Performance Analysis of BLDC Motor for Sinusoidal and Trapezoidal Back-Emf using MATLAB/SIMULINK Environment

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV3IS050811

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Performance Analysis of BLDC Motor for Sinusoidal and Trapezoidal Back-Emf using MATLAB/SIMULINK Environment

Pramod Pal

Department of Electrical Engineering Maulana AzadNational Institute of Technology

Bhopal, India

T M Shubhum Department of Electrical Engineering

Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology Bhopal,India

Abstract: The Brushless DC Motor find variety of applications in domestic and industrial applications. BLDC Motor has some important characteristics like low and high power density and ease of speed control. This paper presents a three phase inverter fed Brushless DC motor. The process considering the development of BLDC Motor Model in MATLAB/SIMULINK environment with sinusoidal and trapezoidal back-Emf waveform and also includes a comparison study for the harmonic analysis for sinusoidal and trapezoidal back-Emf models.

Key Words: BLDC Motor, Simulink Model, back-Emf

I.INTRODUCTION

Brushless DC Motor has the characteristics of DC motor but eliminates the need of commutator and brushes this reduces the losses in the machine and also improve the efficiency but increases the cost. Therefore BLDC Motor replaces the conventional DC Machine in high efficiency applications. The main reason for motor speed control is to account a signal for demanded speed and to drive the motor for that speed [1]. BLDC Motor uses DC voltage sources but the commutation is done electronically. BLDC Motor comes in variety of power ratings from low range to high range. It has some advantages over conventional DC motors like noiseless operations, higher efficiency, better speed and torque characteristics and longer life [2]. The selection of right BLDC motor for various applications is very important. The back-Emf is the most important factor which affects the torque produced in the BLDC Motor. Normally BLDC motor has trapezoidal back-Emf with rectangular waveform of stator current. It causes constant value torque but practically torque ripple exists due to current ripple, phase current commutations and non uniform back-Emf waveforms therefore always a difference exists between actual value and simulation results. The paper attempts to compare BLDC Motor performance for both sinusoidal and

trapezoidal back-Emf waveforms.

Wref

SPEED CONTROL

CURRENT CONTROL

POWER INVERTER

BLDC MOTOR

Vdc

Tload

Fig.1 BLOCK DIAGRAM OF BLDC MOTOR CONTROL SYSTEM

Fig.1 shows block diagram of BLDC motor control system. Here hysteresis or PWM control is to be used for maintaining the actual current flowing into the motor as close as possible to the rectangular reference values [3]. The major disadvantage of BLDC Motor is its higher cost and high degree of complexity introduced by the six step inverter [4], [5].

II MATHEMATICAL MODELLING

Modeling of BLDC Motor can be done by considering it as a conventional three phase synchronous motor. It has three phase stator and permanent magnet rotor. The current induced in the rotor can be minimized by the high resistivity of both the magnet and stainless steel laminations. The BLDC Motor can be modeled in both d-q axis model and also abc phase model analysis. The important equations in modeling of BLDC Motor are as follows:

Vab = R ia ib + L d ia ib + ea eb [1]

dt

Vbc = R ib ic + L d ib ic + eb ec [2]

dt

Vca = R ic ia + L d ic ia + ec ea [3]

dt

Where:

R= Per Phase Stator Resistance L=Per Phase Stator Inductance

Where:

= Wm

ia,ib,ic=Instantaneous Stator Phase current Vab,Vbc,Vca= Instantaneous Stator Line voltages eab,ebc,eca =Instantaneous phase back-Emf

The Phase currents can also be written as:

ia + ib + ic = 0

Thus the equation can be written as:

ic = (ia + ib)

Thus the line voltage given by equations [1] and [2] can be written as:

Vab = R ia ib + L d ia ib + ea eb [4]

dt

Vbc = R ia + 2ib + L d ia + 2ib + eb ec [5]

dt

The flux of the permanent magnet rotor and speed of the rotor will influence the back-Emf as explained as follows:

ea = Ke m F(e) [5]

2

eb = Ke m F[e 2] [6]

J=Moment of Inertia in Kg/m2 Kf=friction constant in NM/Rad/Sec. TL=Load Torque in NM

  1. SIMULINK MODEL

    2 3

    ec = Ke m F[e 4] [7]

    2 3 Fig.2 SIMULINK MODEL FOR PWM CONTROL OF BLDC MOTOR

    Thus the electromagnetic torque is given by:

    Te = Ke F e ia + Ke F e 2 ib + Ke F e 4 ic

    The simulink model of BLDC Motor is as shown in the figure. In BLDC Motor the commutation is done

    2

    Where

    P

    2 3 2 3

    [8]

    electronically and the stator winding will be energized in a sequence and this makes rotor position information critical for successful commutation. The stator winding will be energized in proper sequence according to the information provided from the rotor sensors embedded into the stator.

    e =2m Electrical Angle ,degree

    Wm=Rotor Speed in Rad/Sec. Ke=back-Emf constane in volt/rad./sec.

    The dynamics of the motor and load as follows:

    To = KfWm + J d Wm + TL [9]

    dt

    To TL = KfWm + J d Wm [10]

    dt

    Normally Hall Effect sensors are used for sensing the position of rotor. In the presented model three hall sensors are used and this is the main disadvantage of the present model the sensors can also be minimized by using a different technique for PWM control of BLDC Motor [6]. If North Pole is passes through the hall sensor it will give active high signal and if South Pole passes through hall sensor it will give active low and thus this sequence will give commutation logic. PWM generation block will uses following equations for signal generation

    J d Wm = To TL KfWm [11]

    Va = T1 Vd (T4) Vd

    [13]

    dt 2 2

    Kf 1

    Vb = T3 Vd (T6) Vd

    [14]

    Wm =

    Wm + (To TL) [12] 2 2

    J J

    Vc = T5 Vd T2 Vd

    [15]

    2 2

    Thus as explained by the above equations for every 60 electrical rotations the hall sensor will change its state and

    six steps will be taken to complete one electrical degree of rotation. It is not necessary that one electrical degree of rotation is equal to one mechanical degree of rotation.

    The electrical and mechanical degree of rotation will be related as follows:

    e = P m [16]

    2

    Where:

    e=Angle of rotation in electrical degree m=Angle of rotation in mechanical degree

  2. SIMULATION RESULTS TABLE 1 BLDC MOTOR SPECIFICATION

PARAMETER

VALUE

UNIT

Vd

126.966V

Volts

Stator Phase Resistance R

4.8750

Stator Phase

Inductance L

6.5e-3

H

No. of Poles

4

Inertia

15.17×10-6

Kgm2

Kw

56.23×10-3

VradS-1

SIMULATION RESULT FOR SINUSOIDAL WAVEFORM:

Fig.3 Speed

Current

Fig.4 Back Emf

Fig. 4 Torque

FFT ANALYSIS FOR SINUSOIDAL WAVEFORM

Fig.5 FFT Analysis for Speed

Fig.6 FFT Analysis for Back-Emf

Fig.7 FFT Analysis for Current

Fig.8 FFT Analysis for Torque

SIMULATION RESULT FOR TRAPEZOIDAL WAVEFORM:

Fig.9 Speed

Fig.10Back-Emf

Fig. 11Current

Fig. 12 Torque

FFT ANALYSISFOR TRAPEZOIDAL WAVEFORM

Fig. 13 FFT Analysis for Speed

Fig.14 FFT Analysis for back-Emf

Fig.15FFT Analysis for Current

Fig. 16 FFT Analysis for Torque

Type of waveform

Speed

Torque

Rippl e

Peak valu

e

TH D

Rippl e

PEAK VALU

E

TH D

Sinusoidal

0.2

93.5

52.2

0

13.6

22.2

5

Trapezoid

al

0.05

92.5

60.5

0

12.8

29.4

0

Comparison of Sinusoidal and Trapezoidal waveform for speed and torque

Comparison of Sinusoidal and Trapezoidal waveform for stator current

Type of waveform

Current

Ripple

Peak Value

THD

Ia

Ib

Ic

Sinusoidal

0

7.6

7.6

7.5

46.34

Trapezoidal

0

7.4

7.4

7.5

50.71

\Comparison of Sinusoidal and Trapezoidal waveform for Back-Emf

Type of waveform

Back-Emf

Ripple

Peak Value

THD

Ea

Eb

Ec

Sinusoidal

0

55.8

55.8

55.8

22.57

Trapezoidal

0

47.5

47.5

47.5

36.48

IV. REFERENCE

[1]Application characteristics of permanent magnet synchronous and brushless dc motors for servo drives, presented at the IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, Atlanta, 1987.

[2]M. Lajoie-Mazenc, C. Villanueva, and J. Hector, Study and implementation of a hysteresis controlled inverter on a permanent.

  1. T. M. Jahns, Torque production in permanent magnet synchronous motor drives with rectangular current excitation, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. IA-20, no. 4, pp. 803-813, July/Aug. 1984.

  2. A. A. Aboulnaga, P. C. Desai, F. Rodriguez, T. R. Cooke, and A. Emadi, A novel low-cost high-performance single-phase adjustable- speed motor drive using PM brushless DC machines: IITs design for 2003 future energy challenge, in Proc. 19th Annu. IEEE Applied Power Electron. Conf., Anaheim, CA, Feb. 2004, pp. 15951603.

  3. C. W. Lu, Torque controller for brushless DC motors, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 471473, Apr. 1999.

  4. S. Anand, M. Nikola, J.Young and K. Mahesh An FPGA Based Novel Digital PWM Control Scheme for BLDC Motor Drives IEEE Trans. On Ind. Electron., Vol. 56, No.8, Aug. 2009.

Leave a Reply