Topology Optimization of an All-Terrain Vehicle Brake Pedal

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV8IS060446

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Topology Optimization of an All-Terrain Vehicle Brake Pedal

Pritesh Muralidhar Ingale

Department of Mechanical Engineering Lokmanya Tilak College of Engineering, Koparkhairane

Navi Mumbai, India

AbstractThis paper studies the topological optimization of All Terrain Vehicle (ATV) brake pedal for minimum mass without compromising Factor of Safety. The three dimensional solid model of a pedal is created using Solidworks 2019 and static structural analysis and Topology optimization, geometry modification is done using Ansys 18.1. The main objective of study is to minimize the weight without compromising the Factor of Safety.

KeywordsTopology, factor of safety, static analysis, All terrain vehicle

  1. Design

    To design a brake pedal having brake pedal ratio of more than 5:1, as it is suggested that manual braking system (with no power booster) should have a ratio greater than 5. The length of brake pedal should not be too short or too long that hinders the driving position of the drivers leg. The brake pedal ratio should be such that the driver would not feel fatigue while braking.

    The brake pedal was designed using SolidWorks considering the design constraints and parameters. Figure 1 shows the 2D

    1. Isketch of the pedal. The length of brake pedal was decided by

      INTRODUCTION

      Topology optimization (TO) is a mathematical method that optimizes material layout within a given design space, for a given set of loads, boundary conditions and constraints with the goal of maximizing the performance of the system. Topology Optimization is different from shape optimization and sizing optimization in the sense that the design can attain any shape within the design space, instead of dealing with predefined configurations.

      The conventional Topology Optimization formulation uses a finite element method (FEM) to evaluate the design performance. The design is optimized using either gradient- based mathematical programming techniques such as the optimality criteria algorithm and the method of moving asymptotes or non-gradient-based algorithms such as genetic algorithms.

      Topology Optimization has a wide range of applications in aerospace, mechanical, bio-chemical and civil engineering. Currently, engineers mostly use TO at the concept level of a design process. Due to the free forms that naturally occur, the result is often difficult to manufacture. For that reason, the result emerging from Topology Optimization.

    2. DESIGN CONSIDERATION

      The design of brake pedal plays a very crucial role as it is the deciding factor for the force available at master cylinder end. Since there is space constraint for driver while designing an ATV, the resting position of leg on brake pedal is such that it is quite difficult for the driver to produce exact amount of pedal force as compared to force produce by the leg in a regular vehicle. Based on the space constraint and resting position of the leg of the driver the brake pedal is needed to be designed so that the force produced is able to push in the master cylinder completely to its full-length stroke. The maximum force applied while sitting in an ATV can be supposed from human performance capabilities

      calculating the brake pedal ratio. Brake pedal ratio is the ratio of the perpendicular distance from pivot point center to lower end of the brake pedal by the distance from pivot point center to pushrod mounting point center.

      Figure 1: 2D Sketch of brake pedal

      Figure 2: Dimensions of Brake Pedal

  2. Material Selection for Pedal

Al-7075 and Al-6061 was chosen for comparison and various comparable properties are shown in Table1. Comparison of material is based on following factors

  1. Strength to weight ratio

  2. Cost

  3. Physical and mechanical properties

  4. Availability

    Figure 3: Meshed view of Brake Pedal

    Figure 4: Mesh check Aspect Ratio

    Table1: Material properties

    Properties/ Material

    Al-7075

    Al-6061

    Yield Strength (MPa)

    475.73

    276

    Elongation (%)

    7.9

    12

    Density (g/cc)

    2.81

    2.7

    Fatigue Strength (MPa)

    159

    96.5

    1. STATIC ANALYSIS IN ANSYS WORKBENCH

      Table2: Mesh Information

      Mesh type

      Solid mesh

      Element Size

      2.00 mm

      Total Nodes

      260423

      Total Elements

      127651

      Maximum Aspect Ratio

      7

      Figure 5: Mesh check Jacobian Ratio

      Load and Fixture for the Analysis

      Fixture Name: Fixed Support

      Figure 6: Fixed support at mounting point

      Fixture details:

      Entities: 1 face(s) Type: Fixed Geometry

      Load Name: Force

      Load Direction: Perpendicular to the face Load Quantity: 500N

      Figure 7: Load acting on pedal surface

      Load Details Force-1

      Entities: 1 face(s)

      Type: Apply normal force Value: 500 N

      Analysis Results:

      Stress Generated: Max: 35.47 MPa

      Min: 0 MPa

      Figure 8: Stress contour in Pedal

      Deformation Generated: Max: 0.52mm

      Min: 0 mm

      Figure 9: Deformation contour in Pedal

      Hence the Static Structural Analysis is done in Ansys

      Figure 10: Static Structural Layout

      As the stress generated is lower than permissible limits. To minimize the weight by keeping the stiffness of model maximum We will perform Topology Optimization.

    2. TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION

      To perform Topology Optimization on the Static structural analysis. We will connect Engineering Data, Geometry and Model to the Topology Optimization Setup.

      Figure 11: Static Structural Layout connected to Topology Optimization setup

      Upload the Solution of Static Structural Analysis to Setup

      Figure 12: Static Structural Solution connected to Topology Optimization setup

      Design Region in Topology setup is the region where the mass will be reduced.

      Exclusion region is the region which will not be change after the optimization.

      Figure 13: Design and Exclusion Region

      Run the solution the software will perform iterations on the Design region for maximum stiffness and minimum weight.

      RESULT OF TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION:

      The result of the optimization is geometry with minimum weight and the region with red color in result is removed material and grey color represents the marginal material as shown in Figure 14.

      Figure 16: Design Validation system

      Figure 14: Topology Optimization Result

      Figure 15: Topology Optimization Final geometry

    3. POST PROCESSING:

      The result we obtain from the Topological Optimization is not preferable for manufacturing. We need to perform post processing on the geometry to make it suitable for Manufacturing.

      Static structural analysis on optimized model is also necessary.

      Therefore we can transfer the Optimization result to new static tructural study by Transfer to Design Validation System

      After transferring results to the design Validation System we have to clean the geometry in space claim to get proper manufactural geometry.

      The geometry cleaned in ansys space claim is given in figure 17.

      Figure 17: Geometry obtained in results and modified geometry

      Static Structural Analysis on modified geometry:

      For Material Al-6061

      Mesh Attributes has been already discussed above.

      Figure 18: Mesh generated for new geometry

      Load and Fixture for the Analysis

      Load and fixed support conditions are same as the previous model.

      Results of the Analysis: Stress Generated:

      Max: 47.77 MPa

      Min: 0 MPa

      Figure 19: Stress generated in new geometry

      Deformation Generated: Max:0.77mm

      Min:0mm

      Figure 20: Deformation generated in new geometry

      For Material Al-7075

      Mesh Attributes has been already discussed above.

      Load and Fixture for the Analysis

      Load and fixed support conditions are same as the previous model.

      Results of the Analysis: Stress Generated:

      Max: 47.77 MPa

      Min: 0 MPa

      Deformation Generated: Max:1.20mm

      Min:0mm

      Comparison of both the results before optimization and after optimization:

      Quantity

      Before Optimization

      After Optimization

      Stress (MPa)

      35.47

      47.77

      Deformation (mm)

      0.52 (Al-6061)

      0.89 (Al-7075)

      0.77 (Al-6061)

      1.20 (Al-7075)

      FOS

      6.99 (Al-6061)

      12 (Al-7075)

      5.19 (Al-6061)

      9.29 (Al-7075)

      Weight (Kg)

      0.521 (Al-6061)

      0.562 (Al-7075)

      0.384 (Al-6061)

      0.370 (Al-7075)

    4. CONCLUSION:

Stress generated in optimized design is close to previous design. Weight after Topology Optimization is approximately half of the original model.The larger factor of safety insures pedal will withstand higher force. Larger FOS is required due to uncertainity in the force.

REFERANCES

  1. Brake technology Handbook

  2. FMVSS135 section 7.11

  3. Design and analysis of brake pedal : an ergonomic approach.

Leave a Reply