Study Of Machinability of Titanium Alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) In High Speed Turning Process Using Steam As A Coolant

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV1IS9245

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Study Of Machinability of Titanium Alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) In High Speed Turning Process Using Steam As A Coolant

Study Of Machinability Of Titanium Alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) In High Speed Turning Process Using Steam As A Coolant

Jamadar Afaqahmed Mushtaqahmed Prof. Shinde Vilas B.

2nd year M. E. Mechanical Engg. Training and Placement Officer cum P. G.

Lokmanya Tilak College of Engg. Teacher, Lokmanya Tilak College of Engg.

Mumbai University, India. Navi Mumbai.

Abstract In this paper we proposed The challenge of modern machining industries is mainly focused on the achievement of high quality, in terms of dimensional accuracy, surface finish, high production rate and cost saving, with a reduced environmental impact. Such goals are strongly affected by several elements among one of them is the cooling lubricant. Many authors have investigated the machinability with coolant in machining with flood coolant, MQL and cryogenic cooling and it is observed that surface finish, cutting forces, chip formation and tool wear are all affected with the type of coolant, cutting speed, feed rate and depth of cut. Very little investigation in water vapor as coolant is available in the literature hence the water vapor as a coolant has been selected to explore the machinability of titanium alloy with the introduction of this environmental friendly coolant.

Keywords Flood coolant, Cryogenic cooling, and Environmental friendly coolant

I .Introduction

In view of this, an attempt is made to investigate the machinability of titanium alloy using water vapor as a coolant system. The experimental study revealed that at higher cutting speed the chips become more ductile and show continuous morphology with serrated tooth because of increased temperature of shear zone and concentrated shear in the deformation zone. It is observed that chip thickness ratio and cross sectional area of the chip is increased with increase in feed rate for all cutting speeds. Good surface finish is obtained when snarled and ribbon type chips are formed. Pitch of the chip is decreased as speed is increased for all feed levels. Chip segmentation frequency is higher at the higher speed of 180m/min for feed rates of 0.08 and 0.32 mm/rev. It is observed

that the machined surface produced at 60 m/min cutting speed has higher values of surface roughness. However further increase in the cutting speed to 120 m/min and again at 180 m/min causes little reduction in the surface roughness. The above trend might be due to the increase in the machining temperature, which leads to thermal softening and consequent restructuring of the machined surface layer. Thus the machined surface shows lower roughness due to less flaws/alterations on the surface. The effect of feedrate on surface roughness shows that at 0.08 mm/rev feed rate, surface roughness is less and it increases with an increase in the feedrate. This might be due to higher cross sectional area that involves in deformation and thus surfaces show more alterations and higher surface roughness is due to higher deformation of the machined surface layer. Feedmarks are visible at all cutting speeds from 60 m/min to 180 m/min. They are severe at 60 m/min and reduce at higher cutting speed of 180 m/min. This might be due to the increase in cutting speed that causes thermal softening of the work material. It is observed from the SEM analysis that the microparticles in larger size are visible at cutting speed of 60 m/min and comparatively smaller particles are visible at a cutting speed 120 m/min. The size of the particles was more at feedrate of 0.08 mm/rev and less at 0.32 mm/rev. At higher cutting speed of 180 m/min and feed rate of 0.32 m/min grooves are not appeared on the surface. Besides, plastic deformation on the top layer of machined surface is visible due to severe cutting conditions used during machining of Ti-6Al- 4V alloy at 120 m/min and 180 m/min cutting speed.

In high-speed turning process, the quality of the machined surface depends on the process, workpiece and tool related parameters such as – cutting speed, feedrate, depth of cut and cutting fluid used while machining. These parameters significantly influence the performance measures such as chip formation mechanism (chip thickness ratio and chip segmentation frequency), surface roughness and

surface damage. If there are multiple response

original sequence is transferred to a comparable sequence. Linear normalization is usually required since the range and unit in one data sequence may differ from the others. As the original sequence of surface roughness is a problem of smaller-the-better type. Hence the smaller-the-better normalization formula was used to transfer original sequence to comparable sequence and is given below.

variables, for the same conditions of independent variables, design of experiments provides separate

x k

max x o k x o k

i i

i

max x o k min x o k

(1)

optimum parametric conditions for each response i i

variable. These conditions could be significantly different from each other, say for example, in machining, optimum condition for maximizing chip thickness ratio need not be the same as for minimizing surface roughness or chip segmentation frequency. In such circumstances, obtaining a solution that gives the best possible surface finish, at

the highest possible chip thickness ratio is necessary.

Similarly for the chip thickness ratio the original sequence is a problem of larger the better type. Hence the larger the better type normalization formula is used to transfer original sequence to comparable sequence and is given below.

x * k

i

i

(2)

x (o) k min x (o) k

Therefore, design of experiments alone is not

i max x (o) k min x (o) k

i i

appropriate for such problems. On the other hand,

grey relational analysis ranks the experiments based on the increasing order of their grey relational grade (GRG) and this GRG can be used to identify the most influencing factors affecting the response variables. The present investigation is focused on the improvement of surface topography in high-speed turning process. As the chip formation mechanism plays a major role in generation of machined surface. The mechanism of chip curl, chip thickness, frequency of chip segmentation affects the mechanism of surface generation and hence the resultant machined surface topography to considerable extent. Surface topography in turning process can be measured in terms of output variables such as surface roughness, chip thickness ratio and chip segmentation frequency. Each of these variables has different measurement unit that quantify the performance of the process individually. Thus comparison of the above output variables is not possible considering individual measurement unit. Hence, the multi-objective problem is converted into a single objective using grey relational principle.

  1. Normalization of response variables

    A normalization of the response variables was performed to prepare raw data for analysis where the

    For the chip segmentation frequency the original sequence is a problem of smaller the better type. Hence the smaller the better type normalization formula is used to transfer original sequence to comparable sequence. The values of normalization (xi*(k))of nine experimental runs are shown in Table

    Expt

    Surface roughness (Ra)

    Chip thickness ratio (rc)

    p>Chip segmentation frequency

    1

    0.328

    0.568

    9.31

    2

    0.933

    0.604

    21.99

    3

    2.634

    0.654

    15.18

    4

    0.399

    0.561

    14.20

    5

    0.863

    0.729

    27.68

    6

    2.244

    0.517

    13.47

    7

    0.432

    0.469

    24.79

    8

    0.936

    0.607

    11.26

    9

    2.034

    0.810

    29.51

    2. for surface roughness, chip thickness ratio and chip segmentation frequency. Table 1.Values of Ra, r.

    xi*(k) values of surface roughness, chip thickness ratio, and chip segmentation frequency

    Table 2.

    Expt

    Surface roughness

    xi*(k)

    Chip thickness ratio

    xi*(k)

    Chip segmentation frequency

    xi*(k)

    1

    1

    0.292

    1

    2

    0.7376

    0.395

    0.372375

    3

    0

    0.543

    0.709296

    4

    0.9692

    0.270

    0.757854

    5

    0.7680

    0.763

    0.090756

    6

    0.1691

    0.142

    0.793922

    7

    0.9549

    0.000

    0.233576

    8

    0.7363

    0.404

    0.903594

    9

    0.2602

    1.000

    0

    A. Determination of Deviation Sequences, 0i (k)

    The deviation sequence, 0i (k) is the absolute difference between the reference sequence x0(k) and the comparability sequence xi(k) after normalization.

    The value of x0(k) was considered as 1. It is

    determined using Eq. 3 as given below. The values of deviation sequences for surface roughness, chip

    Table 3.

    Expt.

    Surface roughness 0i (k)

    Chip thickness ratio

    0i (k)

    Chip segmentation frequency

    0i (k)

    1

    0

    0.708

    0

    2

    0.2624

    0.605

    0.627625

    3

    1

    0.457

    0.290704

    4

    0.0308

    0.730

    0.242146

    5

    0.2320

    0.237

    0.909244

    6

    0.8309

    0.858

    0.206078

    7

    0.0451

    1.000

    0.766424

    8

    0.2637

    0.596

    0.096406

    9

    0.7398

    0.000

    1

  2. CALCULATION OF GREY RELATIONAL COEFFICIENT, GRC

Grey relational coefficients (GRC) for all the sequences express the relationship between the ideal (best) and actual normalized response variables. If the two sequences agree at all points, then their grey relational coefficient is 1. The grey relational

coefficient x0(k), xi (k) can be expressed by

thickness ratio and chip segmentation frequency for all nine experimental runs are shown in Table 3.

x0(k), xi (k) min max

0i (k) max

(4)

0i(k) = |x0(k) xi(k)| (3)

where

min

is the smallest value of 0i(k)

0i(k)values of surface roughness, chip thickness ratio, and chip segmentation frequency ,

min imin k x0 *k xi and max is the largest value of 0i(k)

max

imax

k x0

*k xi

*k , x *(k) is the ideal

0

normalized S/N ratio, xi*(k) is the normalized comparability sequence and is the distinguishing coefficient. The value of () is taken as 0.5 for all response variables and is substituted in Eq. 4. The GRC for all the experimental runs are calculated.

Grey relational coefficient for the response variables Table 4.

Sample

GRC for

Surface roughness

GRC for chip thickness ratio

GRC for chip segmentation frequency

1

1.0000

0.4138

1.0000

2

0.6558

0.4526

0.4434

3

0.3333

0.5226

0.6323

4

0.9419

0.4066

0.6737

5

0.683

0.6786

0.3548

6

0.3757

0.3681

0.7081

7

0.9172

0.3333

0.3948

8

0.6547

0.4561

0.8384

9

0.4033

1.0000

0.3333

The overall assessment of the multiple performance characteristics is based on the grey relational grade. The grey relational grade is an average sum of the grey relational coefficient, which is defined as follows:

m

x0, xi 1 x0(k), xi (k) (5)

m i1

Where x , x is the grey relational grade for the jth

observed that the experiment #1 has the highest grey relational grade.

GRG of the multiple performance characteristics Table 5

Expt

GRG

1

0.8046

2

0.5173

3

0.4961

4

0.6741

5

0.5721

6

0.4840

7

0.5484

8

0.6497

9

0.5789

Condition one is optimum i. e V= 60 m/min and f =

0.08 mm/rev

  1. Effect of Cutting Speed on GRG

    It observed from the mean effects plot that as cutting speed increases from 60 m/min to 120 m/min the grey relational grade decreases. Further increase in the cutting speed to 180 m/min causes increase in the grey relational grade. As the cutting speed increases

    0 i chip thickness ratio decreases and chip segmentation

    experiment and m is the number of performance characteristics.

    frequency increases Fig.1 Effect of cutting speed

    0.610

    The grey relational grade

    x0, xi represents the

    0.605

    level of correlation between the reference sequence and the comparability sequence. If the two sequences agree at all points, then their grey relational coefficient is 1 everywhere, and therefore, their grey relational grade is equal to 1. The grey relational grade was determined by Eq. 5 and is shown in Table

    1. A higher grey relational grade in Table 5 indicates that the corresponding condition is optimum. It is

      0.600

      Mean of GRG

      0.595

      0.590

      0.585

      0.580

      0.575

      60

      120

      Cutting spe e d

      180

  2. Effect of Feedrate on GRG

    The effect of feed rate on rey relational grade shows that the feedrate has linear relationship with gray relational grade. It is observed that the gray relational grade decreases with an increase in the feed rate during machining. Fig. 2

    0.68

    0.66

    0.64

    Me an of GRG

    0.62

    0.60

    0.58

    0.56

    0.54

    0.52

    0.50

    Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for Gray Relational Grade

    It is observed from the ANOVA Table that the feedrate influences the grey relational grade when compared to cutting speed.

    Source

    DF

    SOS

    MS

    F –

    ratio

    P –

    value

    Cutting speed (Vc )

    2

    0.00129

    0.00064

    0.06

    0.946

    Feedrate

    f

    2

    0.03717

    0.01858

    1.63

    0.304

    Error

    4

    0.04572

    0.01143

    Total

    8

    0.08418

    R-Sq = 45.68%

    Table 6 ANOVA for grey relational grade

    0.08

    0.16

    Fe e drate

    0.32

    Fig. 2 Main effects plot for feederate.

  3. Interaction between Cutting Speed and Feedrate

The effect of cutting speed and feedrate is shown in the Fig 3. It is seen from interaction plot that at highest feedrate the change in the value of grey relational grade is less when cutting speed changes from 60 m/min to 120 m/min. However it is found that the grey relational grade value decreases when feedrate changes from 0.08 mm/rev to 0.32 mm/rev at cutting speed of 60 m/min and 120 m/min, while it reaches for highest values at feedrate of 0.08 m/min and cutting speed 60 m/min.

0.80 Cutting

speed,

IV CONCLUSION

  • It is observed that the feedrate and interaction between the cutting speed and feedrate shows significant influence on the chip thickness ratio.

  • It is found that the cutting speed influences the chip thickness ratio, which in turn governs the chip morphology. It is observed that at lower and medium cutting speed of 60 m/min and 120 m/min respectively the chip thickness ratio

    follows the decreasing trend, however at higher

    0.75

    Mean of GRG

    0.70

    0.65

    0.60

    0.55

    0.50

    0.08

    0.16

    Fee drate, mm/re v

    0.32

    m/min

    60

    120

    180

    cutting speed of 180 m/min, the trend is reversed. In this case, the chip thickness ratio increases and chips produced are of broken coiled and washer type. This might be due to the change in chip formation mechanism at higher cutting speed due to material deformation characteristics. It is further seen that the chips break frequently due to increase in the chip sliding velocity which might supersede the

    cutting velocity.

    Fig. 3 Interaction between cutting speed and federate.

  • The effect of feed rate on chip thickness ratio shows that the feed rate has almost linear relationship with chip thickness ratio. It is

    observed that the chip thickness ratio increases with an increase in the feed rate during machining. At 0.08 mm/rev, the chip thickness ratio is less, and chip cross sectional area is also less. Chip shows tendency of snarled ribbon type morphology. The breaking of chips is more due to higher feed rates in this case. Further with an increase in the feedrate from 0.08 mm/rev to

    0.16 mm/rev chip thickness ratio increases significantly. This might be due to increase in the undeformed chip thickness. Morphology of chip is snarled washer type. Further, increase in the feedrate from 0.16 mm/rev to 0.32 mm/rev causes increase in the chip thickness ratio and chip cross sectional area too.

  • It is observed that the higher chip width and chip thickness ratio are produced when feed (0.32 mm/rev) and cutting speed (180 m/min) both are higher. However, lower value of chip thickness ratio was observed when the feedrate was lowest (0.08 mm/rev) level and the cutting speed (180 m/min) at the highest level.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work is supported in part by the Lokmanya Tilak College of Engg under University of Mumbai. The first author would like to acknowledge Prof. shinde Vilas B. for his contributions to this work.

.

REFERENCES

    1. E.O. Ezugwu, Z.M. Wang,Titanium alloys and their machinability- review, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 68 (1997) 262-272.

    2. Junyan Liu, Rongdi Han, Li Zhang, Hongbin Guo, Study on lubricating characteristic and tool wear with water vapor as coolant and lubricant in green cutting, Wear 262 (2007) 442-452.

    3. Farhad Nabhani, Machining of aerospace titanium alloys, Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 17 (2001) 99-106.

    4. H.A. Kishawy, C.E. Becze, D.G. McIntosh, Tool performance and attainable surface quality during the machining of aerospace alloys using self-propelled rotary tools, Journal

      of Materials Processing Technology 152 (2004) 266-271.

    5. Emmanuel O. Ezugwu, John Bonney, Rosemar

      B. Da Silva, O.Cakir, Surface integrity of finished turned Ti-6Al-4V alloy with PCD tools using conventional and high pressure coolant supplies, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 47 (2007) 884- 891.

    6. R. Komanfuri and w. R. Reed, Jr., Evaluation of carbide grades and a new cutting geometry for machining titanium alloys, Wear, 92 (1983) 113-123.

    7. R. Komanfuri, New observations of the mechanism of chipformation when machining titanium alloys, Wear 69 (1981) 179-188.

    8. J. Barry, G. Byrne, D. Lennon, Observations on chip formation and acoustic emission in machining Ti-6Al-4V alloy, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 41 (2001) 1055-1070.

    9. A. E. Bayoumi, J. Q. Xie, Some metallurgical aspects of chip formation in cutting Ti- 6wt.%Al-4wt.%V alloy, Materials Science and Engineering A190(1995) 173-180.

    10. Molinari, C. Musquar and G. Sutter, Adiabatic shear banding in high speed machining of Ti6Al-4V: experiments and modeling, International Journal plasticity 18 (2002) 443 -459.

    11. Shuting Lei, Wenjie Liu, High-speed machining of titanium alloys using the driven rotary tool, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 42 (2002) 653 661.

    12. Douglas c Montgomary design and analysis of experiments, Fifth Edition, John Wiely and sons,1997.

Leave a Reply