Thermal Analysis of Combustion Chamber of Two Stroke SI Engine

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS120527

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Thermal Analysis of Combustion Chamber of Two Stroke SI Engine

Manish S. Lande1 Roshan D.Bhagat2

Assistant Professor Assistant Professor

Mechanical Engg.Department Mechanical Engg.Department

College of Engg.And Tech.Akola College of Engg.And Tech.Akola

S.G.B.A.University Amravati. S.G.B.A.University Amravati.

ABSTRACT:-

Cylinder is the heart of internal combustion engine as combustion takes place inside the cylinder large amount of heat is produce inside the cylinder due to that heat distortion of cylinder wall May takes place. Due to inadequate heat transfer through the engine cylinder block the engine cylinder gets overheated, lead to knocking and some time result into structural failure. This also causes an increase in the thermal stresses in the liner wall which ultimately affects the strength of liner wall. The main objective of this project is to carry out thermal analysis of combustion chamber (Liner, piston,) in Ansys10 to predict temperature distribution across the combustion chamber of scavenged engine. For the analysis purpose firstly we modeling the liner and piston in Pro/E wildfire 4.0 and analyzed the temperature distribution in Ansys 10.

1. 1INTRODUCTION

Heat transfer is a very wide field used in analysis of internal combustion engine heat transfer effect parameter such as performance, emission and also efficiency. It is said that for a given mass of fuel higher the heat transfer to the combustion wall will reduce the average combustion pressure and temperature, this indirectly reduces the work done by the piston per cycle and these effects the specific power.

Temperature rise of the engine parts may cause a serious durability of the engine. The shape of isothermal lines and high temperature regions become more important in these studies. The experimental way will find these regions are costly and time consuming; Analytical methods are almost equally good for fast conformation of this region by using finite elements

Measuring the actual dimension of various components of two-stroke S.I engine (Bajaj bravo, 150cc). modeling of piston, liner along with combustion chamber are done using Pro/E wildfire4.0,then by using Ansys 10 we analyzed the temperature distribution and thermal stresses on above component, compare that thermal stresses with theoretically calculated thermal stresses.

  1. 1 AIM AND OBJECTIVE:-

    Aim: –

    The main objective of this project is to carry out thermal analysis of combustion chamber in Ansys to predict temperature distribution across the liner wall and piston of two strokes SI engine also find out the thermal stresses.

    Objective:-

    • Modeling of liner and piston in pro/E; wildfire 4.0

    • Performance evaluation of 150cc, two stroke SI engine with and without scavenging process.

    • Find out the theoretical thermal stresses in liner and compare which found out by software.

    • Analyze the heat distribution across the assembly of piston and liner considering both temperatures with and without scavenging with the help of ANSYS 10 software.

  2. FACTOR AFFECTING HEAT TRANSFER IN ENGINE

It may be noted that the engine heat transfer depended upon parameter. Unless the effect of this parameter is known, the design of a proper cooling system will be difficult.

  • Fuel-air ratio:-

    A change in fuel-air ratio will change the temperature of the cylinder gases and affect the flame speed. The maximum gas temperature will occurs at an equivalence ratio of about 1.12 i.e., at a fuel-air ratio about

    0.075. At this a fuel-air ratio Twill be a maximum .However, from experimental observations the maximum heat rejection is found to occur for a maximum, slightly leaner than this value.

  • Compression ratio:-

    An increase in compression ratio causes only a slight increase in gas temperature near the top dead centre; but, because of greater expansion of the gases, there will be a considerable reduction in gas temperature near bottom dead centre where a large cylinder wall is exposed. The exhaust gas temperature will also be much lower because of greater expansion so that heat rejected during blow down will be less. In general, as compression ratio increase their tend to be a marginal reduction in heat rejection.

  • Spark advance:-

    A spark advances more than the optimum as well as less than the optimum will result in increased heat rejection to the cooling system. This is mainly due to the fact that the spark timing other then MBT value (minimum spark advance for best torque) will reduce the power output and thereby more heat is rejected.

  • Engine output:-

    Engines which are designed for high mean effective pressure or high piston speeds, heat rejection will be less. Less heat will be lost for the same indicated power in large engine.

  • Speeds and loads:-

    Prediction of spark ignition engine heat transfer as a function of speed and load. The cycle heat transfer is expressed as a percent of fuels chemical energy. The relative importance is of heat losses per cycle decrease as speed and load increase: the average heat transfer per unit time, however, increased as speed and load increase.

  • Spark timing:-

    Retarding the spark timing in as SI engine decreases the heat flux. The burned gas temperature is decreased as timing is retarded because combustion occurs latter when the cylinder volume is larger. Temperature trends vary component. Piston and spark plug electrode temperature change most with timing variation; exhaust wall temperature increases as timing as retarded due to higher exhausting gas temperature.

  • Inlet temperature:-

    The heat flux increases linearly with increases inlet temperature. The gas temperature throughout the cycle is increased. An increase of 100K gives a 13 percent increases in heat flux.

  • Cylinder gas temperature:-

The average cylinder gas temperature is much higher in comparison to the cylinder wall temperature. Hence, any marginal change in cylinder gas temperature will have very little effect on the temperature difference and thus on heat rejection.

.

2.1 MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE INSIDE COMBUSTION CHAMBER

Given Data:-

Compression ratio (r) = 8 , Room Temp. (T1) = 300 k., Ratio of specific heat () = 1.4 r = (T3 /T1 )1/2.(-1)

T3 / T1 = (r)2.(-1)

T3 = T1 × (r)2.(-1)

= 300 × (8)2(1.4-1)

= 300 × (5.27)

= 1581k.

T3 = 1308c.

It is the highest temperature inside the engine.

From the above derivation we find out the maximum temperature inside the combustion chamber, at speed 5500 rpm. Here we consider the compression ratio 8 and at room temperature 300k.

  1. 2 EXPEIMENTAL SETUP AND CALCULATION Engine Specification under Study

    • Type 2-stroke 5-ports single cylinder S.I engine

    • Cooling Air cooled

    • Bore ¢ 57 mm

    • Stroke 54 mm

    • Displacement 145.5cc

    • Compression ratio 8

    • Connecting rod length 105mm

    • Maximum engine output 5.9kw@5500rpm

Fig. 2.1 Experimental setup.

LEGENDS

  1. Engine Frame, 2-Crank Case, 3-Caburetor, 4-Air Box, 5-Fuel Tank, 6-Burrete, 7-Exhaust Of Engine, 8-PUC Machine Setup, 9-Rope Brake Dynamometer, 10-Air Box Stand, 11-Machine Stand, 12-Hole Provided For Direct Air Injection, 13-Tachometer

    • Test Procedures

      1. Start the ngine by cranking the kick provided for cranking.

      2. Adjust the burret level up to 25ml.

      3. Then close the tank fuel valve and open burette valve & measure the fuel consumption for 10 sec with the help of stopwatch. .

      4. Note down the speed of engine by the tachometer.

      5. Note down the manometric reading from u-tube manometer.

    • Reading:-

      Sr.no.

      Speed (r.p.m.)

      Manometric reading(H) (cm)

      Mass of fuel(ml)

      Time(sec.)

      Velocity (m/s)

      1

      1160

      8

      0.9

      10

      36.62

      2

      1300

      9

      1

      10

      38.84

      3

      1600

      13

      1.2

      10

      46.49

      4

      2000

      16

      1.5

      10

      51.79

      5

      2750

      20

      1.7

      10

      57.91

      • Table 2.1 Readings with scavenging

        Sr.no

        Speed (r.p.m.)

        Manometric reading(H) (mm)

        Mass of fuel(ml)

        Time(sec.)

        Velocity (m/s)

        1

        1000

        6

        1

        10

        10.03

        2

        1550

        8

        1.4

        10

        11.58

        3

        1700

        12

        1.9

        10

        14.18

        4

        2100

        20

        2.3

        10

        18.31

        5

        2400

        28

        2.8

        10

        21.66

    • Where,

    • Table 2.2 Readings without scavenging

      • V= 2gh

    • V= velocity of air, g = acceleration due to gravity, h= manometric head

    • When considering the readings with direct injection of air and without direct injection of air, there is a difference in fuel consumption rate. The velocity of air is increased in direct air injection mean there is better burning of fuel are take place due to the better burning of fuel temperature inside the combustion chamber has been increased. We considering the 50c increased in temperature with direct injection of air

      3] CALCULATION

      3.1] Theoretical Thermal Stresses.

      Whenever there is some increase or decrease in the temperature of a body, it causes the body to expand or contract. A little consideration will show that if the body is allowed to expand or contract freely, with the rise or fall of the temperature, no stresses are induced in the body. But, if the deformation of the body is prevented, some stresses are induced in the body. Such stresses are known as thermal stresses.

      Let

      l = Original length of the body, t = Rise or fall of temperature, and = Coefficient of thermal expansion, Increase or decrease in length,

      l = l. . t

      If the ends of the body are fixed to rigid supports, so that its expansion is prevented, then compressive strain induced in the body,

      Therefore

      c = l / l

      = l. . t/ l

      = . t

      Thermal stress, th = c .E

      = . t. E

    • Thermal Stresses For Without Scavenging:-

      Given data;-

      l = 0.124m, t = 12810k, = 23.3×10-6 /0c, E = 2×1011 N/m2

      Increase or decrease in length,

      l = l. . t

      = 0.124× 23.3×10-6 × 1281

      = 0.00365 m

      c = l / l

      = 0.00365/0.124

      = 0.0294

      Thermal stress, th = c .E

      = 0.02796 × 2×1011

      = 0.58 × 1010 N/m2

    • Thermal Stresses For With Scavenging:-

Given data;- l = 0.124m, t = 13310k, = 23.3×10-6 /0c , E = 2×1011 N/m2 Increase or decrease in length,

l = l. . t

= 0.124 × 23.3×10-6 × 1331

= 0.00384 m

c = l / l

= 0.00384/0.124

= 0.0310

Thermal stress, th = c E

= 0.0291 × 2×1011

= 0.62×1010 N/m2.

3.2 Thermal Stresses from Analysis

Fig. 3.1 Thermal Stresses on color scale.

Fig. 3.1 Thermal Stresses on color scale by zoomed view.

The theoretical thermal stresses and by using software ansys10 are nearly equal.

  1. 3 Material Properties:

    SR.NO

    PART

    MATERIAL

    THERMAL COMDUCTIVITY

    DENSITY(kg/m³)

    1

    PISTON

    CAST IRON

    60 (W/m °k)

    7200

    2

    PISTON RING

    HIGH SPEED STEEL

    54 (W/m °k)

    7750

    3

    LINER

    CAST IRON

    60 (W/m °k)

    7200

    4

    PISTON

    ALUMINIUM

    225( W/m °k)

    2750

    Table 3.1: Material Properties

  2. GEOMETRY DEFINITION OF ASSEMBLY

A 3D model of engine (liner, piston, and combustion chamber) has been drawn using CAD software pro/E; wildfire 3.0 as shown in the figure.

Fig 4.1 Assembly in ansys window

This model have very complicated shape, therefore it always difficult to mesh and there is lot of geometry loss take place when importing it to the analysis software ANSYS from different CAD software i.e. As an IGES file format. Our results do not match with realistic model due to element shape quality therefore it is necessary to simplify the model in ANSYS for maintaining the element shape quality as well as controlling the number of element for reducing the time for analysis figure shows the simplified (liner, piston, and combustion chamber) model in ANSYS.

4. 1 BOUNDARY CONDITION AT THE COMBUSTION CHAMBER

A variety of thermal boundary conditions is necessary to complete the application of FEM models for the prediction of temperature and heat flux distribution on engine structure. Since the application of these conditions introduce a factor of uncertainty on to the final results, a detailed knowledge of physical mechanisms become essential. For our model we used three boundary conditions, first condition is applied inside the combustion chamber and top of the piston, when the position of piston is 8 after TDC.The temperature applied at that condition is 1581 k for without direct injection which is calculated in. earlier. And for direct injection we assume temperature increased 50c .The second boundary condition is applied at piston skirt, the temperature applied at that condition which is to be assume is 423k .And third boundary condition is applied at bottom of liner which is to be at 300 k. Also on piston ring 1000k temperature is applied. There are some assumption are made like, Effect of piston motion on the heat transfer is neglected. The ring does not twist.

  1. 2 TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION IN ASSEMBLY

    Result from the ANSYS program gives us a temperature distribution of engine liner. To review this result general post processor has been used. Post processor enables to review results at one time step over the entire model.

    • Temperature Distribution Considering Without Scavenging For C.I

      Fig. 4.2 Temperature distribution for CI

      The above figure shows temperature distribution from higher temperature to lower temperature ranging between 1581 to 3000k. The distribution of temperature on assembly shown by various color. Various ports affect the temperature distribution on assembly.

    • Temperature Distriution Considering With Scavenging For C.I

      Fig .4.3 Temperature distribution for CI

    • Temperature Distribution Considering Without Scavenging For Aluminium

      Fig.4. 4 Temperature distribution for Al

    • Temperature Distribution Considering With Scavenging For Aluminium

Fig. 4.5 Temperature distribution in Al

From the analysis we find out that the heat distribution in aluminium piston is better than cast iron due to its high thermal conductivity. Hence it increases the heat transfer rate and it can reduce the tendency of knocking.

4. 3 NODAL TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION

TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION ON EACH NODE WITHOUT SCAVENGING ON PISTON FOR CI

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

391

1003.2

414

1000.5

437

995.95

460

1014.7

483

1145.1

392

1005.4

415

999.85

438

995.80

461

1027.6

484

1153.4

393

1009.7

416

999.24

439

995.67

462

1044.8

485

1155.0

394

1015.3

417

999.03

440

995.58

463

1059.0

486

1148.1

395

1021.9

418

998.57

441

995.41

464

1078.3

487

1154.3

396

1034.1

419

998.30

442

995.28

465

1082.4

488

1156.7

397

1049.1

420

998.08

443

994.92

466

1084.5

489

1154.1

398

1072.0

421

997.83

444

994.79

467

1201.6

490

1148.0

399

1075.4

422

997.57

445

994.64

468

1185.3

491

1158.3

400

1076.9

423

997.25

446

994.67

469

1172.5

492

1156.7

401

1065.3

424

997.10

447

994.69

470

1156.9

493

1156.0

402

1050.5

425

997.06

448

994.90

471

1154.0

494

1152.9

403

1033.4

426

997.04

449

995.05

472

1145.7

495

1165.3

404

1022.5

427

996.79

450

995.64

473

1153.6

496

1166.9

405

1016.2

428

996.77

451

996.10

474

1153.8

497

1164.8

406

1011.6

429

996.64

452

996.64

475

1150.6

498

1152.7

407

1008.6

430

996.42

453

997.44

476

1137.1

499

1155.1

408

1006.7

431

996.47

454

998.39

477

1149.1

500

1156.5

409

1004.7

432

996.45

455

999.70

478

1155.1

501

1158.0

410

1003.0

433

996.22

456

1001.2

479

1156.8

503

1153.7

411

1002.3

434

995.86

457

1003.5

480

1153.0

504

1152.0

412

1001.6

435

995.96

458

1006.4

481

1142.5

505

1151.1

413

1000.9

436

995.97

459

1010.3

482

1131.0

506

1150.0

TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION ON EACH NODE WITHOUT SCAVENGING ON PISTON FOR ALUMINIUM

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

391

1427.9

414

1450.8

437

1444.9

460

1419.3

483

1531.3

392

1427.1

415

1451.4

438

1444.2

461

1418.3

484

1532.0

393

1426.6

416

1451.6

439

1443.3

462

1417.5

485

1532.0

394

1426.2

417

1451.7

440

1442.7

463

1418.1

486

1531.8

395

1425.9

418

1451.6

441

1441.3

464

1454.4

487

1532.6

396

1425.8

419

1451.9

442

1440.6

465

1452.4

488

1532.4

397

1425.4

420

1452.2

443

1437.2

466

1450.3

489

1531.9

398

1424.5

421

1451.4

444

1435.0

467

1532.1

490

1531.1

399

1421.8

422

1451.3

445

1435.2

468

1532.2

491

1531.9

400

1419.2

423

1451.2

446

1435.3

469

1532.1

492

1531.8

401

1449.7

424

1450.5

447

1432.6

470

1531.4

493

1531.6

402

1449.5

425

1450.6

448

1430.2

471

1531.6

494

1531.1

403

1449.7

426

1450.3

449

1430.0

472

1530.9

495

1531.7

404

1449.7

427

1450.1

450

1429.5

473

1531.7

496

1531.7

405

1449.6

428

1449.4

451

1428.2

474

1531.9

497

1531.4

406

1449.7

429

1448.7

452

1427.1

475

1531.8

498

1530.3

407

1449.9

430

1447.8

453

1425.6

476

1530.5

499

1530.6

408

1449.6

431

1447.7

454

1424.5

477

1531.6

500

1530.6

409

1450.3

432

1447.4

455

1423.2

478

1532.1

501

1530.3

410

1450.5

433

1446.6

456

1421.1

479

1532.3

502

1529.3

411

1450.9

434

1445.3

457

1421.0

480

1532.0

503

1529.6

412

1451.2

435

1445.6

458

1421.3

481

1531.1

504

1529.5

413

1451.2

436

1445.6

459

1419.9

482

1529.8

505

1529.1

TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION WITH SCAVENGING ON PISTON FOR C.I.

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

391

1464.1

414

1489.1

437

1482.7

460

1454.7

483

1576.8

392

1463.3

415

1489.7

438

1481.8

461

1453.6

484

1577.6

393

1462.6

416

1489.9

439

1480.9

462

1452.7

485

1577.5

394

1462.2

417

1490.0

440

1480.2

463

1453.4

486

1577.3

395

1461.9

418

1489.9

441

1478.7

464

1493.0

487

1578.2

396

1461.8

419

1490.3

442

1477.9

465

1490.7

488

1578.0

397

1461.4

420

1490.6

443

1474.2

466

1488.5

489

1577.5

398

1460.4

421

1489.7

444

1471.9

467

1577.7

490

1576.6

399

1457.5

422

1489.6

445

1472.0

468

1577.7

491

1577.5

400

1454.6

423

1489.5

446

1472.1

469

1577.7

492

1577.4

401

1487.8

424

1488.8

447

1469.2

470

1576.9

493

1577.2

402

1487.6

425

1488.8

448

1466.6

471

1577.1

494

1576.6

403

1487.8

426

1488.5

449

1466.4

472

1576.4

495

1577.3

404

1487.8

427

1488.2

450

1465.8

473

1577.3

496

1577.2

405

1487.8

428

1487.5

451

1464.4

474

1577.5

497

1576.9

406

1487.9

429

1486.8

452

1463.2

475

1577.4

498

1575.7

407

1488.0

430

1485.8

453

1461.6

476

1576.0

499

1576.1

408

1487.7

431

1485.7

454

1460.4

477

1577.1

500

1576.0

409

1488.5

432

1485.4

455

1459.0

478

1577.7

501

1575.7

410

1488.7

433

1484.5

456

1456.6

479

1577.9

502

1574.6

411

1489.1

434

1483.1

457

1456.5

480

1577.6

503

1575.0

412

1489.5

435

1483.3

458

1456.9

481

1576.5

504

1574.8

413

1489.5

436

1483.4

459

1455.4

482

1575.2

505

1574.4

TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION WITH SCAVENGING ON PISTON FOR ALUMINIUM

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE

391

1471.0

414

1494.9

437

1488.8

460

1462.0

483

1579.1

392

1470.2

415

1495.5

438

1488.0

461

1461.0

484

1579.8

393

1469.6

416

1495.7

439

1487.1

462

1460.1

485

1579.8

394

1469.2

417

1495.8

440

1486.5

463

1460.7

486

1579.5

395

1468.9

418

1495.7

441

1485.0

464

1498.7

487

1580.4

396

1468.8

419

1496.1

442

1484.3

465

1496.5

488

1580.2

397

1468.4

420

1496.4

443

1480.7

466

1494.4

489

1579.7

398

1467.4

421

1495.6

444

1478.4

467

1579.9

490

1578.9

399

1464.6

422

1495.4

445

1478.6

468

1579.9

491

1579.7

400

1461.9

423

1495.4

446

1478.7

469

1579.9

492

1579.6

401

1493.7

424

1494.7

447

1475.9

470

1579.1

493

1579.4

402

1493.5

425

1494.7

448

1473.4

471

1579.4

494

1578.8

403

1493.7

426

1494.4

449

1473.2

472

1578.7

495

1579.5

404

1493.8

427

1494.1

450

1472.6

473

1579.5

496

1579.5

405

1493.7

428

1493.4

451

1471.3

474

1579.7

497

1579.1

406

1493.8

429

1492.7

452

1470.1

475

1579.6

498

1578.0

407

1493.9

430

1491.8

453

1468.6

476

1578.3

499

1578.4

408

1493.6

431

1491.7

454

1467.4

477

1579.4

500

1578.3

409

1494.4

432

1491.4

455

1466.1

478

1579.9

501

1578.0

410

1494.6

433

1490.6

456

1463.8

479

1580.1

502

1577.0

411

1495.0

434

1489.2

457

1463.7

480

1579.8

503

1577.3

412

1495.3

435

1489.4

458

1464.1

481

1578.8

504

1577.2

413

1495.4

436

1489.5

459

1462.6

482

1577.5

505

1576.8

CONCLUSION

The thermal stresses which are found in Ansys software are nearly equal to theoretical thermal stresses. The value of thermal stresses is th = 0.62×1010 N/m2.and according to material property of engines its safe. The ports present on the liner affect the temperature distribution across the liner body due to the reduction of area. The nodal temperature distribution table shows there is proportionality variation in nodal temperature for with and without scavenging. The temperature distribution in case of cast iron and aluminum piston show the variation due to the thermal conductivity difference, means aluminum piston are able to better heat distribution so we can say that aluminum piston gives better heat transfer than cast iron piston so it can reduced tendency of knocking.

REFERENCES

1] Rosli abu bakar, devarajan ramasamy chiew chen wee Heat transfer in the cylinder of a new two stroke cross scavenged engine,Malaysia.

2] H.K.D.H Bhadeshia Thermal analysis techniques University of Cambridge,material science and metallurgy.

3] V.Esfahanian,A.Javaheri and M.Ghaffarpour Thermal analysis of an S.I. engine. Using different combustion boundary condition treatment. United States (2005)

4] Qiang Du and Desheng Wang, Tetrahedral mesh generation and optimization based on centroidal voronoi tessellations PA 16802,U.S.A.

5] Mario Hirz; Tanja Goeber; Michal Ludwig; Michael Lang; Roland Kirchberger; Wolfgang Hirschberg. Design and Development of a 50 Cc Scooter Frame Supported By Testing and Simulation. SAE International, Dated- October 2005.

6] M.Ayaz Afsar, Experimental Investigation of direct air injection scavenged two strokk engine. Proceedings of 2009 International Symposium on Computing communication and control, Singapore. ISBN 978-1-84626.

7] Ibrahim, Semin ,Rosli Abu Bakar.In-cylinder mass flow rate and gas species concentration simulation of S.I.engineISSN.1816-949X,2007,Malaysia.

8] V.Ganesan, Internal combustion engines second edition Tata McGraw Hill publication, New Delhi, 2005.pp.1-6.

9] M.L.Mathur and R.P.Sharma.Internal combustion engine Dhanpat Rai New Delhi 2007 pp.164 to 183 10] R.K. Rajput, Heat and Mass Transfer, third edition S.Chand publication, New Delhi, 2006.pp.11-16 11] R.K. Rajput, Thermal engineering, sixth edition Laxmi publication, New Delhi 2006, pp945-957.

12] R.S. Khurmi, Machine Design, S. Chand and company limited, New Delhi 2008, pp1132-1143.

13] O.P. Khanna, Materialscience and metallurgy, Dhanpat Rai publication, New Delhi 1998, pp5-6 to 5-20. 14] J.N. Reddy, Finite element method, Tata McGraw Hill publication, New Delhi, 2005 .pp.357 to 367.

Leave a Reply