- Open Access
- Total Downloads : 155
- Authors : Sudip Kumar Das, Shreyashi Sarkar
- Paper ID : IJERTV5IS110270
- Volume & Issue : Volume 05, Issue 11 (November 2016)
- DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV5IS110270
- Published (First Online): 23-11-2016
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Removal of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Solution using Natural Adsorbents – Column Studies
Shreyashi Sarkar
Resesarch Scholar Chemical Engineering Department
University of Calcutta
92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata 700009, West Bengal, India
Sudip Kumar Das
Professor
Chemical Engineering Department University of Calcutta
92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata 700009, West Bengal, India
Abstract The packed bed column study was investigated using coconut shell and neem leaf for the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution. The breakthrough characteristics for Cr(VI) removal was reported. The effect of operating parameters like influent Cr(VI) concentration, bed height of the packed column and the flow rate of aqueous solution on the breakthrough curve was studied. Bohart-Adams, Yoon-Nelson, Thomas model,Yan et al. model and Wolborska model were applied to the experimental data for their suitability.
Keywords Hexavalent chromium removal, Column study, Yoon-Nelson model, Thomas model, Adams-Bohart model Introduction
-
INTRODUCTION
The major sources of chromium in water bodies by the human activities are mainly from industrial waste water discharges such as mining, cement, steel and paint industries. Such types of industries discharge Cr(VI) contained water. Cr(VI) has been reported to be toxic to animals, humans and also it is known as carcinogenic (Raji and Anirudhan, 1998). Excessive accumulation of Cr(VI) in human being causes ulcerations, dermatitis and allergic skin reactions. The concentration of Cr(VI) in industrial wastewater remains in the range from 0.5 to 270 mg/L (Casarett and Doul, 1980). According to EPA the maximum tolerance limit of Cr(VI) in drinking water 0.1 mg/L (MINAS, 2001). Tolerance limit of Cr(VI) in drinking water according to Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India is 0.01 mg/L (MINAS, 2001).
Several conventional technologies are used to remove the heavy metal from the aqueous solution such as membrane separation, electrochemical precipitation, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration and adsorption. Major drawbacks of these processes are either high cost or discharge of sludge formed. Ion-exchange is considered a better alternative technique but its operating cost is high. All other techniques have higher operating cost. Hence among these techniques the adsorption method with using low-cost adsorbent is cost effective and extremely useful. Fixed bed column study is more effective for industrial purpose than batch adsorption process. A wide variety of agricultural waste such as rice husk, coconut shell, sawdust, wheat husk, wheat and rice straw abundantly available can be used as low- costadsorbent. Here, coconut shell and neem leaf are used as
the adsorbent for Cr(VI) removal in continuous mode operation. The effect of initial pH, flow rate of metal solution, influent metal ion concentration and bed height are studied. Available models, i.e., Thomas model, Yoon-Nelson model, Adams-Bohart model, Yan et al. model, Wolborska model are applied to the experimental data to find out the suitable model. The coconut shell and neem leaf are widely available throughout India. India being a 3rd world country these adsorbent are suitable for the treatment on of Cr(VI) containing wastewater for small to any sized industries.
-
EXPERIMENTAL
Preparation of adsorbent
In the present study coconut shell and neem leaf were used as the adsorbent for the removal of Cr(VI) ions from aqueous solution. Initially adsorbents were collected from local area near Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Initially coconut shell was crushed in roll crusher and then it was grinded. Neem leaves and coconut shell were treated with 0.1N NaOH to remove lignin-based colour materials followed by 0.1N H2SO4 (Singha and Das, 2011). Then the adsorbents were washed with distilled water several times and dried at 105Cfor 6 h. Next the adsorbent was sieved to pass through a
-44 +52 mesh screen. After sieving the adsorbent was kept by in an airtight container in a decicator.
Metal solution
1000 mg/L of Cr(VI) solution was prepared by dissolving 2.83 gm of potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) in double distilled water. Then stock solution of Cr(VI) was diluted to obtain required standard solution containing 5, 10, 15, 20 mg/L of Cr(VI). Throughout the experiment the glass wares were washed with 20% nitric acid followed by washing with deionized water and then the glass wares were dried in oven at 383K.
Reagents and instrument used
The analytical grade reagents were used and obtained from E. Merck Limited, Mumbai, India. WTW pH meter (Multi 340i/SET, Germany) was used to determine the pH of the solution. UV-vis Spectrophotometer (Dr 5000, HACH, U.S.A.) was used to determine the Cr(VI) content in standard and treated solution.
Experimental procedure
Adsorption experiment was conducted in packed bed column at ambient temperature. Required amount of adsorbent was packed in glass columns to produce desired height. The glass columns had an internal diameter of 2 cm and height of 50 cm. Initially pH of Cr(VI) was adjusted by adding 0.1 N HCl. Cr(VI) solution was pumped through the packed bed column in a down flow direction at a desired flow rate by a peristaltic pump (Cole-Parmer, model-7535-04, USA). Samples were collected from the exit of the column at desired time intervals and 1,5 diphenyl-cabazide is added to produce the complex agent which is analyzed by UV-vis Spectrophotometer to determine the concentration of Cr(VI) (Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, 1998). Experimental setup is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Schematic diagram of experimental set up of column study
1. Reservoir tank with metal solution; 2 Peristaltic pumps; 3. Porous sheet; 4. Glass beads; 5.Adsorbents; 6. Filter; 7. Treated effluent storage.
-
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Characterization of the adsorbent
Scanning electron microscopic image of the used adsorbents were carried out to see its surface structure. SEM images of adsorbent represented in Figures 2 and 3. The surface of coconut shell and neem leaf is porous and irregular in nature.
Figure 2. Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of coconut shell
Figure 3. Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of neem leaf
The FTIR studied indicated that the main functional groups like aliphatic -CH , aliphatic acid, aromatic NO2, alkane and sulphonyl chlorides stretching are responsible for Cr(VI) binding on neem leaves and similarly phosphate ester, aliphatic acid, aromatic nitro, alkane SO3 and sulphonic S=O stretching are important for Cr(VI) binding on coconut shell (Singha et al., 2011).
The surface areas are measured in Micromeritics surface area analyzer (ASAP 2010, USA). The point of zero charge was determined by solid addition (Srivastava et al. 2006). Other physical properties of the adsorbents are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Different physical characteristics of bioadsorbent
Adsorbents
Coconut shell
Neem leaf
Surface area (m2/g)
0.52
0.57
Bulk Density (g/cm3)
0.82
0.71
Dry matter (%)
93.84
91.67
Moisture content(%)
6.16
8.33
Point of zero charge
6.62
6.94
Ash content(%)
9.23
13.58
Effcts of operating parameters
– 2-
– 2-
– 2-
– 2-
In our earlier study (Singha and Das, 2011) the effects of pH on the Cr(VI) removal onto coconut shell and neem leaf are reported for batch process. It was observed that for both adsorbents the maximum adsorption observed at pH 2. Cr(VI) exist in different forms in aqueous solution depending on pH. The chromate represented as H2CrO4, HCrO4 , CrO4 , HCr2O7 and Cr2O7 in solution as a function of pH and concentration [Gurgel et al., 2009].
–
–
4
4
2 2
2 2
2 – 2 –
2 – 2 –
At pH 1, chromium ions exist in the form of HCrO4 , while in the pH range 26 different forms of chromium ions such as Cr2O7 , HCrO4 ,and Cr3O10 ,coexists, of which HCrO4 predominates. As the pH increases this form shifts to CrO4 and Cr2O7 (Singha and Das 2011). At low pH values, the Cr(VI) exists as univalent form, HCrO – and needs only one exchange site. As the pH increased, the overall surface charge on the adsorbents became negative and adsorption decreased.
The adsorption experiments were operated at flow rate of 10 ml.min-1, 20 ml.min-1 and 30 ml.min-1.The breakthrough curve is a plot of dimensionless ratio of concentration (Ct/C0) versus time and is shown in Figures 4 and 5. The better performance was observed at lower flow rate (10 ml.min-1). At higher flow rate breakthrough occurred more rapidly than the lower flow rate. These figures indicated that with increase in flow rate the breakthrough time decreases. This behaviour occurred because at higher flow rate the Cr(VI) solution had less contact time, i.e., residence time within the column. At lower flow rate the Cr(VI) solution had more time to contact with the adsorbent in the column and hence higher removal of metal ions observed. The best adsorption capacity of the fixed bed column obtained at 10 ml min-1 flow rate. Similar results are obtained by other researchers (Hanen and Abdelmottaleb,2013 ; Sivaprakash et al.,2010).
Figure 4 Effect of flow rate for Cr(VI) adsorption on coconut shell at constant bed height and influent metal ion concentration
Figure 5 Effect of flow rate for Cr(VI) adsorption on neem leaf at constant bed height and influent metal ion concentration
The effects of bed height were investigated for bed height of 5, 10 and 15 cm at a constant flow rate and influent metal ion concentration. The breakthrough curves are shown in Figures 6 and 7.The removal of heavy metal is entirely dependent on the bed height. From these graphs it was observed that the breakthrough time decreases as the bed height decreases. At higher bed height breakthrough occurred more slowly than the lower bed height because at higher bed height aqueous solution got more binding sites of the adsorbent and this behaviour produced higher removal of metal ions in the column. Similar observations are obtained by other researchers (Hasfalina et al., 2012; Nwabanne et al., 2012).
The effects of metal ion concentration were investigated at different initial Cr(VI) concentration of 10 mg/L, 20 mg/L and 30 mg/L. The breakthrough curves are shown in Figures
8 and 9. From the breakthrough graphs it observed that adsorption capacity of the packed bed increases with the decrease in metal ion concentration. At high influent metal ion concentration adsorption capacity decreased due to earlier saturation of active surfaces. At lower influent metal ion concentration the adsorption capacity increased because the metal ions would react with active binding sites. The breakthrough time increased as the influent metal ion decreased (Deepali, 2011).
Figure 6 Effect of bed height of column for removal of Cr(VI) on coconut shell at constant flow rate and influent metal ion concentration
Figure 7 Effect of bed height of column for removal of Cr(VI) on neem leaf at constant flow rate and influent metal ion concentration
-
MODELLING OF COLUMN STUDY Maximum adsorption capacity of the adsorbent in a
fixed bed column is calculated by following equations
Figure 9 Effect of influent metal ions concentration for the removal of Cr(VI) on neem leaf at constant bed height and flow rate
Bohart-Adams (1920) model
Bohart and Adams developed to find the adsorption capacity and adsorption rate constant of the continuous column operation (Bohart and Adams, 1920).The expression
qe
v
1000w
ttotal
(C0
-
Ct )dt
(1)
given by Bohart and Adams for an adsorption column is given as follows (Aksu and Gönen, 2004),
C z
AB 0 AB 0
AB 0 AB 0
0 ln
t k C t k N
(3)
q qtotal
(2)
Co
v
emax w
The intercept and slope of the linear plot of ln(Ct/C0) versus time were used to determine the value of adsorption capacity N0 and kinetic constant kAB. The values of kAB, N0 and statistical parameters are tabulated in Table 2. It is observed that the rate constant (kAB) and saturation concentration (N0) is dependent on flow rate and metal ion concentration. It is also observed that the value of rate constant (kAB) increases with the increasing flow rate.
Figure 8 Effect of influent metal ions concentration for the removal of Cr(VI) on coconut shell at constant bed height and flow rate
Table 2 Bohart -Adams model parameters
Flow rate v
(ml/min)
Influent concentration C0
(mg/L)
Bed height (cm)
Rate constant, kAB X 104
ml/( min. mg)
Saturation concentration,
N0
(g/L)
R2
Adsorbent : Coconut shell
10
10
5
5.68
11.48
0.7999
20
10
5
5.55
14.03
0.7869
30
10
5
13.92
13.91
0.6586
10
20
5
2.4
18.665
0.8155
20
20
5
2.4
40.65
0.8825
30
20
5
3.75
21.963
0.9280
10
30
5
0.433
70.27
0.9368
20
30
5
0.933
58.20
0.9096
30
30
5
1.26
45.73
0.9810
10
30
10
0.933
37.74
0.9285
20
30
10
0.8
48.64
0.9077
30
30
10
1.233
24.90
0.9750
10
30
15
0.8
32.7108
0.9637
20
30
15
19.4
40.16
0.8630
30
30
15
0.4033
48.28
0.9555
Adsorbent : Neem leaf
10
10
5
3.5
12.97
0.8796
20
10
5
3.8
21.10
0.8228
30
10
5
10.3
13.10
0.6409
10
20
5
2.2
15.95
0.8770
20
20
5
2.1
34.24
0.8737
30
20
5
2.7
21.95
0.9387
10
30
5
0.4
48.97
0.9421
20
30
5
0.8
50.32
0.9017
30
30
5
0.9
43.14
0.9815
10
30
10
1.2
24.41
0.9688
20
30
10
0.7
38.37
0.9300
30
30
10
0.9
23.84
0.9848
10
30
15
1.1
20.27
0.9618
20
30
15
0.7
28.63
0.8920
30
30
15
0.5
28.55
0.9636
Yoon-Nelson (1984) model
The basic assumption of this model is the rate of decrease in the probability of adsorption for each adsorbate molecule depends on the adsorbate adsorption. The Yoon-
Table 3 Yoon-Nelson model parameters
Flow rate
v
(ml/min)
Influent concentration C0
(mg /L)
Bed height
(cm)
Time,
(min)
Rate constant kYN (1/min)
R2
Adsorbent : Coconut shell
10
10
5
475.0072
0.0069
0.8623
20
10
5
359.4598
0.0072
0.8581
30
30
5
191.2437
0.0170
0.7370
10
20
5
332.679
0.0065
0.8791
20
20
5
377.849
0.0063
0.9304
30
20
5
89.48
0.0126
0.9520
10
30
5
633.398
0.0020
0.9826
20
30
5
237.68
0.0046
0.9403
30
30
5
66.497
0.0061
0.9672
10
30
10
1027.048
0.00349
0.9604
20
30
10
524.57
0.0035
0.9475
30
30
10
149.84
0.0031
0.9230
10
30
15
1419.0813
0.0028
0.9773
20
30
15
691.978
0.0027
0.9192
30
30
15
257.4705
0.0020
0.9708
Adsorbent : Neem leaf
10
10
5
654.9772
0.0044
0.9284
20
10
5
663.2368
0.0038
0.8277
30
10
5
216.7615
0.0130
0.7286
10
20
5
340.952
0.0063
0.9238
20
20
5
391.551
0.0058
0.9240
30
20
5
102.75
0.0091
0.9620
10
30
5
543.63
0.0022
0.9675
20
30
5
258
0.0040
0.9330
30
30
5
61.96
0.0056
0.9830
10
30
10
864.66
0.0045
0.9746
20
30
10
507.64
0.0034
0.9630
30
30
10
84.34
0.0053
0.9790
10
30
15
1134.7027
0.0037
0.9580
20
30
15
625.1
0.0030
0.9358
30
30
15
161.533
0.0030
0.9721
Thomas (1948) model
Thomas model has been widely used for heavy metal removal in fixed bed column studies (Thomas, 1948). The mathematical form of Thomas model is expressed as follows (Malkoc et al., 2006),
Nelson equation is as follows (Zeinali and et al., 2010),
Ct 1
(5)
C
C
t exp(kYNt kYN)
(4)
C0 1 exp[( kThqe x ) k C t]
C0 Ct
Q Th 0
The intercept and slope of the linear plot of ln(Ct/C0-Ct) Linearized form of Thomas model is expressed as follows,
versus time were used to determine the value of breakthrough
parameters and kYN. Parameters and the values of R2 are
ln( Ct
1)
kTH qe x
-
k C t
(6)
tabulated in Table 3. From the tabulated data it is observed
C Q
TH 0
0
that time required for 50% breakthrough decreases as the flow rate increases but the value of rate constant kYN increases with the increasing flow for Cr(VI) removal on coconut shell and neem leaf respectively. From the R2 values it can be concluded that Yoon-Nelson model is appropriate to describe the column operation of Cr(VI) removal on coconut shell and neem leaf respectively. Similar result obtained by other researcher (Saadi et al., 2013).
The model parameters and the values of R2 are tabulated in Table 4. From the table it is observed that the value of calculated qe from Thomas model is greater than the value of experimental qe. The value of qe increases as the adsorbent dose increases but the value of KTh decreases for the same. It is also observed that value of qe decreases as the flow rate of aqueous solution increases.
Flow rate, v (ml/mi n) |
Influent concentra tion C0 (mg/L) |
Bed height (cm) |
kTh ml/(min. mg) |
qe,max(cal ) (mg/g) |
qe,max(ex p) (mg/g) |
R2 |
Adsorbent : Coconut shell |
||||||
10 |
<>10 |
5 |
0.690 |
7.63 |
4.28 |
0.8623 |
20 |
10 |
5 |
0.72 |
11.47 |
6.06 |
0.8561 |
30 |
10 |
5 |
1.7 |
9.31 |
5.35 |
0.7370 |
10 |
20 |
5 |
0.325 |
10.61 |
5.97 |
0.8791 |
20 |
20 |
5 |
0.32 |
23.8 |
13.2 |
0.9304 |
30 |
20 |
5 |
0.633 |
8.52 |
5.19 |
0.9502 |
10 |
30 |
5 |
0.068 |
30.45 |
16.009 |
0.9828 |
20 |
30 |
5 |
0.15 |
22.63 |
13.16 |
0.9403 |
30 |
30 |
5 |
0.203 |
9.5 |
4.86 |
0.9672 |
10 |
30 |
10 |
0.116 |
25 |
13.77 |
0.9603 |
20 |
30 |
10 |
0.1167 |
24.97 |
14.18 |
0.9475 |
30 |
30 |
10 |
0.104 |
10.71 |
6.35 |
0.9327 |
10 |
30 |
15 |
0.093 |
22.75 |
11.84 |
0.9773 |
20 |
30 |
15 |
0.913 |
21.49 |
11.99 |
0.9131 |
30 |
30 |
15 |
0.07 |
11.50 |
6.14 |
0.9666 |
Adsobent : Neem leaf |
||||||
10 |
10 |
5 |
0.44 |
10.39 |
5.75 |
0.9284 |
20 |
10 |
5 |
0.49 |
16.14 |
9.23 |
0.8837 |
30 |
10 |
5 |
1.3 |
10.32 |
6.32 |
0.7286 |
10 |
20 |
5 |
0.3 |
10.36 |
6.58 |
0.9238 |
20 |
20 |
5 |
0.29 |
24.86 |
13.82 |
0.9247 |
30 |
20 |
5 |
0.45 |
9.78 |
5.52 |
0.9620 |
10 |
30 |
5 |
0.07 |
42.65 |
13.61 |
0.9675 |
20 |
30 |
5 |
0.13 |
24.58 |
14.08 |
0.9335 |
30 |
30 |
5 |
0.18 |
8.87 |
5.45 |
0.9839 |
10 |
30 |
10 |
0.15 |
20.58 |
11.13 |
0.9746 |
20 |
30 |
10 |
0.11 |
24.18 |
13.21 |
0.9632 |
30 |
30 |
10 |
0.17 |
6.028 |
3.12 |
0.9792 |
10 |
30 |
15 |
0.12 |
18.01 |
9.10 |
0.9580 |
20 |
30 |
15 |
0.10 |
19.84 |
10.72 |
0.9358 |
30 |
30 |
15 |
0.10 |
7.69 |
4.23 |
0.9721 |
Flow rate, v (ml/mi n) |
Influent concentra tion C0 (mg/L) |
Bed height (cm) |
kTh ml/(min. mg) |
qe,max(cal ) (mg/g) |
qe,max(ex p) (mg/g) |
R2 |
Adsorbent : Coconut shell |
||||||
10 |
10 |
5 |
0.690 |
7.63 |
4.28 |
0.8623 |
20 |
10 |
5 |
0.72 |
11.47 |
6.06 |
0.8561 |
30 |
10 |
5 |
1.7 |
9.31 |
5.35 |
0.7370 |
10 |
20 |
5 |
0.325 |
10.61 |
5.97 |
0.8791 |
20 |
20 |
5 |
0.32 |
23.8 |
13.2 |
0.9304 |
30 |
20 |
5 |
0.633 |
8.52 |
5.19 |
0.9502 |
10 |
30 |
5 |
0.068 |
30.45 |
16.009 |
0.9828 |
20 |
30 |
5 |
0.15 |
22.63 |
13.16 |
0.9403 |
30 |
30 |
5 |
0.203 |
9.5 |
4.86 |
0.9672 |
10 |
30 |
10 |
0.116 |
25 |
13.77 |
0.9603 |
20 |
30 |
10 |
0.1167 |
24.97 |
14.18 |
0.9475 |
30 |
30 |
10 |
0.104 |
10.71 |
6.35 |
0.9327 |
10 |
30 |
15 |
0.093 |
22.75 |
11.84 |
0.9773 |
20 |
30 |
15 |
0.913 |
21.49 |
11.99 |
0.9131 |
30 |
30 |
15 |
0.07 |
11.50 |
6.14 |
0.9666 |
Adsobent : Neem leaf |
||||||
10 |
10 |
5 |
0.44 |
10.39 |
5.75 |
0.9284 |
20 |
10 |
5 |
0.49 |
16.14 |
9.23 |
0.8837 |
30 |
10 |
5 |
1.3 |
10.32 |
6.32 |
0.7286 |
10 |
20 |
5 |
0.3 |
10.36 |
6.58 |
0.9238 |
20 |
20 |
5 |
0.29 |
24.86 |
13.82 |
0.9247 |
30 |
20 |
5 |
0.45 |
9.78 |
5.52 |
0.9620 |
10 |
30 |
5 |
0.07 |
42.65 |
13.61 |
0.9675 |
20 |
30 |
5 |
0.13 |
24.58 |
14.08 |
0.9335 |
30 |
30 |
5 |
0.18 |
8.87 |
5.45 |
0.9839 |
10 |
30 |
10 |
0.15 |
20.58 |
11.13 |
0.9746 |
20 |
30 |
10 |
0.11 |
24.18 |
13.21 |
0.9632 |
30 |
30 |
10 |
0.17 |
6.028 |
3.12 |
0.9792 |
10 |
30 |
15 |
0.12 |
18.01 |
9.10 |
0.9580 |
20 |
30 |
15 |
0.10 |
19.84 |
10.72 |
0.9358 |
30 |
30 |
15 |
0.10 |
7.69 |
4.23 |
0.9721 |
Table 4 Thomas model parameters
Yan et al. (2011) model
Mass transfer model is used to describe the breakthrough curve of the fixed bed column study (Yan et al. 2011). This model proposed a better approach to describe the breakthrough curve than the Thomas model. Linearized form
Table 5 Yan et al. model parameters
Flow rate v (ml/min) |
Influent concentrati on C0 (mg/L) |
Bed height (cm) |
Rate constant kY ml/(mg. min) |
qY (mg/g) |
R2 |
Adsorbent : Coconut shell |
|||||
10 |
10 |
5 |
1564.19 |
5.6743 |
0.9740 |
20 |
10 |
5 |
2405.80 |
11.32 |
0.9534 |
30 |
30 |
5 |
5099.70 |
5.67 |
0.9486 |
10 |
20 |
5 |
413.10 |
16.70 |
0.9899 |
20 |
20 |
5 |
843.17 |
41.51 |
0.9642 |
30 |
20 |
5 |
1111.05 |
13.18 |
0.9675 |
10 |
30 |
5 |
129.76 |
142.73 |
0.8974 |
20 |
30 |
5 |
635.1 |
1.27 |
0.9468 |
30 |
30 |
5 |
259.12 |
46.87 |
0.8911 |
10 |
30 |
10 |
360.6 |
38.61 |
0.8988 |
20 |
30 |
10 |
412.67 |
59.42 |
0.9465 |
30 |
30 |
10 |
244.07 |
55.11 |
0.9692 |
10 |
30 |
15 |
351.70 |
48.71 |
0.8322 |
20 |
30 |
15 |
453.46 |
44.40 |
0.9836 |
30 |
30 |
15 |
216.37 |
74.35 |
0.9528 |
Adsorbent : Neem leaf |
|||||
10 |
10 |
5 |
1124.50 |
11.89 |
0.9867 |
20 |
10 |
5 |
1455.80 |
61.34 |
0.9890 |
30 |
10 |
5 |
3889.80 |
0.95 |
0.9786 |
10 |
20 |
5 |
401.80 |
18.20 |
0.9599 |
20 |
20 |
5 |
812.40 |
42.31 |
0.9707 |
30 |
20 |
5 |
632.10 |
27.33 |
0.9560 |
10 |
30 |
5 |
128.13 |
104.61 |
0.9255 |
20 |
30 |
5 |
268.26 |
77.10 |
0.9525 |
30 |
30 |
5 |
190.80 |
45.94 |
0.9143 |
10 |
30 |
10 |
360.73 |
38.04 |
0.7967 |
20 |
30 |
10 |
375.40 |
67.27 |
0.9351 |
30 |
30 |
10 |
185.05 |
42.78 |
0.7992 |
10 |
30 |
15 |
354.26 |
41.60 |
0.7539 |
20 |
30 |
15 |
409.80 |
48.58 |
0.9588 |
30 |
30 |
15 |
185.40 |
58.09 |
0.8948 |
Wolborska (1989) model
The mathematical expression of Wolborska model is similar to Adams-Bohart model. The linearised form of Wolborska model is given as follows (Wolborska, 1989),
Ct z
of Yan et al. model is given as follows,
ln C
kABC0t kAB N0 v
(8)
Ct K
Q2
K C0
o
ln Y C0 ln Y ln t
(7)
The model parameter values are tabulated in Table 6. These
C0 Ct Q KY qY m Q
values depend on the flow rate and bed height. The value of b
The value of rate constant (KY), adsorption capacity (qY) and R2 are tabulated in Table 5. From the table it is observed that the adsorption capacity (qY) increases with the increase in flow rate and bed height. The rate constant (KY) value increases with the increase in flow rate.
increases with the increase in flow rate but decreases with the increases in bed height.
Flow rate, v (ml/min) |
Influent concentration C0 (mg/L) |
Bed height (cm) |
(L/min) |
Saturation concentration, N0 (g/L) |
R2 |
Adsorbent : Coconut shell |
|||||
10 |
10 |
5 |
0.6520 |
11.48 |
0.7999 |
20 |
10 |
5 |
1.0367 |
14.03 |
0.7869 |
30 |
30 |
5 |
1.9360 |
13.91 |
0.6586 |
10 |
20 |
5 |
0.4479 |
18.665 |
0.8155 |
20 |
20 |
5 |
0.9750 |
40.65 |
0.8825 |
30 |
20 |
5 |
0.8230 |
21.963 |
0.9280 |
10 |
30 |
5 |
0.3042 |
70.27 |
0.9368 |
20 |
30 |
5 |
0.5430 |
58.20 |
0.9096 |
30 |
30 |
5 |
0.5463 |
45.73 |
0.9810 |
10 |
30 |
10 |
0.3521 |
37.74 |
0.9285> |
20 |
30 |
10 |
0.3890 |
48.64 |
0.9077 |
30 |
30 |
10 |
0.2852 |
24.90 |
0.9750 |
10 |
30 |
15 |
0.2616 |
32.7108 |
0.9637 |
20 |
30 |
15 |
0.2590 |
40.16 |
0.8630 |
30 |
30 |
15 |
0.1947 |
48.28 |
0.9555 |
Adsorbent : Neem leaf |
|||||
10 |
10 |
5 |
0.5721 |
12.97 |
0.8796 |
20 |
10 |
5 |
1.0103 |
21.10 |
0.8228 |
30 |
10 |
5 |
1.7007 |
13.10 |
0.6409 |
10 |
20 |
5 |
0.4421 |
15.95 |
0.8770 |
20 |
20 |
5 |
0.9270 |
34.24 |
0.8737 |
30 |
20 |
5 |
0.7470 |
21.95 |
0.9387 |
10 |
30 |
5 |
0.2880 |
48.97 |
0.9421 |
20 |
30 |
5 |
0.5281 |
50.32 |
0.9017 |
30 |
30 |
5 |
0.5250 |
43.14 |
0.9815 |
10 |
30 |
10 |
0.3791 |
24.41 |
0.9688 |
20 |
30 |
10 |
0.3708 |
38.37 |
0.9300 |
30 |
30 |
10 |
0.2802 |
23.84 |
0.9848 |
10 |
30 |
15 |
0.2725 |
20.27 |
0.9618 |
20 |
30 |
15 |
0.2645 |
28.63 |
0.8920 |
30 |
30 |
15 |
0.1918 |
28.55 |
0.9636 |
Flow rate, v (ml/min) |
Influent concentration C0 (mg/L) |
Bed height (cm) |
(L/min) |
Saturation concentration, N0 (g/L) |
R2 |
Adsorbent : Coconut shell |
|||||
10 |
10 |
5 |
0.6520 |
11.48 |
0.7999 |
20 |
10 |
5 |
1.0367 |
14.03 |
0.7869 |
30 |
30 |
5 |
1.9360 |
13.91 |
0.6586 |
10 |
20 |
5 |
0.4479 |
18.665 |
0.8155 |
20 |
20 |
5 |
0.9750 |
40.65 |
0.8825 |
30 |
20 |
5 |
0.8230 |
21.963 |
0.9280 |
10 |
30 |
5 |
0.3042 |
70.27 |
0.9368 |
20 |
30 |
5 |
0.5430 |
58.20 |
0.9096 |
30 |
30 |
5 |
0.5463 |
45.73 |
0.9810 |
10 |
30 |
10 |
0.3521 |
37.74 |
0.9285 |
20 |
30 |
10 |
0.3890 |
48.64 |
0.9077 |
30 |
30 |
10 |
0.2852 |
24.90 |
0.9750 |
10 |
30 |
15 |
0.2616 |
32.7108 |
0.9637 |
20 |
30 |
15 |
0.2590 |
40.16 |
0.8630 |
30 |
30 |
15 |
0.1947 |
48.28 |
0.9555 |
Adsorbent : Neem leaf |
|||||
10 |
10 |
5 |
0.5721 |
12.97 |
0.8796 |
20 |
10 |
5 |
1.0103 |
21.10 |
0.8228 |
30 |
10 |
5 |
1.7007 |
13.10 |
0.6409 |
10 |
20 |
5 |
0.4421 |
15.95 |
0.8770 |
20 |
20 |
5 |
0.9270 |
34.24 |
0.8737 |
30 |
20 |
5 |
0.7470 |
21.95 |
0.9387 |
10 |
30 |
5 |
0.2880 |
48.97 |
0.9421 |
20 |
30 |
5 |
0.5281 |
50.32 |
0.9017 |
30 |
30 |
5 |
0.5250 |
43.14 |
0.9815 |
10 |
30 |
10 |
0.3791 |
24.41 |
0.9688 |
20 |
30 |
10 |
0.3708 |
38.37 |
0.9300 |
30 |
30 |
10 |
0.2802 |
23.84 |
0.9848 |
10 |
30 |
15 |
0.2725 |
20.27 |
0.9618 |
20 |
30 |
15 |
0.2645 |
28.63 |
0.8920 |
30 |
30 |
15 |
0.1918 |
28.55 |
0.9636 |
Table 6 Wolborska model parameters
-
SAFE DISPOSAL OF USED ADSORBENTS
The leaching possibility of the Chromium ions from the used adsorbents restricts its dumping in the open environment. The Cr(VI) loaded adsorbents were incinerated at 700o C to form ash and then 5 mg of the ash samples were mixed with 25 ml of deionized water to give a liquid – solid ratio of 5:1 (Nag et al., 2015). After continuous gentle stirring for 24 h the filtrate was analyzed for Cr(VI) ions. It was observed that Cr(VI) did not leach from the ash sample. Hence, this ash may be used for road filling particularly in the nearby rural areas or to be placed in the agricultural field.
-
CONCLUSIONS
Fixed-bed column studies have been carried out for the removal of Cr(VI) ions using coconut shell and neem leaf
.
-
An effective removal of Cr(VI) is observed by a fixed bed column using coconut shell and neem leaf as an low- costadsorbent.
-
The removal efficiency of the adsorbent depends on the pH and flow rate of the metal solution, influent metal ion concentration and the bed height of the packed column. The removal process is effective at pH 2 for Cr(VI) removal on coconut shell and neem leaf respectively.
-
Maximum amont of metal removal is observed at lower flow rate. But at higher flow rate breakthrough time decreases which finally produces insufficient amount of metal removal.
-
At higher bed height maximum amount of heavy metal is removed than the lower bed height at a constant flow rate.
-
At low metal ion concentration adsorption capacity of the packed column increases. At higher metal ion concentration lower amount of metal removal is observed.
-
Bohart-Adams model, Yoon-Nelson model, Thomas model, Yan et al. model and Wolborska model are used to describe the performance of the fixed be column study. Thomas model and Yoon-Nelson model fit well with the experimental data for predicting the breakthrough curves for Cr(VI) removal compare to the other models.
-
Incineration of the used adsorbents to form non-leachable ash is the safe disposal suggested method.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
S. Sarkar thanks UGC for fellowship [Project no. F1- 17.1//2012-13/RGNF-2012-13-SC-WES-24757/(SA- III/Website)].
Authors are thankful to DST, Govt. of West Bengal for providing nancial assistance [Sanction Number: 211(Sanc.)/ST/P/S&T/13G-1/2013 dt. 06.06.2014].
NOMENCLATURE
C0 initial Cr(VI) concentration (mg/L) Ct Cr(VI) concentration at time t (mg/L) kAB kinetic constant (ml/min.mg)
kTh rate constant (ml/min.mg)
kYN rate constant (1/min)
KY rate constant (ml/mg.min)
N0 adsorption capacity (g/L)
qe,max maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g ) qY maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g) x mass of the adsorbent (g)
t breakthrough time (min)
z bed depth (cm)
Greek letters
Wolborska model constant (L/min)
time required for 50% adsorbate breakthrough (min)
v flow rate of metal solution (ml/min)
REFERENCES
-
Aksu, Z. and F. Gönen (2004), Biosorption of phenol by immobilized activated sludge in acontinuous packed bed: prediction of breakthrough curves. Proc. Biochem. 39 599 613.
-
APHA, AWWA (1998). Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 20th Ed., Washington, DC, New York.
-
Bohart G., E. N. Adams (1920). Some aspects of the behavior of charcoal with respect to chlorine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 42 523544.
-
Casarett, L. J. and J. Doul (1980). Toxicology, the basic science of poisons, Macmillan, New York.
-
Deepali (2011). Bioremediation of Chromium (VI) from Textile Industrys Effluent and Contaminated Soil Using Pseudomonas putida. Iranica J. Energy and Environ. 2(1) 24- 31.
-
Gurgel, L. V . A., J. C. P. de Melo, J. C. de Lena and L. F. Gil (2009). Adsorption of chromium (VI) ion from aqueous solution by succinylatedmercerized cellulose functionalized with quaternary ammonium groups. Biores. Technol. 100 32143220.
-
Hanen, N. and O. Abdelmottaleb (2013). Modeling of the dynamics adsorption of phenol from an aqueous solution on activated carbon produced from olive stones. J. Chem. Engg. Process Technol. 4(3) 153 doi:10.4172/2157-7048.1000153.
-
Hasfalina, C. M., R. Z. Maryam, C. A. Luqman and M. Rashid (2012). Adsorption of copper (II) from aqueous medium in fixed-bed column by kenaf fibres. APCBEE Procedia 3 255- 263.
-
Malkoc, E., Y. Nuhoglu and Y. Abali (2006). Cr(VI) adsorption by waste acron of quercusithaburensis in fixed beds: prediction oh breakthrough curves. Chem. Engg. J. 119 61-68.
-
MINAS, Pollution control acts, rules, and notification there under Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi, 2001.
-
Nag, S., A. Mondal, U. Mishra, N. Bar, S. K. Das (2016). Removal of chromium(VI) from aqueous solutions using rubber leaf powder: batch, column studies and ANN modeling. Desalination Water Treat., 57(36) 16927-16942.
-
Nwabanne, J. T. and P. K. Igbokwe (2012). Adsorption Performance of packed bed column for the removal of Lead
(II) using oil Palm Fibre. Int. J.App. Sci. Technol. 2(5) 106- 115.
-
Raji, C. and T. S. Anirudhan (1998). Batch Cr(VI) removal by polyacrylamide-grafted sawdust:kinetics and thermodynamics. Water Res. 32(12) 37723780.
-
Saadi, Z., R. Saadi and R. Fazaeli (2013). Fixed-bed adsorption dynamics of Pb (II) adsorption from aqueous solution using nanostructured -alumina. J. Nanostructure chem., http://www.jnanochem.com/content/3/1/48.
-
Singha, B. and S. K. Das (2011). Biosorption of Cr(VI) ions from aqueous solutions : kinetics, equilibrium, thermodynamics and desorption studies. Coll. Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 84 221
232.
-
Singha, B., T. K.Naiya, A. K. Bhattacharya and S. K.Das (2011). Cr(VI) Ions removal from aqueous solutions using natural adsorbentsFTIR studies. J. Environ. Protection, 2 729-735.
-
Sivaprakash, B., N. Rajamohan and A. Mohamed Sadhik (2010). Batch and column sorption of heavy metal from aqueous solution using a marine alga Sargassumtenerrimum. Int. J. Chem. Tech. Res. 2(1) 155-162.
-
Srivastava V.C, I. D.Mall, I. M. Mishra (2006). Characterization of mesoporous rice husk ash (RHA) and adsorption kinetics of metal ions from aqueous solution onto RHA. J. Hazard. Mater. B134 257267.
-
Thomas H.G. (1948). Chromatography: A problem in kinetics. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 49 161182.
-
Wolborska, A. (1989). Adsorption on activated carbon of p- nitrophenol from aqueous solution. Water Res. 23 8591.
-
Yan, G.Y., T. Viraraghavan and M. Chem (2001). A new model for heavy metal removal in a biosorption column. Ads. Sci. Technol. 19 25-43.
-
Yoon Y.H., J.H. Nelson(1984). Application of gas adsorption kinetics I. A theoretical model for respirator cartridge service life. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 45 509516.
-
Zeinali, F., A. A. Ghoreyshi and G. D. Najafpour (2010). Adsorption of dichloromethane from aqueous phase using granular activated carbon : isotherm and breakthrough curve measurements. J. Scientific Res. 5(4) 191198.