Water Quality Assessment of Kham River, Aurangabad, Maharashtra

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV3IS041692

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Water Quality Assessment of Kham River, Aurangabad, Maharashtra

Sanman P. Kulkarni

Civil Engineering Dept Sinhgad College of Engineering,

Pune (M.S.), India

Prof. S. S. Jain

Civil Engineering Dept Sinhgad college of Engineering,

Pune (M.S.), India

AbstractKham River is major river in Aurangabad city. In This paper water quality assessment of Kham River, Aurangabad is presented along with the Water Quality Index. The ten months study from May 2013 to February 2014 is done on six locations of Kham River in order to achieve Water Quality Assessment for future use of Kham River. Major water quality parameters like pH, Turbidity, Dissolved Oxygen, Biochemical Oxygen Demand, Total Suspended Solids, Total Dissolved Solids, Total Alkalinity, Total Hardness and Electrical Conductivity are analyzed in order to assess water quality and to obtain Water Quality Index. Water Quality Index for each selected sampling station is find out by using Modified Mishra and Tiwari method (1985) and Weighted Arithmetic Mean Method. From this Ten months water quality study, it is observed that Kham River is heavily polluted due to presence of untreated sewage and some amount of industrial wastewater. It is concluded that Kham River water is not fit for domestic and drinking purpose.

Keywords – Water Quality Assessment, Water Quality Index, Kham River.

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Aurangabad city is spread over on area of about 137.40 Sq.Kms. with over 10 lakhs population (2010). Aurangabad city is the major district of Marathwada region of Maharashtra and it is situated on the banks of Kham River in latitude 19 53 ' 59'' north and longitude 75 20' east. The city stands in the Dudhana valley between the Lakenvara range on the north and the Satara hills on the south.

    Water Quality Index (WQI) provides a single number that express overall water quality at a certain location and time, based on several water quality parameters. The objective of water quality index is to turn complex water quality data into information that is useful for public [1]. However a water quality index based on some very important parameters can provide a simple indicator of water quality. In general, water quality indices incorporate data from multiple water quality parameters into a mathematical equation that rates the health of a water body with number [3].

    Water quality index (WQI) is valuable and unique rating to depict the overall water quality status in a single term that is helpful for the selection of appropriate treatment technique to meet the concerned issues. However, WQI depicts the composite influence of different water quality parameters and

    communicates water quality information to the public and legislative decision makers. In spite of absence of a globally accepted composite index of water quality, some countries have used and are using aggregated water quality data in the development of water quality indices [4]. Attempts have been made to review the WQI criteria for the appropriateness of drinking water sources.

    In this project Following two methods were used to find out WQI:

    1. Modified Tiwari and Mishra method of calculating WQI (1985) [5] to Assess water Quality.

    2. Weighted Arithmetic Water Quality Index Method to Assess Suitability for Drinking Purpose [3].

    .

  2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Preliminary survey is carried out, Accessibility for Sampling and Collection is determined, Points at which major Contamination of Kham River find out and then only following stations were selected:

    Station A – Barapulla Gate Station B – Makai Gate

    Station C – Near Income Tax Office Station D – Banewadi

    Station E – Waladgaon Station F Patoda

    The points at which major Contamination of Kham River takes place are taken as sampling stations The water samples were collected for water quality assessment from Kham River and analyzed at regular intervals of one month for a period of ten months from May 2013 to February 2014. The samples were well mixed and stored in 1.5 liter plastic cans for the analysis work. Sample collection was usually completed during morning hours between 6.00 am to 9.00 am every for further analysis. The Parameters like Temperature, pH and EC are tested on the spot, D.O fixation is done on the spot and other parameters were tested in ISO standard Environmental Engineering Laboratory. Standard methods as prescribed by IS 10500 were followed for examination of various physical and chemical parameters of water.

    Figure No. 1. General View Of Sampling Stations.

  3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    Water Quality assessment of Kham River is done for the ten months i.e. from May 2013 to February 2014. In table

    number 1, mean values of all parameters for each station is represented. From these values WQI is carried out.

    Table No.1 Mean Values of all Parasmeters for each Station.

    1. Water Quality Index Of Kham River By using Modified Mishra and Tiwari Method:

      Factors which have higher permissible limits are less harmful because they can harm quality of river water when they are present in very high quantity. So weightage of factor has an

      inverse relationship with its permissible limits. Weightage (Wi) for each parameter is given in Table2 [5].

      Therefore Wi = k/Si

      Where, k = constant of proportionality Wi = unit weight of factor

      Si = maximum permissible limits as recommended by Indian Council of Medical Research / Public Health Environmental Engineering Organization Values of k were calculated as:

      K= 1/(1/Si)

      Rating scale (Table 3) was prepared for range of values of each parameter. The rating varies from 0 to 100 and is divided into five intervals. The rating Vr = 0 implies that the parameter present in water exceeds the standard maximum permissible limits and water is severely polluted. On the other hand Vr= 100 implies that the parameter present in water has the most desirable value. The other ratings fall between these two extremes and are Vr = 40, Vr = 60 and Vr = 80 standing for excessively polluted, moderately polluted and slightly less polluted respectively. This scale is modified version of rating scale given by Tiwari and Mishra (1985) [5].

      Essentially, a WQI is a compilation of a number of parameters that can be used to determine the quality of a river. WQI is calculated for each station and is given in Table

      4. The parameters involved in the WQI are pH, Dissolved Oxygen, Electrical Conductivity, Total Dissolved solids, Total alkalinity, Total Hardness. The numerical value is then multiplied by a weighting factor that is relative to the significance of the test to water quality. The sum of the resulting values is added together to arrive at an overall water quality index.

      WQI = Wi x Vr

      i.e. Water Quality Index is equal to the product of rating (Vr) and unit weight (Wi) of all the factors. Wi x Vr = Wi(pH) x Vr(pH) + Wi(DO) x Vr(DO) + Wi(EC) + Vr (EC) + Wi(TDS) x Vr(TDS) + Wi(Total Alkalinity) x Vr(Total Alkalinity) + Wi(Hardness) x Vr(Hardness).

      Table No.2 WQI Quality Factors : the ICMR/CPHEEO standards assigned unit Weights

    Sr. No

    Parameter

    Station-A

    Station-B

    Station-C

    Station-D

    Station-E

    Station-F

    Mean

    Mean

    Mean

    Mean

    Mean

    Mean

    1

    Temperature (° C)

    23.84

    23.84

    24

    23.88

    23.89

    23.89

    2

    pH

    7.438

    7.579

    7.658

    7.751

    7.962

    8.016

    3

    Turbidity (NTU)

    27.66

    34.61

    38.56

    54.38

    57.99

    62.99

    4

    Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)

    2.077

    2.03506

    1.98347

    1.962693

    1.94012

    1.92682

    5

    Biochemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)

    123.3268

    125.9345

    130.3982

    135.2437

    139.7369

    143.36

    6

    Chemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)

    204.9087

    209.043

    216.278

    221.154

    277.258

    288.205

    7

    Total Solids (mg/l)

    812.8

    833.6

    852

    866

    876.4

    885.2

    8

    Total Suspended Solids (mg/l)

    82.8

    89.6

    94

    95.6

    96.4

    98

    9

    Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l)

    730

    744

    758

    770.4

    780

    787.2

    10

    Total Alkanity (mg/l)

    331.52

    336.88

    342.08

    345.16

    350.28

    358.81

    11

    Total Hardness (mg/l)

    341.0255

    346.8052

    351.8818

    370.9093

    419.22

    436.65

    12

    Electrical Conductivity (mhos/cm)

    1025.1

    1041.5

    1051.6

    1091

    1106.6

    1108.4

    Water Quality Factors

    ICMR/CPHEEO STANDARDS (Xi)

    Unit Weight (Wi)

    pH

    7.0 – 8.5**

    0.355

    Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)

    >5*

    0.603

    Electrical Conductivity (mhos/cm)

    <300*

    0.01

    Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l)

    <1500**

    0.002

    Total Alkalinity (mg/l)

    <120*

    0.025

    Total Hardness (mg/l)

    <600**

    0.005

    *ICMR Standards (1975) **CPHEEO Standards (1991)

    Table No.3 Rating Scale for Quality of Water

    Sr. No

    Parameters

    RANGES

    Unit Weights (Wi)

    Class-1

    Class-2

    Class-3

    Class-4

    Class-5

    1

    pH

    7.0-8.5

    8.6-8.7

    8.8-8.9

    9.0-9.1

    > 9.2

    0.355

    6.8-6.9

    6.7-6.8

    6.5-6.7

    < 6.5

    2

    Dissolved Oxygen

    > 7.0

    5.1-7.0

    4.1-5.0

    3.1-4.0

    < 3.0

    0.603

    3

    Electrical Conductivity

    0-75

    75.1-150

    150.1-225

    225.1-300

    > 300

    0.01

    4

    Total Dissolved Solids

    0-375

    375.1-750

    750.1-1125

    1125.1-1500

    > 1500

    0.002

    5

    Total Alkalinity

    21-50

    50.1-70

    70.1-90

    90.1-120

    > 120

    0.025

    6

    Total Hardness

    0-150

    150.1-300

    300.1-450

    450.1-600

    > 600

    0.005

    7

    Rating Scale (Vr)

    100

    80

    60

    40

    0

    8

    Extent Of Pollution

    Clean

    Slight Pollution

    Moderate Pollution

    Excess Pollution

    Severe Pollution

    Table No.4 Rating Scale for Quality of Water

    Range of Rating Scale (Vr)

    Quality Of Water

    90-100

    Excellent

    70-90

    Good

    50-70

    Medium

    25-50

    Bad

    0-25

    Very Bad

    Table No.5 Water Quality index (WQI) for the Kham River water Sampling stations.

    Sr.No

    Station No.

    Water Quality Index WQI= Wi × Vr

    Water Quality

    1

    Station- A

    35.76

    Bad

    2

    Station- B

    35.76

    Bad

    3

    Station- C

    35.72

    Bad

    4

    Station- D

    35.72

    Bad

    5

    Station- E

    35.72

    Bad

    6

    Station- F

    35.72

    Bad

  4. Water Quality Index of Kham River By using Weighted Arithmetic Mean Method:

Weighted arithmetic water quality index method classified the water quality according to the degree of purity by using the most commonly measured water quality variables. The method has been widely used by the various scientists and the calculation of WQI was made by using the following equation:

WQI=Qi/Wi

The unit weight (Wi) for each water quality parameter is calculated by using the following formula[3]:

Wi= K/Si

The quality rating scale (Qi) for each parameter is calculated by using this expression:

Qi = 100[(Vi-Vo)/(Si-Vo)]

Where, Vi is estimated concentration of ith parameter in the analyzed water

Vo is the ideal value of this parameter in pure water = 0 (except pH =7.0 and DO = 14.6)

Si is the recommended standard value of ith parameter.

Where, K = proportionality constant and can also be calculated by using the following equation:

K= 1/(1/Si)

Table No.6 Drinking Water Standards, Recommending Agencies and Unit Weights

Sr.No

Parameters

Standards

Recommended Agency

Unit Weight (Wi)

1

pH

6.5-8.5

ICMR/BIS

0.1597

2

Turbidity (NTU)

10

BIS

0.136

3

Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)

5

ICMR/BIS

0.2715

4

Biochemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)

5

ICMR

0.2715

5

Chemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)

10

WHO

0.1357

6

Total Suspended Solids (mg/l)

500

WHO

0.00271

7

Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l)

500

ICMR/BIS

0.00271

8

Total Alkalinity (mg/l)

120

ICMR

0.01131

9

Total Hardness (mg/l)

300

ICMR/BIS

0.004525

10

Electrical Conductivity (mhos/cm)

300

ICMR

0.004525

Table No.7 WQI and Status of Water Quality

WQI Level

Water Quality Status

0-25

Excellent Water Quality

26-50

Good Water Quality

51-75

Poor Water Quality

76-100

Very Poor Water Quality

Above 100

Unsuitable For Drinking

Table No.8 WQI for Station A by Weighted Arithmetic Mean Method

Sr.No

Parameters

Standards (Si)

Observed Values (Vi)

Unit Weight (Wi)

Quality Rating (Qi)

WiQi

1

pH

6.5-8.5

7.438

0.1597

29.2

4.66

2

Turbidity (NTU)

10

27.66

0.136

276.6

37.617

3

Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)

5

2.077

0.2715

130

35.295

4

Biochemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)

5

123.3268

0.2715

2466.536

669.66

5

Chemical Oxygen Demand

(mg/l)

10

204.9087

0.1357

2049.087

278.061

6

Total Suspended Solids (mg/l)

500

82.8

0.00271

16.56

0.04487

7

Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l)

500

730

0.00271

146

0.39566

8

Total Alkalinity (mg/l)

120

331.52

0.01131

276.27

3.1246

9

Total Hardness (mg/l)

300

341.0255

0.004525

113.675

0.51437

10

Electrical Conductivity

(mhos/cm)

300

1025.1

0.004525

341.66

1.546

Total Sum

1.00018

5845.588

1030.92

WQI= QiWi/Wi= 1030.733

Table No.9 WQI for Station B by Weighted Arithmetic Mean Method

Sr.No

Parameters

Standards (Si)

Observed Values (Vi)

Unit Weight

(Wi)

Quality Rating

(Qi)

WiQi

1

pH

6.5-8.5

7.579

0.1597

38.6

6.1644

2

Turbidity (NTU)

10

34.61

0.136

346.1

47.0696

3

Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)

5

2.03506

0.2715

130

35.295

4

Biochemical Oxygen Demand

(mg/l)

5

125.9345

0.2715

2518.69

683.824

5

Chemical Oxygen Demand

(mg/l)

10

209.043

0.1357

2094.3

284.196

6

Total Suspended Solids (mg/l)

500

89.6

0.00271

17.92

0.04856

7

Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l)

500

744

0.00271

148.8

0.40325

8

Total Alkalinity (mg/l)

120

336.88

0.01131

280.733

3.175

9

Total Hardness (mg/l)

300

346.8052

0.004525

115.6

0.52309

10

Electrical Conductivity

(mhos/cm)

300

1041.5

0.004525

347.166

1.5709

Total Sum

1.00018

6037.909

1062.27

WQI= QiWi/Wi= 1062.0788

Table No.10 WQI for Station C by Weighted Arithmetic Mean Method

Sr.No

Parameters

Standards (Si)

Observed Values (Vi)

Unit Weight (Wi)

Quality Rating (Qi)

WiQi

1

pH

6.5-8.5

7.658

0.1597

43.866

7.005

2

Turbidity (NTU)

10

38.56

0.136

385.6

52.44

3

Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)

5

1.98347

0.2715

131.422

35.68

4

Biochemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)

5

130.3982

0.2715

2607.964

708.0622

5

Chemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)

10

216.278

0.1357

2162.78

293.489

6

Total Suspended Solids (mg/l)

500

94

0.00271

18.8

0.050948

7

Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l)

500

758

0.00271

151.6

0.410836

8

Total Alkalinity (mg/l)

120

342.08

0.01131

285.06

3.224

9

Total Hardness (mg/l)

300

351.8818

0.004525

117.29

0.5307

10

Electrical Conductivity (mhos/cm)

300

1051.6

0.004525

350.533

1.58616

Total Sum

1.00018

6254.915

1102.4788

WQI= QiWi/Wi= 1102.264

Table No.11 WQI for Station D by Weighted Arithmetic Mean Method

Total Sum

1.00018

6590.047

1158.09

WQI= QiWi/Wi= 1157.884

Table No.12 WQI for Station E by Weighted Arithmetic Mean Method

Sr.No

Parameters

Standards (Si)

Observed Values (Vi)

Unit Weight (Wi)

Quality Rating (Qi)

WiQi

1

pH

6.5-8.5

7.962

0.1597

64.133

10.242

2

Turbidity (NTU)

10

57.99

0.136

579.9

78.8664

3

Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)

5

1.94012

0.2715

131.87

35.8027

4

Biochemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)

5

139.7369

0.2715

2794.738

758.77

5

Chemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)

10

277.258

0.1357

2772.528

376.232

6

Total Suspended Solids (mg/l)

500

96.4

0.00271

19.28

0.05225

7

Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l)

500

780

0.00271

156

0.42276

8

Total Alkalinity (mg/l)

120

350.28

0.01131

291.9

3.30139

9

Total Hardness (mg/l)

300

419.22

0.004525

139.74

0.63232

10

Electrical Conductivity

(mhos/cm)

300

1106.6

0.004525

368.866

1.66911

Total Sum

1.00018

7318.955

1265.99

WQI= QiWi/Wi= 1265.762

Table No.13 WQI for Station F by Weighted Arithmetic Mean Method

Sr.No

Parameters

Standards (Si)

Observed Values (Vi)

Unit Weight (Wi)

Quality Rating (Qi)

WiQi

1

pH

6.5-8.5

8.016

0.1597

67.733

10.816

2

Turbidity (NTU)

10

62.99

0.136

629.9

85.66

3

Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)

5

1.926822

0.2715

132.012

35.8412

4

Biochemical Oxygen

Demand (mg/l)

5

143.3595

0.2715

2867.19

778.44

5

Chemical Oxygen

Demand (mg/l)

10

282.2054

0.1357

2822.054

382.953

6

Total Suspended Solids

(mg/l)

500

98

0.00271

19.6

0.05312

7

Total Dissolved Solids

(mg/l)

500

787.2

0.00271

157.44

0.4266

8

Total Alkalinity (mg/l)

120

358.81

0.01131

299.008

3.3817

9

Total Hardness (mg/l)

300

436.65

0.004525

145.55

0.6586

10

Electrical Conductivity (mhos/cm)

300

1108.4

0.004525

369.466

1.6718

Total Sum

1.00018

7493.353

1299.9

WQI= QiWi/Wi= 1299.66

  • CONCLUSION AND FUTURE SCOPE

  • As WQI of Kham River at Respected Stations is calculated, study reveals that Kham River is heavily polluted due to continuous discharge of untreated domestic sewage and mixing of industrial wastewater. From this WQI study it is noted that Kham River Water comes in to Bad Quality of Water and unsuitable for drinking and domestic purpose.

    In this paper WQI is used to evaluate water quality and its suitability for drinking and domestic purpose, so there is future scope is that to carry out WQI to find out irrigation perspective suitability of Kham River.

    REFERENCES

    1. Jiang Yaping and MA Zongrenl. An Evaluation of Water Quality from Locations of Huangyang Reservoir. Procedia Environmental Engineering 12-280 284. ICESE 2011. Elsevier.

    2. P. Ravikumar, Mohammad Aneesul Mehmood and R. K. Somashekar. Water quality index to determine the surface water quality of Sankey tank and Mallathahalli lake, Bangalore urban district, Karnataka, India. Applied Water research 247261 DOI 10.1007/s13201-013-0077-2. Springer.

    3. Shweta Tyagi, Bhavtosh Sharma, Prashant Singh, Rajendra Dobhal. Water Quality Assessment in Terms of Water Quality Index. American Journal of Water Resources, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 3, 34-38.

    4. Ram Pal Singh, Satyendra Nath, Subhash C. Prasad and Arvind K. Nema. Selection of Suitable Aggregation Function for Estimation of Aggregate Pollution Index for River Ganges in India. DOI: 10.1061/ASCE0733- 9372-208-134:8689 Journal Of Environmental Engineering. AUGUST 2008.

    5. Mahesh Kumar Akkaraboyina and S.N.Raju. A Comparative Study Of Water Quality Indices Of River Godavari. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development eISSN : 2278-067X, pISSN : 2278-800.

    6. Ghorade I. B, V.R. Jadhavar, V.R. Potadarand and S.S. Patil. Physico-Chemical Assessment of Kham River, Aurangabad, Maharashtra. World Journal of Applied Environmental Chemistry eISSN 2277-8055 Volume 1, Issue 2: 67-71 (2011).

    Leave a Reply