Study on Wear Properties of Al7075/SiC/Graphite Hybrid Composites

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV7IS010062

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Study on Wear Properties of Al7075/SiC/Graphite Hybrid Composites

Bagesh Bihari

Research Scholar Department of Foundry Technology

National Institute of Foundry and Forge Technology Hatia, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

Md. Rashid Hasnain

M.Tech Student Department of Foundry Technology

National Institute of Foundry and Forge Technology Hatia, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

Anil Kumar Singh

Professor

Department of Foundry Technology National Institute of Foundry and Forge Technology

Hatia, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

Abstract: A composite material is a material system composed of a combination of two or more micro or macro constituents that differ in form, chemical composition and which are essentially insoluble in each other. Metal matrix composites are become a highly important material in automotive industries due to its light weight and high strength properties. In this investigation, the composites were fabricated using liquid metallurgy route i.e stir casting method. Ceramic particles along with solid lubricating materials were incorporated into aluminium alloy matrix to accomplish reduction in both wear resistance and coefficient of friction. The Al 7075/SiC/graphite hybrid composite was prepared with 3 wt.% graphite particles addition and 3,6, and 9 wt.% of SiC. The study of wear characteristics on Al 7075/SiC/Graphite hybrid composite were carried out. The wear properties of the hybrid composites containing graphite exhibited the superior wear-resistance properties.

Keywords: Hybrid Mmc, Stir Casting, Wear

I.INTRODUCTION

Aluminum metal matrix composites (AMMC) have emerged as a material for advanced automobile, aerospace and marine applications. It possesses properties like high specific strength, high stiffness, increased fatigue resistance, good wear resistance at elevated temperatures, excellent corrosion resistance, and high temperature durability [1-3]. These composites are alternatives to the traditional engineering alloys. The suitability of MMCs as a promising replacement depends on the ability of synthesizing them with consistent reproducibility in microstructure and properties. These newer generation materials have an increased strength to weight ratio. They can be used in automobile applications like brake rotors, piston rings, etc. [4-7].

Wear is one of the important phenomena that takes place at a materials interface metal matrix composites (MMCs) with reinforcement of hard particles that offer superior performance and wear resistance [8]. AMMCs reinforced with particles of Graphite have been reported to be possessing better wear characteristics owing to the reduced

wear because of formation of a thin layer of Graphite particles, which prevents metal to metal contact of the sliding surfaces.

Generally lubricant is externally added to reduce the wear. This poses the problem when the materials need the periodic applications of lubricant particularly to wear parts which are difficult to access. For such applications self-lubricating materials are preferred because the solid lubricant contained in them can be automatically released during the wear process to reduce the wear. Graphite is one of the most widely used solid lubricant materials. Earlier researchers [9- 12] have already focused their investigation on applications of aluminium graphite composite.

There are also earlier reports from some investigators [13- 14] who identified the trend that aluminium graphite composite containing the small amount of graphite exhibit superior wear properties over the base alloys. The limitation with the aluminium graphite composite is in using graphite as a solid lubricant whose introduction results in the loss of strength of the composite.

S. Kassim et al. [15] reported that the abrasive wear resistance of the alloy is increased as SiCp reinforcement content increases. Y. Sahin et al. have observed significant increase in wear resistance up to 10% addition of SiC and a stable value between 1055% for AlSiC composites produced by vacuum infiltration [16].

Addition of SiC particulates increases both mechanical strength and wear resistance of Al alloy. But the consequent increase in hardness makes the machining difficult [17]. On the other hand, addition of Graphite particulates facilitates easy machining and results in reduced wear of AlGraphite composites compared to Al alloy. But high amount of Graphite may result in increase of wear due to decrease in fracture toughness with increase in % reinforcement of Graphite particulates as observed by Ted Guo and Tsao [18].

  1. Suresha and B.K. Sridhara [19] investigated the tribological behaviour of the hybrid composites obtained using a stir-casting procedure, with variable SiC and Graphite amounts (05 %) and the total ratio of 10 %. K. Ravindran et al. [20] investigated the tribological behaviour of the hybrid composites with aluminium alloy Al 2024 bases. The hybrid composites were obtained with powder metallurgy using 5 % of SiC and (0. 5 or 10) % of Graphite. Hybrid composite Al/SiC/Gr (5 % SiC and 5 % Gr) showed the best tribological characteristics, while a further increase in the graphite amount increased the wear.

    1. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

      Al7075 was selected as matrix material due to its excellent casting properties, strength, formability, and heat treatable properties. The Chemical Composition of Al7075 is shown in Table.1. Graphite and SiC particles sizes of around 20-30 m and purity of approx 98% were used as reinforcement material in Al7075 matrix material.

      Table.1.Chemical Composition of Al 7075 (wt%)

      Element

      Zn

      Cu

      Mg

      Si

      Fe

      Wt.%

      5.8

      1.5

      2.4

      0.09

      0.36

      Element

      Fe

      Mn

      Cr

      Ti

      Al

      Wt%

      0.36

      0.07

      0.21

      0.05

      89.52

      A conventional casting route was used for fabricating the composites. The appropriate weight of the aluminium alloy was charged in a graphite crucible and was heated in an electrical furnace. The reinforcement particles were preheated at 750°C in a separate furnace. After melting the charge in the furnace, the preheated particles were added and the mixed charge was stirred at 800 rpm for ten minutes by using an electric motor during which the temperature was kept constant at 800°C. Due to the stirring action, the melted aluminium alloy split into droplets due to the shear forces induced by the impeller at the presence of graphite. Now the charge was evacuated from the crucible into a steel mould and it was solidified. The composites were fabricated at 3, 6, and 9 wt.% of SiC and and 3 wt % of Graphite.

      WEAR TEST:

      From cast plate, a small portion of dimension 2×2×10 cm3 were cut and then it was machined to make the cylindrical pin of having dimension 6mm diameter and 35 mm length Fig.1. The wear and frictional tests were carried out on pin on disc apparatus (Model: TR-20LM-M5). All the wear tests were carried out as per ASTM G-99 standard under dry condition at room temperature.

      Fig.1.Pin for wear test

    2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

      Based on the tabulated results, various graphs are plotted and presented in Graph.1 to Graph.4 for different percentage of reinforcement (SiC) under different test conditions. Graph.1 shows the variation of wear with sliding istance at constant load (20N) and170 rpm. It is seen from the plots that as sliding distance increases the wear of the hybrid composite and Al 7075 alloy exhibited decreasing trend. This was due to that initially both the surfaces were associated with a large number of sharp asperities, and contact between the two surfaces was taken place primarily at these points. During the preliminary wear process, influence of low applied loads (20N) and low speeds (0.8 m/s) were identified in the form of smoothness in work material and miniature lubricant layer in between work material and counter surface. As the asperities were very sharp in nature, the effective stress on these sharp points might be more than the elastic stress, and subsequently these sharp asperities were plastically deformed at their contact points, except the partially projected points of the reinforcement. The plastically deformed surface will fill the valley of the material in both pin and the counter face during the course of action and there was a possibility of fracturing a few asperities on both the surfaces leading to very fine debris. The asperities of the sliding pin surface were come in contact with the steel disc surface and work hardening of the matrix material takes place under the applied load and speed. Consequently, the wear of specimen reduced for high sliding distance. Nature of graph almost matches with the experiment performed by Wang [21].

      Graph.2 shows variation of wear with sliding velocity. The plot shows that the wear was increased with rise of speed. When the speed was increased, the ploughed surface of the counter face (Fe) will react and formFe3O4 and SiC particles will crush and form very minute particles. The Fe3O4, Fe and minute fractured particles of the SiC form a layer between the work hardened pin and the counter face and reduces the wear rate up to a speed 0.6 m/s. When the speed was increased up to 1 m/s the surface film will break the sub surface, work material was under severe stress and asperities sliding surface were caused a combination of abrasive and adhesive wear [22].

      Graph.3 shows the variation of wear with normal load. It can be observed from the plots that the wear increases with increase in normal load. At high load (30 N) due to increase in the temperature, the surface of the matrix alloy was became smooth and also promotes local yielding and the wear mechanism has changed from abrasion to delamination wear. Due to this large amount of plastic deformation was observed on the surface of the unreinforced alloy. In case of composite material as the load increase to higher values 10 to 30 N, the morphology of the worm surface was gradually changed from fine scratches to district groove. It was inferred that tearing (fracture) causes formation of wear debris at very high load [23].

      The effect of graphite on friction coefficient is shown in Graph.4. The presence of graphite in the hybrid composite decreases the coefficient of friction. The reduction in the coefficient of friction exhibited by the hybrid composite relative to Al 7075 is due to the release of graphite during their wear process which acted as the solid lubricant [24].

      However it is observed that in all cases wear decreases with respect to increase in percentage addition of reinforcement up to 7 %. The subsequent marginal increasing trend of these hybrid composites at 9 wt. % of reinforcement (i.e. SiC) overshooting the wear rate can be the adverse effect of the hard particle addition together with the increasing tendency of crack initiation and propagation at the reinforcement/metal interface.

      Table 2: Wear properties of material at different sliding distance

      Load: 20N, Sliding speed: 0.8 m/s, RPM: 170

      Material

      Sliding distance (m)

      Time (sec)

      W1

      (µm)

      W2

      (µm)

      Wmean (µm)

      Al 7075

      250

      312

      332

      340

      336

      500

      624

      198

      216

      207

      750

      936

      143

      149

      146

      1000

      1248

      91

      87

      89

      Al 7075 +

      3% SiC +

      3%Gr

      250

      312

      230

      222

      226

      500

      624

      140

      156

      148

      750

      936

      115

      103

      109

      1000

      1248

      68

      76

      72

      Al 7075 +

      6% SiC+

      3%Gr

      250

      312

      154

      152

      153

      500

      624

      139

      137

      138

      750

      936

      105

      103

      104

      1000

      1248

      62

      70

      66

      Al 7075 +

      9% SiC+

      3%Gr

      250

      312

      183

      177

      180

      500

      624

      145

      145

      145

      750

      936

      101

      111

      106

      1000

      1248

      57

      63

      60

      Table 3: Wear properties of material at different sliding speed Load: 20N, Sliding distance: 250 m

      Material

      Sliding speed (m/s)

      W1

      (µm)

      W2

      (µm)

      Wmean (µm)

      Al 7075

      0.6

      440

      436

      438

      0.8

      332

      336

      334

      1

      480

      490

      485

      Al 7075 +

      3% SiC +

      3% Gr

      0.6

      295

      301

      298

      0.8

      260

      258

      259

      1

      345

      349

      347

      Al 7075 +

      6% SiC +

      3% Gr

      0.6

      263

      259

      261

      0.8

      154

      158

      156

      1

      271

      267

      269

      Al 7075 +

      9% SiC +

      3% Gr

      0.6

      264

      268

      266

      0.8

      183

      181

      182

      1

      305

      305

      305

      Table 4: Wear properties of material at different load Sliding speed: 0.8 m/s, sliding distance: 250 m

      Material

      Load (N)

      W1 (µm)

      W2 (µm)

      Wmean (µm)

      Al 7075

      10

      44

      50

      47

      20

      71

      73

      72

      30

      81

      77

      79

      Al 7075 +

      3% SiC + 3%

      Gr

      10

      29

      31

      30

      20

      35

      39

      37

      30

      65

      71

      68

      Al 7075 +

      6% SiC + 3%

      Gr

      10

      28

      26

      27

      20

      32

      28

      30

      30

      57

      61

      59

      Al 7075 +

      9% SiC + 3%

      Gr

      10

      47

      45

      46

      20

      57

      51

      54

      30

      63

      69

      66

      Table 5: Coefficient of friction of different material Load: 20N, Sliding speed: 0.8 m/s, sliding distance: 250 m

      Material

      (cof)1

      (cof)2

      (cof)mean

      Al 7075

      0.255

      0.285

      0.27

      Al 7075 + 3% SiC + 3% Gr

      0.25

      0.19

      0.22

      Al 7075 + 6% SiC + 3% Gr

      0.16

      0.18

      0.17

      Al 7075 + 9%

      SiC + 3% Gr

      0.14

      0.12

      0.13

      Graph.1: Sliding distance Vs wear

      Graph.2: Sliding speed Vs wear

      Graph.3: Load Vs wear

      Graph.4: Wt %Vs cof

    3. CONCLUSION

In the Present research, hybrid metal matrix composites i.e. Al 7075/SiC/Graphite has been successfully fabricated using stir cast method. Dispersion of SiC and Graphite particles in aluminium matrix reduces the wear of the matrix material. Increase in load increases the wear while it is observed that wear decreases with respect to increase in sliding distance. In case of sliding velocity as it increases the nature of graph shows that wear first decreases then it suddenly increases.

Wear tends to decrease with increasing particle volume content. It also indicates that SiC and graphite addition is beneficial in reducing wear of the aluminium composite. Wear in reinforced alloy is less compare to unreinforced alloy. Coefficient of friction decreases with respect to increase in particle volume content.

REFERENCES:

  1. Suresh, A. Mortensen, and A. Needleman, Fundamentals of Metal Matrix Composites, Stoneham, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993

  2. M. Taya and R.J. Arsenault, Metal Matrix CompositesThermo Mechanical Behavior, New York, Pergamon Press, 1989

  3. A. Ibrahim, F.A. Mohammed, and E.J. Lavernia, Metal Matrix Composites A review, J. Mater. Sci., 1991, 26, p 1137-1157

  4. A.P. Sannino and H.J. Rack, Dry Sliding Wear of Discontinuously Reinforced Aluminum CompositesResults and Discussions, Wear, 1995, 189, p 1-19

  5. R.L. Deuis, C. Subramanian, and J.M. Yellup, Abrasive Wear of Aluminum CompositesA Review, Wear, 1996, 201, p 132-144

  6. J. Goni, Development of Low Cost Metal Matrix Composites for Commercial Applications, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2000, 16, p 743-746

  7. G.J. Howell and A. Ball, Dry Sliding Wear of Particulate Reinforced Al Alloys against Automobile Friction Materials, Wear, 1995, 181- 183, p 379-390

  8. Ylmaz O, Buytoz S. Abrasive wear of Al2O3-reinforced aluminium- based MMCs. Compos Sci Technol 2001;61:238192.

  9. Liu Y, Rohatgi PK, Ray S. Tribological characteristics of aluminum- 50 Vol Pct graphite composite. Metall Trans A 1993;24 A:1519.

  10. Rohatgi PK, Ray S, Liu Y. Tribological properties of metal matrix graphite particle composites. Int Mater Rev 1992;3(7):12952.

  11. Liu YB, Lim SC, Ray S, Rohatgi PK. Friction and wear of aluminiumgraphite composites: the smearing process of graphite during sliding. Wear 1992;159:2015.

  12. Rohatgi PK, Liu Y, Barr TL. Tribological behavior and surface analysis of tribdeformed Al Alloy-50 Pet graphite particle composites. Metall Trans A 1991;22A:143541.

  13. Mustafa SF. Casting of graphite AlSi base composites. Can Metall Quart 1994;33:25964.

  14. Krishan BP, Rohatgi PK. Modification of AlSi alloy melts containing graphite particle dispersions. Met Technol 1984;11:414.

  15. S. Kassim and Al-Rubaie, Three Body Abrasion of Al-SiCp Composites, Wear, 1999, 225-229, p 163-173

  16. Sahin Y, Acilar M. Production and properties of SiCp-reinforced aluminium alloy composites. Composites 2003;34A:70918.

  17. Krishnamurthy L. Machinability studies on metal matrix hybrid composites.PhD thesis, Kuvempu University, Karnataka, India; 2009.

  18. Ted Guo ML, Tsao CYA. Tribological behavior of self-lubricating aluminium/ SiC/graphite hybrid composites synthesized by the semi- solid powder densification method. Compos Sci Technol 2000;60:65 74.

  19. S. Suresha, B. K. Sridhara, Friction characteristics of aluminium silicon carbide graphite hybrid composites, Materials & Design, 34 (2012), 576583

  20. K. Ravindran, R. Manisekar, P. Narayanasamy, N. Narayanasamy, Tribological behaviour of powder metallurgy-processed aluminium hybrid composites with the addition of graphite solid lubricant,

    Ceramics International, 39 (2013) 2, 11691182

  21. Wang YQ, Afsar AM, Jang JH, Han KS, Song JI. Room temperature dry and lubricant wear behaviours of Al2O3f/SiCp/Al hybrid metal matrix composites.Wear 2010;268:86370.

  22. Dieter GE. Mechanical metallurgy. SI metric edition. McGraw-Hill; 1988. ISBN0-07-100406-8.

  23. Asif M, Chandra K, Misra PS. Development of aluminum based hybrid metal matrix composites for heavy duty applications. J Miner Mater Char Eng 2011:133744.

  24. hao H, Liu L, Hu W, Shen B. Friction and wear behavior of Ni graphite composites prepared by electroforming. Mater Des 2007; 28:13748.

Leave a Reply