Removal of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Solution using Natural Adsorbents – Column Studies

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV5IS110270

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Removal of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Solution using Natural Adsorbents – Column Studies

Shreyashi Sarkar

Resesarch Scholar Chemical Engineering Department

University of Calcutta

92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata 700009, West Bengal, India

Sudip Kumar Das

Professor

Chemical Engineering Department University of Calcutta

92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata 700009, West Bengal, India

Abstract The packed bed column study was investigated using coconut shell and neem leaf for the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution. The breakthrough characteristics for Cr(VI) removal was reported. The effect of operating parameters like influent Cr(VI) concentration, bed height of the packed column and the flow rate of aqueous solution on the breakthrough curve was studied. Bohart-Adams, Yoon-Nelson, Thomas model,Yan et al. model and Wolborska model were applied to the experimental data for their suitability.

Keywords Hexavalent chromium removal, Column study, Yoon-Nelson model, Thomas model, Adams-Bohart model Introduction

  1. INTRODUCTION

    The major sources of chromium in water bodies by the human activities are mainly from industrial waste water discharges such as mining, cement, steel and paint industries. Such types of industries discharge Cr(VI) contained water. Cr(VI) has been reported to be toxic to animals, humans and also it is known as carcinogenic (Raji and Anirudhan, 1998). Excessive accumulation of Cr(VI) in human being causes ulcerations, dermatitis and allergic skin reactions. The concentration of Cr(VI) in industrial wastewater remains in the range from 0.5 to 270 mg/L (Casarett and Doul, 1980). According to EPA the maximum tolerance limit of Cr(VI) in drinking water 0.1 mg/L (MINAS, 2001). Tolerance limit of Cr(VI) in drinking water according to Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India is 0.01 mg/L (MINAS, 2001).

    Several conventional technologies are used to remove the heavy metal from the aqueous solution such as membrane separation, electrochemical precipitation, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration and adsorption. Major drawbacks of these processes are either high cost or discharge of sludge formed. Ion-exchange is considered a better alternative technique but its operating cost is high. All other techniques have higher operating cost. Hence among these techniques the adsorption method with using low-cost adsorbent is cost effective and extremely useful. Fixed bed column study is more effective for industrial purpose than batch adsorption process. A wide variety of agricultural waste such as rice husk, coconut shell, sawdust, wheat husk, wheat and rice straw abundantly available can be used as low- costadsorbent. Here, coconut shell and neem leaf are used as

    the adsorbent for Cr(VI) removal in continuous mode operation. The effect of initial pH, flow rate of metal solution, influent metal ion concentration and bed height are studied. Available models, i.e., Thomas model, Yoon-Nelson model, Adams-Bohart model, Yan et al. model, Wolborska model are applied to the experimental data to find out the suitable model. The coconut shell and neem leaf are widely available throughout India. India being a 3rd world country these adsorbent are suitable for the treatment on of Cr(VI) containing wastewater for small to any sized industries.

  2. EXPERIMENTAL

    Preparation of adsorbent

    In the present study coconut shell and neem leaf were used as the adsorbent for the removal of Cr(VI) ions from aqueous solution. Initially adsorbents were collected from local area near Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Initially coconut shell was crushed in roll crusher and then it was grinded. Neem leaves and coconut shell were treated with 0.1N NaOH to remove lignin-based colour materials followed by 0.1N H2SO4 (Singha and Das, 2011). Then the adsorbents were washed with distilled water several times and dried at 105Cfor 6 h. Next the adsorbent was sieved to pass through a

    -44 +52 mesh screen. After sieving the adsorbent was kept by in an airtight container in a decicator.

    Metal solution

    1000 mg/L of Cr(VI) solution was prepared by dissolving 2.83 gm of potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) in double distilled water. Then stock solution of Cr(VI) was diluted to obtain required standard solution containing 5, 10, 15, 20 mg/L of Cr(VI). Throughout the experiment the glass wares were washed with 20% nitric acid followed by washing with deionized water and then the glass wares were dried in oven at 383K.

    Reagents and instrument used

    The analytical grade reagents were used and obtained from E. Merck Limited, Mumbai, India. WTW pH meter (Multi 340i/SET, Germany) was used to determine the pH of the solution. UV-vis Spectrophotometer (Dr 5000, HACH, U.S.A.) was used to determine the Cr(VI) content in standard and treated solution.

    Experimental procedure

    Adsorption experiment was conducted in packed bed column at ambient temperature. Required amount of adsorbent was packed in glass columns to produce desired height. The glass columns had an internal diameter of 2 cm and height of 50 cm. Initially pH of Cr(VI) was adjusted by adding 0.1 N HCl. Cr(VI) solution was pumped through the packed bed column in a down flow direction at a desired flow rate by a peristaltic pump (Cole-Parmer, model-7535-04, USA). Samples were collected from the exit of the column at desired time intervals and 1,5 diphenyl-cabazide is added to produce the complex agent which is analyzed by UV-vis Spectrophotometer to determine the concentration of Cr(VI) (Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, 1998). Experimental setup is shown in Figure 1.

    Figure 1 Schematic diagram of experimental set up of column study

    1. Reservoir tank with metal solution; 2 Peristaltic pumps; 3. Porous sheet; 4. Glass beads; 5.Adsorbents; 6. Filter; 7. Treated effluent storage.

  3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

    Characterization of the adsorbent

    Scanning electron microscopic image of the used adsorbents were carried out to see its surface structure. SEM images of adsorbent represented in Figures 2 and 3. The surface of coconut shell and neem leaf is porous and irregular in nature.

    Figure 2. Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of coconut shell

    Figure 3. Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of neem leaf

    The FTIR studied indicated that the main functional groups like aliphatic -CH , aliphatic acid, aromatic NO2, alkane and sulphonyl chlorides stretching are responsible for Cr(VI) binding on neem leaves and similarly phosphate ester, aliphatic acid, aromatic nitro, alkane SO3 and sulphonic S=O stretching are important for Cr(VI) binding on coconut shell (Singha et al., 2011).

    The surface areas are measured in Micromeritics surface area analyzer (ASAP 2010, USA). The point of zero charge was determined by solid addition (Srivastava et al. 2006). Other physical properties of the adsorbents are shown in Table 1.

    Table 1 Different physical characteristics of bioadsorbent

    Adsorbents

    Coconut shell

    Neem leaf

    Surface area (m2/g)

    0.52

    0.57

    Bulk Density (g/cm3)

    0.82

    0.71

    Dry matter (%)

    93.84

    91.67

    Moisture content(%)

    6.16

    8.33

    Point of zero charge

    6.62

    6.94

    Ash content(%)

    9.23

    13.58

    Effcts of operating parameters

    – 2-

    – 2-

    – 2-

    – 2-

    In our earlier study (Singha and Das, 2011) the effects of pH on the Cr(VI) removal onto coconut shell and neem leaf are reported for batch process. It was observed that for both adsorbents the maximum adsorption observed at pH 2. Cr(VI) exist in different forms in aqueous solution depending on pH. The chromate represented as H2CrO4, HCrO4 , CrO4 , HCr2O7 and Cr2O7 in solution as a function of pH and concentration [Gurgel et al., 2009].

    4

    4

    2 2

    2 2

    2 – 2 –

    2 – 2 –

    At pH 1, chromium ions exist in the form of HCrO4 , while in the pH range 26 different forms of chromium ions such as Cr2O7 , HCrO4 ,and Cr3O10 ,coexists, of which HCrO4 predominates. As the pH increases this form shifts to CrO4 and Cr2O7 (Singha and Das 2011). At low pH values, the Cr(VI) exists as univalent form, HCrO – and needs only one exchange site. As the pH increased, the overall surface charge on the adsorbents became negative and adsorption decreased.

    The adsorption experiments were operated at flow rate of 10 ml.min-1, 20 ml.min-1 and 30 ml.min-1.The breakthrough curve is a plot of dimensionless ratio of concentration (Ct/C0) versus time and is shown in Figures 4 and 5. The better performance was observed at lower flow rate (10 ml.min-1). At higher flow rate breakthrough occurred more rapidly than the lower flow rate. These figures indicated that with increase in flow rate the breakthrough time decreases. This behaviour occurred because at higher flow rate the Cr(VI) solution had less contact time, i.e., residence time within the column. At lower flow rate the Cr(VI) solution had more time to contact with the adsorbent in the column and hence higher removal of metal ions observed. The best adsorption capacity of the fixed bed column obtained at 10 ml min-1 flow rate. Similar results are obtained by other researchers (Hanen and Abdelmottaleb,2013 ; Sivaprakash et al.,2010).

    Figure 4 Effect of flow rate for Cr(VI) adsorption on coconut shell at constant bed height and influent metal ion concentration

    Figure 5 Effect of flow rate for Cr(VI) adsorption on neem leaf at constant bed height and influent metal ion concentration

    The effects of bed height were investigated for bed height of 5, 10 and 15 cm at a constant flow rate and influent metal ion concentration. The breakthrough curves are shown in Figures 6 and 7.The removal of heavy metal is entirely dependent on the bed height. From these graphs it was observed that the breakthrough time decreases as the bed height decreases. At higher bed height breakthrough occurred more slowly than the lower bed height because at higher bed height aqueous solution got more binding sites of the adsorbent and this behaviour produced higher removal of metal ions in the column. Similar observations are obtained by other researchers (Hasfalina et al., 2012; Nwabanne et al., 2012).

    The effects of metal ion concentration were investigated at different initial Cr(VI) concentration of 10 mg/L, 20 mg/L and 30 mg/L. The breakthrough curves are shown in Figures

    8 and 9. From the breakthrough graphs it observed that adsorption capacity of the packed bed increases with the decrease in metal ion concentration. At high influent metal ion concentration adsorption capacity decreased due to earlier saturation of active surfaces. At lower influent metal ion concentration the adsorption capacity increased because the metal ions would react with active binding sites. The breakthrough time increased as the influent metal ion decreased (Deepali, 2011).

    Figure 6 Effect of bed height of column for removal of Cr(VI) on coconut shell at constant flow rate and influent metal ion concentration

    Figure 7 Effect of bed height of column for removal of Cr(VI) on neem leaf at constant flow rate and influent metal ion concentration

  4. MODELLING OF COLUMN STUDY Maximum adsorption capacity of the adsorbent in a

fixed bed column is calculated by following equations

Figure 9 Effect of influent metal ions concentration for the removal of Cr(VI) on neem leaf at constant bed height and flow rate

Bohart-Adams (1920) model

Bohart and Adams developed to find the adsorption capacity and adsorption rate constant of the continuous column operation (Bohart and Adams, 1920).The expression

qe

v

1000w

ttotal

(C0

  • Ct )dt

    (1)

    given by Bohart and Adams for an adsorption column is given as follows (Aksu and Gönen, 2004),

    C z

    AB 0 AB 0

    AB 0 AB 0

    0 ln

    t k C t k N

    (3)

    q qtotal

    (2)

    Co

    v

    emax w

    The intercept and slope of the linear plot of ln(Ct/C0) versus time were used to determine the value of adsorption capacity N0 and kinetic constant kAB. The values of kAB, N0 and statistical parameters are tabulated in Table 2. It is observed that the rate constant (kAB) and saturation concentration (N0) is dependent on flow rate and metal ion concentration. It is also observed that the value of rate constant (kAB) increases with the increasing flow rate.

    Figure 8 Effect of influent metal ions concentration for the removal of Cr(VI) on coconut shell at constant bed height and flow rate

    Table 2 Bohart -Adams model parameters

    0.6409

    Flow rate v

    (ml/min)

    Influent concentration C0

    (mg/L)

    Bed height (cm)

    Rate constant, kAB X 104

    ml/( min. mg)

    Saturation concentration,

    N0

    (g/L)

    R2

    Adsorbent : Coconut shell

    10

    10

    5

    5.68

    11.48

    0.7999

    20

    10

    5

    5.55

    14.03

    0.7869

    30

    10

    5

    13.92

    13.91

    0.6586

    10

    20

    5

    2.4

    18.665

    0.8155

    20

    20

    5

    2.4

    40.65

    0.8825

    30

    20

    5

    3.75

    21.963

    0.9280

    10

    30

    5

    0.433

    70.27

    0.9368

    20

    30

    5

    0.933

    58.20

    0.9096

    30

    30

    5

    1.26

    45.73

    0.9810

    10

    30

    10

    0.933

    37.74

    0.9285

    20

    30

    10

    0.8

    48.64

    0.9077

    30

    30

    10

    1.233

    24.90

    0.9750

    10

    30

    15

    0.8

    32.7108

    0.9637

    20

    30

    15

    19.4

    40.16

    0.8630

    30

    30

    15

    0.4033

    48.28

    0.9555

    Adsorbent : Neem leaf

    10

    10

    5

    3.5

    12.97

    0.8796

    20

    10

    5

    3.8

    21.10

    0.8228

    30

    10

    5

    10.3

    13.10

    10

    20

    5

    2.2

    15.95

    0.8770

    20

    20

    5

    2.1

    34.24

    0.8737

    30

    20

    5

    2.7

    21.95

    0.9387

    10

    30

    5

    0.4

    48.97

    0.9421

    20

    30

    5

    0.8

    50.32

    0.9017

    30

    30

    5

    0.9

    43.14

    0.9815

    10

    30

    10

    1.2

    24.41

    0.9688

    20

    30

    10

    0.7

    38.37

    0.9300

    30

    30

    10

    0.9

    23.84

    0.9848

    10

    30

    15

    1.1

    20.27

    0.9618

    20

    30

    15

    0.7

    28.63

    0.8920

    30

    30

    15

    0.5

    28.55

    0.9636

    Yoon-Nelson (1984) model

    The basic assumption of this model is the rate of decrease in the probability of adsorption for each adsorbate molecule depends on the adsorbate adsorption. The Yoon-

    Table 3 Yoon-Nelson model parameters

    Flow rate

    v

    (ml/min)

    Influent concentration C0

    (mg /L)

    Bed height

    (cm)

    Time,

    (min)

    Rate constant kYN (1/min)

    R2

    Adsorbent : Coconut shell

    10

    10

    5

    475.0072

    0.0069

    0.8623

    20

    10

    5

    359.4598

    0.0072

    0.8581

    30

    30

    5

    191.2437

    0.0170

    0.7370

    10

    20

    5

    332.679

    0.0065

    0.8791

    20

    20

    5

    377.849

    0.0063

    0.9304

    30

    20

    5

    89.48

    0.0126

    0.9520

    10

    30

    5

    633.398

    0.0020

    0.9826

    20

    30

    5

    237.68

    0.0046

    0.9403

    30

    30

    5

    66.497

    0.0061

    0.9672

    10

    30

    10

    1027.048

    0.00349

    0.9604

    20

    30

    10

    524.57

    0.0035

    0.9475

    30

    30

    10

    149.84

    0.0031

    0.9230

    10

    30

    15

    1419.0813

    0.0028

    0.9773

    20

    30

    15

    691.978

    0.0027

    0.9192

    30

    30

    15

    257.4705

    0.0020

    0.9708

    Adsorbent : Neem leaf

    10

    10

    5

    654.9772

    0.0044

    0.9284

    20

    10

    5

    663.2368

    0.0038

    0.8277

    30

    10

    5

    216.7615

    0.0130

    0.7286

    10

    20

    5

    340.952

    0.0063

    0.9238

    20

    20

    5

    391.551

    0.0058

    0.9240

    30

    20

    5

    102.75

    0.0091

    0.9620

    10

    30

    5

    543.63

    0.0022

    0.9675

    20

    30

    5

    258

    0.0040

    0.9330

    30

    30

    5

    61.96

    0.0056

    0.9830

    10

    30

    10

    864.66

    0.0045

    0.9746

    20

    30

    10

    507.64

    0.0034

    0.9630

    30

    30

    10

    84.34

    0.0053

    0.9790

    10

    30

    15

    1134.7027

    0.0037

    0.9580

    20

    30

    15

    625.1

    0.0030

    0.9358

    30

    30

    15

    161.533

    0.0030

    0.9721

    Thomas (1948) model

    Thomas model has been widely used for heavy metal removal in fixed bed column studies (Thomas, 1948). The mathematical form of Thomas model is expressed as follows (Malkoc et al., 2006),

    Nelson equation is as follows (Zeinali and et al., 2010),

    Ct 1

    (5)

    C

    C

    t exp(kYNt kYN)

    (4)

    C0 1 exp[( kThqe x ) k C t]

    C0 Ct

    Q Th 0

    The intercept and slope of the linear plot of ln(Ct/C0-Ct) Linearized form of Thomas model is expressed as follows,

    versus time were used to determine the value of breakthrough

    parameters and kYN. Parameters and the values of R2 are

    ln( Ct

    1)

    kTH qe x

  • k C t

(6)

tabulated in Table 3. From the tabulated data it is observed

C Q

TH 0

0

that time required for 50% breakthrough decreases as the flow rate increases but the value of rate constant kYN increases with the increasing flow for Cr(VI) removal on coconut shell and neem leaf respectively. From the R2 values it can be concluded that Yoon-Nelson model is appropriate to describe the column operation of Cr(VI) removal on coconut shell and neem leaf respectively. Similar result obtained by other researcher (Saadi et al., 2013).

The model parameters and the values of R2 are tabulated in Table 4. From the table it is observed that the value of calculated qe from Thomas model is greater than the value of experimental qe. The value of qe increases as the adsorbent dose increases but the value of KTh decreases for the same. It is also observed that value of qe decreases as the flow rate of aqueous solution increases.

Flow rate, v (ml/mi n)

Influent concentra tion C0 (mg/L)

Bed height

(cm)

kTh

ml/(min. mg)

qe,max(cal

)

(mg/g)

qe,max(ex

p)

(mg/g)

R2

Adsorbent : Coconut shell

10

<>10

5

0.690

7.63

4.28

0.8623

20

10

5

0.72

11.47

6.06

0.8561

30

10

5

1.7

9.31

5.35

0.7370

10

20

5

0.325

10.61

5.97

0.8791

20

20

5

0.32

23.8

13.2

0.9304

30

20

5

0.633

8.52

5.19

0.9502

10

30

5

0.068

30.45

16.009

0.9828

20

30

5

0.15

22.63

13.16

0.9403

30

30

5

0.203

9.5

4.86

0.9672

10

30

10

0.116

25

13.77

0.9603

20

30

10

0.1167

24.97

14.18

0.9475

30

30

10

0.104

10.71

6.35

0.9327

10

30

15

0.093

22.75

11.84

0.9773

20

30

15

0.913

21.49

11.99

0.9131

30

30

15

0.07

11.50

6.14

0.9666

Adsobent : Neem leaf

10

10

5

0.44

10.39

5.75

0.9284

20

10

5

0.49

16.14

9.23

0.8837

30

10

5

1.3

10.32

6.32

0.7286

10

20

5

0.3

10.36

6.58

0.9238

20

20

5

0.29

24.86

13.82

0.9247

30

20

5

0.45

9.78

5.52

0.9620

10

30

5

0.07

42.65

13.61

0.9675

20

30

5

0.13

24.58

14.08

0.9335

30

30

5

0.18

8.87

5.45

0.9839

10

30

10

0.15

20.58

11.13

0.9746

20

30

10

0.11

24.18

13.21

0.9632

30

30

10

0.17

6.028

3.12

0.9792

10

30

15

0.12

18.01

9.10

0.9580

20

30

15

0.10

19.84

10.72

0.9358

30

30

15

0.10

7.69

4.23

0.9721

Flow rate, v (ml/mi n)

Influent concentra tion C0 (mg/L)

Bed height

(cm)

kTh

ml/(min. mg)

qe,max(cal

)

(mg/g)

qe,max(ex

p)

(mg/g)

R2

Adsorbent : Coconut shell

10

10

5

0.690

7.63

4.28

0.8623

20

10

5

0.72

11.47

6.06

0.8561

30

10

5

1.7

9.31

5.35

0.7370

10

20

5

0.325

10.61

5.97

0.8791

20

20

5

0.32

23.8

13.2

0.9304

30

20

5

0.633

8.52

5.19

0.9502

10

30

5

0.068

30.45

16.009

0.9828

20

30

5

0.15

22.63

13.16

0.9403

30

30

5

0.203

9.5

4.86

0.9672

10

30

10

0.116

25

13.77

0.9603

20

30

10

0.1167

24.97

14.18

0.9475

30

30

10

0.104

10.71

6.35

0.9327

10

30

15

0.093

22.75

11.84

0.9773

20

30

15

0.913

21.49

11.99

0.9131

30

30

15

0.07

11.50

6.14

0.9666

Adsobent : Neem leaf

10

10

5

0.44

10.39

5.75

0.9284

20

10

5

0.49

16.14

9.23

0.8837

30

10

5

1.3

10.32

6.32

0.7286

10

20

5

0.3

10.36

6.58

0.9238

20

20

5

0.29

24.86

13.82

0.9247

30

20

5

0.45

9.78

5.52

0.9620

10

30

5

0.07

42.65

13.61

0.9675

20

30

5

0.13

24.58

14.08

0.9335

30

30

5

0.18

8.87

5.45

0.9839

10

30

10

0.15

20.58

11.13

0.9746

20

30

10

0.11

24.18

13.21

0.9632

30

30

10

0.17

6.028

3.12

0.9792

10

30

15

0.12

18.01

9.10

0.9580

20

30

15

0.10

19.84

10.72

0.9358

30

30

15

0.10

7.69

4.23

0.9721

Table 4 Thomas model parameters

Yan et al. (2011) model

Mass transfer model is used to describe the breakthrough curve of the fixed bed column study (Yan et al. 2011). This model proposed a better approach to describe the breakthrough curve than the Thomas model. Linearized form

Table 5 Yan et al. model parameters

Flow rate v (ml/min)

Influent concentrati on C0 (mg/L)

Bed height

(cm)

Rate constant kY ml/(mg. min)

qY

(mg/g)

R2

Adsorbent : Coconut shell

10

10

5

1564.19

5.6743

0.9740

20

10

5

2405.80

11.32

0.9534

30

30

5

5099.70

5.67

0.9486

10

20

5

413.10

16.70

0.9899

20

20

5

843.17

41.51

0.9642

30

20

5

1111.05

13.18

0.9675

10

30

5

129.76

142.73

0.8974

20

30

5

635.1

1.27

0.9468

30

30

5

259.12

46.87

0.8911

10

30

10

360.6

38.61

0.8988

20

30

10

412.67

59.42

0.9465

30

30

10

244.07

55.11

0.9692

10

30

15

351.70

48.71

0.8322

20

30

15

453.46

44.40

0.9836

30

30

15

216.37

74.35

0.9528

Adsorbent : Neem leaf

10

10

5

1124.50

11.89

0.9867

20

10

5

1455.80

61.34

0.9890

30

10

5

3889.80

0.95

0.9786

10

20

5

401.80

18.20

0.9599

20

20

5

812.40

42.31

0.9707

30

20

5

632.10

27.33

0.9560

10

30

5

128.13

104.61

0.9255

20

30

5

268.26

77.10

0.9525

30

30

5

190.80

45.94

0.9143

10

30

10

360.73

38.04

0.7967

20

30

10

375.40

67.27

0.9351

30

30

10

185.05

42.78

0.7992

10

30

15

354.26

41.60

0.7539

20

30

15

409.80

48.58

0.9588

30

30

15

185.40

58.09

0.8948

Wolborska (1989) model

The mathematical expression of Wolborska model is similar to Adams-Bohart model. The linearised form of Wolborska model is given as follows (Wolborska, 1989),

Ct z

of Yan et al. model is given as follows,

ln C

kABC0t kAB N0 v

(8)

Ct K

Q2

K C0

o

ln Y C0 ln Y ln t

(7)

The model parameter values are tabulated in Table 6. These

C0 Ct Q KY qY m Q

values depend on the flow rate and bed height. The value of b

The value of rate constant (KY), adsorption capacity (qY) and R2 are tabulated in Table 5. From the table it is observed that the adsorption capacity (qY) increases with the increase in flow rate and bed height. The rate constant (KY) value increases with the increase in flow rate.

increases with the increase in flow rate but decreases with the increases in bed height.

Flow rate, v (ml/min)

Influent concentration C0

(mg/L)

Bed height

(cm)

(L/min)

Saturation concentration,

N0

(g/L)

R2

Adsorbent : Coconut shell

10

10

5

0.6520

11.48

0.7999

20

10

5

1.0367

14.03

0.7869

30

30

5

1.9360

13.91

0.6586

10

20

5

0.4479

18.665

0.8155

20

20

5

0.9750

40.65

0.8825

30

20

5

0.8230

21.963

0.9280

10

30

5

0.3042

70.27

0.9368

20

30

5

0.5430

58.20

0.9096

30

30

5

0.5463

45.73

0.9810

10

30

10

0.3521

37.74

0.9285

20

30

10

0.3890

48.64

0.9077

30

30

10

0.2852

24.90

0.9750

10

30

15

0.2616

32.7108

0.9637

20

30

15

0.2590

40.16

0.8630

30

30

15

0.1947

48.28

0.9555

Adsorbent : Neem leaf

10

10

5

0.5721

12.97

0.8796

20

10

5

1.0103

21.10

0.8228

30

10

5

1.7007

13.10

0.6409

10

20

5

0.4421

15.95

0.8770

20

20

5

0.9270

34.24

0.8737

30

20

5

0.7470

21.95

0.9387

10

30

5

0.2880

48.97

0.9421

20

30

5

0.5281

50.32

0.9017

30

30

5

0.5250

43.14

0.9815

10

30

10

0.3791

24.41

0.9688

20

30

10

0.3708

38.37

0.9300

30

30

10

0.2802

23.84

0.9848

10

30

15

0.2725

20.27

0.9618

20

30

15

0.2645

28.63

0.8920

30

30

15

0.1918

28.55

0.9636

Flow rate, v (ml/min)

Influent concentration C0

(mg/L)

Bed height

(cm)

(L/min)

Saturation concentration,

N0

(g/L)

R2

Adsorbent : Coconut shell

10

10

5

0.6520

11.48

0.7999

20

10

5

1.0367

14.03

0.7869

30

30

5

1.9360

13.91

0.6586

10

20

5

0.4479

18.665

0.8155

20

20

5

0.9750

40.65

0.8825

30

20

5

0.8230

21.963

0.9280

10

30

5

0.3042

70.27

0.9368

20

30

5

0.5430

58.20

0.9096

30

30

5

0.5463

45.73

0.9810

10

30

10

0.3521

37.74

0.9285

20

30

10

0.3890

48.64

0.9077

30

30

10

0.2852

24.90

0.9750

10

30

15

0.2616

32.7108

0.9637

20

30

15

0.2590

40.16

0.8630

30

30

15

0.1947

48.28

0.9555

Adsorbent : Neem leaf

10

10

5

0.5721

12.97

0.8796

20

10

5

1.0103

21.10

0.8228

30

10

5

1.7007

13.10

0.6409

10

20

5

0.4421

15.95

0.8770

20

20

5

0.9270

34.24

0.8737

30

20

5

0.7470

21.95

0.9387

10

30

5

0.2880

48.97

0.9421

20

30

5

0.5281

50.32

0.9017

30

30

5

0.5250

43.14

0.9815

10

30

10

0.3791

24.41

0.9688

20

30

10

0.3708

38.37

0.9300

30

30

10

0.2802

23.84

0.9848

10

30

15

0.2725

20.27

0.9618

20

30

15

0.2645

28.63

0.8920

30

30

15

0.1918

28.55

0.9636

Table 6 Wolborska model parameters

  1. SAFE DISPOSAL OF USED ADSORBENTS

    The leaching possibility of the Chromium ions from the used adsorbents restricts its dumping in the open environment. The Cr(VI) loaded adsorbents were incinerated at 700o C to form ash and then 5 mg of the ash samples were mixed with 25 ml of deionized water to give a liquid – solid ratio of 5:1 (Nag et al., 2015). After continuous gentle stirring for 24 h the filtrate was analyzed for Cr(VI) ions. It was observed that Cr(VI) did not leach from the ash sample. Hence, this ash may be used for road filling particularly in the nearby rural areas or to be placed in the agricultural field.

  2. CONCLUSIONS

Fixed-bed column studies have been carried out for the removal of Cr(VI) ions using coconut shell and neem leaf

.

  1. An effective removal of Cr(VI) is observed by a fixed bed column using coconut shell and neem leaf as an low- costadsorbent.

  2. The removal efficiency of the adsorbent depends on the pH and flow rate of the metal solution, influent metal ion concentration and the bed height of the packed column. The removal process is effective at pH 2 for Cr(VI) removal on coconut shell and neem leaf respectively.

  3. Maximum amont of metal removal is observed at lower flow rate. But at higher flow rate breakthrough time decreases which finally produces insufficient amount of metal removal.

  4. At higher bed height maximum amount of heavy metal is removed than the lower bed height at a constant flow rate.

  5. At low metal ion concentration adsorption capacity of the packed column increases. At higher metal ion concentration lower amount of metal removal is observed.

  6. Bohart-Adams model, Yoon-Nelson model, Thomas model, Yan et al. model and Wolborska model are used to describe the performance of the fixed be column study. Thomas model and Yoon-Nelson model fit well with the experimental data for predicting the breakthrough curves for Cr(VI) removal compare to the other models.

  7. Incineration of the used adsorbents to form non-leachable ash is the safe disposal suggested method.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

S. Sarkar thanks UGC for fellowship [Project no. F1- 17.1//2012-13/RGNF-2012-13-SC-WES-24757/(SA- III/Website)].

Authors are thankful to DST, Govt. of West Bengal for providing nancial assistance [Sanction Number: 211(Sanc.)/ST/P/S&T/13G-1/2013 dt. 06.06.2014].

NOMENCLATURE

C0 initial Cr(VI) concentration (mg/L) Ct Cr(VI) concentration at time t (mg/L) kAB kinetic constant (ml/min.mg)

kTh rate constant (ml/min.mg)

kYN rate constant (1/min)

KY rate constant (ml/mg.min)

N0 adsorption capacity (g/L)

qe,max maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g ) qY maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g) x mass of the adsorbent (g)

t breakthrough time (min)

z bed depth (cm)

Greek letters

Wolborska model constant (L/min)

time required for 50% adsorbate breakthrough (min)

v flow rate of metal solution (ml/min)

REFERENCES

  1. Aksu, Z. and F. Gönen (2004), Biosorption of phenol by immobilized activated sludge in acontinuous packed bed: prediction of breakthrough curves. Proc. Biochem. 39 599 613.

  2. APHA, AWWA (1998). Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 20th Ed., Washington, DC, New York.

  3. Bohart G., E. N. Adams (1920). Some aspects of the behavior of charcoal with respect to chlorine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 42 523544.

  4. Casarett, L. J. and J. Doul (1980). Toxicology, the basic science of poisons, Macmillan, New York.

  5. Deepali (2011). Bioremediation of Chromium (VI) from Textile Industrys Effluent and Contaminated Soil Using Pseudomonas putida. Iranica J. Energy and Environ. 2(1) 24- 31.

  6. Gurgel, L. V . A., J. C. P. de Melo, J. C. de Lena and L. F. Gil (2009). Adsorption of chromium (VI) ion from aqueous solution by succinylatedmercerized cellulose functionalized with quaternary ammonium groups. Biores. Technol. 100 32143220.

  7. Hanen, N. and O. Abdelmottaleb (2013). Modeling of the dynamics adsorption of phenol from an aqueous solution on activated carbon produced from olive stones. J. Chem. Engg. Process Technol. 4(3) 153 doi:10.4172/2157-7048.1000153.

  8. Hasfalina, C. M., R. Z. Maryam, C. A. Luqman and M. Rashid (2012). Adsorption of copper (II) from aqueous medium in fixed-bed column by kenaf fibres. APCBEE Procedia 3 255- 263.

  9. Malkoc, E., Y. Nuhoglu and Y. Abali (2006). Cr(VI) adsorption by waste acron of quercusithaburensis in fixed beds: prediction oh breakthrough curves. Chem. Engg. J. 119 61-68.

  10. MINAS, Pollution control acts, rules, and notification there under Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi, 2001.

  11. Nag, S., A. Mondal, U. Mishra, N. Bar, S. K. Das (2016). Removal of chromium(VI) from aqueous solutions using rubber leaf powder: batch, column studies and ANN modeling. Desalination Water Treat., 57(36) 16927-16942.

  12. Nwabanne, J. T. and P. K. Igbokwe (2012). Adsorption Performance of packed bed column for the removal of Lead

    (II) using oil Palm Fibre. Int. J.App. Sci. Technol. 2(5) 106- 115.

  13. Raji, C. and T. S. Anirudhan (1998). Batch Cr(VI) removal by polyacrylamide-grafted sawdust:kinetics and thermodynamics. Water Res. 32(12) 37723780.

  14. Saadi, Z., R. Saadi and R. Fazaeli (2013). Fixed-bed adsorption dynamics of Pb (II) adsorption from aqueous solution using nanostructured -alumina. J. Nanostructure chem., http://www.jnanochem.com/content/3/1/48.

  15. Singha, B. and S. K. Das (2011). Biosorption of Cr(VI) ions from aqueous solutions : kinetics, equilibrium, thermodynamics and desorption studies. Coll. Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 84 221

    232.

  16. Singha, B., T. K.Naiya, A. K. Bhattacharya and S. K.Das (2011). Cr(VI) Ions removal from aqueous solutions using natural adsorbentsFTIR studies. J. Environ. Protection, 2 729-735.

  17. Sivaprakash, B., N. Rajamohan and A. Mohamed Sadhik (2010). Batch and column sorption of heavy metal from aqueous solution using a marine alga Sargassumtenerrimum. Int. J. Chem. Tech. Res. 2(1) 155-162.

  18. Srivastava V.C, I. D.Mall, I. M. Mishra (2006). Characterization of mesoporous rice husk ash (RHA) and adsorption kinetics of metal ions from aqueous solution onto RHA. J. Hazard. Mater. B134 257267.

  19. Thomas H.G. (1948). Chromatography: A problem in kinetics. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 49 161182.

  20. Wolborska, A. (1989). Adsorption on activated carbon of p- nitrophenol from aqueous solution. Water Res. 23 8591.

  21. Yan, G.Y., T. Viraraghavan and M. Chem (2001). A new model for heavy metal removal in a biosorption column. Ads. Sci. Technol. 19 25-43.

  22. Yoon Y.H., J.H. Nelson(1984). Application of gas adsorption kinetics I. A theoretical model for respirator cartridge service life. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 45 509516.

  23. Zeinali, F., A. A. Ghoreyshi and G. D. Najafpour (2010). Adsorption of dichloromethane from aqueous phase using granular activated carbon : isotherm and breakthrough curve measurements. J. Scientific Res. 5(4) 191198.

Leave a Reply