- Open Access
- Total Downloads : 416
- Authors : A. Pushpalatha, R. Nithyakala
- Paper ID : IJERTV2IS120389
- Volume & Issue : Volume 02, Issue 12 (December 2013)
- Published (First Online): 30-12-2013
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
sc*g-Homeomorphisms in Topological Spaces
A. Pushpalatha
Department of Mathematics, Government Arts College
Udumalpet-642 126, Tirupur District Tamil Nadu, India
R. Nithyakala
Department of Mathematics Vidyasagar College of Arts and Science Udumalpet-642 126, Tirupur District Tamil Nadu, India
Abstract
In this paper, we introduced a new class sc*g- Homeomorphisms in Topological space.
Key words: Homeomorphism – strongly g-homeomorphism- sc*g – homeomorphism.
1. Introduction
Several mathematicians have generalized homeomorphisms in topological spaces. Biswas[18], Crossely and Hildebrand[19], Gentry and Hoyle[20] and Umehara and Maki[21] have introduced and investigated semi-homeomorphisms somewhat homeomorphisms and g-A- homeomorphisms Crossely and Hildebrand defined yet another semi-homeomorphism which is also a generalization of homeomorphisms. Sundaram[6] introduced g-homeomorphisms and gc- homeomorphisms in topological spaces.
In the section, we introduce the concept of sc*g- homeomorphisms and study some of their properties.
Definition: 2.7.1 A bijection f : (X, ) (Y, ) from a topological space X into a topological space Y is called a sc*generalized homeomorphism (sc*g- homeomorphism) if f is both sc*g-open and sc*g-continuous.
Theorem: 2.7.2 Every homeomorphism is a sc*g-homeomorphism.
Proof : Since every continuous function is sc*g- continuous and every open map is sc*g-open, the proof follows.
The converse of the above theorem need not be true as seen from the following example.
Example: 2.7.3 Consider the topological spaces X = Y= {a, b, c} with topologies ={ ,X,{a, b}} and = { ,Y,{a}, {a, b}}. Then the identity
map f : (X, ) (Y, ) is a sc*g- homeomorphism but not a homeomorphism. Since for the open set {a} in Y is not open in X.
Theorem:2.7.4 Everystrongly g- homeomorphism is a sc*g-homeomorphism but not conversely.
Proof : Let f : X Y be a strongly g- homeomorphism. Then f is strongly g -continuous and strongly g -open. Since every strongly g – continuous function is sc*g-continuous and every strongly g -open map is sc*g-open, f is sc*g- continuous and sc*g-open. Hence f is a sc*g- homeomorphism.
The converse of the above theorem need not be true as seen from the following example.
Example : 2.7.5 Let X=Y={a, b, c} with
={ ,X,{a}}and = { ,Y,{a, b}} respectively.
Then the identity map f : (X, ) (Y, ) is sc*g-homeomorphism but not a strongly g- homeomorphism. Since for the open set {a, b} in Y is not a strongly g-open set in X.
Next we shall characterize the sc*g- homeomorphism and sc*g-open maps.
Theorem : 2.7.6 For any bijection f : X Y the following statements are equivalent.
(a)f -1: Y X is sc*g-continuous. (b)f is a sc*g-open map.
(c)f is a sc*g-closed map.
Proof : (a) (b) Let G be any open set in X. Since f -1 is sc*g-continuous, the inverse image of G under f -1, namely f(G) is sc*g-open in Y and so f
is sc*g-open map.
-
(c) Let f be any closed set in X. Then Fc is open in X. Since f is sc*g-open, f(Fc) is
sc*g-open in Y. But f(Fc) = Y- f(F) and so f(F) is
sc*g-closed in Y. Therefore f is a sc*g-closed map.
-
(a) Let F be any closed set in X. Then
(f -1)-1(F) = f(F) is sc*g-closed in Y . Since f is a sc*g-closed map. Therefore f -1 is sc*g-continuous.
Theorem : 2.7.7 Let f : (X, ) (Y, ) be a bijective and sc*g-continuous map, the following statements are equivalent.
(a)f is a sc*g-open map.
-
f is a sc*g-homeomorphism.
-
f is a sc*g-closed map.
Proof : (a)(b) By assumption, f is bijective and sc*g-continuous and sc*g-open. Then by definition, f is sc*g- homeomorphism.
(b)(c) By assumption, f is sc*g-open and bijective. By theorem 2.7.4 f is sc*g-closed map. (c)(a) By assumption, f is sc*g-closed and bijective. By theorem 2.7.4 f is sc*g-open map.
The following example shows that the composition of two sc*g-homeomorphisms need not be sc*g- homeomorphism.
Example : 2.7.8 Consider the topological spaces X = Y= Z= {a, b, c} with topologies
1={ , X, {a}, {a, b}}, 2={ , Y, {a}}and
3={ , Z, {b, c}} respectively. Let f and g identity maps such that f : X Y and g : Y Z. Then f and g are sc*g-homeomorphisms but their
composition g f : X Z is not a sc*g-
homeomorphism. For the open set {a, b} in X, g(f{a, b}) = {a, b} is not sc*g-open set in Z. Definition :2.7.9 A bijection f : (X, ) (Y, ) is said to be a (sc*g)*-homeomorphism if f and its inverse f -1are sc*g-irresolute maps. Notation : Let family of all (sc*g)*- homeomorphisms from (X, ) onto itself be denoted by (sc*g)*h(X, ) and family of all sc*g- homeomorphisms from (X, ) onto itself be
denoted by sc*g h(X, ). The family of all homeomorphisms form from (X, ) onto itself be denoted by h(X, ).
Theorem :2.7.10 Let X be a Topological space.
Then
-
The set (sc*g)*h(X) is a group under composition of maps.
(ii)h(X) is a subgroup of (sc*g)*h(X). (iii)(sc*g)*h(X) sc*g h(X).
Proof: (i) Let f, g (sc*g)*h(X). Then g h (sc*g)*h(X) and so (sc*g)*h(X) is closed under the composition of maps. The composition of maps is associative. The identity map i : xx is a (sc*g)*- homeomorphism and so i (sc*g)*h(X). Also f . i =
i. f = f for every f (sc*g)*h(X). If f (sc*g)*h(X),
then f -1 (sc*g)*h(X) and f. f -1 = f -1. f = i. Hence (sc*g)*h(X) is a group under the
composition of maps.
-
Let f : X Y be a homeomorphism. Then by theorem 2.6.5 both f and f -1 are
(sc*g)*-irresolute and so f is a (sc*g)*- homeomorphism. Therefore every homeomorphism is a (sc*g)*-homeomorphism and so h(X) is a subset of (sc*g)*h(X). Also h(X) is a group under the composition of maps. Therefore h(X) is a subgroup of the group (sc*g)*h(X).
-
Since every (sc*g)*-irresolute map is sc*g- continuous, (sc*g)*h(X) is a subset of sc*gh(X).
From the above observations we get the following diagram:
Homeomorphism strongly g-homeomorphism sc*g – homeomorphism
References
-
Levine , N., Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topologicalspaces, Amer.Math.Monthly,70(1963),36- 41.
-
Levine ,N.,Generalized closed sets in topology, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, 19(1970),89-96.
-
Maki., Devi, R., and Balachandran, K., Generalized -closed sets in topology, Bull. Fukuoka Univ. Ed. Part III, 42(1993), 13-21.
-
Hatir, E., Noiri, T., and Yuksel, S., A decomposition of continuity, ActaMath. Hungar.,70(1996),145-150.
-
Rajamani, M., Studies on decompositions of generalized continuous maps in topological spaces, Ph.D Thesis, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore,(2001).
-
Sundaram, P., Studies on generalizations of continuous maps in topological spaces, Ph.D Thesis, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore,(1991).
-
Sundaram, P., On C-continuous maps in topological spaces, Proc. of 82nd session of the Indian Science Congress, Calcutta (1995),48-49.
-
Tong, J., On decomposition of continuity in topological spaces, ActaMath.Hungar.,54(1989),51-55.
-
Bhattachraya and Lahiri, B.K., Semi-generalized closed sets in topology, Indian J.Math., 29(3)375- 382(1987)
-
Nagaveni, N., Studies on Generalizations of Homeomorphisms in Topological spaces,Ph.D Thesis, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore,(1999).
-
Andrijevic,D., Semi-preopen sets, Mat. Vesnik,38(1986),24-32.
-
Dontchev, J., On generalizing semi-pre open sets, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kochi Univ. Ser. A. Math., 16(1995), 35- 48.
-
Nithyakala, R., scg, sc*g, sc(s)g-closed sets in Topological spaces, Proc. Of 99th Indian Science Congress, Bhubaneswar(2012), 89.
-
Balachandran, K., Sundaram, P., and Maki, H., On generalized continuous maps in Topological spaces, Mem. Fac. Kochi Univ. Ser. A. Math., 12(1991), 5-13.
-
Maki, H., Devi, R., and Balachandran, K., Associated topologies of generalized – closed sets and – generalized closed sets, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kochi Univ. Ser. A. Math., 15 (1994), 51-63.
-
Crossley, S.G., and Hildebrand, S.K., Semi- closure, Texas J. Sci., 22 (1971), 99-112.
-
Malghan, S.R., Generalized closed maps, J.Karnataka Univ.Sci., 27(1982), 82-88.
-
Biswas,N., On some mappings in Topological spaces, Bull.Cal.Math.Soc., 61(1969),127-135
-
Crossley, S. G. and Hildebrand, S.K., Semi- topological properties, Fund.Math., 74(1972), 233-254.
-
Gentry, K. R. And Hoyle, H. G., Somewhat continuous functions, Czechoslovak Math. J., 21(1971), 5-12.
-
Umehara, J. and Maki, H., A note on the homeomorphic image of a T v- space, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kochi Univ. (Math)., 10(1989), 39-45