Optimization of CNC Turning for EN36 Alloy Steel Using Coated Carbide insert

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV6IS110227

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Optimization of CNC Turning for EN36 Alloy Steel Using Coated Carbide insert

Shalaka Jadhav

P.G. Student

Department of Mechanical Engineering Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil of Engineering Satara, India

Vijay Sabnis

Associate Professor Department of Production Engineering

Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil of Engineering, Satara Satara, India

Abstract: This study applies Taguchis design of experiment methodology for optimization of process parameters in CNC Turning of EN36 Alloy Steel using coated carbide. Experiments have been carried out based on L27 orthogonal array with three process parameters namely cutting speed, feed and depth of cut for surface roughness, material removal rate and cylindricity. Experiments were conducted under dry environment. The optimal parameter combinations for surface roughness, material removal rate and cylindricity were found out. ANOVA was performed to know which input parameter has most significant effect on performance measures.

Keywords: CNC Turning, EN36 Alloy Steel, Taguchi, ANOVE

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Turning is basic and most widely used cutting operation in metal cutting industries [1]. Modern industries strive hard to achieve improved quality of product and this can be achieved by selection of proper material and method [2]. S.J. Raykar et.al [3]The study optimized the cutting parameters for high speed turning of Al7075, were grey relational analysis has been used for multi-optimization. The recommended cutting parameters were 200 m/min speed, 0.1 mm/rev feed, and 0.5 mm depth of cut with coated carbide insert in dry condition.

    M. Murali Mohan et.al [4] the optimization of EN36 Alloy steel was performed using RSM. Results showed that temperature is mainly affected by depth of cut while surface roughness by feed. Sayak Mukherjee et.al [5] studied effect of cutting parameters on material removal rate was studied. An optimum combination was obtained and the study was also useful for computer aided process planning. Shreemony kumar Nayak et.al [6] paper aims at investigating influence of different cutting parameters on different performance measures in dry turning of AISI304 using ISO P30 uncoated cemented carbide cutting tool. Optimum parametric combinations were found out for different responses. Even attempt was made to simultaneously optimize machining parameters using grey relational analysis. 88.76% of improvement was found in GRG. Sundrendra Kumar Saini et.al [7] in this research work CNC Turning of Al8011 is performed using carbide inserts. The optimum sets as well as combined effect were estimated using Taguchi-fuzzy

    application. Analysis showed that feed is the most significant process parameter followed by depth of cut and cutting speed.

    B. Singarvel et.al [8] analyzed, optimization is performed using taguchi based utility concept coupled with principal component analysis turning of EN25 steel with PVD and CVD coated tools. Results showed that principle component analysis is successfully employed for estimation of weight factors. The result of ANOVA shows that coated tool is most significant parameter followed by cutting speed. R. Deepak Joel Johnson et.AL [9] an effort has been made to reduce the quantity of cutting fluid used. The optimization of cutting parameters and fluid application parameters was done for turning of OHNS steel with minimal cutting fluid application using taguchi technique. The results clearly indicated that minimal cutting fluid application enhanced the cutting performances by improving surface finis. Harsh Y Valera et.al

    [10] presents experimental study of power consumption and surface roughness for turning of EN31 alloy steel. Result showed that all cutting parameters significantly affect the responses. Ashok Kumar Sahoo et.al [11] studied taguchi DOE and regression analysis for optimization of process parameters in turning AISI 1040 steel using coated carbide insert under dry condition. L9 orthogonal array was used. Optimum parameter combinations were found. Further grey relational analysis combines with taguchi method has been proposed. Results show good agreement between estimated value and experimental value. The improved grey relational grade is found to be 0.284. B. C. Routaru et. al [12] made an attempt has been made to optimize the surface roughness prediction model using genetic algorithm to find optimum cutting parameters [12]
  2. MATERIAL

The work piece material selected for this study was EN36 Alloy steel which is widely used in disc wheels, grooved parts, and gears, heavy duty gears for aircrafts, heavy vehicles and automobile parts. Workpiece used was a cylindrical bar having dimensions Ø34 mm x 90 mm. Chemical composition was checked at Material test Laboratory, Mumbai.

Table 1: Chemical composition of EN36 Alloy steel (%)

C

Si

Mn

P

S

Cr

Mo

Ni

0.1430

0.2200

0.4100

0.0260

0.0180

0.7900

0.1900

3.2800

III METHODOLOGY

Taguchis method is one of the effective experimentation techniques in improving quality and cutting down cost at same time. In Taguchis method, quality is measured by deviation of

2. Higher-the-better

=-10log (2)

a characteristic from its target value. A loss function is developed for this deviation. Since the elimination of noise factors is impractical and often impossible, the taguchi method seeks to minimize the effect of noise and to determine the optimal level of important controllable factors based on concept of robustness. Taguchi method uses a special design of orthogonal array to study the entire parameters space with only a small number of experiments. ANOVA was performed to find the most significant factor that affect response.

In current study Smaller-the- better characteristics is used for Surface roughness and Cylindricity whereas Higher- the- better characteristics is used for Material removal rate.

The equations for calculating S/N ratios for as follows:

  1. Lower-the-better

=-10log (1)

IV EXPERIMENTAL SETUP

Figure.1 shows experimental setup for machining EN36 Alloy steel using coated carbide insert. Turning experiment was conducted using Feeler CNC Lathe FTC-20. All the experiments were conducted under dry environment. Coated carbide insert was used as cutting tool with ISO Coding TNMG160408MP and with tool holder PTLNR2020. All experimental runs were carried out under dry environment.

The experiment was carried out with out with controllable 3- level factors and 3 response variable. The present paper deals with 3 process parameters i.e. , Cutting speed, Feed and Depth of cut and 3 response factors, Surface roughness (Ra), Material Removal Rate (MRR) and Cylindricity (Ø).

Based on Taguchis design of experiment and orthogonal array L27, total 27 experiments were carried out. Table 2 shows process parameters and their levels.

Figure.1: Photographic view of experimental setup for machining

.

Table 2: Process Parameters and their levels

Sr.no

Factors

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

1

Cutting speed ( ) (m/min)

140

150

160

2

Feed (f) (mm/rev)

0.18

0.20

<>0.22

3

Depth of cut ( ) (mm)

0.5

1

1.5

V. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

All twenty-seven experimental runs are tabulated in Table 3 along with input parameters setting and experimental results. Reading for respective performance measure was taken. Mitutoya surface roughness was used for measurement of surface roughness (Ra). Cylindricity was measured using CMM.

Table 4 shows experimental results and S/N ratios for Ra, MRR and Cylindricity

Table 3: Taguchi L27 Orthogonal Array for experimental runs and results

Expt no.

Process parameters

Experimental results

(m/min)

f (mm/rev)

(mm)

Ra (µm)

MRR

(g/min)

Ø

(mm)

1

140

0.18

0.5

1.461

10.435

0.0192

2

140

0.18

1

1.498

41.739

0.0181

3

140

0.18

1.5

1.481

73.043

0.0127

4

140

0.20

0.5

1.690

28.571

0.0243

5

140

0.20

1

1.620

57.143

0.0205

6

140

0.20

1.5

1.654

85.714

0.0175

7

140

0.22

0.5

1.930

18.000

0.0193

8

140

0.22

1

1.937

60.000

0.0183

9

140

0.22

1.5

1.907

96.000

0.0155

10

150

0.18

0.5

1.161

16.364

0.0221

11

150

0.18

1

1.256

54.545

0.0201

12

150

0.18

1.5

1.261

87.273

0.0185

13

150

0.20

0.5

1.387

24.000

0.0279

14

150

0.20

1

1.422

54.000

0.0245

15

150

0.20

1.5

1.310

96.000

0.0211

16

150

0.22

0.5

1.497

25.263

0.0235

17

150

0.22

1

1.645

63.158

0.0219

18

150

0.22

1.5

1.491

101.053

0.0186

19

160

0.18

0.5

1.112

22.857

0.0183

20

160

0.18

1

1.285

51.429

0.0181

21

160

0.18

1.5

1.097

91.429

0.0141

22

160

0.20

0.5

1.307

25.263

0.0237

23

160

0.20

1

1.390

69.474

0.0224

24

160

0.20

1.5

1.458

83.000

0.0186

25

160

0.22

0.5

1.596

54.000

0.0209

26

160

0.22

1

1.667

73.333

0.0184

27

160

0.22

1.5

1.643

106.667

0.0162

Table 4: Experimental results and S/N ratios for Ra, MRR and Ø

Expt no.

Experimental results

S/N Ratios

Ra

(µm)

MRR

(g/min)

Ø

(mm)

Ra

MRR

Ø

1

1.461

10.435

0.0192

-3.29300

20.3697

34.3340

2

1.498

41.739

0.0181

-3.51024

32.4109

34.8464

3

1.481

73.043

0.0127

-3.41110

37.2716

37.9239

4

1.690

28.571

0.0243

-4.55773

29.1186

32.2879

5

1.620

57.143

0.0205

-4.19030

35.1392

33.7649

6

1.654

85.714

0.0175

-4.37071

38.6611

35.1392

7

1.930

18.000

0.0193

-5.71115

25.105

34.2889

8

1.937

60.000

0.0183

-5.74259

35.5630

34.7510

9

1.907

96.000

0.0155

-5.60701

39.6454

36.1934

10

1.161

16.364

0.0221

-1.29664

24.2776

33.1122

11

1.256

54.545

0.0201

-1.97979

34.7352

33.9361

12

1.261

87.273

0.0185

-2.01430

38.8176

34.6566

13

1.387

24.000

0.0279

-2.84153

27.6042

31.0879

14

1.422

54.000

0.0245

-3.05799

34.6479

32.2167

15

1.310

96.000

0.0211

-2.34543

39.6454

33.1544

16

1.497

25.263

0.0235

-3.50444

28.0498

32.5786

17

1.645

63.158

0.0219

-4.32332

36.0086

33.1911

18

1.491

101.053

0.0186

-3.46955

40.0910

34.6097

19

1.112

22.857

0.0183

-0.92210

27.1804

34.7510

20

1.285

51.429

0.0181

-2.17806

34.2241

34.8464

21

1.097

91.429

0.0141

-0.80413

39.2216

37.0156

22

1.307

25.263

0.0237

-2.32551

28.0498

32.5050

23

1.390

69.474

0.0224

-2.86030

36.8364

32.9950

24

1.458

83.000

0.0186

-3.27515

38.3316

34.6067

25

1.596

54.000

0.0209

-4.06066

34.6479

33.5917

26

1.667

73.333

0.0184

-4.43871

37.3060

34.7036

27

1.643

106.667

0.0162

-4.31275

40.5606

35.9176

The optimal para,eteric combinations for each performance measure were found by main effect plots for S/N Ratios.

The level of parameter with highest S/N ratio gives the optimal level.

Figure 2 shows main effect plot for Ra. The optimal prameteric combination for Ra is 2f11. Thus, optimum parameter value for minimum surface roughness is 150 m/min cutting speed, feed 0.18 mm/rev and depth of cut is 0.5 mm. Further ANOVA was performed. Table 5 shows ANOVA for Ra.

The experimental results were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for identifying the significant factors affecting the performance measures. The results of ANOVA for Ra are shown in Table 7.This analysis was carried out for a significance level of 0.05 (Confidence level of 95 %). The ANOVA result shows that, the F-value for the cutting speed and feed is larger than that of the depth of cut i.e. the largest contribution to the workpiece surface roughness or finish is due to the feed rate. Feed rate (the most significance factor) contributed 55.06 % for Ra.

Figure 2: Main effects plot for S/N ratio of Ra

Table 5: ANOVA for Ra

Factors

DF

SS

MS

F-value

P-value

Contribution%

Cutting speed

2

0.53508

0.267542

77.24

0.000

38.53

Feed

2

0.76470

0.382350

110.39

0.000

55.06

Depth of cut

2

0.01985

0.009924

2.87

0.081

1.42

Error

20

0.06927

0.003464

4.99

Total

26

1.38890

100

Figure.3: Main effects plot for S/N ratio of MRR

Figure 3 shows main effect plot for MRR. The optimal prameteric combination for MRR is 3f33. Thus, optimum parameter value for minimum surface roughness is 160 m/min cutting speed, feed 0.22 mm/rev and depth of cut is

1.5 mm. Further ANOVA was performed. Table 6 shows

ANOVA for MRR. Table 6 shows the realized significance levels, associated with the F-tests for each source of variation. The ANOVA result shows that the F-value for the depth of cut and feed is larger than the cutting speed i.e. the largest contribution to the MRR is due the depth of cut. Depth of cut contributes 83.73% for MRR.

Table 6: ANOVA for MRR

Factors

DF

SS

MS

F-value

P-value

Contribution%

Cutting speed

2

634.2

317.08

7.08

0.005

2.83

Feed

2

1222.8

611.41

13.65

0.000

5.45

Depth of cut

2

19696.6

9848.29

219.89

0.000

87.73

Error

20

895.8

44.79

3.99

Total

26

22449.3

100

Figure 4: Main effect plot for S/N ratios of Cylindricity

Figure 3 shows main effect plot for Cylindricity. The optimal prameteric combination for Cylindricity is 1f13. Thus, optimum parameter value for minimum surface roughness is 140 m/min cutting speed, feed 0.18 mm/rev and depth of cut is 1.5 mm. Further ANOVA was performed. In Table 7, the ANOVA result shows that the F-value for the feed rate and depth of cut is larger than that of the cutting speed. The largest contribution to the cylindricity is of depth of cut i.e. 42.03%. The percent contribution of the second most significance factor i.e. feed was found to be 30.85%.

Table 7: ANOVA for Cylindricity

Factors

DF

SS

MS

F-value

P-value

Contribution%

Cutting speed

2

0.000069

0.000035

61.14

0.00

23.39

Feed

2

0.000091

0.000046

80.45

0.000

30.85

Depth of cut

2

0.0000124

0.000062

109.23

0.000

42.03

Error

20

0.000011

0.000001

3.73

Total

26

0.00295

100

VI CONCLUSION

In this study, the effects of cutting speed, feed and depth of cut on surface roughness, material removal rate and cylindricity during CNC Turning of EN36 Alloy Steel were investigated using Taguchis experimental design. The final conclusion arrived, at the end of this work are as follows:

  • From this analysis, the optimal parametric combinations for Ra, MRR and Cylindricity were found.

  • The optimal parametric combinations for Ra, MRR and Cylindricity is 2f11, 2f22, 1f13 respectively.

  • ANOVA was performed; Ra is most significantly affected by feed rate whereas MRR and Cylindricity is most significantly affected by Depth of cut.

  • Thus Taguchi method is powerful and effective design of experiment technique.

[1]

REFERENCES

Mehul Gosai, Sanket N. Bhausar,Experimental Study on Temperature Measurement in Turning Operation of Hardened

[7]

Surendra Kumar Saini, Sharad Kumar Pradhan,Optimization of

Multi-Objective Response during CNC Turning using Taguchi- Fuzzy Application, 12th GLOBAL CONGRESS ON

Steel (EN36),3rd International Conference on Innovaions in

MANUFACTURING AND MANAGEMENT, GCMM 2014,

Automation and Mechatronics Engineering, ICIAME 2016,

Procedia Engineering 97 (2014) 141 149.

Procedia Technology 23 ( 2016 ) 311 318.

[8]

B. Singarvel, T. Selvaraj, R. Jeyapaul, Multi Objective

[2]

Rajendra B, Deepak D,Optimization of Process Parameters for

Optimization in Turning of EN25 Steel Using Taguchi Based

Increasing Material Removal Rate for Turning Al6061 Using

Utility Concept Coupled With Principal Component Analysis,

S/N ratio, International Conference on Emerging Trends in

12th GLOBAL CONGRESS ON MANUFACTURING AND

Engineering, Science and Technology (ICETEST- 2015),

MANAGEMENT, GCMM 2014, Procedia Engineering 97

Procedia Technology 24 ( 2016 ) 399 405

(2014) 158 165.

[3]

S. J. Raykar, D.M. D addona, A.M. Mane,Multi-objective

[9]

R. Deepak Joel Johnson, K. Leo Dev Wins, Anil Raj, B.

optimization of high speed turning of Al 7075 using grey

AnujaBeatrice,Optimization of cutting parameters and flud

relational analysis,9th CIRP Conference on Intelligent

application parameters during turning of OHNS steel, 12th

Computation in Manufacturing Engineering, Procedia CIRP 33 (

GLOBAL CONGRESS ON MANUFACTURING AND

2015 ) 293 298.

MANAGEMENT, GCMM 2014, procedia Engineering 97

[4]

M. Murali Mohan, Nlava .V.S.S Sagar, M. Lava Kumar,E.

(2014) 172-177.

Venugopal Goud,Multi-Ojective Optimization of machining

[10]

Harsh Y Valera, Sanket N Bhavsar,Experimental investigation

parameters of EN36 Alloy Steel Using RSM,International

of surface roughness and power consumption in turning

Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, vol 04,

operation of EN31 Alloy steel,procedia technology 14 (2014)

eISSN: 2319-1163,pISSN: 2321-7308.

528-534.

  1. Sayak Mukherjee, Anurag Kamal, Kaushik Kumar, Optimization of Material Removal Rate During Turning of SAE 1020 Material in CNC Lathe using Taguchi Technique,12th GLOBAL CONGRESS ON 5ANUFACTURING AND MANAGEMENT, GCMM 2014, Procedia Engineering 97 (2014) 29 35.

  2. Shreemoy Kumar Nayak, Jatin Kumar Patro, Shailesh Dewangan, Soumya Gangopadhyaya, Multi-Objective Optimization of Machining Parameters During Dry Turning of AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel Using Grey Relational Analysis, 3rd International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterisation (ICMPC 2014), Procedia Materials Science 6 ( 2014 ) 701 708.

  1. Ashok Kumar Sahoo, Achyuta Nanda Baral, Arun Kumar Raut,

    B.C. Routra, Multi-objective Optimization and Perdictive Modelling of Surface Roughness and Material rate in Turning using Grey relational and Regression Analysis, International Conference on Modelling, optimization and computing (ICMOC, 2012), Procedia Engineering 38 ( 2012 ) 1606 1627.

  2. B.C.Routara, A. K .Sohoo, A.K. Parida, P.C. Padhi, Response Surface Methodology and Genetic Algorithm used to Optimization the Cutting condition for Surface Roughness Parameters in CNC Turning, International Conference on Modeling, optimization and computing (ICMOC,2012), Procedia Engineering 38 (2012) 1893 1903.

Leave a Reply