Simulation of Compensated Transmission Line Protection from Lightning by using Matlab

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV4IS050277

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Simulation of Compensated Transmission Line Protection from Lightning by using Matlab

Gaurav Sharma

Post Graduate Student

School of Electronics & Electrical Engineering, Reg. No- 11300644, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, Punjab, India

Prof. Mr. Anshul Mahajan Department of Electrical Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India

Abstract:In this paper we are protecting the system from being damaged by the overvoltage develop across the system due to switching and lightning in nature. For analyzing the system we consider case of overvoltage due to lightning. In this paper we emphasize the impact of protection technique used for protecting the various equipment from overvoltage develop across the system.

All the simulating work is done in MATLAB/Simulink in which we develop different graphical relationship between current, voltage waveforms with respect to time. All this simulation is carried out with and without arrester to evaluate transmission line arrester impact on surge develops across the system and to improve the overall performance of the system.

Keywords:Overvoltage, Lightning Overvoltage, Switching Overvoltage, Arrestor.

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Overvoltage is one of the major troubles occurring in the power system and to minimise this problem many methods, equipments and techniques have used. Basically overvoltage is of two types i.e. lightning and switching. To improve the performance of the power system from lighting several studies has been conducted and many methodologies have been purposed in the technical literature over the last decades. The most important safeguard in electrical power system is to protect overhead high voltages transmission line from lightning strokes. Accurate evaluation of the lightning performance helps to make the system highly efficient. Shield wires and surge arrestors are used for the protection of lines from lightning. Due to the lightning phenomena overvoltage occurs which reduces the reliability of electrical network, leading to interruption and consequences increases the transmission line repair cost. To minimize the annual failure of the line overhead ground wires are placed above the phases to intercept lightning strokes [1]. Surge arrestors are the main measures, which are used in order to protect the system against lightning and switching phenomena.

    Franklins invention of lightning rod to protected apparatus from lightning strikes. Till today for more than 200 years, the lightning rod has been used for air terminal of lightning protection systems.[1] But lightning rods cannot always function perfectly because they have an unexpected shielding failures, are often due to the uncertainty of lightning phenomenon. For example, several direct strikes to the transformer substations took place in the power grid

    of north India. For designing a lightning protection system, the protection angle method, the rolling sphere method and the mesh method are used to evaluate the protection zone of a lightning rod, all of these fall considerations on stochastic behaviours of the lightning process. The effectiveness of lightning rods is investigated by means of dynamic simulation of lightning strikes including stochastic[2].

    Over voltages in the power system may be due to the lightning strokes that terminate on or near to power lines such over voltages are known as lightning over voltage or surges. Switching over voltages or surges is due to the certain change in the circuit condition brought about by deliberate or unintentional switching operation. The magnitude of lightning over voltage is essentially independent of system voltage is known as external over voltages.

  2. MATHEMATICAL MODELLING

    In our model we have constructed a 735KV equivalent transmission system feed a load through a 200 Km transmission line. The transmission line is series compensated at the middle point and shunt compensated at the sending end and the receiving end of the system. An overvoltage fault is applied to the transmission line. Firstly we apply lightning fault in which we induce the pulse wave in the transmission line of very high value and then calculate the various results. This lightning is fall on the different position on the transmission line to analysis the result of arrestor across the system. Secondly we introduce switching fault near the load terminal. This fault is cleared by load breaker opening. For simplification purpose only one phase of the transmission system is modelled. All parameters correspond to positive sequence

    A 3 phase short circuit level of the transmission system is 15000MVA. The line is 40% series compensated by the capacitor and shunt compensated by 330MVar inductor at the load end. The series capacitance and shunt inductor are protected by the metal oxide varistor. The series capacitor varistor MOV1 consist of 30 columns protecting the capacitor at 2.5 times its rated value. The shunt inductor is protected by a 2 column arrestor at 1.8 pu of nominal phase to ground voltage.

    Fig1 A single phase MATLAB/Simulink model of 735KV transmission system feed a load through a 200 Km transmission line

  3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION

    CASE I- OCCURANCE OF LIGHTNING BEFORE SERIES CAPACITOR WITHOUT USING ARRESTOR

    In this case when lightning will fall before the series capacitor on the transmission line there is noarrestor present in parallel to the shunt and series compensated device. All lightning overvoltage will pass though the compensated devices attached across the system.

    Table1 RMS value of Voltage and Current of examined transmission lineLightning overvoltage before series capacitor without using arrestor

    RMS

    Voltage at sending end ()

    RMS

    Current at sending end ()

    RMS

    Voltage at midpoint ()

    RMS

    Current at midpoint ()

    RMS

    Voltage at receiving end ()

    RMS

    Current at receiving end ()

    Time frame (T)

    2.66304

    13.36

    11.11

    1477

    4545

    6.308

    0.01

    8195

    8.514

    15.95

    432.1

    5029

    0.6098

    0.02

    5071

    5.484

    2.856

    289.6

    512.1

    3.333

    0.03

    3229

    4.081

    3.444

    723.8

    66.07

    3.716

    0.04

    1727

    2.389

    3.533

    1081

    118.6

    3.629

    0.05

    1075

    2.857

    1.27

    1298

    2339

    0.7514

    0.06

    1390

    0.606

    0.0435

    1430

    2183

    1.544

    0.07

    4097

    0.1562

    0.1145

    1394

    4387

    1.537

    0.08

    3788

    2.118

    1.614

    1269

    5609

    2.029

    0.09

    4571

    3.722

    4.279

    991.2

    2369

    2.514

    0.10

    Fig2 Voltage Vs Tme and Current Vs Time waveform of the shunt reactor at the sending end of transmission line,Lightning overvoltage before series capacitor without using arrestor

    Fig3 Voltage Vs Time and Current Vs Time waveform of the series capacitor at the midpoint of transmission line,Lightning overvoltage

    before series capacitor without using arrestor

    Fig4 Voltage Vs Time and Current Vs Time waveform of the shunt reactor at the receiving end of transmission line,Lightning overvoltage before series capacitor without using arrestor

    CASE II- OCCURANCE OF LIGHTNING BEFORE SERIES CAPACITOR BY USING ARRESTOR

    In this casewhen the lightning will fall before the series capacitor,the arrestor installed in parallel to the shunt and series compensation devices protect the system from the heavy voltage develop across the system. When the lightning impulse will fall on the transmission line, the system will produce a back flash to the receiving end and ground the large amount of lightning voltage to the ground and save the system from heavy damage.

    Table 2 RMS value of Voltage and Current of examined transmission line,Lightning overvoltage before series capacitor by using arrestor

    RMS

    Voltage at sending end ( )

    RMS

    Current at sending end ( )

    RMS

    Voltage at midpoint ( )

    RMS

    Current at midpoint ( )

    RMS

    Voltage at receiving end ( )

    RMS

    Current at receiving end ( )

    Time frame (T)

    2.663

    04

    3.804 77

    1477

    1.911100

    1.536115

    4546

    0.01

    8191

    9.367103

    432.1

    3.968127

    2.435113

    5030

    0.02

    5071

    3.667113

    289.6

    8.02136

    0

    512.2

    0.03

    3230

    5.843123

    723.8

    6.292116

    0

    66.03

    0.04

    1726

    1.429136

    1081

    3.217107

    0

    118.7

    0.05

    1075

    7.483147

    1298

    2.995103

    5.695130

    2338

    0.06

    1391

    3.006141

    1430

    3.783101

    1.826131

    2183

    0.07

    4098

    6621118

    1394

    1.07101

    2.609116

    4387

    0.08

    3785

    1.626119

    1269

    9.775104

    5.771111

    5611

    0.09

    4571

    2.033115

    9912

    4.225109

    1.104129

    2370

    0.10

    Fig5 Voltage Vs Time and Current Vs Time waveform of the shunt reactor at the sending end of transmission line,Lightning overvoltage before series capacitor by using arrestor

    Fig6 Voltage Vs Time and Current Vs Time waveform of the series capacitor at the midpoint of transmission line,Lightning overvoltage before series capacitor by using arrestor

    Fig7 Voltage Vs Time and Current Vs Time waveform of the shunt reactor at the receiving end of transmission line,Lightning overvoltage before series capacitor by using arrestor

    CASE III- OCCURANCE OF LIGHTNING AFTER SERIES CAPACITOR WITHOUT USING ARRESTOR

    In this case when lightning will fall after series capacitor on the transmission line there is no arrestor present in parallel to the shunt and series compensated device. All lightning overvoltage will pass though the compensated devices attached across the system.

    Table 3 RMS value of Voltage and Current of examined transmission line,Lightning overvoltage after series capacitor without using arrestor

    RMS

    Voltage at sending end

    ( )

    RMS

    Current at sending end

    ( )

    RMS

    Voltage at midpoint ( )

    RMS

    Current at midpoint ( )

    RMS

    Voltage at receiving end

    ( )

    RMS

    Current at receiving end

    ( )

    Time frame (T)

    4.6805

    694

    652.5

    7.00505

    1.51705

    59.11

    0.01

    3.42405

    1473

    1438

    5.93105

    2.56505

    481

    0.02

    1.6905

    1908

    1897

    4.25905

    2.52705

    971.6

    0.03

    3.0505

    2070

    2053

    2.29505

    1.85505

    1376

    0.04

    6.97304

    2001

    1986

    2.84104

    9.95104

    1629

    0.05

    1.63105

    1741

    1731

    1.56205

    9828

    1707

    0.06

    7.48804

    1482

    1461

    3.14105

    2.4105

    1462

    0.07

    2.74205

    1058

    1085

    4.40505

    1.6205

    1622

    0.08

    2.49605

    657.7

    615.1

    5.24705

    2.64705

    574.6

    0.09

    2.32205

    59.56

    92.85

    5.59705

    3.17405

    128.6

    0.10

    Fig8 Voltage Vs Time and Current Vs Time waveform of the shunt reactor at the sending end of transmission line,Lightning overvoltage after series capacitor without using arrestor

    Fig9 Voltage Vs Time and Current Vs Time waveform of the series capacitor at the midpoint of transmission line,Lightning overvoltage after series capacitor without using arrestor

    Fig10 Voltage Vs Time and Current Vs Time waveform of the shunt reactor at the receiving end of transmission line,Lightning overvoltage after series capacitor without using arrestor

    CASE IV- OCCURANCE OF LIGHTNING AFTER SERIES CAPACITOR BY USING ARRESTOR

    In this case when the lightning will fall after the series capacitor, the arrestor installed in parallel to the shunt and series compensation devices protect the system from the heavy voltage develop across the system. When the lightning impulse will fall on the transmission line, the system will produce a back flash to the receiving end and ground the large amount of lightning voltage to the ground and save the system from heavy damage.

    Table 4 RMS value of Voltage and Current of examined transmission line,, Lightning overvoltage after series capacitor by using arrestor

    RMS

    Voltage at sending end ( )

    RMS

    Current at sending end ( )

    RMS

    Voltage at midpoint ( )

    RMS

    Current at midpoint ( )

    RMS

    Voltage at receiving end ( )

    RMS

    Current at receiving end ( )

    Time frame (T)

    1.647

    05

    1.40137

    143

    1.6105

    2.6104

    1.38777

    0.01

    1.09105

    1.55946

    3.477

    1.49405

    4.36104

    1.94766

    0.02

    5.9504

    1.08259

    0.0001876

    1.22805

    5.91404

    7.9660

    0.03

    2.95504

    6.86575

    1.7712

    8.48504

    5.21904

    1.54762

    0.04

    4498

    9.141116

    6.02928

    4.16204

    3.7204

    6.87170

    0.05

    2.0204

    3.75385

    1.14998

    1603

    1.82504

    2.33485

    0.06

    3.84404

    3.51569

    1.78528

    4.06104

    2978

    1.017124

    0.07

    2.63604

    2.26977

    1.61515

    7.37604

    4.67604

    6.33365

    0.08

    4.71904

    1.00264

    5.5209

    9.96504

    5.05104

    3.01163

    0.09

    7.0104

    3.93756

    1.09405

    1.1605

    4.40304

    314566

    0.10

    Fig11 Voltage Vs Time and Current Vs Time waveform of the shunt reactor at the sending end of transmission line,Lightning overvoltage after series capacitor by using arrestor

    Fig12 Voltage Vs Time and Current Vs Time waveform of the series capacitor at the midpoint of transmission line,Lightning overvoltage after

    series capacitor by using arrestor

  4. RESULTS

    From all these comparison results we come to a point that in case of arrestor models as long as the voltage develops across the compensated devices is above the protective level then all the current is flowing into the MOV. The flow of current is null through compensated devices when the voltage passes below the protective level because the MOV offers a high resistance. But in the absence of arrester model all the high voltage and current will passes through the compensated device which will either turn off the system or damage the whole compensated system because the compensated devices allow the high voltage and current to pass through them as a low resistive path to flow.

  5. CONCLUSION

    We have also analyse the system by using lightning overvoltage occur in the system. For production of lightning we use a transfer impulse function as impulse generator which induces a large voltage across the transmission just like the occurrences of lightning in the nature. All the simulation is done by inducing lightning on different point on the transmission line and then comparison is made, then considering the results by using arrestor model and without using arrestor model. In the last we conclude that it is preferable to use arrestor across the line to protect the compensated devices across the system because the arrestor protective device operates immediately in order to remove the heavy overvoltage to pass through the compensated devices.

    Fig13 Voltage Vs Time and Current Vs Time waveform of the shunt reactor at the receiving end of transmission line,Lightning overvoltage after series capacitor by using arrestor

  6. REFERENCES

  1. M.Chanaka, KusumShanthi, RanjitPerera Modeling of Power Transmission Lines for Lightning Back Flashover Analysis (A Case Study: 220kV Biyagama-Kotmale Transmission Line) 2011 IEEE 6th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems,

    ICIIS 2011, Aug. 16-19, 2011, Sri Lanka

  2. GuDingxie, Dai Min, He Huiwen, High Voltage Institute China State Grid Electric Power Research Institute Wuhan, China Lightning Protection of 1000 kV AC Power Transmission Lines and Substations 2011 IEEE, 7th Asia-Pacific International Conference on Lightning, November 1-4, 2011, Chengdu, China

  3. Xuewei Zhang, Lin Dong, Jinliang He*, Shuiming Chen and RongZeng Study on the Effectiveness of Single Lightning Rods by a Fractal Approach Lightning Research, 2009 State Key Lab of Power Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

  4. L. Ekonomou, I.F. Gonos, D.P. Iracleous, I.A. StathopulosApplication of artificial neural network methods for the lightning performance evaluation of Hellenic high voltage transmission lines Electric Power Systems Research 77 (2007) National Technical University of Athens, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, High Voltage Laboratory, 9 IroonPolitechniou St., Zografou, GR 157 80 Athens, Greece

  5. DalinaJohari, TitikKhawa Abdul Rahman, Ismail Musirin, Member, IEEEArtificial Neural Network Based Technique for Lightning PredictionThe 5th Student Conference on Research and Development SCO 11-12 December 2007, Malaysia

  6. C.A. Christodoulou1, G. Perantzakis, G.E. Spanakis, P. KarampelasEvaluation of lightning performance of transmission lines protected by metal oxide surge arrestors using artificial intelligence techniques Journal of Energy Systems The final publication is available at www.springerlink.com

  7. AbdolamirNekoubin Simulation of series compensated transmission line protected with Mov World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol:5 2011-10-28, Electrical Engineering Department, Islamic Azard University Najaf Abad Branch, International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 5(10)2011.

  8. B.R.Gupta power system analysis and design book,first edition 2005

Leave a Reply