Wear Rate of Copper Electrode in Chromium Abrasive Suspended Kerosene Oil Dielectric during EDM of OHNS die Steel

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV4IS120009

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Wear Rate of Copper Electrode in Chromium Abrasive Suspended Kerosene Oil Dielectric during EDM of OHNS die Steel

Kamal Sabharwal, Harvinder Lal

Mechanical Engineering Department, Ramgarhia Institute of Engineering & Technology,

Phagwara 144402, Punjab, India

Paramjit Singh

Mechanical Engineering Department,

Amritsar College of Engineering & Technology, Amritsar 143001, Punjab, India

AbstractThis experimental investigation is dedicated to study rate of tool elected wear in sinking electro discharge machining (EDM) process. Pure kerosene oil and chromium abrasives added kerosene oil dielectrics are used and experiments are performed on OHNS steel using OSCARMAX S645 CNC sinking EDM machine. Taguchi method has been used to design and examine the performance of process. Polarity, current, pulse on time, pulse off time, gap voltage and amount of chromium abrasives mixed in kerosene oil as dielectric fluid were selected as inputs to the process. Taguchi recommended orthogonal array is used to plan the experiments. The outcome of this study provides highly valuable data to minimize tool electrode wear rate.

KeywordsAbrasive mixed EDM; OHNS steel; Electrode wear rate

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Joseph Priestly, in 1770 was the first [1] who discovered that the electrical discharges can erode metal. A long time is elapsed to convert this discovery into a real and controlled process called electro discharge machining process. Originally inefficient, poor performance with low output conventional EDM process used only in the tool rooms and not in the production lines of industries. Coupling of computer-numeric- control technology with electro-discharge-machining technology in 1980 [3] and since then this electro-thermal process became the leading research potential area to work among all non conventional processes. Capability to cut precisely for intricate shapes [4] on softest to hardest conductive materials without much thermal damage and mechanical failure of tool used are among the notable advantages of the process. Since 1940s, researchers tried various innovative ideas to remove above said deficiencies and make EDM process a more stable, capable and efficient process [2]. These ideas include addition of foreign particles

    [5-7] into the dielectric of process, use of composite electrode tools, use of vibrating electrodes, etc. Additive EDM known for its high machining rate coupled with good surface finish, a revolutionary technique which established EDM as competitive machining technique [8-9]. Many researchers listed in [6] [10] [11] and [12] tried various powders of conductive materials and studied their influence on output response like base material cutting rates, efficiency of the process, wearing rates of tool used, quality of surface produced, and properties of fluid itself etc.

    This work is focused to study the rate of wear of tool electrode in sinking EDM process. Here, use of the design of experiments methodology is made to study wear rate (of solid copper electrode) in EDM sinking experiments on OHNS steel. Percentage content of chromium abrasives is varied in kerosene oil (used as dielectric) in experiments performed both at positive and negative polarity.

  2. MATERIAL USED AND TAGUCHIS PLANNING

    STRATEGY

    A 40 mm thick rectangular cross-section plate of OHNS die steel and 9 mm diameter solid copper rod are used as workpiece material and tool electrode respectively. Chemical composition of OHNS die steel consists of .82% C, .18% Si,

    .52% Mn, .49% Cr, .19% V, .13% Mo, .05% Ni and balanced Fe. Architecture of experimental runs is planned as per Taguchi methodology. An L18 mixed level orthogonal array with eighteen rows is selected to vary the range of process inputs. Table I gives the process inputs, levels and variation range values.

    TABLE I. PROCESS INPUTS, LEVELS AND THEIR RANGE OF VARIATION

    Process Input

    First level of Input

    Second level of Input

    Third level of Input

    Polarity of Cu tool electrode

    Positive

    Negative

    Current (amp)

    4.0

    8.0

    12.0

    Pulse on time (µs)

    90.0

    150.0

    200.0

    Pulse off time (µs)

    30.0

    45.0

    60.0

    Gap voltage (volt)

    30.0

    40.0

    50.0

    Concentration of chromium abrasives in kerosene (g/l)

    0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    Keeping objectives of this experimental work into mind, appropriate signal to noise (S/N) equation (for lower the better response criterion) was selected as shown in Eq. (1).

    (S )

    = 10 log [1 K ( 1 )] (1)

    N EWR

    s=1 2

    s

    m

    K

    In Eq. (1); ms = observed value of EWR

    K = no. of repetitions

    OSCARMAX S645 CNC sinking EDM machine (Fig. 1) with integrated servo mechanism is used to conduct experiments. Wear rate of tool electrode is calculated using Eq. (2)

    =

    (2)

    In Eq. (2), the Ew and Tm are the loss of material from tool electrode in a cut and machining time for the cut respectively.

    Fig. I. OSCARMAX S645 CNC SINKING EDM MACHINE

  3. RESULT OBTAINED AND DISCUSSIONS Taking the range of variation of inputs as per orthogonal

    array plan and to avoid impact of unaccounted parameters,

    all the eighteen experimental runs are performed randomly and the output is recorded for EWR. Calculated values of EWR, process input matrix adopted with signal to noise ratio values is shown in Table II.

    TABLE II. TAGUCHI ORTHOGONAL ARRAY L18 WITH EWR & S/N RATIO VALUES

    Experiment No.

    Polarity

    Current

    Pulse on time

    Pulse off Time

    Voltage

    Concentrat.

    of Cr. abrasives

    EWR

    (g/min)

    S/N ratio (dB)

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    0.00054

    65.29636

    2

    1

    1

    2

    2

    2

    2

    0.00050

    66.0206

    3

    1

    1

    3

    3

    3

    3

    0.00030

    70.41753

    4

    1

    2

    1

    1

    2

    2

    0.00333

    49.54243

    5

    1

    2

    2

    2

    3

    3

    0.00272

    51.31696

    6

    1

    2

    3

    3

    1

    1

    0.00240

    52.40272

    7

    1

    3

    1

    2

    1

    3

    0.00730

    42.73441

    8

    1

    3

    2

    3

    2

    1

    0.00508

    45.88932

    9

    3

    3

    1

    3

    2

    0.00508

    45.88932

    10

    2

    1

    1

    3

    3

    2

    0.00058

    64.69372

    11

    2

    1

    2

    1

    1

    3

    0.00055

    65.17411

    12

    2

    1

    3

    2

    2

    1

    0.00055

    65.17411

    13

    2

    2

    1

    2

    3

    1

    0.00173

    55.2302

    14

    2

    2

    2

    3

    1

    2

    0.00198

    54.06828

    15

    2

    2

    3

    1

    2

    3

    0.00162

    55.81776

    16

    2

    3

    1

    3

    2

    3

    0.00115

    58.80464

    17

    2

    3

    2

    1

    3

    1

    0.00143

    56.87503

    18

    2

    3

    3

    2

    1

    2

    0.00228

    52.83515

    TABLE III. ANOVA & F-TEST VALUES (S/N DATA)

    Source

    DOF

    Seq SS

    Adj SS

    Adj MS

    Calculated F

    Value

    Critical F

    value

    P Value

    Contribution (%).

    Polarity

    1

    85.21

    85.209

    85.209

    3.56

    05.99

    0.108

    7.66

    Current

    2

    842.82

    842.816

    421.408

    17.59

    05.14

    0.003

    75.74

    Pulse on time

    2

    3.24

    3.240

    1.620

    0.07

    05.14

    0.935

    0.29

    Pulse off time

    2

    14.17

    14.167

    7.083

    0.30

    05.14

    0.754

    1.27

    Voltage

    2

    12.68

    12.684

    6.342

    0.26

    05.14

    0.776

    1.14

    Concen. of Cr.

    abrasives

    2

    11.03

    11.026

    5.513

    0.23

    05.14

    0.801

    0.99

    Residual error

    6

    143.71

    143.711

    23.952

    12.91

    Total

    17

    1112.85

    ANOVA of observed data values is performed to obtain the

    %age contribution and significance of each of six inputs towards improvement of EWR. Statistically calculated values of ANOVA and F-Test are given in table III. Results of EWR are taken as smaller the better criterion. In table III, F-critical value is taken from statisticians tables. Statistically calculated f-value of peak current is 17.59, which is more than f-values of other inputs. This shows that %age contribution of peak current is highest (75.74%). Also 0.003 p-value of peak current shows significant contribution of this input at 95% confidence level. P-value of other inputs is more than 0.05 at same confidence level which shows their insignificant contribution towards EWR. Graphically in main effects plot the general effects (S/N data) of all inputs is given in fig. 2. Following Taguchi guidelines, highest level of input gives the desired response value. Experimentation at negative tool polarity level favors the desired response i.e. lower the EWR. Low value of peak current is desirable for lowering the EWR because at low currents, the sparks are having low discharge energy which is not capable to erode much volume of OHNS

    plate material. This discharge energy increases per spark at higher input peak current value and erodes comparatively more material from work surface. So, first level of peak current is favorable for the desirable response value. Slope of curves of EWR variation with all levels of other inputs made clear about their non significant contribution towards process output. Therefore, polarity at second level, peak current at first level, pulse on time at third level, pulse off time at third level, gap voltage at third level and chromium concentration at third level gives the desired response i.e. minimum EWR. Delta static value is calculated by taking minimum and maximum S/N ratio value for each input and associated level (Table IV). This value is useful to decide the relative magnitude of effect of inputs in the process. Generally more the delta value more is the input effect in the process. Overall, largest delta value (15.62) for peak current and smallest delta static (1.04) for pulse on time decides their role as most influential input and least influential inputs respectively as far as the EWR performance is taken.

    Main Effects Plot for SN ratios

    Data Means

    Polarity Peak C urrent

    Pulse on time

    65

    60

    55

    50

    1

    2

    1

    2

    Voltage

    3

    1

    2

    3

    1

    2

    3

    1

    2

    3

    1

    2

    3

    Signal-to-noise: Smaller is better

    65

    60

    55

    50

    A brasiv e C oncentration

    Pulse off time

    Mean of SN ratios

    Fig. II. MAIN EFFECT PLOT FOR S/N RATIO (FOR EWR)

    TABLE IV. RESPONSE TABLE FOR EWR (S/N DATA)

    Level

    Polarity

    Peak current

    Pulse on time

    Pulse off Time

    Gap voltage

    Concentration of abrasives

    Mean Value

    1

    54.39

    66.13

    56.05

    56.43

    55.42

    56.81

    57.54

    2

    58.74

    53.06

    56.56

    55.55

    56.87

    55.51

    56.05

    3

    50.50

    57.09

    57.71

    57.40

    57.38

    46.68

    Delta

    4.35

    15.62

    1.04

    2.16

    1.99

    1.87

    Rank

    2

    1

    6

    3

    4

    5

    Further in table 4, the 58.74 value at second level of polarity,

      1. value at first level of peak current, 57.09 value at third level of pulse on time, 57.71 value for third level of pulse off time, 57.40 value third level of gap voltage and 57.38 value at third level of abrasive concentration are the biggest values for associated inputs. These values tell the optimum input levels for minimum tool EWR.

  4. CONCLUSIONS

Taguchi method is applied to study tool EWR for smaller the better criterion. In accodance with experimental outcomes following conclusions are made:

      1. Taguchi method is capable to study EWR performance of abrasive EDM process.

      2. Possible input level combination is obtained for minimum EWR performance of present process.

      3. EWR increases sharply with very high energy generation because it erodes more material from tool electrode.

      4. Peak current is significant input for deciding wearing of copper tool electrode in the process.

      5. Experimental proved results will be useful for industrial applications engaged in machining OHNS die steel material.

REFERENCES

  1. S. Krar, and A. Gill, Exploring Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, 1st ed., Industrial Press Inc., p.6.2.1.

  2. Y.F. Luo, The dependence of interspace discharge transitivity upon the gap debris in precision electro-discharge machining, J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol. 68 (2), 1997, 121-131.

  3. L. Houman, Total EDM, in: E.C. Jameson (Ed.), Electrical Discharge Machining: Tooling, Methods and Applications, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Michigan, 1983, pp. 5-19.

  4. O.A. Abu Zeid, On the effect of electro-discharge machining parameters on the fatigue life of AISI D6 tool steel, J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol. 68 (1), 1997, pp. 27-32.

  5. W.S. Zhao, Q.G. Meng, and Z.L. Wang, The application of research on powder mixed EDM in rough machining, J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol. 129 (1-3), 2002, pp. 30-33.

  6. Y.F. Tzeng, and C.Y. Lee, Effects of powder characteristics on electro discharge machining efficiency, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., Vol. 17, 2001, pp. 586-592.

  7. H. Narumiya, N. Mohri, N. Saito, H. Otake, Y. Tsnekawa, T. Takawashi, K. Kobayashi, EDM by powder suspended working fluid, in: Proceedings of 9th ISEM, 1989, pp.5-8.

  8. A. Erden, S. Bilgin, Role of impurities in electric discharge machining, in: Proceedings of 21st International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, Swansea1980, pp. 345-350.

  9. M.L. Jeswani, Effect of the addition of graphite powder to kerosene used as dielectric fluid in electrical discharge machining, Wear, Vol. 70, (2), 1981, 133-139.

  10. G. Kibria, B.R. Sarkar, B.B. Pradhan, B.B. Bhattacharyya, Comparative study of different dielectrics for Micro-EDM performance during microhole machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, Vol. 48, 2010, pp. 557-570.

  11. P. Singh, A. Kumar, N. Beri, V. Kumar, Some experimental investigation on aluminium powder mixed EDM on machining performance of hastelloy steel, Int J Adv Eng Technol, Vol. 1 (2), 2010, pp. 28-45.

  12. L. Gu, L. Li, W. Zhao, K.P. Rajurkar, Electrical discharge machining of Ti6Al4V with a bundled electrode, Int J Mach Tools & Manuf, Vol. 53 (1), 2012, pp. 100-106.

Leave a Reply