qureshi, N.L. Singh,

    P.K. Kulriya, K.P. Singh, D.K. Avasthi (2009), Structural and Chemical Modification of Polymer Composite by Proton Irradiation, Surface & Coatings Technology, 203, 2595-2599.

  5. R. C. Ramola, S. Chandra, A. Negi,

J.M.S. Rana, S. Annapoorni, R.G. Sonkawade, P.K. Kulriya and

A. Srivastava (2009), Study of Optical Band Gap, Carbonaceous Clusters and Structuring in CR-39 and PET Polymers Irradiated by

100 MeV O7+ Ions, Physica B, 404, 26-30.

  1. G.M. Wallner, W. Platzer and R. W. Lang (2005), Structure- Property, Correlations of Polymeric Films for Transparent Insulation Wall Applications. Part 2: Infrared Optical Pro- perties, Solar Energy, 79,593- 602.

  2. L. Calcagno, G. Compagnini and G. Foti (1992), Structural Modification

    of Polymer Films by Ion Irradiation, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B,65, 413-422.

  3. D. Sinha and K. K. Dwivedi (2003), Radiation-Induced Modi- fication on Thermal Properties of Different Nuclear Track Detectors, Radiation Measurements, 36, 713-718.

  1. Z. Mokrani (2003), Characterization of Chemical An Optical Modifications Induced By 22.5 MeV Proton Beams In CR-39 Detectors, Radiation Measurements, 36, 615-620.

  2. S. Singh, S. Prasher (2004), UV- VIS Spectroscopic And Etching Studies of IR Exposed CR-39 Plastic Track Detector, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 215, 169-173.

  3. R.L. Clough, G.M. Malone, K.T. Gillen, J.S. Wallace, M.B. Sinclair (1995), Discoloration and subsequent recovery of optical polymers exposed to ionizing radiation Polymer dergardation and Stability, 49, 305.

  4. J.S. Wallace, M.B. Sinclair, K.T. Gillen, R.L. Clough (1993), Color center annealing in – irradiated polystyrene, under vacuum and air atmospheres, Radiation

    Physics and Chemistry, 41, 85-100.

  5. C. Liu, Z. Zhu, Y. Jin, Y. Sun, M. Hou, Z. Wang, X. Chen, C. Zhang, J. Liu, B. Li,

    Y. Wang, (2000). Nucl. Instr. And Meth.In Physics Research Section B 166-167,

    p. 641-645

  6. A.L. Patterson (1939), The Scherrer formula for X-ray particle size determination, Physics Review, 56, 978982.

  7. R. C. Ramola, S. Chandra, A. Negi,

    J.M.S. Rana, S. Annapoorni, R.G. Sonkawade, P.K. Kulriya and A. Srivastava (2009), Study of Optical

    Band Gap, Carbonaceous Clusters and Structuring in CR-39 and PET Polymers Irradiated by 100 MeV O7+ Ions, Physica B, 404, 26- 30.

  8. V. Singh, T. Singh, A. Chandra, S.K. Bandyopadhyay, P. Sen, K. Witte,

    U.W. Scherer, A. Srivastava (2006), Swift Heavy Ion Induced Modification In PET: Structural And Thermal Properties, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in

    Physics Research B 244, p.

    243-247.

  9. M. Narwal, S. Prasher, M. Kumar (2009), Comparative Study on the Influence of IR Radiations to Some Polymers, Asian Journal of Chemistry Vol. 21, No. 10 (2009), S216-219

  10. B.D. Cullity (1978, Elements of X- ray Diffraction, Addison Wasley Publishing company Inc.,

    London , 286.

  11. B. Mallick, R.C. Behera, T. Patel,

    S.N. Sarangi, S.N. Sahu, R.K. Choudhary (2006), Microstrain Analysis of Proton Irradiated PET Microfiber, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 248, 305-310.

  12. S. Chattopadhy, T. K. Chaki, A. K. Bhowmick (2001), Journal of Applied Polymer Sciences, 81, 1936.

Leave a Reply