- Open Access
- Total Downloads : 565
- Authors : T. Ravi Teja, S. Krishna Chaitanya
- Paper ID : IJERTV2IS3008
- Volume & Issue : Volume 02, Issue 03 (March 2013)
- Published (First Online): 15-03-2013
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Optimize The Heuristic Line Balancing Using Nn Technique
T. Ravi Teja1, S. Krishna Chaitanya2
1Assistant professor, Mechanical Dept, Narasaraopeta engg college, Andhra Pradesh, India, t.raviteja@gmail.com
2Associate professor, Mechanical Dept, St. Marys Group of institutions, Andhra Pradesh, India,
———————————————————————–***———————————————————————–
Abstract
network tool[3] in mat lab software. It which has attracted |
8 |
0.6 |
3,4 |
||||
network tool[3] in mat lab software. It which has attracted |
8 |
0.6 |
3,4 |
||||
The assembly line balancing[1] problem consists of assigning tasks to an ordered sequence of stations such that the precedence relations among the tasks are satisfied and some performance measure is optimized. In this paper we had done the largest candidate rule problem[2] solved using neural
attention of researchers and practitioners.
1. INTRODUCTION
The fundamental of line balancing problems is to assign the tasks to an ordered sequence of stations, such that the precedence relations are satisfied and some measurements of effectiveness are optimized. The first published paper of the assembly line balancing problem (ALBP) was made by Salveson (1955) who suggested a linear programming solution. Since then, the topic of line balancing has been of great interest to researchers. However, since the ALB problem falls into the NP hard class of combinatorial optimization problems (Gutjahr and Nemhauser, 1964), it has consistently developed the efficient algorithms for obtaining optimal solutions. Thus numerous research efforts have been directed towards the development of computer-efficient approximation algorithms or heuristics (e.g. Kilbridge and Wester, 1961; Helgeson and Birnie, 1961; Hoffman, 1963; Mansoor, 1964; Arcus, 1966; Baybar, 1986a) and exact methods to solve the ALB problems. (e.g. Jackson, 1956; Bowman, 1960; Van Assche and Herroelen, 1978; Mamoud, 1989; Hackmanetal., 1989; Sarin et al., 1999). Now we did the problem in neural network technique.
-
Largest candidate rule method
Procedure:
Step 1. List all elements in descending order of Te value, largest Te at the top of the list.
Step 2. To assign elements to the first workstation, start at the top of the list and work done, selecting the first feasible element for placement at the station. A
Example for Largest-Candidate Rule (LCR) Step 1.
Work element Te Immediate predecessor
3 0.7 1
11 0.5 9,10
2 0.4 —
10 0.38 5,8
7 0.32 3
5 0.3 2
9 0.27 6,7,8
1 0.2 —
12 0.12 11
6 0.11 3
4 0.1 1,2
Step 2, 3. If we assume Tc = 1.00 min.
Station Element Te Te at station
1 2 0.4
5 0.3
1 0.2
4 0.1 1.00
2 3 0.7
6 0.11 0.81
3 8 0.6
10 0.38 0.98
4 7 0.32
9 0.27 0.59
5 11 0.5
12 0.11 0.62
feasible element is one that satisfies the precedence requirements and does not cause the sum of the Tej
value at station to exceed the cycle time Tc. Step 3. Repeat step 2.
Fig -1: Precedence structure
Fig -2; Work station order
-
Neural network tool in Mat lab
Neural networks have a large appeal to many researchers due to their great closeness to the structure of the brain, a characteristic not shared by more traditional systems.
Fig -3. Basic structure of NN
Fig 4: NN tool
Fig 5: Network diagram
Fig 6: Training diagram
Fig 7. Performance plot
Fig 8. Training plot
Fig 9: Regression plot
CONCLUSION
In the above results shows that research has made nn tool developments in solving simple problems. Though nn tool is a effective exact and heuristic algorithms are available which solve small and medium-size instances of problems. Nevertheless, further algorithmic improvement is necessary for solving large-scale problems.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Recently, assembly line balancing research evolved towards formulating and solving generalized problem with different additional characteristics such as cost functions, paralleling, equipent selection, u-line layout and mixed-model production. In the literature survey on GALBP (cf. Becker and Scholl, 2006) shows that a lot of relevant problems have been identified and modeled but development of sophisticated solution procedures has just begun. Then, additional research is necessary to adopt state-of-the-art solution concepts like
met heuristics and highly developed algorithms for SALBP to the variety of GALBP.
REFERENCES:
[1]. Amen, M., 2000a. An exact method for cost-oriented assembly line balancing. International Journal of Production Economics. Vol.64: pp.187-195. [2]. Hoffmann,T.R., 1963. Assembly Line Balancing with a Precedence Matrix. Management Science. Vol. 9, No.4: pp.551-562. [3]. Van Assche, F. and Herroelen,W.S., 1978. An Optimal Procedure for the Single-Model Deterministic Assembly Line Balancing Problem. European Journal of Operations Research. Vol.3: pp. 142- 149. [4]. http://www.mathworks.in/help/nnet/functionlist.html-
Russell, Ingrid. "Neural Networks Module". Retrieved 2012.
-
Y. Liu, J. A. Starzyk, Z. Zhu, Optimized Approximation Algorithm in Neural Network without Overfitting, IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, vol. 19, no. 4, June, 2008, pp. 983-995.