Strength Assessment of an Existing Building Using Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Meter

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV11IS02024

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

  • Open Access
  • Authors : Robin Scaria, Pooja Pramod, Nirmalan Thomas, Sangeeth Santhosh, Gokul P.V
  • Paper ID : IJERTCONV11IS02024
  • Volume & Issue : Volume 11, Issue 02
  • Published (First Online): 15-06-2023
  • ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
  • Publisher Name : IJERT
  • License: Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Text Only Version

Strength Assessment of an Existing Building Using Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Meter

Robin Scaria, Pooja Pramod, Nirmalan Thomas, Sangeeth Santhosh

B.Tech students Dept. of civil engineering

Mangalam college of engineering

Gokul P.V

Assistant Professor

Dept. of civil engineering Mangalam college of engineering Kottayam, India

AbstractUltrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) meter is a widely used non-destructive testing technique for assessing the strength of concrete and other construction materials. The UPV method involves sending ultrasonic waves through the material using a transducer and measuring the time taken for the waves to travel between two points. The velocity of the waves is directly related to the mechanical properties of the material, such as compressive strength, elasticity, and tensile strength. This paper provides an overview of the UPV method and its applications in the construction industry for assessing the strength and quality of concrete structures. The paper discusses the advantages of the UPV method, including its fast, accurate, and reliable results, and its non-destructive nature. The paper also covers the limitations and potential sources of errors associated with the UPV method, along with the methods to minimize these errors. The paper highlights the importance of UPV testing in ensuring the structural integrity and safety of concrete structures. UPV testing can be used to detect early signs of damage and deterioration, allowing for timely maintenance and repairs. The UPV method is an essential tool for engineers and construction professionals in assessing the strength and quality of concrete structures and ensuring their longevity and safety. In conclusion, the UPV method is an effective and widely used non-destructive testing technique for assessing the strength of concrete and other construction materials. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the UPV method and its applications in the construction industry, highlighting its importance in ensuring the structural integrity and safety of concrete structures.

Keywords UPV, Concrete, Transducer, Structral integrity

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Assessing the strength and integrity of existing buildings is of paramount importance for ensuring their structural stability and safety. Traditional methods of strength evaluation often involve destructive testing, which can be time-consuming, expensive, and disruptive to the building occupants. In recent years, non-destructive testing techniques have gained significant prominence, with the Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) meter emerging as a powerful tool for assessing the strength of construction materials, particularly concrete.

    The UPV method utilizes the propagation of ultrasonic waves through a material to determine its mechanical properties, such as compressive strength, elasticity, and tensile

    strength. By measuring the velocity of these ultrasonic waves, the UPV meter provides valuable insights into the quality and strength of concrete without causing any damage to the structure. This non-destructive approach offers numerous advantages, including fast testing, minimal disruption to building occupants, and the ability to assess large areas or multiple locations within a structure.In this journal, we present a comprehensive study on the application of the UPV method for strength assessment of existing buildings. The aim of this research is to demonstrate the efficacy and reliability of UPV testing in evaluating the structural integrity of buildings, identifying potential weaknesses, and facilitating informed decision-making regarding maintenance, repair, or retrofitting strategies. By harnessing the power of non-destructive testing, this study seeks to contribute to the advancement of building assessment practices, promoting efficient and effective methods for ensuring the safety and longevity of existing structures.

    Overall, the utilization of the UPV meter for strength assessment of existing buildings offers significant potential to enhance structural evaluation practices, enabling proactive maintenance and intervention strategies. By providing reliable and non-invasive data on the material properties, the UPV method empowers engineers and building professionals with valuable information for making informed decisions regarding the structural integrity of buildings. This research aims to highlight the benefits and applications of the UPV technique and contribute to the body of knowledge in the field of non- destructive testing and building assessment.

  2. OBJECTIVES

    The objective of assessing the strength of existing buildings using an ultrasonic pulse velocity meter is to evaluate their structural integrity and identify potential weaknesses. By measuring the velocity of ultrasonic waves passing through concrete or masonry, the assessment aims to determine the overall condition of the building, detect areas of deterioration or weakness, and provide a basis for informed decisions on maintenance or repair strategies. This helps ensure the safety and longevity of the building by quantifying material properties, monitoring deterioration over time, and facilitating decision-making for necessary intervention

  3. EQUIPMENTS

    Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Meter: This is the primary equipment you will need. It consists of a handheld device that emits ultrasonic pulses and measures the velocity of the pulses as they travel through the building materials.

    Transducers: These are the sensors that transmit and receive the ultrasonic pulses. They are typically attached to the surface of the building material being assessed. Make sure you have transducers suitable for the type of material you are testing.

    Cables: You will need cables to connect the transducers to the ultrasonic pulse velocity meter. Ensure that the cables are in good condition and have the appropriate connectors for your equipment.

    Couplant: This is a gel or liquid used to ensure good contact between the transducer and the surface of the building material. It helps transmit the ultrasonic pulses effectively. Common couplants include water-based gels or oils.

    Power Source: Check that the ultrasonic pulse velocity meter is properly charged or has access to a power source, depending on its power requirements. Carry any necessary chargers or batteries.

    Documentation Tools: Have a notebook, pen, or digital device to record your measurements and observations during the assessment. Accurate and detailed documentation is essential for analysis and future reference.

    Reference Standards: It can be helpful to have reference standards or calibration blocks made from the same material as the building elements you are assessing. These allow you to calibrate your equipment and verify its accuracy.

  4. METHADOLOGY

    The objective of this methodology is to assess the strength of existing buildings using an ultrasonic pulse velocity meter. The focus is on evaluating the structural integrity of concrete or masonry elements, detecting potential weaknesses, and providing a basis for informed decision-making regarding maintenance and repair strategies.

    Site selection:

    Select representative locations within the building for assessment. These locations should include different structural elements such as columns, beams, slabs, and walls. Consider areas that may be prone to deterioration or have a higher probability of weaknesses based on previous inspections or observations.

    Equipment preparation:

    Ensure the ultrasonic pulse velocity meter is calibrated and functioningcorrectly. Verify that the transducers are securely attached to the instrument and properly aligned for accurate wave transmission and reception.

    Surface preparation:

    Prepare the surfaces of the structural elements to be tested. Clean the surfaces from any loose debris, dirt, or coatings that may affect the accuracy of the measurements. Smooth out rough or uneven areas to ensure good contact between the transducers and the surface.

    Measurement procedure:

    Placement of Transducers: Place the transmitting transducer on the surface of the structure at the measurement point, ensuring good coupling with the material. Position the receiving transducer on the opposite side, directly opposite the transmitting transducer, forming a straight path for the ultrasonic wave.

    Signal Generation: Activate the ultrasonic pulse velocity meter to generate a short pulse of ultrasonic waves. The pulse is transmitted through the material under evaluation.

    Wave Reception and Timing: The receiving transducer detects the ultrasonic waves that have traveled through the material. The ultrasonic pulse velocity meter measures the time taken for the waves to travel from the transmitting transducer to the receiving transducer.

    Data analysis

    Calculation of Pulse Velocity:

    Calculate the pulse velocity by dividing the distance between the transducers by the time taken for the ultrasonic waves to travel between them. Repeat the process for all measurement points.

    Comparison with Standards:

    Compare the measured pulse velocities with established standards or reference values for the specific type of material being assessed.

    Data Interpretation:

    Analyze the collected data to identify areas of potential weakness or deterioration. Look for variations in pulse velocity values that deviate significantly from the expected range, indicating potential defects or reduced strength.

    Reporting and decision-making:

    Compile the assessment results in a clear and concise report. Present the findings, including identified weaknesses, areas of concern, and recommendations for maintenance, repair, or further investigation. The report should serve as a basis for informed decision-making regarding appropriate actions to address the identified issues.

    COLUMN 2

    Sl. No

    Distance(cm)

    Time(S)

    Velocity(m/s)

    1

    20

    194.6

    1.02

    2

    20

    146.5

    1.36

    3

    20

    107.2

    1.865

    COLUMN 3

    Sl. No

    Distance(cm)

    Time(S)

    Velocity(m/s)

    1

    20

    164.1

    1.218

    2

    20

    98.2

    2.03

    3

    20

    106.3

    1.88

    COLUMN 4

  5. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

    COLUMN 1

    Sl. No

    Distance(cm)

    Time(S)

    Velocity(m/s)

    1

    20

    86.8

    2.30

    2

    20

    88.1

    2.27

    3

    20

    75.2

    2.66

    COLUMN 5

    Sl. No

    Distance(cm)

    Time(S)

    Velocity(m/s)

    1

    20

    366.8

    0.545

    2

    20

    292.9

    0.682

    3

    20

    320.2

    0.624

    BEAMS

    2

    BEAM 1

    BEAM 2

    BEAM 3

    1.5

    1

    0.5

    Sl. No

    Distance(cm)

    Time(S)

    Velocity(m/s)

    1

    20

    100.5

    1.99

    2

    20

    146.9

    1.36

    3

    20

    147.8

    1.35

    0

    VELOCITY

  6. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

    Grading of concrete quality based on pulse velocity

    Pulse velocity(km/second)

    Concrete Quality

    Above 4.5

    Excellent

    3.5 to 4.5

    Good

    3.0 to 3.5

    Medium

    Below 3.0

    Doubtful

    Strength assessment for concrete columns

    Columns

    Velocity

    Average velocity

    1

    1.56

    1.53

    2

    1.41

    1.53

    3

    1.70

    1.53

    4

    2.41

    1.53

    5

    0.61

    1.53

    Strength assessment for concrete beams

    Beams

    Velocity

    Average velocity

    1

    1.65

    1.66

    2

    1.92

    1.66

    3

    1.42

    1.66

    As per the final output the average velocities obtained for the concrete columns and beams are 1.53m/s and 1.66m/s. By evaluating the obtained value with the grade of concrete we can summarize that the quality of concrete is doubtful that means the quality and strength of concrete is poor.

    For columns: Column no 5 is weaker, so we need emergency replacement.

    For beams: Beam no 3 is weaker, so we need repair and maintenance.

    Building: the building requires proper maintenance and additional repairs. Not suitable for educational purposes.

  7. REMEDIAL MEASURES

    • Steel plate bonding

    • Fiber reinforced polymer wrap

    • Steel jacketing

    • Concrete jacketing

    • Column or beam replacement

    • Seismic retrofitting

    • Foundation

    • Strengthening techniques: Post tensioning, Adding reinforcement

    • Foundation improvements

  8. CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the building requires proper maintenance and additional repairs. Totally the building is very weak and doubtful for educational purposes. By measuring the pulse velocity of ultrasonic waves in building materials, such as concrete or masonry, the UPV meter provides valuable insights into material quality, uniformity, and the presence of defects. This information aids engineers in making informed decisions about building strength, enabling timely maintenance and ensuring the safety and durability of structures without causing disruption or damage.

REFERENCES

[1] Asaad, D., et al. (2021). "Non-destructive assessment of alkali-silica reaction in concrete using ultrasonic pulse velocity." Construction and Building Materials.

[2] Chen, Y., et al. (2020). "Effect of recycled coarse aggregate on the ultrasonic pulse velocity and compressive strength of concrete."Construction and Building Materials.

[3] Ghosh, S., et al. (2020). "Correlation between ultrasonic pulse velocity and compressive strength of alkali activated slag concrete: An artificial neural network approach." Construction and Building Materials.

[4] Jokar, A., et al. (2020). "Correlation of compressive strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity of sustainable concretes: An artificial neural network approach." Construction and Building Materials.

[5] Padmini, A. K., et al. (2019). "Correlation between ultrasonic pulse velocity and compressive strength of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete." Journal of Building Engineering.

[6] Kim, J., et al. (2021). "Evaluation of freeze-thaw damage in concrete using ultrasonic pulse velocity and acoustic emission." Construction and Building Materials

[7] Demir, I., et al. (2019). "Evaluation of the mechanical properties of hardened concrete using ultrasonic pulse velocity and regression analysis." Construction and Building Materials.