Solar and UV based Photo Degradation Studies on Paraquat using Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Photocatalyst

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV5IS050589

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Solar and UV based Photo Degradation Studies on Paraquat using Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Photocatalyst

S K Shivaranjani1

1 Assistant Professor,

Department of Civil Engineering, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore – 641049

S Karthikeyan2

Associate Professor, Centre for Environmental Studies,

Anna University, Chennai 600 025

Abstract Photocatalytic degradation of paraquat was performed on wastewater by various photodegradation techniques via Solar, Solar/TiO2, Solar/H2O2, UV, UV/TiO2 and UV/H2O2 processes. Studies were also performed to optimize the operating parameters such as pH, initial concentration, catalyst dosage and contact time on photocatalytic degradation of paraquat. It was found that the UV/H2O2 photo catalytic process was more effective than any other methods studied for degradation of the paraquat. The maximum degradation of paraquat was 95.27% at 300 minutes for initial pH 7, initial paraquat concentration of 10mg/l and H2O2 dosage of 2g/l. The kinetic constant (k) for UV/H2O2 was found to 8.26 times greater than solar process and 7.28 times greater than the UV process. The order of reaction rate constant was UV/ H2O2 > UV/TiO2 > Solar/H2O2

> Solar/TiO2> UV> Solar.

Keyword: Paraquat, Herbicide, Solar, UV, H2O2, TiO2

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Agriculture plays a dominant role in Indian economy and more than 80% of population depends on it. About 30 percent of the potential food production is said to be lost in India due to insect pest, plant pathogens, weeds, rodents, birds and hence the usage of pesticides has become absolutely essential.

    Most of the pesticides have very long half-life times in the soil and are known to elicit their adverse effects by natural hormones in the body and it has been postulated that their long term, low- dose exposure are increasingly linked to the human health effects such as immune suppression, hormone disruption, diminished intelligence, reproductive abnormalities and cancer (Crisp et al 1998; Hurley et al 1998).

  2. PARAQUAT

    Paraquat (C12H14Cl12N2) is one of the most widely used herbicides to control weeds. The pyridine is coupled with sodium in anhydrous ammonia to give 4, 4 bipyridine, which is then methylated with chloromethane to give the desired compound. It is quick acting and non- selective, killing green plant tissue on contact. It is also toxic to human beings and animals. The effect of paraquat on human include burns to the mouth, acute respiratory distress, loss of appetite, abdominal pain, thirst, nausea,

    vomiting, diarrhea, giddiness, headache, fever, muscle pain, lethargy, shortness of breath and rapid heartbeat. The Central Pollution Control Board has prescribed effluent standard of paraquat in pesticide industrial effluent as 23 mg/l (CPCB, 2006). However World Health Organisation (WHO) has recommended the maximum concentration of paraquat in drinking water as 10 µg/L. Though paraquat was banned in many countries especially in European countries, it is widely used in agriculture and industries for control of weeds in India.

    Generally, pesticide industries in India have adopted two schemes for treatment of wastewater (COINDS 2006) evaporation and detoxification followed by biological treatment. They have also adopted certain physical and chemical treatment methods like flocculation, precipitation, adsorption on granular activated carbon, air stripping and reverse osmosis. But these methods could transfer pollutants from one phase to another one, but not destroy them.

    Photocatalytic degradation of various pesticides have been reported by many researchers such as Diuron by Xe lamp/TiO2 (Bamba et al.,2008), 2, 4

    Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by UV/TiO2 (Lu and Chen, 1997), Atrazine, Simazine, Trietazine, Prometon and Prometryn by UV/TiO2 (Pelizzeti et al., 1990), Carbendazim by UV/TiO2 (Saien and Khezrianjoo, 2008), Thiram by UV/TiO2 (Haque and Munner, 2005), Cartap Hydrochloride(synthetic pesticide) by UV/TiO2 (Choi et al., 2004), Phosalone by UV/TiO2 and UV/TiO2/H2O2 (Dhaneshwar et al., 2004), Carbofuran by UV/TiO2 (Mahalakshmi et al., 2007), 3,4 dichloro propionamide by UV/TiO2 (Pathirana and Maithreepala, 1997), 2, 4

    Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by UV/ZnO (Sancheaz et al.,

    1996), carabaryl by UV/TiO2 (Kuo et al., 2008).

    In this study, photocatalytic degradation of paraquat by Solar, UV, Solar/TiO2, UV/TiO2, Solar Fenton, Solar/H2O2 and UV/H2O2 processes were conducted. Also the effect of operating variables such as initial concentration of paraquat, dose of catalysts, pH of pesticide solution was studied.

  3. EXPERIMENTAL METHODOLOGY

    Experimental setup of UV Photocatalytic reactor

    An annular reactor with an effective volume of 500ml was used and 15W mercury lamp (Sankyodenki 7B made in Japan; supplied by Heber Scientific- India) with wavelength of 352nm was used as UV light source, placed in a double walled immersion well of quartz. The reactor has an inlet and two outlets, one at the top for collecting the excess wastewater and another at the bottom for collection of treated sample. The whole reactor is mounted on a magnetic stirrer to ensure complete homogeneity of the reacting solution.

    The reactor was wrapped with aluminium foil to prevent the UV ray into the working area. A tube was inserted at one side of the quartz cylinder and connected to the bottom of a glass condenser through the peristaltic pump. The other end of the condenser was connected to another side of the quartz cylinder through another tube. The condenser was cooled by a cooler (Model LAUDA WK 1400; made in Germany) in order to prevent the excess heat generated and the reaction temperature was maintained as 210C.

    The solar photolytic studies were conducted in batch mode in 2 L glass tray containing 500 ml of paraquat solution.

  4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Dark Adsorption

10mg/l of paraquat with 1g/l of TiO2 was kept in dark environment without any stray light. At the end of 24 hrs of contact time, about 10.15% decrease was observed due to adsorption of paraquat on the surface of catalyst. It absorbance is measured at 600nm in UV-Visible Spectrophotometer SPEKOL 1200 (Analytic Jena, Germany) against a standard reference solution.

Effect of pH on photodegradation of paraquat by Treatment Alternatives

The pH of solution affects the adsorption and dissociation of the pollutant on catalyst surface (Lea and Adesina 2001). Hence, degradation studies were conducted in the pH range of 5 9 by maintaining other parameters, concentration of paraquat (50mg/l), contact time of 180 minutes, dosage of TiO2 1 g/L and that of H2O2 as 2 g/L. The solar degradation studies were conducted during 11

a.m to 2.00 p.m and the results are shown in Fig. 2.

The direct photolysis by solar and UV methods did not have any significant effect on paraquat removal. In solar /TiO2 and UV/TiO2 method, the paraquat removal was increased with initial pH attained the maximum removal at pH 7 and decreased with further increase in the initial pH.

Figure.2. Effect of pH on Photodegradation of Paraquat

The maximum removal efficiency obtained at pH

7 was 17.94% and 57.77% by solar/TiO2 and UV/TiO2 methods respectively. The dependence of the degradation rate of paraquat with pH is the consequence of pH changes in the adsorption of paraquat on the surface of TiO2.

However, the degradation efficiency decreased with increase in the pH from 5 to 9, when H2O2 was the photocalayst for solar and UV processes. The maximum removal of paraquat by solar/H2O2 andUV/H2O2 was 16.33% and 61.27% respectively at pH 5. H2O2 could stay stable at high pH probably because it solvates a proton to form an oxonium ion (H3O2+). The oxonium ion makes H2O2 electrophilic to enhance its stability and reduce the reactivity. Further no hydroxyl radical will be produced if H2O2 was not decomposed and so lower degradation was observed at higher pH. Besides, H2O2 is also unstable in basic solution and may decompose to give oxygen and water and lose its oxidation ability. Also, the oxidation potential of hydroxyl radical is known to decrease with increasing pH (Eisenhauer 1964) which also reduces degradation.

Effect of Initial Concentration of Paraquat on Photodegradation by Treatment Alternatives

In order to study the effectiveness of photo catalysis with increasing the pollutant concentration, experiments were conducted with synthetic wastewater containing paraquat at concentration ranging from 10 to 50mg/l. For photo catalysis, the initial concentration of pollutants usually was not higher than 100mg/l, beyond this value negative effect of high concentration would occur and photocatalytic efficiency would decrease. The initial pH was maintained as the actual pH for photolysis and TiO2 photocatalytic studies and 5 for H2O2 catalytic study. The results obtained for the effect of initial concentration on paraquat is represented in Fig. 3

Figure 3. Effect of Initial Concentration

From the Figure it was observed that the degradation efficiency decreased when there is increase in initial concentration of paraquat. The maximum degradation of paraquat observed at initial concentration of 10mg/l at 180 minute was 18.83%, 33.62%, 36.14%,

    1. %, 76.21% and 75.81% by Solar, UV, Solar/TiO2, solar/H2O2, UV/TiO2 and UV/H2O2 respectively. Similaly, maximum degradation of paraquat observed at initial concentration of 50mg/l at 180 minute was 4.37%, 12.24%,

      16.33%, 17.85%, 57.77% and 61.27% by Solar, UV,

      Solar/TiO2, solar/H2O2, UV/TiO2 and UV/H2O2 respectively. Since illumination time and amount of catalyst are constant, the radicals formed on the catalysts remain constant. Hence, the relative number of hydroxyl radical species attacking the pesticide molecules decreased with increase of pesticide concentration (Mengyne et al 1995).

      Effect of TiO2 dosage on paraquat degradation by Solar/TiO2 and UV/TiO2 Methods

      The catalyst concentration required for particular

      pollutant is to be optimized as the excess catalyst may reduce the amount of photo energy being transferred in the medium due to opacity offered by the catalyst particles. Therefore, experiments were performed with the TiO2 dosage ranging from 0.5 2.5g/l by maintaining pH 7, Concentration of paraquat as 10mg/l and contact time of 180 minutes. The results obtained are given in the figure 4.

      It was observed that the degradation efficiency increased till 1 g/L of TiO2 and then decreased. The maximum degradation of paraquat obtained with 1 g/L of TiO2 was 36.13% and 76.21% for solar/TiO2 and UV/TiO2 methods respectively.

      Figure 4. Effect of TiO2 Dosage

      Increase in catalyst dosage above the optimum level resulted in decrease in light penetration and deactivation of activated molecules due to collision with the ground state molecules (Shankar et al 2004).

      Effect of H2O2 dosage on paraquat degradation by Solar/H2O2 and UV/H2O2

      Similarly, experiments were performed by varying

      the dosage of H2O2 from 0.5 to 2.5g/l by maintaining other parameters pH 5, concentration of paraquat 10mg/l and contact time of 180 minutes. The results obtained for the effect of H2O2 dosage on paraquat is given in the Figure 5.

      Figure 5. Effect of H2O2 on photodegradation of Paraquat

      Similar to TiO2 studies, the degradation increased with dose from 0.5 to 2g/l, and a sharp decrease was observed afterwards. which might be due to the self decomposition of H2O2. It may also act as a free radical , thereby decreasing the concentration of hydroxyl radicals and reducing the degradation efficiency (Kang and Hwang 2000). The maximum degradation occurred at 2 g/L of H2O2 at 180 minutes was 33 and 74% for Solar/H2O2 and UV/H2O2 methods respectively.

      Effect of inorganic ions by solar photo degradation of paraquat

      The experiments were conducted in the optimized condition pH 7, concentration of paraquat 10mg/l and contact time of 180 minutes. The concentration of the Ammonical nitrogen, Nitrite, Nitrate formation by solar photodegradation was only about 10.12mg/l, 11.97mg/l and 9.29mg/l respectively because during the degrdation process indicated that the pesticide was decomposed with the evolution of inorganic ions. The concentration of the Ammonical nitrogen, Nitrite, Nitrate formation is only about 17.89mg/l, 24.56mg/l and 13.45 mg/l respectively by solar/TiO2 process.In case of paraquat, the formation of Nitrate was much lower than the Nitrite possibly because of the sequential oxidation of the amine group on the molecular structure to form nitrate being a slow process.

      The concentration of the Ammonical nitrogen, Nitrite, Nitrate formation is improved upto 30.12 mg/l, 39.18 mg/l and 30.13 mg/l respectively compared to above two process by solar/H2O2 process.

      The concentration of the Ammonical nitrogen, Nitrite, Nitrate formation is increased upto 40.39 mg/l, 43.17 mg/l and 34.56 mg/l respectively by UV degradation. It was accounted generally in photocatalytic experiments the presence of chloride ions affects the adsorption step which also absorbs UV light partly and reduces degradation.

      The concentration of the Ammonical nitrogen, Nitrite, Nitrate formation is increased upto 60.75 mg/l, 50.16 mg/l and 47.82 mg/l respectively by UV/TiO2 method. The concentration of the Ammonical nitrogen was increased upto 71.45% whereas nitrate and nitrite formation was decreased to some extent in UV/H2O2.

      Kinetics of Removal of Paraquat by different Photocatalytic Process

      The results with respect to paraquat removal under different photocatalytic methods follow pseudo first order. The plot of ln(Ct / C0) versus time t gives a straight line passing through the origin, the slope of which is first order rate constant (R). The kinetics of the various photocatalytic processes are depicted in Table 1 and represented in figure

      6. The kinetic constant (k) for UV photocatalytic studies were almost double that of solar photocatalytic method.

      Table 1 Kinetics of removal of paraquat

      Concentration of paraquat

      Method of treatment

      Linear Regression Equation

      K x 10-3

      Min-1

      10mg/l

      Solar

      ln(Ct/Co) = 0.0052t

      5.2

      UV

      ln(Ct/Co) = 0.0059t

      5.9

      Solar/TiO2

      ln(Ct/Co) = 0.0094t

      9.4

      Solar/ H2O2

      ln(Ct/Co) = 0.0127t

      12.7

      UV/ TiO2

      ln(Ct/Co) = 0.015t

      15

      UV/ H2O2

      ln(Ct/Co) = 0.023t

      23

      The order of reaction rate constant was UV/ H2O2 > UV/TiO2 > Solar/H2O2 > Solar/TiO2> UV> Solar. Thus UV/H2O2 was found to be highly effective in degradation of paraquat than any other processes.

      5. CONCLUSIONS

      The major conclusions drawn from the above study are given below

      • The UV/H2O2 photocatalytic method is highly effective in degradation of paraquat. UV/H2O2 is strongly superior to Solar, UV, Solar/TiO2, UV/TiO2 and Solar/H2O2 processes in degradation of paraquat.

      • The order of reaction rate constant was UV/ H2O2 > UV/TiO2 > Solar/H2O2 > Solar/TiO2> UV> Solar.

      • The kinetic constant (k) for UV/H2O2 was found to

8.26 times greater than solar process and 7.28 times greater than the UV process.

REFERENCES

ol>

  • Crisp T.M., Clegg E.D., Cooper R.L., Wood W.P., Anderson D.G., Baetcke K.P., Hoffmann J.L., Morrow M.S., Rodier D.J., Schaeffer J.E., Touart L.W., Zeeman M.G and Patel Y.M. (1998), Environmental endocrine disruption: An effects assessment and analysis, Environmental health perspect., Vol. 106, pp. 11 -56.

  • Hurley P.M., Hill R.N. and Whiting R.J. (1998), Mode of carcinogenic action of pesticides inducing thyroid follicular cell tumours in rodents, Environmental health perspect, Vol.103, pp. 437 -445.

  • COINDS (2006), Wastewater management in pesticide industry, CPCB, Report No. Inserted entries relating to emissions by Rule 2(V) of the Environment (Protection) First Amendment Rules, 2006 notified vide G.S.R.46 (E), dated 3.2.2006.

  • Bamba D., Atheba P., Robert D., Tokunery A. and Dongui B. (2008), Photocatalytic degradation of the diuron pesticide, Environment chemistry Letter, Vol. 3, pp. 163-167.

  • Lu M.C and chen J.N and chang C.P. (1997) Pretreatment waste water by photocatalytic oxidation Water Science technology. Vol. 36, pp. 117-22.

  • Pelizzeti R .and schivallo M. (ED) (1997) Photochemical conversion and storage of solar energy, klenwer academic publishers Netherlands, pp. 251.

  • Saien J. and khezrianjoo S. (2008), Degradation of the fungicide carbendaziam in aqueous solution with UV/TiO2 process: Optimisation kinetics and toxicity studies, Journal of hazard master, Vol. 2-3, pp. 269-276.

  • Haque M.M. and Muneer M. (2005), photo catalysed degradation of a fungicide, thiram in aqueous suspension of titanium dioxide. Indian Journal of Chemistry technology, Vol. 12, pp. 68-72.

  • Daneshvar N., Hejazi M.J., Rangarangy B. and Khataee A.R. (2004), photocatalytic degradation of an organo phosphorus pesticide phosalone in aqueous suspension of TiO2, Journal of Environment and Science health. Part-B, Vol. 22, pp. 285-296.

  • Kuo W.S ching Y.H and Lai L.S. (2008), Solar photo catalysis of Carbaryl rinsate promoted by dye sensitization, dyes and pigments Vol.76, pp. 82-87.

  • Mahalakshmi M., Arabindoo B., Palanichamy M. and MurugesamV. (2007) Photocatalytic degradation of carbofuran using semiconductor oxides, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 143, pp. 240-245.

  • Lea J. and Adesina A.A (2001) , Oxidative degradation of 4 nitrophenol in UV illuminated titania suspension, J.chem.Tech. Biotech., Vol. 76 No. 8,pp. 803 810.

  • Mengyne Z., Shifu C. And Yaowu T.(1995) , Photocatalytic degradation of organophosphorus pesticides using thin films of TiO2, J.Chem. technol. Biotechnol., Vol.64, pp. 339 344.

  • Shankar M.V ., Cheralathan K.K., Arabindoo B., Palanisamy M. And Murugesan V. (2004)., Enhanced photocatalytic activity for the destruction of monocrotophos pesticide by TiO2 , J.Mol.

    Catal.Vol.223 , pp. 195 200

  • Kang Y.W and Hwang K.Y . (2000), Effects of reaction conditions on the oxidation efficiency in the fenton process , Wat. Res., Vol. 34, pp.2786

  • Leave a Reply