Myth Associated with Rewound Induction Motor-An Analysis

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS110902

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Myth Associated with Rewound Induction Motor-An Analysis

Keerti Rai1 S B L Seksena2 A N Thakur3

Research Scholar Professor Professor

Department of Electrical Engg., NIT, Jamshedpur

Abstract

Induction Motors (IM) are the horse power of any industry and they consume most of the energy. To reduce energy consumption, it is necessary to find a way for energy saving and for sustainable development. In this paper an attempt has been made to remove this myth which is associated with rewound induction motor, by an analytic approach. If the efficiency of rewound motor is found approaching to that of new motor, rewound motor may be proffered as replacement for the new one. This paper explains the approach carried on investigating the individual efficiency of rewound IM as well as that of the new motor. On the basis of the analysis, efficiency of new motor compared with that of the rewound induction motor and it has been investigated that rewound motor up to a rating of 15 hp may be recommended as an replacement for the new motor at full load.

Keywords: Rewound Induction Motor, New Induction Motor, Efficiency.

  1. Introduction

    The major source of energy consumption in an industry is electrical motors. About 70 percent of energy is consumed by induction motors in industries hence, it is important to focus on energy saving. If winding of induction motor is burnt at early stage, there is need for replacement and there are two options for it ,i.e either to purchase a new induction motor or to rewind the same motor. There is a myth associated with rewound induction motor that it is not efficient as the new motor, owing to high running cost & not suitable for sustainable development. In this paper the rewound IMs of different horsepower were analyzed for all types of losses to determine their efficiencies. These efficiencies of both the induction motors (Rewound and New) are compared, which reveals that the replacement of rewound induction motor for new motor is an viable option which helps not only in energy saving but also sustainable development may also be achieved successfully.

  2. Method

    The parameters (rated and measured) of the motors are recorded. These parameters are then used for determining the efficiencies of the induction motors (Rewound and New). The instrument used for measurement of the parameters are described in Table 1 below;

    Table1. Parameters and Measuring Instruments Used

    To analyze the machine some strategies are to be followed. Fig.1 shows the procedure for analyzing the motor behavior [6]. Rated Parameters of 3- phase, 4 poles. 50 Hz Induction motor is given Table2.

    INFORMATION ABOUT MOTOR

    SELECTION OF MOTOR FOR ENERGY SAVING

    ANALYZING THE MOTOR FOR ENERGY SAVING

    Fig.1 Procedure to Analyze the Motor

    The Parameters (measured and calculated) of New and Rewound Induction Motors are shown in Table 2 and Table3

    Rating of Motor (HP)

    New/Rewound IM

    Power (kW)

    Voltage (V)

    Current (A)

    Speed (RPM)

    15

    New

    12

    415

    19

    1460

    Rewound

    12

    415

    19

    1460

    20

    New

    15

    415

    20

    1460

    Rewound

    15

    415

    20

    1460

    50

    New

    37

    415

    62

    1480

    Rewound

    37

    415

    62

    1480

    100

    New

    75

    415

    122

    1480

    Rewound

    75

    415

    122

    1480

    Table. 2 Rated Parameters of New and Rewound induction motor

    .

    Rating of Motor (HP)

    New/ Rewoud IM

    No Load Current Inl

    (A)

    No Load Speed N1 (RPM)

    Winding Temp. of Still Motor T1 (C)

    Resistance at Room Temp. R1 ()

    Winding Temp. of No Load Motor T2 (C)

    Winding Temp. of Full Load Motor

    T3 (C)

    15

    New

    15.00

    1480

    13

    0.5

    34

    140

    Rewound

    13.00

    1480

    15

    0.8

    43

    142

    20

    New

    17.00

    1490

    23

    0.25

    39

    137

    Rewound

    14.00

    1490

    25

    1.20

    41

    141

    50

    New

    27.00

    1495

    27

    0.11

    39

    110

    Rewound

    22.00

    1490

    30

    0.87

    43

    141

    100

    New

    81.00

    1495

    40

    0.05

    43

    120

    Rewound

    79.00

    1495

    42

    0.45

    46

    132

    Table. 3.1 Measured Parameters of New and Rewound induction motor

    Rating of Motor (HP)

    New/Rewound IM

    Full Load Voltage vFL(V)

    Full Load Current Ifl (A)

    Full Load Input Power Pfl(Kw)

    Full Load Speed

    N2 (RPM)

    No Load Input Power Pnl (W)

    15

    New

    415.00

    24.00

    13.50

    1475

    523

    Rewound

    410.00

    25.00

    13.50

    1470

    589

    20

    New

    415.00

    32.00

    15.00

    1475

    615

    Rewound

    410.00

    34.00

    17.30

    1475

    660

    50

    New

    415.00

    66.00

    41.00

    1485

    1290

    Rewound

    415.00

    68.00

    43.00

    1480

    1800

    100

    New

    415.00

    100.00

    85.00

    1485

    2700

    Rewound

    415.00

    105.00

    85.50

    1485

    3000

    Table. 3.2 Measured Parameters of New and Rewound induction motor

    Calculated Parameters for 15 HP Rewound Induction motor at full load;

    Synchronous speed, =

    120 × f P

    120 × 50

    =

    = 1500 rpm

    Full-load rotor loss,

    Stator resistance at no-load,

    =

    × 2

    235 + 2

    235 + 43

    100

    = 2 × 13500 754.00 438.66

    2 = 1 × 235 + = 0.80 × +

    100

    1

    = 0.89

    Stator resistance at load,

    235 15

    = 246.15

    Stray losses,

    3

    3

    235 +T 235 +142

    R3 = R1 × = 0.80 × = 1.21

    = 0.015 ×

    = 0.015 × 13500

    235 +T1

    235 +15

    = 202.5

    Stator Copper. loss,

    1 = 2 × 2 = 132 × 0.89 = 150.34

    Stator Copper. loss,

    Full-load output power,

    Poutput = Pfl Pstray Pr Pst 2

    = 13500 202.5 246.15 754.00

    = 12297.35W

    Efficiency at full-load,

    =

    2

    ×

    = 252 × 1.21 = 754.00

    2

    3

    12297.35

    Iron + Friction & Windage losses,

    =

    =

    = 91.09

    13500

    + = 1 = 589 150.34

    = 438.66

    No-load slip,

    1

    After comparing this efficiency of the rewound induction motor with efficiency of new induction motor, On the basis of above calculations it is found that there is not so much difference in both the efficiencies.

    Same procedure is applied to all the motors. Table 4 shows the calculated parameters for different rating

    % =

    × 100

    of motors.

    1500 1480

    =

    1500

    × 100

    Full-load slip,

    = 1.33%

    2

    % = × 100

    1500 1475

    =

    1500

    × 100 = 2%

    Rating of Motor (HP)

    New/Rewou nd IM

    Synchronous Speed Ns(RPM)

    Stator Resistance of No load Motor R2 ()

    Stator Resistance at Load R3 ()

    Stator Cu. Loss at No Load Pst (W)

    Stator Cu. Loss at Full Load Pst2 (W)

    15

    New

    1500

    0.54

    0.76

    122.03

    435.48

    Rewound

    1500

    0.89

    1.21

    150.34

    754.00

    20

    New

    1500

    0.27

    0.36

    76.73

    369.12

    Rewound

    1500

    1.27

    1.74

    249.67

    2006.10

    50

    New

    1500

    0.12

    0.14

    83.86

    630.95

    Rewound

    1500

    0.91

    1.23

    441.74

    5707.94

    100

    New

    1500

    0.05

    0.06

    331.63

    645.45

    Rewound

    1500

    0.46

    0.60

    2849.01

    6573.21

    Table 4.1 Calculated Parameters of New and Rewound Induction Motor at different rating

    Rating of Motor (HP)

    New/Rewound IM

    Iron and F &W Losses Pi+Pf&w (W)

    No Load Slip Snl (%)

    Full Load Slip Sfl (%)

    Full Load Rotor Losses Pr (W)

    Stray Losses Pstray (W)

    Full Load O/P Power Poutput (W)

    Efficiency at Full Load (%)

    15

    New

    400.97

    1.33

    1.67

    211.06

    202.50

    12650.96

    93.71

    Rewound

    438.66

    1.33

    2.00

    246.15

    202.50

    12297.35

    91.09

    20

    New

    538.27

    0.67

    1.67

    234.88

    225.00

    14171.01

    94.47

    Rewound

    410.33

    0.67

    1.67

    248.06

    259.50

    14786.34

    85.47

    50

    New

    1206.14

    0.33

    1.00

    391.63

    615.00

    39362.42

    96.01

    Rewound

    1358.26

    0.67

    1.33

    479.12

    645.00

    36167.95

    84.11

    100

    New

    2368.37

    0.33

    1.00

    819.86

    1275.00

    82259.68

    96.78

    Rewound

    150.99

    0.33

    1.00

    787.76

    1282.50

    76856.53

    89.89

    Table 4.2 Calculated Parameters of New and Rewound Induction Motor at different rating

    Comparison of the efficiencies of the new and rewound induction motors are shown in Table 5. The results in Table 5 have been expressed in Figure 2 in a more convening way.

    HP

    Efficiency of New Motor

    Efficiency of Rewound Motor

    15

    93.71

    91.09

    20

    94.47

    85.47

    50

    96.01

    84.11

    100

    96.78

    89.89

    Table 5 Comparison of the efficiency of New and Rewound induction motor.

    Fig. 2 Efficiency vs Rating of New and Rewound IMs

  3. Results and Discussions

    It is investigated after analysis the Efficiency of the rewound motor varies. The results shown in Table5, for 15 hp there is not so much difference, but as goes to higher rating of motor the variation of efficiencies increases. On the basis of these results it can be recommended that, for lower rating of motor (up to 15 hp) rewound IM may be used as replacement.

    The multiple rewinds adopting the best practices may also improve efficiency of the rewound induction motor slightly by a margin of 0.2 percent but at the cost of multiple rewound attempts.

  4. Conclusion

    Efficiency decreases by the use of rewound IM is proved to be an absolute myth. After analysis carried out in this paper, it is found that for low rating of induction motor i.e up to 15hp rewound IM may be preferred for replacement of a faulty induction motor (w.r.t winding) by a new one.

  5. Acknowledgment

    The authors would like thank and express their gratitude to Electrical Engg. Dept. and Computer Center of NIT Jamshedpur fore extending valuable technical support require to carry out this investigation.

  6. Refernces

  1. John S. H., John D. K., Comparison of Induction Motor Field Efficiency Evaluation Method, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Applications, Vol. 34, No. 1, Jan/Feb 1998.

  2. Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE), Energy Efficiency in Electrical Utilities: Electric Motors, Available at: http://emtindia. com/BEE-Exam/GuideBooks/book3.pdf .

  3. Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE), Energy Performance Assessment for Equipment & Utility Systems: Electric Motors and Variables Speed Drives, Available at: http://emtindia. com/BEE-

    Exam/GuideBooks/book4.pdf

  4. Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE), General Aspect of Energy Management and Energy Audit: Financial Management, Available at: http://emt-india.com/BEE-Exam/ GuideBooksbook1.pdf.Gajendra Singh,N K Sharma, P Tiwari, Pankaj Mishra, Energy Efficient Industrial Motors, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2010, Vol. 2(12), 7904-7913.

  5. Mandeep Verma and Jatin Gupta Efficiency of rewound Induction Motors in a Textile Plant: An Analysis, International Journal of Electronics Engg, 3 (2), 2011, pp. 185-187.

  6. Neena Malhotra, Shivani Sehgal, Efficiency of Rewound Induction Motor in Sugar Mill, International Journal of Computer Applications, Oct 2012 Volume 55 No.5.

  7. .Austin Bonnett, Brain Gibbon, The Results Are In: Motor Repais Impact On Efficiency White Paper, Reliable Solutions Today, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, 2002.

  8. HM Mzungu, P Barendse, MA Khan and M Manyage, Determination of effects on Induction Motor Efficiency,time etable.cput.ac., 12 Feb, 2005.

Leave a Reply