- Open Access
- Authors : Swati Sharma , Urmila Pawar
- Paper ID : IJERTV10IS060019
- Volume & Issue : Volume 10, Issue 06 (June 2021)
- Published (First Online): 08-06-2021
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Proposal for Ideal Green Spaces at Town and Neighborhood Level – A Case of New Chandigarh
Swati Sharma
1st Affiliation 1 (Author) Student Masters of Urban Planning
School of Planning & Architecture, Poornima University Jaipur, India
Ar. Urmila Pawar
2nd Affiliation (Author)
Architect, Urban Planner, Associate Professor School of Planning & Architecture, Poornima University
Jaipur, India
Abstract:- Green Space in urban area performs multidimensional functions and provides enormous benefits to the citizens. Importance is still more due to its limited availability in urban area as a result of urbanization. It not only performs the regulatory but also environmental and social functions and provides various types of benefits as per its location and size at various spatial levels. The hypothesis of this study is that the benefits and functions of Urban Green Space at various spatial levels perform differently. To examine this hypothesis and to evaluate extent of the green space benefits and functions at various spatial level, Chandigarh city is chosen as a case example and its implications in its expansion New Chandigarh . An intensive and in depth study of green spaces in Le Corbusiers master plan with respect to high and low density sectors. Specially analyzing how green space equity varies along spatial and socio-economic gradients, understanding the current status of green space distribution and its variations over different socioeconomic groups of urban residents to enhance the benefits of green space for all residents This paper intent to looks at quantitative aspects of Urban Green Spaces in terms of its benefits to user and giving proposals for green spaces at city and neighborhood level for New Chandigarh.
Keywords: Urban green space , urbanization , Green space equity
INTRODUCTION
The urban population of Chandigarh has increased by 340.32 % from 1971 to 2011 .The massive increase in the urban population among other factors has resulted in urban growth in Chandigarh and also in the surrounding areas. The surrounding region has witnessed encroachments on fertile agricultural land and vegetation cover due to development and expansion of urban areas in the recent past .The city has a great potential to attract people from all income groups due to high quality lifestyle and high development rate .
Chandigarh has the rare accolade of being one of the few cities in the world with planned landscape. Its Master Plan, a unique work of art, laid the foundation of what is now popularly called a city beautiful. Between the orderly chequered-mesh of the grid-iron road layout encompassing the sectors, lies a structured patterns of linear green belts and city parks.
With increased urban population and re-densified built forms in Chandigarh an extension of the city New Chandigarh has been proposed by Greater Mohali Area Development Authority to cater to the projected growth of Chandigarh. The conversion of green spaces into the built-up areas has become one of the major reasons for habitat destruction worldwide.
Through accelerating urbanization, mass demographic growth and expanding global consumption patterns, more and more open spaces in cities continue to be converted into industrial, commercial or residential areas. Green space has become an increasingly scarce resource, for which many competing forces battle for the right to control and manipulate it. The loss of Open spaces in cities will put tremendous strain on resources and threaten human health. Evidence indicates that the frequency of physical activity is negatively affected by a lack of greenery.
Thus public Green Space per Capita, as a landuse indicator can be valuable for examining the citizens daily wellbeing and quality of life. There is an urgent need to look after the issues related to the urban green spaces at grass root level or at local level.
Hence the main objective of this study was to analyze the urbanization impact quantitatively over the city green spaces over two major spatial levels i.e. City level(Macro level), and Neighborhood level(Micro Level) in terms of per capita green availability and also by mapping its benefits and functions.
STUDY AREA
New Chandigarh is a new planned smart city near Mullanpur in the Mohali district (SAS Nagar) in Punjab, India. It is designed as an extension of already crowded city of Chandigarh. It is developed by Greater Mohali Area Development Authority. New Chandigarh LPA lies in the state of Punjab and was planned within the purview of the overall vision of the Greater Mohali Region Plan 2008-2058.
The total area notified as Local Planning Area (LPA) for New Chandigarh is 6,109 hectares with key land uses as Residential, Mixed Use, Education and Health. Other supporting land uses include, City Centre, Commercial and Green & Recreational areas. There are no manufacturing industries proposed as per the notified master plan and proposed revised land use plan.
The New Chandigarh LPA has been planned to cater to an ultimate population of approximately 10 lakh by the year 2058. The
gross residential population density applicable to the entire LPA is 170 ppa (people per acre). The entire LPA is divided into three broad density zones :
-
Low (upto 30 ppa) Low Density Zone(upto 150 ppa) High Density Zone(200 ppa).
Fig.1 New Chandigarh location
Fig.2 New Chandigarh regional connectivity
Fig.3 New Chandigarh physical features and boundary on satellite imagery Source : Detailing of Master Plan New Chandigarh
Table 1 New Chandigarh Landuse Map.1 New Chandigarh Master Plan Source : Detailing of Master Plan New Chandigarh
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Hypothesis:
The hypothesis of this study is that the benefits and functions of Urban Green Space at various spatial levels perform differently.
Scope and limitations:
Only structured (Parks ,neighborhood ,housing area parks , planned green avenues) are considered .Forest areas Catchment area, steep
hill vegetation Green on banks of nallah , road side plantation is not considered. Census data of 2011 is considered for population.
Method adopted for Quantitative Analysis:
Calculation of Per capita green space is adopted for quantitative analysis.
As per WHO norms minimum per capita green requirement is 9 m2 per/person and as per UDPFI guidelines it is about 10-12 m2 per/person.
Per capita Green = Total area under green / Total population
LITERATURE REVIEW
The parks, green spaces, open areas and playgrounds within an urban area influence the quality of the urban environment for residents, contributing to the overall health of the city environment. Green spaces symbolize peace, minimal stress and a cleaner environment for many people, which are considered as important factors in making a city livable, pleasant and attractive for its citizens and guests. The major functions performed by Urban green space are as follows:
S.NO. |
TYPE |
FUNCTIONS |
1 |
Regulation functions |
Regulates the chemical composition of atmosphere and purifying the local air |
Controlling the runoff and flooding |
||
Regulating the hydrological cycles |
||
Supporting biological diversity in the city |
||
Preventing the soil erosion and sediments |
||
Regulating the local and global climate |
||
2 |
Carrier functions |
Conserving the energy in the city through controlling the micro climatic variations |
Helping the recreation and tourism |
||
Integrating the urban man to the nature |
||
3 |
Information functions |
Aesthetic information |
Spiritual and religious information |
||
Cultural and artistic inspiration |
||
Scientific and educational information sources |
Table 2 Functions of green spaces
Source : Chandigarh Urban Green Guidelines2014
Major benefits obtained through urban green spaces are categorized under two perspectives i.e. tangible and intangible they are as follows:-
Tangible Benefits Ecological Benefits :
-
Green spaces have been to absorb pollutants, moderate the impact of human activities for eg. Absorbing pollutants and releasing oxygen.
-
They contribute to the healthy urban environment by providing clean air, water and soil.
-
They improve the urban climate and maintain the balance of the citys natural urban environment.
-
UGS provide safe play space for children & contribute to their physical, social and mental development.
Benefits at Planning level:
-
A network of high quality green spaces linking residential areas with business, retail and leisure developments can help to improve the accessibility and attractiveness of local facilities and employment centres.
-
It encourages people travel safely by foot or by bicycle for recreation.
-
Well-designed UGS provide a barrier to noise and can function as a visual screen.
Economic Benefits:)
-
Research all around the world shows that the property owners value the urban forest by the premium they pay to live in the neighborhood UGS and urban parks. For e.g. Just one km increase in the distance to the nearest forested area leads to an average 5.9 % decrease in market value of the dwelling.
-
Study on effects of neighborhood parks on the transaction price of high rise private residential units in Hong Kong indicated that neighborhood parks could lift price by 16.88%, including 14.93% for availability and 1.95% for view. Comparing with
other landscape elements, Neighborhood parks induced the heaviest investment intention in the home buying behavior.
INTANGIBLE BENEFITS
Social Benefits:
-
Green spaces provide a refreshing contrast to the harsh shape, colour, and texture of buildings and stimulate the senses with their simple color, sound, smell and motions.
-
Well managed and maintained green spaces contribute to social justice by creating opportunities for people of all age groups to interact.
-
Encourages volunteerism, Promotes stewardship,
-
Promotes individuals with disabilities.
-
It supports seniors ,helps in development of youths and enhances education
-
They enhance cultural life by providing venues for local festivals, civic celebrations and theatrical performances.
-
Reduces crime, Strengthens community by reflecting the different communities they serve and meeting their varying needs.
-
Health Benefits:
Decrease obesity, Boosts immune system, Relieves stress, Life expectancy, Reduces depression.
Improves Quality of life.
-
Recreational activities are a medium in which participants can change their self-image and gain personal satisfaction. Quality of life benefits from recreational activities include:
-
Enhanced self esteem through improved feelings of selfworth, reliance and gain personal satisfaction.
-
Personal growth
-
Enhanced expression of and reflection on personal spiritual ideals and feelings of satisfaction from ones personal, neighborhood and community life.
Case study
Chandigarh was the first planned city in India post-independence in 1947 and known for its impeccable urban green spaces . Chandigarh is a union territory in the northern part of India that serves as the capital of the states of Punjab and Haryana. As a union territory, the city is ruled directly by the Union Government of India and is not part of either state.Chandigarh is located near the foothills of the Shivalik Range of the Himalayas in northwest India. It borders the states of Haryana and Punjab. The exact geographic coordinates of Chandigarh are 30.74°N 76.79°E.
Map 2 Existing Chandigarh Master Plan Source: Chandigarh Master Plan 2031
Fig.4 Location of Chandigarh
Table 3 Chandigarh landuse
Source: Chandigarh Master Plan 2031
Chandigarh Green Space Typology
As per Chandigarhs master plan green spaces are subdivided into four major divisions:
-
City level Public Green Space with artificial waterbody – that attract people from outside the city and may
have national importance.
-
Free Flowing Green Spaces connecting the entire site – Green belts, forests surrounding the city
-
Semi Private Green Areas for Neighborhood pockets – attract people from residential units across the city, have a number of
facilities and features and hold neighborhood events.
-
Private Green Areas for Residential units – used by the local community, with limited facilities.
SECTOR |
|||||||
S.N O |
Phase-I (Sector 1- 30) Sector 26 E ,Ind.Area I , Sukhna Lake, Golf Range/Club |
Phase-II (Sector 31- 47) Sector 38 West ,Ind.Area II, |
Phase-III(Sector 48-56) and part of Sector 61 and 63 |
Periphery |
Total |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Total Area ( In Acres) |
9398.83 |
5158.76 |
1870.54 |
11741.87 |
28170 |
100 |
2 |
Residential |
4012.7 |
3460.26 |
1371.31 |
1827.89 |
10672.16 |
37.88 |
3 |
Commercial |
444.49 |
433.52 |
140.51 |
321.21 |
1339.73 |
4.76 |
4 |
Transport |
747.95 |
514.23 |
161.66 |
622.26 |
2046.10 |
7.26 |
5 |
Industrial |
516.74 |
272.08 |
– |
537.68 |
1326.50 |
4.71 |
6 |
Publi/Semi Public |
1812.92 |
372.18 |
92.41 |
691.28 |
2968.79 |
10.54 |
7 |
Recreational |
1850.33 |
72.19 |
81.28 |
424.67 |
2428.47 |
8.62 |
8 |
Agriculture |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
9 |
Public Utilities |
13.7 |
34.3 |
23.37 |
230.96 |
302.33 |
1.07 |
10 |
Railway Land |
– |
– |
– |
316.29 |
316.29 |
1.12 |
11 |
Defence |
– |
– |
– |
p>1573.00 |
1573.00 |
4.52 |
12 |
Forest |
– |
– |
– |
2113.97 |
2113.97 |
7.50 |
13 |
Reserved |
– |
– |
– |
– |
||
14 |
Vacant Land |
– |
– |
– |
3082.67 |
3082.67 |
10.94 |
SECTOR |
|||||||
S.N O |
Phase-I (Sector 1- 30) Sector 26 E ,Ind.Area I , Sukhna Lake, Golf Range/Club |
Phase-II (Sector 31- 47) Sector 38 West ,Ind.Area II, |
Phase-III(Sector 48-56) and part of Sector 61 and 63 |
Periphery |
Total |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Total Area ( In Acres) |
9398.83 |
5158.76 |
1870.54 |
11741.87 |
28170 |
100 |
2 |
Residential |
4012.7 |
3460.26 |
1371.31 |
1827.89 |
10672.16 |
37.88 |
3 |
Commercial |
444.49 |
433.52 |
140.51 |
321.21 |
1339.73 |
4.76 |
4 |
Transport |
747.95 |
514.23 |
161.66 |
622.26 |
2046.10 |
7.26 |
5 |
Industrial |
516.74 |
272.08 |
– |
537.68 |
1326.50 |
4.71 |
6 |
Publi/Semi Public |
1812.92 |
372.18 |
92.41 |
691.28 |
2968.79 |
10.54 |
7 |
Recreational |
1850.33 |
72.19 |
81.28 |
424.67 |
2428.47 |
8.62 |
8 |
Agriculture |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
9 |
Public Utilities |
13.7 |
34.3 |
23.37 |
230.96 |
302.33 |
1.07 |
10 |
Railway Land |
– |
– |
– |
316.29 |
316.29 |
1.12 |
11 |
Defence |
– |
– |
– |
1573.00 |
1573.00 |
4.52 |
12 |
Forest |
– |
– |
– |
2113.97 |
2113.97 |
7.50 |
13 |
Reserved |
– |
– |
– |
– |
||
14 |
Vacant Land |
– |
– |
– |
3082.67 |
3082.67 |
10.94 |
Map 3 Chandigarh green space typology Source: Foundation Le Corbusier
Map 4 Chandigarh green space at city level Source: Chandigarh Master Plan 2031
S.NO |
Category |
No. of parks |
Area in ha |
URDFPI norms |
Remarks |
1 |
Sub-City Park (SCP) (250,000sqm and above) |
1 |
161.8 |
100 Ha 1 for 1,000,000 population |
High |
2 |
District Park (DP) (50,000-250,000 sqm) |
7 |
182.11 |
25 Ha 1 for 500,000 population |
Intermediate |
3 |
Community Park (CP) (10,000-50,000 sqm) |
18 |
102.44 |
5 Ha 1 for 100,000 population |
Intermediate |
4 |
Neighborhood Park (NP) (5000-10,000sqm) |
74 |
259.9 |
1Ha 1 for 15,000 population |
Intermediate |
5 |
Housing Area Park (HAP) Less then 5000Sqm |
1733 |
198.6 |
0.5Ha 1 for 5000 population |
Intermediate |
Table 4 Comparative Analysis Hierarchy of green space in Chandigarh with URDFPI norms.
Macro Level Analysis
-
Green Area Available Within The Sectoral Grid = 2342 Acres.
-
Green Area Available In Manimajra = 71 Acres.
-
Botanical Garden = 180 Acres.
-
Total Planned Green Area = 2593 Acres.
-
Forest Area In U.T. Chandigarh=3436Ha.
-
Total Green Area Including Forest = 3828 Ha. (9455 Acres).
-
Green/Open Spaces (Percentage) = 33.5% Of The Total Area
-
Average Green Available In 2011 (Sqm/Person)=17.4Sqm/Person (including all types of open spaces)
-
Average Green Available In 2011 (Sqm/Person)=9.31Sqm/Person (including only parks and garden
S.NO
URDFPI
Chandigarh
Remarks
1
Area
114 sqkm
2
Population
10,54,686
3
Green space
9827000sqm
4
Green space %
10-15%
8.62
Less
5
Green space per capita
10-12 sqm
9.31 sqm
Less
Table 5 Comparative analysis of green space in Chandigarh with URDFPI norms.
Micro level
High Density Sector
Sector 20 is a high density sector .Major portion of the sector is residential having a mix of government and private housing of G+2 structure having school, college ,institutional buildings in its vicinity.
Area
1.47 km2
Population in sector
25901
No. of Parks
48
Total green area
52,478 sqm
Per capita green sqm/person
2 sqm/person
Area
1.47 km2
Population in sector
25901
No. of Parks
48
Total green area
52,478 sqm
Per capita green sqm/person
2 sqm/person
Fig.5 Chandigarh Sector 20 Parks Source: Author
Fig.4 Chandigarh Sector 20 Plan Source: UT Administration
.
Sector 4 is a low density posh area of Chandigarh. The sector is inhabited by the VIPs of the town having 4-8 kananl private housing and it has no nuisance of a market place though there is one in the neighboring Sector 9. Sector 4 is a walking distance from the Rock Garden and the Sukhna Lake which is the two icons of the city and above all it over looks the hills which are by themselves very scenic.
Area
1.54km2
Population in sector
12,234
12
Total green area
41538 sqm
Per capita green sqm/person
3.3sqm /per person
Fig.6 Chandigarh Sector 4 Plan Source: UT Administration
Fig.7 Chandigarh Sector 4 Parks Source: Author
S.NO
High density
Low density
URDFPI
norms
Remarks
Sector -20
Sector-4
1
Area
1.47 sqkm
1.54 sqkm
2
Population
25,901
12234
3
Green space
52,478 sqm
41538 sqm
4
Green space per capita
2 sqm/person
3.3 sqm/per person
10-12
sqm/person
Less
Table 6 Comparative Analysis of green spaces in sectors with URDFPI norms.
Inferences
From analysis it was found that a planned city like Chandigarh at city level has sufficient provision of urban green ,though recreation spaces at city level is less than the norms laid by URDPFI .
At sector level there is gap in green space equity among high density and low density wards.
At sector level has per person green space 2sqm per person in a high density sector and 3.3 in a low density sector which is less as per URDFPI norms.
As standards set by URDPFI are quite to achieve by cities due to increase rate of urbanization ,so urban green space standards , typology and hierarchy followed in Chandigarh as envisaged by Le Corbusier are taken into consideration for proposing ideal green spaces for cities.
Existing Site
As per Greater Mohali Development Authority Sector -22 is a proposed housing site in New Chandigarh. The site has an area of 106.2 Ha and is surrounded by proposed 60 m wide roads for connectivity. Sector-22 has village Palheri of 11 hectare in its central core and 2.5 hectare land reserved for group housing by Suntech city .The remaining site is proposed for government housing .
Fig.8 Sector 22 location in New Chandigarh ,satellite imagery Source: Google
Table 7 Proposed landuse by GMADA for sectors in New Chandigarh
S.NO
Percentage area
1
Residential
50
2
Commercial
5
3
Public-Semi Public
34
4
Green
5
Proposal And Recommendation
At city level green spaces proposed by GMADA are as follows:
-
-
-
Recreational = 157.54 Ha ( 2.58 %)
Parks = 2.45 Ha ( 149.79 % )
-
Forests and Open Spaces = 197.56 Ha (3.23 % )
-
De Notified PLPA Agriculture =1185.89 Ha ( 19.41 % )
-
Total Planned Green Area = 159.99 Ha
-
Total Green Area Including Forest = 1383.3 Ha
-
Green/Open Spaces (Percentage) = 30.67% of The Total Area
-
Average Green Available (Sqm/Person)=13.83Sqm/Person (including all types of open spaces)
-
Average Green Available (Sqm/Person)=15.9 Sqm/Person (including only parks and garden
URDFPI |
New Chandigarh |
Old Chandigarh |
Remarks |
|
Area |
60 sqkm |
114 sqkm |
||
Population |
Proposed 10,00,000 |
10,54,686 |
||
Green space |
1599000 sqm |
9827000 sqm |
||
Green space per capita |
10-12 sqm |
15.9 Sqm |
9.31 Sqm/person |
New Chandigarh has been proposed a relatively high amount of green space |
Total Area of the Neighborhood is 60 Ha Approx. and total population is 15,000 people.
*The recommendations mentioned here are based on the existing space standards suggested by URDPFI. The existing norms have been modified keeping in view the reduced speed of movement and comfortable outdoor time relevant for Indian climate
Hierarchy |
Distance |
Density |
Area |
Remarks |
Totlot |
No Existing data |
6 Nos for a neighborhood |
125 sqmt each covering a total area of 750sqm |
The existing norms specify the area of a tot-lot as 125sqm. We suggest that spaces as small as 50sqm can also be converted to tot- lots. This will incresae their spread and reached across the neighborhood |
Recommended: Placed at walking distance of max.10 minutes or 300m |
Recommended: 6 -15 Nos |
Recommended: 50 – 125sqm. Covering a total area of 750sqm |
||
Housing Area Park |
No Existing data |
3Nos |
5000 Each. covering a total area of 15000 Sqm |
The number of Housing area parks is suggested to be increases for better reach |
Recommended: Place at 200-300 m |
Recommended: 3 -6 Nos |
Recommended: 2500 – 5000sqm. covering a total area of 15000sqm |
||
Neighborhood Park/ Playground |
No Existing data |
1Nos |
10000 Sqm |
The existing norms suggest 1 No. Neighborhood Park of 10000sqm. We suggest the area coverage should increase from 10000 to 18000sqm. Also the area should be broken into 3-4 Nos. of parks for better distribution. |
Recommended: Place at 200-300 m |
Recommended: 3-4 Nos |
Recommended: 4500 – 6000sqm. covering a total area of 18000sqm |
||
Average Per Capita Open Space |
0 -12sqm per person Including recreational space, Organized green & Other common open spaces (such as vacant lands/ open spaces including flood plains, forest cover etc. in plain areas. Min. 3sqm/ person In the built up area (excluding recreational space, vacant land, flood plain, forest) |
The range provided in URDPFI is a gross figure of open space and therefore a high value for a neighborhood .The NBC standard of 3.0sqm is a baseline standard. A range of 3-4 sqm is suggested in an attempt to better the existing norm |
||
Recommended: 3-4 sqm per person |
Table 28 Ideal green space recommendation
Ideal Green Space for a high density Sector22 , for New Chandigaarh
S.NO |
Area in Ha |
|
1 |
Sector 22 |
106.2 |
2 |
Existing Plotted housing Suncity |
2.5 |
3 |
Existing village Palheri with future expansion |
12.4 |
4 |
Area available for planning |
91.3 |
S.NO |
Area in Ha |
Percentage |
||
1 |
Residential |
45.6 |
50 |
|
2 |
Commercial |
4.56 |
5 |
|
3 |
Roads/Transport |
21 |
23 |
|
5 |
Public/Semi Public |
11 |
10 |
|
6 |
Recreational |
11 |
12 |
|
Total Area ( In Ha) |
93.16 |
100 |
||
S.NO |
Plot Type |
No of Plots |
Total Plots |
No of Residents |
1 |
HIG |
243 |
729 |
3645 |
2 |
MIG |
845 |
2535 |
12675 |
3 |
LIG |
1863 |
5589 |
27945 |
4 |
Group Housing |
NA |
NA |
1385 |
5 |
Total |
45650 |
S.NO |
Area in Ha |
Percentage |
||
1 |
Residential |
45.6 |
50 |
|
2 |
Commercial |
4.56 |
5 |
|
3 |
Roads/Transport |
21 |
23 |
|
5 |
Public/Semi Public |
11 |
10 |
|
6 |
Recreational |
11 |
12 |
|
Total Area ( In Ha) |
93.16 |
100 |
||
S.NO |
Plot Type |
No of Plots |
Total Plots |
No of Residents |
1 |
HIG |
243 |
729 |
3645 |
2 |
MIG |
845 |
2535 |
12675 |
3 |
LIG |
1863 |
5589 |
27945 |
4 |
Group Housing |
NA |
NA |
1385 |
5 |
Total |
45650 |
Total Population 200 PPA / 500 PPH 91.3 Ha x 500 = 45650
S.NO |
Plot Type |
Unit Area (SQM) |
Area in sqm |
1 |
HIG |
375 |
91300 |
2 |
MIG |
162 |
136900 |
3 |
LIG |
98 |
182600 |
4 |
Group Housing |
NA |
91976 |
5 |
Total |
502776 |
S.NO |
Plot Type |
Area in Ha |
No of floors |
Area in Percentage |
1 |
HIG |
9.13 |
G+2 |
20 |
2 |
MIG |
13.69 |
G+2 |
30 |
3 |
LIG |
18.26 |
G+2 |
40 |
4 |
Group Housing |
9.1 |
G+3 |
10 |
5 |
Total |
100 |
Distribution of green space
Total Population 200 PPA / 500 PPH 91.3 Ha x 500 = 45650
Green Space Per Person 2.4 SQM
S.No |
Category |
No. of Parks |
Area In Sqm |
1 |
Community Park (CP) (10,000-50,000 sqm) |
2 |
31505 |
2 |
Neighborhood Park (NP) (5000-10,000sqm) |
5 |
27500 |
3 |
Housing Area Park (HAP) Less then 5000Sqm |
42 |
50995 |
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS
S. No |
Potential Challenge |
Policy Proposal |
1 |
Degradation of urban green spaces due to overuse |
Providing local urban green space close to peoples homes to distribute the demand pressure Restricting planning to functions that match the size and capacity of the urban green space Ensuring adequate and frequent maintenance and cleaning |
2 |
Community dissatisfaction with urban green space features/ services |
Early community engagement Involving local residents in design and construction Clarifying at an early stage that urban green space interventions need time to deliver their full benefits. |
3 |
Uncertain or reduced budgets for maintenance of urban green spaces |
Ensuring a low-maintenance design Looking at innovative models of funding (such as community ownership models like land trusts, foundations or cooperatives) Ensuring local political support early on working with community groups, nongovernmental and other organizations to support maintenance |
4 |
Community engagement |
Organizing competition for best gardens at residential levels Organising dedicated festivals- like Rose Festival to promote open spaces |
REFERNCES
-
URDPFI-2015, Vol 1, MoUD, GoI
-
Census of India, District. Census Handbook: Chandigarh 2011
-
New Chandigarh Report GMADA
-
Chen, J. (2004). The role of Green structures in development of the sustainable City. stockholm: Universitetetsservice US AB , Stockholm .
-
Choudhary P and Tewari VP. (2010). Role of public parks
-
/gardens in attracting domestic tourists: An example from city beautification of India . Tourismos(5), 101-109.
-
Gairola, S. ,. (2010). Emerging trend of urban green space research and the implications for safegaurding biodiversity :a viewpoint. Nature and science, 43-47.
-
Gaodi X, Wenhua L, Xiao Y, Zhang B,Chunxia L, Kia A, Wang J, kANG X. (2010). Forest ecosystems services and their value in Beijing . Chinese Geographical Science 20, 51- 58.
-
Grahn P and Stigsdotter U A. (2003). Lanscape planning and stress. Urban forestry and Urban greening20, 001-018.
-
Jim C Y and Chen W Y. (2008). Assessing the ecosystem services of airpollutant removal by Urban trees in Guangzhou. Journal of Environmental Management, 665-676.
-
Nowak D J, et al. (2006). Air pollution removal by Urban Trees and shrubs in the United states . Urban forestry and Urban greening, 115-123.
-
9. Roberts B, Kanaley TB. (2006). Urbanization and sustainability in Asia:Case studies of good practices. Retrieved june 2013, from
Asian development Bank: http://www.adb.org/publications/Urbanization-and- sustainability-asia-good-practice- approaches-urban -region- development
-
Sivaramakrishnan k, K. A. (2005). Handbook of urbanization in India: An analysis of trends and process. New Delhi: Oxford university Press.
-
Urban Greening Guidelines2014