Removal of COD from Textile Effluent using Electro coagulation: Statistical Design and Modeling

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV4IS100101

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Removal of COD from Textile Effluent using Electro coagulation: Statistical Design and Modeling

K Sahithi*1, V Sujatha2 ,V Sridevi 3

1M.tech, 2,3Professor,

Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam-530003,India.

Abstract – Electrocoagulation is widely used method in waste water treatment. The removal of COD from textile effluent by EC using Iron(Fe) as sacrificial electrodes was investigated in this paper.A Central composite design was developed to examine the individual and combined effects of important process parameters, such as pH ,voltage and electrolysis time on the percentage of COD removal .Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a high coefficient of determination value R2 (99.347%) for the percentage of COD removal. The optimum conditions for predicted maximum COD removal were found to be pH 7.23,voltage 8.77v and electrolysis time of 84.29 min.

Keywords: Electro Coagulation; Iron Electrode;Textile Waste Water; Response Surface Methodology.

I.INTRODUCTION

The textile industries in India, now-a-days are the important sectors of countrys economy, and contributes to the total output of the fast growing industrial sector which is at present revolving around 14%. The textile dyeing industries consumes large quantities of water and produces large volumes of wastewater(1). Many industries consume fresh water and releases wastewater so it should be treated properly to reduce or eradicate the pollutants and achieve the permissible limit to discharge as well as for its reutilization in the industrial/agriculture process to promote sustainability. Effluent with high colour and high COD and turbidities are common in industries like textile, paper, leather ,pharmaceutical and mineral processing(2). Currently there are more than 10,000 varieties of dye and pigments used in dyeing and printing processes. The effluent released from dyeing and printing processes contains mainly strong colourants, inorganic salts, chemicals and toxic compounds(3). Presence of dyes in water resources and aqueous environments, causes aesthetic aspect and affects the transparency and oxygen availability in water and some of these dyes are toxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic to human and aquatic life . Also discharge of colored wastewater without adequate treatment interferes with light penetration that disturbs biological processes and is harmful for aqueous plants(4). Electrocoagulation uses an electrical current and produces several metal ions in electrolyte solution to purify the wastewater. As a result, the electrocoagulation system is very effective removing suspended solids, dissolve metals, tannin and dyes, COD. In a electrocoagulation system, when metal ions are neutralized with ions of

opposite electric charges, they become unstable and precipitate in a form that is usually very stable. The hydrogen gas bubbles carry the colloidal pollutants to the top of the solution. These particles can be more easily concentrated, collected and removed from the top of the solution. In the electrocoagulation process, during the evolution of H2, the metallic ions react with the OH- ions, which are produced at the cathode as a result, the insoluble hydroxides absorb the pollutants out of the solution.(5) .

Electrocoagulation is simple and efficient method which is employed successfully in many waste water treatments. Hence it was chosen here to treat the textile waste water due to its numerous advantages.

    1. esign of Experiments and Modeling

      Response surface methodology is a collection of mathematical and statistical method used for modeling and optimization where the response of interest is influenced by several variables and the main objective is to optimize the response. The RSM generates empirical model which can describe the process and analyze the influence of independent variables on a specific dependent variable (response). are presumed to be continuous and can be controlled with negligible error.. The individual variables (x1, x2, , xk) are presumed to be continuous and can be controlled with negligible error The response (y) is postulated to be a random variable. The independent variables denoted by x1, x2, , xk and the response (y) can be related as follows (6)

      y=f(x1 ,x2 ,x3xk)+£ (1)

      where y is the response of the system, f is the unknown function of response, x1, x2, x3 xk the independent variables, k the number of independent variables, and £ the statistical error .In the present study the optimization of COD was done by using CCD in which , 20 experiments was done wih 8 star points,6 axial points(=±1.68) and 6 centre point techniques useful for the modeling and analysis of problems in which a response of (=0).As presented in table 2 ,each independent variable was coded in 5 level as (-1.68,-1,0,1,1.68) as xi according to the equation

      xi=Xi – X0/X (2)

      where X0 is value of the Xi (selected parameters) at the centre point and X presents the step change.COD

      removal efficiency was taken as the response of the experiments according equation.

      in order to minimize the deposition on the electrodes. The power system was used to supply Direct Current (DC) at desired voltage to the electrodes. The system converted the

      i=1

      Yi=b0+n

      bixi +

      input Alternating Current (AC) into Direct Current (DC) of

      n biixij2 + n1 n

      bijxixj

      (3)

      desired voltage. Provisions Ampere of 1A range was fitted

      i=1

      i=1

      j+1

      in the power system to display the amperage of the power

      where Yi is the percentage of dye removal efficiency b0= the constant coefficient

      bi = the regression coefficients for linear effects bii = the quadratic coefficients

      bij = the interaction coefficients

      and xi, xj are the coded values of the parameters.The accuracy of the fitted model was justified through analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the coefficient of R2(7). The characteristics of a textile effluent was shown in Table 1.

      TABLE 1:Characteristics of Textile Effulent

      Parameter va

      lue

      pH

      7.8

      Total Dissolved Solids

      2400(ppm)

      BOD

      250(ppm)

      COD

      8720(ppm)

      Color

      Purple

      Odour

      Pungent

      Fig1:Electrocoagulation apparatus

      1. MATERIALS AND METHODS

        A laboratory scale unit was used to conduct the experiments in the present study. The unit includes two components: The Reactor and the Spacing between the two electrodes was 15mm. the experimental set up was shown in Fig1. Polarity of current was reversed at regular intervals

        supplied. All the runs were performed at room temperature and the agitator speed was maintained constant at 500 were made in the system to regulate voltage of the output and to display it on a handy multi meter. An rpm.Regular samples were collected at respective intervals and the pH adjustment was done by using NaOH and H2SO4.The pH was measured by the pH meter and the COD ,total suspended solids (TSS) and total dissolved solids (TDS) were done by the standard methods (APHA,2005) (8) for examination of water and waste water.

      2. .RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The range of parameters used in the experiment were listed in Table 2 and the experiments were conducted according to the conditions of CCD coded values and the results were shown in Table3

TABLE 2:Coded and real values of indeendent parameters used for CCD

Parameters

levels

-1.68

-1

0

1

1.68

pH

5

6

7

8

9

Time(min)

40

60

80

100

120

Voltage(v)

4

6

8

10

12

.

A.Analysis of variance (ANOVA)

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the significant effects of process parameters on percentage removal of COD. The Anova table was shown in Table 4. It can be noticed from Table 4 that the F-statistics values for the regressions are higher. The large F-values for percentage COD removal indicate that the response fits more favourable for the regression model. The associated p-value is used to estimate whether the F-statistics are large enough to indicate statistical significance. p-values lower than 0.05 indicates that the model is statistically significant for percentage COD removal. The regression model equation fitted by the curve is developed by the second order polynomial equation for percentage of COD removal as a function of x1(pH), x2(voltage) and Electrolysis time (x3)

The regression equation is developed from the responses and is shown below

1 2

Y=-752.206+115.759×1+65.581×2+3.328×3-0.609x1x2-0.13x2x3-0.019x3x1-6.873x 2-3.328x 2-0.01

TABLE 3:Design of experiments and response for % COD removal

Run

pH

Voltage(v)

Time(min)

COD

Expt(%)

COD

Pred(%)

1

6

6

60

46.4

42.87

2

8

6

60

56

59.00

3

6

10

60

63.2

68.85

4

8

10

60

74.8

80.1

5

6

6

100

59.4

55.95

6

8

6

100

60.9

61.65

7

6

10

100

74

78.86

8

8

10

100

79.8

79.68

9

7

8

80

91.5

91.57

10

7

8

80

91.5

91.57

11

7

8

80

91.5

91.57

12

5.29

8

80

72

65.05

13

8.73

8

80

83

79.3

14

7

4.54

80

35.7

34.79

15

7

11.46

80

80.1

71.76

16

7

8

45.4

60.6

71.41

17

7

8

114.6

82.3

82.04

18

7

8

80

91.5

91.57

19

7

8

80

91.5

91.57

20

7

8

80

91.5

91.57

The high coefficient of the R2 value means best fit of the model.The R2 value provides a measure of how much variability in the observed response values can be explained by the experimental variables and their interactions. The R2 value is always between 0 and 1. The closer the R2 value is to 1, the stronger the model is and the

better it predicts the response. In this case, the value of the determination coefficient (R2 = 0. 99347) indicates that

99.34 % of the variability in the response could be explained by the model. In addition, the value of the adjusted determination coefficient (R2adj = 0.9876) is also very high to advocate for a high significance of the model

Table 4: Anova for the second order polynomial equation for COD removal percentage

Source Regression coefficients

SS

DF

Meansquare

F-value

p-value

CONSTANT

-752.206

X1

115.759

245.132

1

245.132

69.5455

0.000008

X2

65.581

1651.399

1

1651.399

468.5134

0.000000

X3

3.328

136.583

1

136.583

38.7496

0.000000

X1X2

-0.609

11.883

1

11.883

3.3712

0.000000

X2X3

-0.130

4.728

1

4.728

1.3413

0.000098

X3X1

-0.019

54.340

1

54.340

15.4167

0.000001

X1

-6.873

678.578

1

678.578

192.5172

0.096212

X2 2

-3.392

2645.063

1

2645.063

750.4228

0.002837

X3

-0.013

397.578

1

397.578

112.7958

0.273714

ERROR

35.248

10

3.525

TOTAL SS

5401.497

19

*p0.05

    1. Effect of Voltage and pH

      Fig 2: Surface plot shows the combined effect of voltage and pH on COD removal

      From the Fig 2 it was proved that the iron works good for neutral pH and for slightly basic nature.As the pH increased beyond that does not shows significant effect on COD removal due to the formation of soluble metal hydroxide.The removal percentage of COD was shown as maximum at voltage 8v, pH 7 for the fixed electrolysis time of 80 min.

    2. Effect of pH and Electrolysis Time

      It was clearly shown that the COD removal increases on increasing time upto the maximum level and further increase in time decreases the removal of COD slightly. As stated above the removal percentage increases for increase in time and pH upto the optimum value pH 7 and electrolysis time 80 min,and then the trend is reversed as shown in Fig 3

      Fig3: A surface plot showing the combined effect of pH and Electrolysis time on % CO removal

    3. Effect of Electrolysis time and voltage

The effect of Electrolysis time and voltage on COD removal is shown in Fig 4.The COD removal increases with increase in both the time and voltage and after that decreases slightly .The optimum value for maximum COD removal lies near the centre point as shown in the Fig 4.

Table 5: Critical values

The critical values obtained from the experimentwere shown in Table 5

Factor

Observed optimized

values in preliminary studies

Critical values obtained in RSM

pH

7

7.2332

Voltage(v)

8

8.77765

Time (min)

80

84.29051

Fig 4: Combined effect of Electrolysis time and voltage on percentage of COD removal .

D: Comparison of predicted values with observed experimental values

The variance of observed and predicted values was shown in Fig 5 and from the figure it is clearly shown that , the points cluster around the diagonal line indicated the optimal fit of the model, since thedeviation between the experimental and predicted values were minimal.

Fig5: Observed Vs predicted values

IV CONCLUSIONS

Experiments were carried to percentage COD removal by EC from textile effluent covering wide range of operating conditions .The percentage of COD removal shows the significant influence by operating conditions, such as voltage ,pH and electrolysis time. The experimental data were analysed using RSM. To overcome problems associated with chemical coagulation,EC has been advocated as a novel approach in removing COD from textile effluent.Nevertheless the general opinion of research works is that for the EC process to be effective in treating waste water parameters such as pH,voltage and electrolysis time used must be considered.

REFERENCES

  1. Vinodha Diego carmerego, Jegathambal p

    ,Comparison of Fe and Alelectrodes in the treatment of blue CA dye effluent using electrocoagulation process, international journal of engineering science and technology (IJEST) ISSN : 0975- 546vol. no.02,may 2012.

  2. Akanksha 1, roopashree g. b2, lokesh k. s.3comparative study of electrode material (iron, aluminium and stainless steel) for treatment of textile industry wastewater,International journal of environmental sciences volume no 4, 2013 ,ISSN:0976 402

  3. Sachin k. patil, 2 kiran r. patil, 3 manoj h motaa ,Review of electrocoagulation technique in treatment of textile mill waste water

    ,Journal of information, knowledge and research and civil engineering. journal of information, knowledge and research in civil engineering ISSN: 0975 6744| NOV 14 TO OCT 15 | Volume 3,

    Issue 2.

  4. Arash Dalvand,Mitra Gholami,Ahmad Joneidi,Niyaz Mohammad,Dye removal, energy Consumption and Operating Cost of Electrocoagulation of Textile Wastewate as a Clean Process, Clean Soil, Air, Water 2011, 39 (7), 665672.

  5. Yavuz demirci1, lutfiye c. pekel2, mustafa alpbaz, Investigation of different electrode connections in electrocoagulation of textile waste water treatment , Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 10 (2015) 2685 – 2693.

  6. K.C. Praveen, K.V. Radha, N. Balasubramanian, Electrochemical Treatment of Plating Effluent: Kinetics and Statistical Modeling, ARCH. ENVIRON. SCI. (2011), 5, 17-24.

  7. Mahsa Taheri1, Mohammad Reza Alavi Moghaddam2*and Mokhtar Arami ,Optimization of Acid Black 172 decolorization by electrocoagulation using Response surface methodologyTaheri et al. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering 2012, 9:23.

  8. APHA APHA, (2005). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed., AWWA, WPCF, Washington DC: American Public Health Association.

Leave a Reply